The Ups and Downs of Deflation 11 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Just a few months ago we may have still been engaged in the economic debate of whether inflationary or deflationary forces would win out. On the one hand you had the credit collapse on a global scale which sucked the wind out of the economy and on the other hand you had the immediate and collective response of the Western world to inject mind-boggling amounts of money through monetary and fiscal stimuli.
But today the debate is over. In spite of the inflationary forces unleashed to fight it, deflation has cleary won. We are seeing this anecdotally on the ground as well as trickles of econometric data coming in from North America, Europe and even China.
The US economy is akin to a patient barely clinging to life in a critical care unit (insert US health care joke here). If the Federal Reserve is imprudent enough to raise interest rates from basically zero, it is not difficult to guess what might happen. Needless to say, they are not that stupid.
Even so, the Fed is pushing against a string at this point. They are basically observers like the rest of us, helplessly watching the largest decline in consumer prices in 50 years:
The chart below shows the real interest rate (interest rate minus inflation), rather than the nominal rate, its much more famous cousin:
![]()
If you’re a worrier by nature, this chart should have you biting your fingernails to the nub. Right now, after the globally orchestrated monetary easing, the long term real interest rates in the US are approaching 6.5%. In other words, if we didn’t have deflation at all, it would be akin to having the Fed jack up the reserve rate a couple hundred basis points overnight.
In a deflationary period frugality is rewarded as savers gain without doing anything. The problem is that the losers are those who borrow money because they will have to pay more to retire the debt. In the past, the US miracle economy was fueled by inflation and credit as the US consumer bought more than they could afford with money they didn’t have, and repaid (some of) it with money that was worth less than that which was borrowed initially.
Now we are in a completely different world with a different set of incentives. So obviously we can’t expect the orgy of borrow and spend to start all over again. This may not be all that terrible when you consider that historically many economies have had bouts of deflation without any real detriment to their long term health. In fact, if a spell of deflation helps to bring into balance the twin forces of saving and consumption, it would be a very good thing indeed. Here is a research paper from the Minneapolis Fed on the lack of empirical evidence linking economic depressions and deflation (pdf).
Just don’t expect the US consumer to reprise their gluttony. You can’t dig yourself out of a hole and it looks like the US consumer has finally put down the shovel and started climbing.
Here are some more thoughts on inflation vs. deflation:
- Deflation: A Story Told In Pictures
- Is Deflation Winning? (video)
- A Tsunami Coming: Deflation or Inflation?
Also, here is a free 60 page eBook from Elliott Wave about the dangers of deflation and how to position yourself both defensively and offensively to benefit.
The elite financial community labeled Prechter – the 1980s “Guru of the Decade” – an outcast, a man preoccupied with the concerns of “small children.” Experts from all schools of the economics profession said Prechter’s deflationary scenario was “utter nonsense,” and as likely to happen as “being eaten by piranhas.”
Yet … here it is. Since the real estate top in 2005, deflation has festered its way into almost all asset classes, ravaging the portfolios of millions. If you’ve been spared from deflation’s mighty jaws, you surely know someone who hasn’t.
Related Articles
|

























You're right to say that defaltion is bad for debtors. Who's the biggest debtor of them all? The US government. Turkeys don't vote for Christmas. The Fed have been clear that they want inflation and they have the means to achieve it. The old advice still applies: don't fight the Fed.
Nonsense. Your graph shows something related to year-over-year CPI changes, right? Well, take a closer look at the latest CPI numbers, which shows CPI-U down 2.1% from last year. But look at the components. Every line item except housing and transportation shows an increase:
Food: +1.1%
Housing: -0.7%
Apparel: +1.1%
Transportation: -14.1% (heavy energy inputs)
Medical care: +3.2%
Recreation: +1.2%
Education: +2.8%
Other: +7.5%
Here's the bottom line:
ALL ITEMS LESS FOOD AND ENERGY: +1.5%
Oil was roughly 100% higher a year ago than it is today. Is it any wonder that the overall price level is slightly lower? This is NOT indicative of deflation - it's indicative of the petroleum/commodities bubble we saw last year.
"Since the real estate top in 2005, deflation has festered its way into almost all asset classes, ravaging the portfolios of millions."
The Case-Shiller housing peak was in mid-2006, not 2005, and since then, CPI-U has INCREASED by 5.8%. I understand your confusion but asset depreciation, even widespread, is not deflation.
On Aug 20 11:45 AM Donald Ingram wrote:
> Deflation is here. I agree. You may find it everywhere if you look.
> If you care to look and believe what your eyes see. There are those
> (ostrich people) who prefer not to look, or not to believe what they
> see. The danger is they take others along for the ride to financial
> destruction.
The Hindus believe that God inflates the world during the Day of Brahma and deflates the world during the Night of Brahma. If you throw money at the Black Hole when the world is deflating, the Black Hole just eats the money.
> The Hindus believe that God inflates the world during the Day of
> Brahma and deflates the world during the Night of Brahma. If you
> throw money at the Black Hole when the world is deflating, the Black
> Hole just eats the money.
If throwing money keeps the black hole from eating the world, THROW FASTER.
Throwing money into the Black Hole just gets us more in debt.
On Aug 20 03:51 PM Vox Rationalis wrote:
> On Aug 20 02:13 PM Michael Clark wrote:
> Actually, the Black Hole will eat the world -- and then it will spit
> out a new version of the world. That's what happened after World
> War II. World War II was the Black Hole. And the Black Hole spit
> out a new world.
>
> Throwing money into the Black Hole just gets us more in debt.
Then you should change your analogy; black holes spit nothing out.
It doesn't match the interest rate chart.
Look at 1980.
Also you seem to be confusing (as do most deflationists) asset deflation from real deflation.
Where is the deflation (except for a few tech gadgets) except in financial assets that are simply returning to the mean from bubble-like inflated values??