Seeking Alpha
About this author:
Submit
an article to

Despite growing concerns about the growth in Federal spending, voiced this week by none other than Warren Buffett, Washington seems determined to keep its foot on the money pumping accelerator for as long as it can. But even though Washington continues to ignore the realities, alarm bells are beginning to ring at town halls across the country.

Last week the Fed left its key short-term rates frozen at 0 to 0.25 percent, enabling banks to borrow at near zero and reap spreads as high as 6 to 24 percent. The Fed also continued its policy of paying interest on banks' reserves, further boosting Wall Street's bottom line. The government has decided to save the banks, no matter how much the public has to suffer.

Worse still, the Administration has been largely silent over the obscene bonuses paid by banks to the very executives whose 'casino' mentality caused a financial crisis that the IMF now estimates has cost the world some $7 trillion. At financial firms that have received bailout money, it has been estimated that thus far in 2009 bonuses paid to executives have exceeded profits.

However, with the pedal still hitting the metal, the Fed has begun to discuss plans of a so called "exit strategy" that would pave the way toward higher interest rates.

These statements of economic neutrality were based upon the Fed’s impression that the recession is ending. But the Fed has not yet taken any meaningful actions to curb its potentially inflationary policies.

For now mere words are enough to encourage American stock markets, but only briefly. More recently, U.S. equity investors gradually are facing up to the fact that, while stock prices rose recently by some 45 percent, earnings, although "ahead of estimates", have fallen by almost 30 percent, despite savage cost cutting and deep inventory depletion. The more important top line revenues have fallen by about 15 percent and free cash flows are tumbling in response.

The public, who feel the vicious bite of 'real' 20 percent unemployment (rather than the official rate of 9.8 percent), are becoming increasingly distrustful of big government and deeply resentful of its increasing grasp of their lives. The cracks are beginning to show.

A key element of the Obama Administration is its 1,000-page healthcare reform bill. Despite the impossibility of reading, let alone understanding, the legislative behemoth, Obama tried forcefully to push it through Congress in just two weeks.

And, despite the clear failure of government healthcare in many parts of the world, including domestically in Massachusetts, the Administration is still looking to move ahead with a public option plan.

The public is not yet willing to play ball. While much of the biased media paint the rowdy town hall meetings across the country as merely the clumsy machinations of the Republican Party, the events are revealing the deep misgivings average Americans have about the growth of government. If this movement spreads, it could have a dramatic and healthy effect on the American economy in the long-term.

At their core, Americans hold individual freedom and self-reliance dear. Therefore, by nature, they are not socialists and resent big government. To them the actions of the Administration, supported by a compliant Congress, are clear: use massive amounts of public funds to support the financial elite, maintain massive entitlement spending to secure votes, and extend the grasp of big government through healthcare and other measures. Their anger is justified.

President Obama campaigned on political 'change' and an end to the abuse of taxpayers. So far, he has massively increased government entitlement spending and has failed to loosen Congress's firm grasp of the pork barrel.

It may be that the deep resentment expressed in town halls will embolden ordinary people to pressure Congress to stop the train. If that happens, America will begin the long and painful road towards economic restructuring, individual freedom and enterprise. Under those conditions America would represent a great investment opportunity.

Print this article
Comments
43
You are viewing the first 20 comments View all »
  •  
    If you mean can America get back to where it was? No, and it is not even desirable to even attempt it.

    If you mean can something be salvaged from the wreckage? Well, it is going to be tough, but it has to be worth an attempt!

    Ultimately, the US will only become a viable centre for inward investment once again if Government debt is brought under control. Frankly, this can only be done by accepting a more realistic valuation for the dollar, which is probably about half of what it is now. Yes, that is going to mean high interest rates, high inflation and high unemployment. There simply is no "Get Out of Jail Free Card". This is an End of Empire scenario and they are always painful. Readjusting to the new reality is going to be very painful. Ask the Brits! But if you observe the British Model, whereby we underwent a probably bigger fall from grace, it is possible to find a role in the World and have a viable economy even if other nations don't take much notice of you anymore.
    2009 Aug 20 02:59 AM Reply
  •  
    On Aug 20 02:59 AM Dave Wrixon wrote:

    > If you mean can America get back to where it was? No, and it is not
    > even desirable to even attempt it.
    >
    > If you mean can something be salvaged from the wreckage? Well, it
    > is going to be tough, but it has to be worth an attempt!
    >
    > Ultimately, the US will only become a viable centre for inward investment
    > once again if Government debt is brought under control. Frankly,
    > this can only be done by accepting a more realistic valuation for
    > the dollar, which is probably about half of what it is now. Yes,
    > that is going to mean high interest rates, high inflation and high
    > unemployment. There simply is no "Get Out of Jail Free Card". This
    > is an End of Empire scenario and they are always painful. Readjusting
    > to the new reality is going to be very painful. Ask the Brits! But
    > if you observe the British Model, whereby we underwent a probably
    > bigger fall from grace, it is possible to find a role in the World
    > and have a viable economy even if other nations don't take much notice
    > of you anymore.

