China's Bubbles and Demographic Trends 15 comments
August 11, 2009
| about: FXI
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
In recent weeks, many experts have expressed growing concern about a bubble forming in China's stock and property markets. While investors love it when prices rise, many observers fail to realize the hidden and harmful impact it has on worker productivity, competitiveness, and demographic trends.
As part of Beijing's effort to stimulate the economy, Chinese banks made $1.08 trillion in loans in the first six months of 2009, triple the year-earlier level. While most of that was intended for new roads, bridges, and factories, an estimated 20 percent was put into stocks by business managers seeking quick profits.
Andy Xie, an independent economist based in Shanghai, recently warned in a blog post that Chinese stocks and properties are 50-100% overvalued. "The odds are that both will adjust in the fourth quarter (of 2009)," predicts Xie. “However, both might flare up again sometime next year. Fluctuating within a long bubble could be the dominant trend for the foreseeable future."
Frank Gong, chief economist for China at JPMorgan Chase was quoted in Businessweek as saying, "Equity markets are supposed to do that." Gong and others argue it's unlikely the government will choke off credit, because no one wants to be blamed for slowing China's recovery.
Xie calls China's asset markets a giant Ponzi scheme and predicts they will collapse when the US dollar becomes stronger. He warns, "The most ignorant retail investors are being sucked in by the rising momentum. They again dream of getting rich overnight. As in the past, retail investors usually lose, especially like the ones jumping in now. The final frenzy usually doesn't last."
When a bubble is formed, more resources are diverted and wasted. Xie says businessmen in China are reluctant to focus on real economic activities and are devoting time and energy to market speculation. This means China will have fewer globally competitive companies in the future. “Even though China has had three decades of high growth, few companies are globally competitive,” Xie says. “The serial bubble making in the Chinese economy may be the reason.”
The most serious damage that a property bubble inflicts is in changing demographics, says Xie. High property prices force many young couples to have fewer children. Even after property prices decline after a bubble bursts, this low birth rate culture cannot be changed. Many parts of Asia, such as Hong Kong, Japan, and South Korea, all went through property bubbles during their development. Xie concludes:
Their birth rates dropped during the bubbles and didn't recover afterwards despite government providing incentives. China's one-child policy alone will lead to a demographic catastrophe in two decades. The property bubble makes the trend irreversible: when the government abandons the one-child policy, there wouldn't be meaningful impact on birth rate. Within two decades Chinese population could be very old and declining. Of course, property prices would be very low and declining also.
Experts worry that China will become old before it becomes rich. Back in 2004, Richard Jackson and Neil Howe wrote a report about demographic trends entitled The Graying of the Middle Kingdom. They calculated that in 2004 the elderly — here defined as adults aged 60 and over — make up just 11 percent of the population. By 2040, however, the United Nations projects that the share will rise to 28 percent, a larger elder share than it projects for the United States.
In absolute numbers, the magnitude of China's coming age wave is staggering. By 2040, assuming current demographic trends continue, there will be 397 million Chinese elderly people, which is more than the total current population of France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom combined.
Disclosure: None
In absolute numbers, the magnitude of China's coming age wave is staggering. By 2040, assuming current demographic trends continue, there will be 397 million Chinese elderly people, which is more than the total current population of France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom combined.
Disclosure: None
Related Articles
|






















This article has 15 comments:
Everybody is calling everything bubbles this days. A 5% correction can be called a mini-bursting of a bubble. A bubble can be a looooong one that fluctuates up and down.
Some one might as well come up with measurements for bubbliness and a set of bubbliness index to replace all other market indices.
Maybe 'bubble' will be replacing 'market' in the English dictionary soon.
How do you say "bubble" in Chinese? :-)
If it's due to "concern" and kind advice for the investors, this quantity of unsolicited is giving me a lot of "warm and fuzzy". Wow, such caring words from so many people who want to look out for my interests! Words from people on Wall Street and financial companies! Ah... I must express gratitude at their graciousness and concern.
