Inside Sirius Institutional Ownership 81 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
By Brandon Matthews
As Sirius XM Radio (SIRI) continues to improve fundamentally, I have noted in the Satwaves stock discussion forum the importance of keeping tabs on institutional holdings. I personally find this information beneficial when looking at a stock's price movements to gauge whether a particular equity should be considered overbought or oversold. There is a considerable delay in the reporting of this information, but nonetheless the information, when combined with other data, can help investors and analysts make better decisions.
Typically, there are large share purchases as well as sales recorded in any given quarter. Recent filings that have been reported to the SEC through 13F filings have made their way to the NASDAQ where retail investors can access the information. Another good source of institutional holdings is MFFAIS.com. These sources offer a basic black and white picture of which institutions bought and which had sold in the previous quarter. If a stock such as SIRI seems to be moving up, it's a good bet that institutions are accumulating. Likewise a stock in decline should signal that institutions are more likely than not taking profits and reducing their positions.
Investors need to look deep into the actual filings and circumstances to correctly process that information. As an example, the NASDAQ site reports that institutional holdings of Sirius XM Radio have fallen to 23%. Down 1% from the last time I checked. This would usually cause me concern, but I stress again that the data is significantly delayed. The significant price appreciation of Sirius XM common stock on a percentage basis recently, combined with rapidly declining short interest tells me that the low percentage of institutional holdings leaves a lot of room for institutional buying as Sirius XM continues to improve its balance sheet in the current quarter. Stocks simply do not rise 44.1% in a month when institutions are selling.
In the case of SIRI, the data shows that some big name firms have taken positions in Sirius XM Radio’s common stock. As we reported recently, Bank of America took a large stake in Sirius XM Radio through the purchase of 11,201,675 shares of the company’s common stock. Merrill Lynch reported on Friday that it had acquired 8,462,164 as it took a new position in Sirius XM during the second quarter of this year. Citigroup added 2,357,542 shares bringing its total to 3,897,357 shares. T Rowe Price added 19,423,825 shares, which is up from only 270,000 shares in the prior quarter. New players such as FMR Corp. picked up 71,779,200 shares and are now Sirius XM Radio’s third largest shareholder. The top position goes to Vanguard, which added 22,962,896 to bring their total up to 141,326,619. Even Goldman Sachs reportedly owns not only a significant number of SIRI shares but call options as well, as there are no call options below a dollar on the market. A very bullish sign.
Interestingly, Jennison Associates which had held the top spot since the merger of Sirius and XM Radio, are reported to have liquidated their position of 171 million shares. In most cases, the new buys that are being reported are truly equity stakes, whereas the vast majority of the reported large sales are related to fund managers which just recently unwound their arbitrage plays as a result of the merger of Sirius and XM.
By looking back at SEC filings from last year, we can determine that Jennison Associates never intended to hold a position in Sirius Satellite Radio. They did however have a large stake in XM Satellite Radio prior to the merger. As many are aware by now, smart money uses a tactic known as merger arbitrage which takes advantage of the difference in the spread in stock prices relating to mergers and acquisitions. Simply put, a fund will purchase the equity being acquired while shorting the stock of the company that is making the acquisition.
In this case, Jennison Associates were in prime position to take advantage of such a play. It is this type of short selling that leads to a record number of FTD’s in Sirius common stock during the second quarter of 2008, also known as failures to deliver or naked short sales. The arbitrage play in this case is perfectly legitimate; legal and well known. Just a thought…wasn’t Jim Cramer telling you to buy Sirius on CNBC at that time? But I digress, that is another story.
Sirius and XM announced their merger in February of 2007. We can clearly see that as the merger application progressed, Jennison continued to accumulate shares of XMSR, which means of course that they were shorting an equal number of shares of SIRI.
Jennison’s reported holdings:
First Quarter 2007: 1,629,000 shares of XMSR
Second Quarter 2007: 17,483,400 shares of XMSR
Third Quarter of 2007: 22,729, 626 shares of XMSR
Fourth Quarter of 2007 : 20,697,646 shares of XMSR
First Quarter of 2008: 14,074, 973 shares of XMSR
Second Quarter 2008: 30,361,501 shares of XMSR
***** Merger Approved 3rd Quarter 2008 (4.6 shares of SIRI per XMSR share)
Third Quarter 2008: 61,931,684 shares of SIRI (reported)
Fourth Quarter 2008: 169,457,749 shares of SIRI
Clearly, Jennison’s stake came as a result of the merger arbitrage play as 30,361,501 X 4.6 = 141,962,904 after conversion. In the second quarter of this year, Sirius XM Radio was removed from the Russell index. Institutions such as Jennison used that event as a means to unwind their open positions. By selling their Sirius shares that were acquired through merger arbitrage, rather than actual purchases, while covering their Sirius short positions simultaneously, they accomplished their goal.