    It Is Unfortunate That "Children Have Ascended To The Highest Posts Of Power" and sabotaged the system.

    Americans Will "Right Their Ship" When The Cleansing Begins In Earnest..

    Others May Take The Opportunity To Do The Same.

    I Do Not Think Americans Want To Be "The World Police" Anymore Even If Their Government Does.

    The Worst Is Yet To Come.
    2009 Aug 20 05:59 AM Reply
  •  
    Much Good News on Horizon

    US still manufactures 20% of world's goods....... Lower Dollar = Increased Exports

    Consumer Deleveraging........In... Saving = Capital Formation

    Tax Collection Record Lows...........Gov't has to cut back
    2009 Aug 20 06:10 AM Reply
  •  
    One more bubble to pop, the bloated US Government.
    2009 Aug 20 06:52 AM Reply
  •  
    Nice article, you earned my follow. I do hope that the world realizes that we the people and our large banking infrastructure are not one in the same. We have allowed our oligarch older brothers far too much leeway and trust.
    This will change, but not quickly enough to avoid tough lessons in discernment. We have been caught up in our older brothers fights and follies. We are being labeled along with as arrogant, malicious and indecent.
    But we are not our bullying older brothers. We followed them with blind admiration of the power and influence they wield. We will realize how cruel and unjust the use of power has been. We will step out of that shadow in time.
    2009 Aug 20 07:20 AM Reply
  •  
    What is interesting at these town halls many people talk and express themselves better than the elected. The politicians are talking in their scripted political speak and the American people are talking from the heart.
    2009 Aug 20 07:49 AM Reply
  •  
    Short answer to the title's question, no.
    2009 Aug 20 08:28 AM Reply
  •  
    Sorry,
    but trying to convince us "we don't want health-care" because we are "individualistic and resent big government" is getting a little long in the tooth.
    Where were you "fiscal-responsibility" guys when Reagan and Bush Jr. were jacking up the deficits ?
    If and when the Republicans regain the power, I'm sure you'll go back into silence mode as more trillions stolen from our grandchildren go to fighting unwinnable wars.
    If Obama fails with is programs, then I guess it's back to the party that says "government is bad" ---- then turns it into a self-fulfilling prophecy.


    " Universal health care? Are you out of your mind?
    Where for that, might I ask, would the money you find?
    Bridges and roads? What do we need them for?
    There's no jobs so you don't need to get there no more!
    But wait! Like Iraq, there's terror ahead
    Wall Street's meltdown is worse than burning in bed!
    Trillions of dollars to bail them all out?
    The world's bestest minds - those you would doubt?
    Social security - yeah, let's privatize that
    if we had, just think where we'd all now be at! "
    2009 Aug 20 08:29 AM Reply
  •  
    You mean our government is not going to save it?
    Hmmmmm...................
    2009 Aug 20 08:34 AM Reply
  •  
    No, the economy cannot be saved because there is a huge contradiction at the heart of what this administration is trying to do (in a sense, the people themselves are not entirely clear on the concept either). You cannot expect that a generation famous for extravagant consumption, lack of savings, and reckless disregard for the environment will all of a sudden: come of age and retire, become thrifty and save, and be in tune with the environment by consuming less of everything...AND...have economic growth at the same time. We are going through a period that calls for a massive reconversion of lifestyle, and it cannot be done in one or two years. In fact, it cannot be done in the timeframe of any of the elected offices of the US...so we are doomed.
    2009 Aug 20 08:46 AM Reply
  •  
    "despite the clear failure of government healthcare in many parts of the world, including domestically in Massachusetts, the Administration is still looking to move ahead with a public option plan."

    David Cameron -- the Conservative party leader -- joined the chorus defending the NHS. Cameron sent out an e-mail stating, "One of the wonderful things about living in this country is that the moment you're injured or fall ill -- no matter who you are, where you are from, or how much money you've got -- you know that the NHS will look after you."
    2009 Aug 20 09:04 AM Reply
  •  
    Condemning other countries' health care system without factual evidence or even broad based anecdotal evidence is pure ideological bs. If you can cite Canadian, British, German, Japanese, or French public opinion surveys that condemn their health care services then you speak with authority. Otherwise, like many others who may hear a few Canadians complain, you speak merely as sophomore. Many people complain about America's health care system too. Why not listen to them.

    As far as Americans resenting big government--they only resent the big government they don't agree with. Big government spends big on defense, big government spends big on agricultural support/welfare, big government spends big on public education, big government gives generous tax incentives to many big businesses, big government does a lot of big things that people other than "socialists" agree with. Self-reliance, even in the business world, is theory that works only with big government behind it.

