Seeking Alpha
About this author:
Submit
an article to

A WSJ article on Japanese elections comes with the following table.

japan-stats

Japan has spent 20 years fighting deflation with loose monetary policy and deficit spending. To what end?

Keynesians point to Japan’s experience as evidence that the U.S. government can borrow much more before interest rates rise. I suspect they’re right. But what’s the point if, at the end of all of that, we’re saddled with unpayable debts?

Sure, deficit spending prevented more violent economic upheaval last year. But the more debts we build up, the longer and deeper the downturn will prove to be over time.

The article has many interesting details…

  • The party that’s been in power for 59 years will likely lose the elections to another, which promises “ambitious spending programs” despite Japan’s huge debt.
  • Incomes continue to fall. Inflated artificially by a credit bubble, Japan’s per capita income once ranked 4th in the world, but has since fallen to 14th.
  • Declining birth rates mean younger Japanese don’t have the voting power to reduce entitlement spending that’s asphyxiating the economy.

My hope is that America finds the political will to deal with debt. If we don’t, even matching Japan’s sorry trajectory will be tough.

Print this article with comments
Comments
21
Older > Comments 1 - 20 out of 21
You are viewing the latest 20 comments
  •  
    Excellent comparison.

    The problem lies not with the stars, but with ourselves. First demand services/benefits, then elect weak and easily swayed representatives, and finally fear the future.

    It is all our doing. We need to accept the facts and clean house in Washington but only after we decide to do with less for some time.
    Aug 28 10:43 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Excellent comment Whidbey and so true. This is what you are referring to: ragingdebate.com/about . Plan began one year ago and now some interesting investors have taken notice and will accelerate it beyond US borders.


    On Aug 28 10:43 AM whidbey wrote:

    > Excellent comparison.
    >
    > The problem lies not with the stars, but with ourselves. First demand
    > services/benefits, then elect weak and easily swayed representatives,
    > and finally fear the future.
    >
    > It is all our doing. We need to accept the facts and clean house
    > in Washington but only after we decide to do with less for some time.
    Aug 28 11:31 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    In addition Japan's lost decade took place during a decade that for the overall world economy was very prosperous, not without crisis, but with solid demand from the US for japanese products. Now nearly every world economy is doing badly and everybody is counting on somebody else to bail them out, China counts on the US and the US on China, along with Europe, Japan and everybody else. If everybody wants to export somebody has to import a lot and who is able at the moment with China being busy trying to keep it's own economy spining. If you look at all Chinese stimulus programmes and lending it solely focuses on China and chinese products along with giving chinese companies an edge in exports. The only countries that profit are those selling what China does not have, namely commodities, but that is about it. There is nothing America produces that China needs, maybe besides Iphones, but wait, those are manufactured in China as well!
    Aug 28 11:36 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I'm more optimistic.

    Two differences: 1) We are not yet on the glidepath to demographic suicide. 2) We haven't yet developed the "public/private" cooperation that was the model for Japanese industrial policy.

    Basically you get all the ships going in the same direction and for a while, you are the marvel of the world until the tsunami hits and you need some flexibility. The Chinese come to mind.

    It's curious that when you wrote: "Declining birth rates mean younger Japanese don’t have the voting power to reduce entitlement spending that’s asphyxiating the economy."

    I would have thought of demographic suicide as reducing the number of strong backs. Entitlement spending can be adjusted.
    Aug 28 12:00 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Investors have just lost one decade (which most thought was a good one), and now we are in danger of losing another. We are trying to solve a debt problem with more debt--make sense? The cautions mentioned above are correct. Unless we begin to solve our problems the right way--less spending, less debt--(which will take years), we push the day of reckoning further into the future, and we magnify the damage of that day. We are out of quick, easy fixes to our economic problems in this country.
    Aug 28 12:45 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I just don't see how it's possible to compare a country that has run a current account surplus forever, that has a strong manufacturing base, where people save not spend, and where they smoke and drink like crazy and stay thin and live forever, with a nation that does and is the precise opposite, is logical?
    Aug 28 12:46 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I was on my way of saying "no commnet". But then I remembered why US is different then Japan:
    - because the US businessmen are more imaginative and skrewed
    - because US businesses were and are willing o diversify more globaly and to understand the nuances/differences of different local markets
    - because, as much I respect the Japanese for their technical abilities, they are no match to the American marketing machine (this is pretty much the BORG)

    I can probably remember other good points but I already gave you an idea. America cannot be judged solely in terms of debt (public or private). America is more then just that.
    Aug 28 01:22 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Agree with Andrew.. we have different social contracts.. actually, what Japan is experiencing now is what we experienced in the late 60s.
    Aug 28 01:43 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Furthermore, Japan did not have delusions of being a global superpower and did not have a massive military machine to maintain. It was also heavily focused on value added industries rather than those based on distribution and consumption.