The moral of this story is that the institutional landscape of Sirius XM Radio is undergoing a dramatic change, and will continue to require monitoring. Firms that were short the equity are now going long, and arbitrage plays that were unwound during the Russell rebalance are just now being reported which will tend to skew the data. Look to Barclay’s as another example. I’ll save you the details at this time. Knowledge of this is power. The smart money is accumulating shares of Sirius XM Radio’s common stock, and in the long run, that is what is important to know.
Position: Long SIRI
Related Articles
|




















Truth of the matter is Sirius delivers a quality product which I've owned for years now... It is extremely undervauled as a stock and much of it's potential as a product has yet to be tapped...
Win, lose or draw I'll ride the ups and downs without having to day trade to make money... The potential is there for this stock to pop significantly over time... To be fair there is also potential for the stock to fail... but to me the rewards heavily out weigh the risks involved...
There is obvious demand for the product with 16+ million subscribers (I am sure I am off on this figure) who are willing to pay for it... Although there has been a decline over the year... what else would you expect during a recession!? Luxuries go first... Suprising that number haven't sunk more drasticly in such bad times but that just speaks volumes of the product that Sirius offers...
Sirius is obviously a sticky product who relies on a numbers game to gain subscriptions... They know the percentages of people who will retain a subscription when buying a new car and with cash for clunkers putting a ton of people in new cars that audience has significantly increased short term... All it took was a 3 month trial for me to realize that AM/FM radio blows in comparisson... I am confident that I am not the only one out there who feels the same...
If and when the company turns a profit in the near future watch for obvious sharp increases in the stock... Which is much more possible with how they've cut costs over this year... Might just be my jaded opinnion on all of this... But as of today I'm up 70-80% already and I'm not ready to collect any profits... It's worth the roll of the dice to me but I'm a gambling man...
On Aug 19 12:07 PM connorport wrote:
> So far SIRI DOOM you have stated you got in on the stock in Feb and
> now you claim to be a day trader. Those .57 look better at .62. Where
> does your logic come from? I really did get in back in Feb and i
> couldn't be happier. I must be missing something. I thought i was
> doing well with my measly 400% gain for the year so far.
And as for your claim that Mel is a crook (or KarmaCrook as you have unfondly named him), what is your beef? You've made a ton of money off a company led by a person who you've deemed a thief and a liar.
And there is one more thing: In you're daily lectures and moral preachings where your sole intent is to expose corrupt business practices by less than honest principals and organizations, then this question must be asked: How do you justify receiving profit from a company or market where share price is manipulated by such an immoral bunch of rip-off artists?
Scot's Slant
On Aug 19 01:15 PM 464217 wrote:
> I hear people saying how much money they are making however your
> forgetting the people who lost so much. This stock used to be 60
> dollars at one point and was trading between 3-10 dollars for awhile.
> Think about all the people that invested then and lost so much. Its
> nice you made a 400 percent gain but people lost a lot on this stock
> due to Mel. Mel crushed a lot of peoples dreams and money. I love
> siri i think the programing is amazaing and i bought stock at a relatively
> low but I feel bad for the people who got tricked into the stock
> before hand. I would be extremely pissed if i bought this stock higher
> and it sunk this much
But, as it is today, I'm still hangin' with my shares where I need to see $4.25 to break even. Oh well, like I said when I bought in, I'll either lose it all or make a couple bucks. So far, I'm glad I didn't hightail it out when the gittin' got bad.
And one more thing: I've asked this before with no reply: Does anybody want to share a guess as to when price per share might reach my magical number of $4.25 or above?
Scot's Slant
Expose Mel Karmazin and Goldman Sachs as crooks...
On Aug 19 01:15 PM 464217 wrote:
> I hear people saying how much money they are making however your
> forgetting the people who lost so much. This stock used to be 60
> dollars at one point and was trading between 3-10 dollars for awhile.