    P.S. America has the biggest government in the world and every administration I can remember (even those that promised smaller gevernment) increased its size.
    2009 Aug 20 09:09 AM Reply
  •  
    1) Health care in Massachusetts has not failed. 2) American businesses cannot compete worldwide partially because they have high health insurance costs. 3) Insurance companies themselves have driven up costs. The FIRE sector is a parasite upon the real economy.
    2009 Aug 20 09:20 AM Reply
  •  
    Recovery starts with admitting the truth, then, doing the right thing one step at a time. We have certainly done neither in policy, but individuals and businesses are adapting. They don't have the luxury of pontificating platitudes and then throwing the furniture in the fireplace to party on.
    The scripted elected airheads are being exposed, I hope, in the town halls despite the usual Pravda-style MSM reporting. Some hope of step one if this translates to a more real-world dialogue and a massive and repeated exodus of incumbents at elections.
    There is no reason things can't be better than ever in the good 'ol USA eventually. This would take countless correct steps in actions, which are preceded by some kind of thinking. It is unlikely and a long way off, longer still, every day the present rulers piss everything away. There is much success in our past to draw upon we have strayed far from, and people with great ideas now.
    Decline will come from yielding to vested interests in mistaken policies. They aren't easy to shake, as the presence of so many long-time incumbents who are holding us to failed policies and selling us out to the largest failures attests.
    2009 Aug 20 09:24 AM Reply
  •  
    Frosty, according to Dr. Anne Doig, the incoming president of the Canadian Medical Association, "Our Universal Health Care Is 'Sick', and 'imploding'". It is common knowledge that many Canadians cross our borders to be treated in the U.S. Furthermore, if you get out of your bubble and read some of the U.K. you will occasionally read articles referencing individuals who have died due to inaccessible treatment.
    2009 Aug 20 09:26 AM Reply
  •  
    Sorry, I was referring to U.K. newspapers!
    2009 Aug 20 09:29 AM Reply
  •  
    We the people have been awakened and we don't like what we see. Candidate Obama ran as a centerist and was elected on that basis. President Obama is governing from the left and being dragged even farther to the left by secular progressive elements in his party. While the bought and payed for media out lets are steadfastly ignoring the ground swell or trying to depict it as a "Manufactured." protest movement reality will intrude and is intruding on the fantasy. Make no mistake the backlash at the polls in 2010 will be large. Even larger if the Democrats enact legislation we don't want and can't pay for by using rules that were only meant for budgetary measures (Reconsileation.). Our economy will recover, afterall builders have to build and bankers have to manage money. Will it be as it was? Probably not at least short term. Will it suffice? Yes it will, we the people are resilliant, clever and indipendant.
    2009 Aug 20 09:37 AM Reply
  •  
    If we are going to talk health care, I completely agree with frosty above. There is a complete lack of first-hand experience among the talking heads AND the decision-makers concerning other countries public health care systems. How many congressmen or senators lived in another country and went through a socialized medicine system to know what they are doing? This is scary, like the blind leading the blind. The facts are: our health care costs are excessive when compared to other developed/industrialized countries, the quality of care (both in distribution AND actual quality of care) is at best comparable with those other countries...and in some cases it may be worse.

    Also remember, not all socialized systems are created equal, for instance, U.K. retirees move to France and they rave about the French system (many write glowing letters about how they would have been dead in the UK due to poor care and thank the French doctors for the care they receive). The health care debate in America is VERY important, please, stick your head out the window and try to see, and not just look.
    2009 Aug 20 09:52 AM Reply
  •  
    The financial industry who has benefited from insurance industry is loyal to them over the health of US population just like companies who slapped AAA ratings on the junk they spread around to population. The same phenomenon is still in progress where those that extract cash from the population deem to believe that the population is not worthy of electing people who would work for them.

    Those in town halls that are working against the health care reform are not doing so because of the costs, they do so because it is their profits that it is at stake here. This movements has sprung up when street is fighting territorial war to maintain cash flow to it members and not when the population was being bamboozled by the street through most massive financial fraud in history .

    I will say that it can be proven that the street is behind these movements because they are the voice of the movement just as this author is and they weren't speaking up as the street was complicit in causing the credit crisis for a decade instead the sought more deregulation. The double standard is not only a proof, it is the cause of poor health care plans that Americans are stuck with.
    2009 Aug 20 09:54 AM Reply
  •  
    It is also well known that many Americans go to Mexico to be treated. Americans have also died due to inaccessible treatment (40 - 55 million uninsured). Can you compare numbers? No you can't. Again, you are dealing with anecdotes not facts. Many U.S. Surgeons General have criticized health care in America. The AMA has also been critical. It is their job to help make it better as they see it. In Canada also, the incoming president of CMA is, hopefully, trying to help make their system better. That doesn't mean it is bad. As in America where the AMA is only one authoritative voice, the CMA is not the only or most decisive authority on the subject.


    On Aug 20 09:26 AM Speakeasy wrote:

    > Frosty, according to Dr. Anne Doig, the incoming president of the
    > Canadian Medical Association, "Our Universal Health Care Is 'Sick',
    > and 'imploding'". It is common knowledge that many Canadians cross
    > our borders to be treated in the U.S. Furthermore, if you get out
    > of your bubble and read some of the U.K. you will occasionally read
    > articles referencing individuals who have died due to inaccessible
    > treatment.
    2009 Aug 20 10:16 AM Reply