    On Aug 28 10:42 AM Donald Ingram wrote:

    > Agreed. "Matching Japan's trajectory will be tough" or almost impossible.
    > Remember Japan is a nation of net savers, and little debt at the
    > outset of the so called lost decade.
    > The US has entered this period as a nation of non-savers who are
    > in massive debt. Big difference.
    Aug 28 01:44 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    turning japanese? yes i think so...

    but only in the sense that we here in palookaville...

    are fighting deflation with loose monetary policy and deficit spending...

    oh and have zombie banks...

    and state controled capitalism...

    and are bailing out the vested interests...
    Aug 28 02:11 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Lets keep on the borrowing binge, and if no one has money left to lent us, we can always borrow from ourselves to buy from others.
    Aug 28 08:15 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Great article, simple, to the point.

    But even thinking about this hurts my head. Too many variables. The balance of power, spending and production, is going to change things so much that it's hard to fathom.
    Aug 28 08:22 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The Greeks had a saying: "A mans' character is his fate". Perhaps that also applies to nations.
    Aug 29 09:36 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    situations are not really that comparable,
    japan entered the 1970's with an undervalued currency & a rebuilt industrial infrastructure courtesy of the u.s taxpayer, grabbed market share from everybody, especially detroit who insisted on building klutzmobiles.
    today japan suffers from low birthrate and an aging population.
    might not happen here, we can just import more mexicans, guatemalans, bolivianos, etc/
    > jack
    Aug 29 10:32 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Interesting chart here from Bloomberg suggesting if we are following the Japanese pattern, stocks could rally quite a bit further over the next year.
    www.bloomberg.com/apps...
    Aug 29 11:47 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Your kidding me right? So that is why Toyota is helping itself to the handouts that were intended to bail out GM?


    On Aug 28 01:22 PM Mistrofan wrote:


    > US is different then Japan:
    > - because the US businessmen are more imaginative and skrewed
    > - because US businesses were and are willing o diversify more globaly
    > and to understand the nuances/differences of different local markets
    >
    > - because, as much I respect the Japanese for their technical abilities,
    > they are no match to the American marketing machine (this is pretty
    > much the BORG)
    Aug 29 12:10 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    And this is precisely why America will fail.

    They actually still believe that everyone else's success is entirely down to them. Just how deluded can you get?


    On Aug 29 10:32 AM john s. gordon wrote:

    > situations are not really that comparable,
    > japan entered the 1970's with an undervalued currency & a rebuilt
    > industrial infrastructure courtesy of the u.s taxpayer, grabbed market
    > share from everybody, especially detroit who insisted on building
    > klutzmobiles.
    > today japan suffers from low birthrate and an aging population.<br/>...
    > not happen here, we can just import more mexicans, guatemalans, bolivianos,
    > etc/
    Aug 29 12:11 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    "hope America finds the political will to deal with debt."

    I'm sure we will.
    Chances are real good it will be monetized.
    Aug 29 02:44 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Pardon me. I am not American, so therefore it is probably not up for me to judge, but I see EXTREME differences between the Japanese situation in the late 70's, the Japanese economy at that stage and the US now. The American economy is still leading in the world. American companies and individuals own so much wealth abroad that the pure income from it outdoes the excessive spending of the government and now the most important difference: The American economy was and is always exposed to competition and not semi-state regulated as the Japanese was and therefore it will adjust, reshape and get back on the growth path. And one last thing: The Japanese stock market was much more overvalued at that time. I might be wrong, but I think I recall P/E's of 40 and above.... the USA never had that, not even in 2001, neither in 2007. So, to sumarize it, as non American, I am buying American shares since end of last year, and happily optimistic with it. "Just do it USA" !
    Aug 29 03:05 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    look at the world’s worst population pyramid, that for Japan. These graphs show that a nearly perfect pyramid drove a miracle stock market during the fifties and sixties which I remember well, when Japan had your model high growth emerging market economy. That changed dramatically when the population started to age rapidly during the nineties. The 2007 graph is shouting at you not to go near the Land of the Rising Sun, and the 2050 projection tells you why. By then, a small young population of consumers with a very low birth rate will be supporting the backbreaking burden of a huge population of old age pensioners. Every two wage earners will be supporting one retiree. Think low GDP growth, huge government borrowing, deflation, and a terrible stock and housing markets. Dodge the bullet.
    Aug 31 10:34 AM | Link | Reply
Viewing Comments 1-20 out of 21 Older comments >