> Think about all the people that invested then and lost so much. Its
> nice you made a 400 percent gain but people lost a lot on this stock
> due to Mel. Mel crushed a lot of peoples dreams and money. I love
> siri i think the programing is amazaing and i bought stock at a relatively
> low but I feel bad for the people who got tricked into the stock
> before hand. I would be extremely pissed if i bought this stock higher
> and it sunk this much
I do feel since this did break .60 today and held levels this is a confidence boost which i can say I can leave my money in there and not worry as much if an immediate drop of .10 like it was back when it was trading in the 30s plus I can finally say i have anything but profit in there now. even if it does drop. I was worried about today at first and sold some at .56 seeing that was where it was ending up, but this stock has now performed as the market has so i can say if the market is up then this stock will be as well and vice a versa.
happy days more than 1/2 way to the 1.00 goal gratz all
On Aug 19 03:05 PM scots slant wrote:
> Scot's Slant here. Connorport, point well taken. I was one who did
> not want to risk more when price was a lousy nickel per share. Today
> it's called, "I shoulda bought when I coulda mentality."
>
> But, as it is today, I'm still hangin' with my shares where I need
> to see $4.25 to break even. Oh well, like I said when I bought in,
> I'll either lose it all or make a couple bucks. So far, I'm glad
> I didn't hightail it out when the gittin' got bad.
>
> And one more thing: I've asked this before with no reply: Does anybody
> want to share a guess as to when price per share might reach my magical
> number of $4.25 or above?
>
> Scot's Slant
On Aug 19 03:05 PM scots slant wrote:
> Scot's Slant here. Connorport, point well taken. I was one who did
> not want to risk more when price was a lousy nickel per share. Today
> it's called, "I shoulda bought when I coulda mentality."
>
> But, as it is today, I'm still hangin' with my shares where I need
> to see $4.25 to break even. Oh well, like I said when I bought in,
> I'll either lose it all or make a couple bucks. So far, I'm glad
> I didn't hightail it out when the gittin' got bad.
>
> And one more thing: I've asked this before with no reply: Does anybody
> want to share a guess as to when price per share might reach my magical
> number of $4.25 or above?
>
> Scot's Slant
Haven't been here for a long time and reading through all the posts here I can remember why I use to come here so often. Intelligent posters with good intentions....... even SIRI-Doom has, as he so clearly stated, his right to post his opinions... Normally that's fine but, in this case, with *-Doom, we are dealing with an obsessed individual who knows the facts.... or at least knows them as he interprets them. The rest is rather futile.... Engaging the *-Doom only furthers the obsession that this poster has with Mel and the management of the company most here who post, are invested in.... He / She or the Child that is *-Doom has knowledge of how the game works and I congratulate on that recent buy / sell trade..... (hands clapping) Now give us that info as it happens rather than your continuous antagonistic approach to being investors in this company. You are a shameless individual, who appears to take joy only from reading your own posts and the negative feedback that they embrace..... I hope that you do well and get some Sirius Help with your "hating" Mel issues.... For the rest here, who I know come for information and intelligent debate, utilizing the facts at hand, not "tea leaves" and "meaningless accusations" regarding management, I wish you all good luck on your trades.
Still with SIRI, Long and Strong, and as a friend of mine would say if he were here......"Runnnnnn Blue Dog Runnnn!"
And one more thing: Since Vicar of Value left the house, something is missing. I sort of enjoyed his posts as they were most entertaining. I wonder what happened to him? He made me laugh....
Scot's Slant
On Aug 19 01:15 PM 464217 wrote:
> I hear people saying how much money they are making however your
> forgetting the people who lost so much. This stock used to be 60
> dollars at one point and was trading between 3-10 dollars for awhile.
> Think about all the people that invested then and lost so much. Its
> nice you made a 400 percent gain but people lost a lot on this stock
> due to Mel. Mel crushed a lot of peoples dreams and money. I love
> siri i think the programing is amazaing and i bought stock at a relatively
> low but I feel bad for the people who got tricked into the stock
> before hand. I would be extremely pissed if i bought this stock higher
> and it sunk this much
On Aug 19 03:05 PM scots slant wrote:
> Scot's Slant here. Connorport, point well taken. I was one who did
> not want to risk more when price was a lousy nickel per share. Today
> it's called, "I shoulda bought when I coulda mentality."
>
> But, as it is today, I'm still hangin' with my shares where I need
> to see $4.25 to break even. Oh well, like I said when I bought in,
> I'll either lose it all or make a couple bucks. So far, I'm glad
> I didn't hightail it out when the gittin' got bad.
>
> And one more thing: I've asked this before with no reply: Does anybody
> want to share a guess as to when price per share might reach my magical
> number of $4.25 or above?
>
> Scot's Slant
Search the Web:www.2tip.biz