On the other hand, the cynical side of me can't shake the feeling that some fund managers and/or hedgies have missed the boat (and missing the market average, and they're due to be compared to the average soon, as Q3 closes), and are trying to "talk down" the market so they and their clients can get on.
Or it could be shorts with a bearish position, trying to talk down the market to alleviate existing losses or make new positions.
I don't doubt that viewpoints on "bubble or not" exists all the time, but when articles clamor endlessly and without solicitations to incite selling, esp in great quantities and with forceful assertions, I tend to disbelieve.
Call me a media skeptic.
> If the nonsense quoted above from Andy Xie is any indication, it
> doesn't take a very big IQ to become a "China expert." I hope Xie
> continues with the chicken-little warnings so my very undervalued
> Chinese stocks can continue to climb a Great Wall of Worry.
Well, China's central bank has flooded that nation with liquidity, so there may be certain short-term hiccups due to some malinvestments. Longer-term, though, I'd agree that it's foolhardy to bet against 1 billion people who currently have a production- and saving-oriented culture. Moreover, their central government seems to be taking the necessary steps to ensure that growth & development take root by decreasing business regulations on foreign and domestic firms and entrepreneurs.
On the other hand, in the really longer-term, there is no question that there will be a growing cohort of Chinese elderly supported by fewer and fewer working-age Chinese citizens. This is the equivalent of our Social Security problem: more and more retirees depend on fewer and fewer current workers. At some point, there will have to be some sort of adjustment on the part of China due to this changing situation.
How many people here has ever been China? Or just on business trip a few times a year to China?
As for the high saving rate we so touted about. Let's break down demographically. The group who save most are the retirees and the migrant workers. The retirees endured the hardship during the culture revolutionary. They will not spend anything on themselves and often give moneys to their kids to buy apartments and sometime cars. In turn, they are hoping their kids to support them when they get sick. Their propensity to continue saving is limited.
On the opposite end, the youngsters (20-40s) are aspiration consumers. They have very low often nil saving rates. They are driving forces behind the growth of Chinese consumptions. However, they have the heaviest burden as they are supposed to support two parents and two sets of grandparents.
You can group the 40-60s into two groups, who have made it and who have not. For those who has made it, they are likely to consume some things that deems luxury by the ordinary Chinese, such as international tourism and luxury brand name goods. For those didn't, they will continue saving heavily.
There is no doubts that the Chinese population ages rapidly and population growth might topple. Although I'm a China Bear, I do see growth in tourism, gaming, luxury goods, health care (especially nursing home) in the near term.
Central bankers everywhere seem willing to push the envelope, creating credit in excess of wise usefulness. The cycle always ends badly, but while the bubble is blowing larger, the mania consumes the beneficiaries of leverage and proximity to money creation.
It's not different this time, or in this place called China.
The main concern is really an asset bubble in money flowing into property and commodities and not into real demand or productivity, not declining demand due to a population stagnation. In fact, to China growth under 5% is considered terrible. That in itself is a signal that they have grown way too addicted to export growth. Can their internal economy grow as fast without ficticious printing of money? Certainly not.
They should be praying on a speedy US recovery and stop undermining the US Treasury bond market. Their economic survival and stability depends on it. Whether or not they want to admit is is another matter.
泡沫
pao mo
(4) (4)
agree. usd has limited upside.
On Aug 11 12:29 PM Anthony Alfidi wrote:
> Chinese equities are definitely volatile and probably overvalued
> (short term), but hoping for a strong dollar to take them down is
> a long shot. The U.S.'s inflationary bent can only weaken the dollar,
> making yuan-denominated assets look good by comparison.
>
> How do you say "bubble" in Chinese? :-)
You however - an intelligent man with a presumably impressive IQ - already know and understand this distinction between various forms of "intelligence". Don't you?
On Aug 11 03:25 AM williamwu wrote:
> enough of the doom and gloom. For every problem there will be a
> solution. Never underestimate the ability of the human brain. When
> it comes to IQ... don't you know that East Asians have the highest
> avg in the world? China just needs to get its act together and concentrate
> on making technological advances and innovation. With over a billion
> above average IQs... I'm sure it can be done!