Back to Saigon: Vietnam ETF 11 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
In 40 years, it will be the turn of Afghanistan and Iraq to become hot investment destinations for Americans. And there will be a closed end fund investing in Venezuela. But now, the push is to Vietnam. The French, after Dien Bien Phu, had absolutely no interest in getting back into the Saigon bourse. They confined their interest in 'Nam to a consortium drilling for offshore oil into which Total invested.
But G.I. Joe always likes to return to his messes with money and with hopes to make out well despite the shambolic departure the last time around.
My reflections are stimulated by the news that Van Eck on Friday launched a Vietnam Index Fund, an Exchange-Traded Market Vector Fund listed on the NYSE Arca and the Euronext. This is not the first Vietnam Fund attempt; Mark Mobius of Templeton Group tried to create a listed Vietnam Fund in the 1980s, but once the money was raised he could not find any public companies to invest in.
In the interval, Saigon has risen to the stratosphere as less-savvy investors than Mark gobbled up what little bits of private enterprise shares were available to buy. And then there was bust, with the international cowboys heading home from the Ho Chi Minh trail as the global crisis hit.
So this may be a good moment for another attempt to bring the helicopters back to the roof of the American Embassy. The Market Vector fund is rules-based, capitalization-weighted, and float-adjusted. That means that if there is a pile into 'Nam shares again, it will benefit as long as new money is coming in to the market, and crash if there is another rush for the doors.
The fund trades as VNM and tracks an index created to manage the money. This index is 70% by capital made up of Vietnamese companies getting more than half their revenues from Vietnam, and made whole by non-Vietnamese companies with a similar revenue source.
In the start-up, 37% of the allocation is into finance; 19% in energy (maybe they bought into the local Total?); and 12% in materials. Nobody is mentioning profit and I won't either. This is not a recommendation.
Related Articles
|





















And -- given the often poorer public information in emerging markets, have you discovered greater discount-to-NAV opportunities in either single-country or emerging market regions?
www.vaneck.com/sld/van...
www.dbxtrackers.co.uk/...
You'd think we would have learned from the French, after Dien Bien Phu, and left Vietnam to the Vietnamese. Sorry, just to many bad memories culminating in the helicopters on roof of the American Embassy. I'm leaving Vietnam to the Vietnamese investors.
moreover its political crisis is easier for me to understand. from an investing perspective both sides are okay, unlike VN where the other guys are reds.
Thai companies are well covered by Paul Renaud who writes for us. So I do not have to buy a mindless mechanical ETF and can buy real shares as my fancy falls.
if you want 'Nam you are better off with a closed-end fund because it will not be just tracking a pretty ephemeral index, esp. if you can get it at a discount from Net Asset Value. They are all offshore and wild.
as for the question about where the bargains are in Closed-end funds I am at a disadvantage right now, Joe, because I am in London on business and family business. Here I cannot buy Barron's. And the Closed-end Fund Assn. has ended provision of net asset values on its website (WHY?) as of July 31. so I cannot get current data on US and Canada CEFs until I am back Stateside.
while you should not buy closed-end funds because of the discount disappearing (it won't) it helps your money go further if you get a dollar's worth of assets for 85 or 90 cents. You get the return and the gains for the full buck. This is really insane. Markets price irrationally.
I have a question for anyone knowledgeable enough to respond. Anyone heard of the Vietnam Opportunity Fund? Based out of London, they boasted market price 30% above NAV a couple years back. I believe they have given back all of their returns plus some change (i.e. lots of red ink). Luckily I didn't bite.
Why is this time around any different?
To my estimate, they poured in about $8 billion and they money left now is about $4 billion. Trading in Vietnam appears quite different and more difficult than in other markets.
On Aug 18 11:38 AM William M. Wright wrote:
> You'd think we would have learned from the French, after Dien Bien
> Phu, and left Vietnam to the Vietnamese. Sorry, just to many bad
> memories culminating in the helicopters on roof of the American Embassy.
> I'm leaving Vietnam to the Vietnamese investors.
While we have lightened up on China as its local markets fell 20%, as we reported yesterday, this is a buy opportunity. Shanghai is a very immature rumor-driven exchange and the pattern of panic selling followed by a new boost can be spotted again and again.
My Vietnam commentary (linked to the creation of an new U.S. ETF) has got a lot of play, so I follow up. Here are items about other ways to invest in Nam from readers in MD, NY and FL.
*"VCVOF, VinaCapital Opportunity Fund, seems to be a good Vietnam Fund. As you described, I bought my first shares far too high and got crunched last year. Fortunately, I doubled up not far from the bottom. They are managed out of London but also have managers in Viet Nam. As the above symbol indicates, I bought them instantly through Fidelity. They also have a Viet Nam Infrastructure Fund that interests me a lot because it sells below NAV. However Fido had to get that one for me in London."
*Cavico Corp., one of the largest infrastructure and natural resources companies in Vietnam announced a reverse stock split to position the company to apply for a listing on the Nasdaq exchange. Cavico could become the first Vietnam based company to be listed on a major U.S market. Timothy Pham, a Vice President and Director of Cavico (and an American) is boosting infrastructure development in Vietnam as the company will soon begin building a 30 megawatt (MW) wind power plant.
*Further material on offshore funds investing in Vietnam from Compagnie Financière Edmond de Rothschild is provided thanks to yet another reader, but if you cannot afford a subscription you should not be investing in 'Nam, and particularly not with a posh Rothschild bank, source of our oldest and most successful investment of all.
I have to apologize to the Closed-End Fund Association because their CEFA.COM website was down, but it is now back on line. I feared it had disappeared. There is therefore current information on closed-end funds (CEFs) from the U.S. and Canada showing pricesa nd net asset value of the funds. This is useful information for investing even if you do not delude yourself into thinking the discounts will disappear.
CEFs issue a fixed number of shares which are priced by the stock market depending on how attractive they seem to be. They therefore can (and often do) fall to discounts below the net asset value of the portfolios they own. This is a prime example of how prices on exchange do not reflect all known information, and it shows that markets are irrational.
Invest in Vietnam like casino mixing with mafia and gangster.
You can make alot alot of money but have to run fast , fast ... and never come back .
Good luck