Ben Bernanke: Ultimately Destructive?

Despite vocal criticism of the Federal Reserve’s stewardship of the economy over the past decade, President Obama’s renomination of Ben Bernanke to a second term as Fed Chairman nevertheless served to reassure and boost financial markets.

While it is true that markets tend to crave predictability from government, rewarding the continuation of horrible Bush-era policies is perhaps pushing the boundaries of nostalgia. More interestingly, President Obama, who campaigned for ‘change,’ has clearly come down once again on the side of continuity.

In supporting his nomination, the President described Bernanke as “an expert on the causes of the Great Depression,” reminding everyone that Bernanke had “approached a financial system on the verge of collapse with calm and wisdom.” These were fine-sounding words, but they ignore the crucial fact that long before he moved into the Chairman’s office, Bernanke was an active member of the Federal Open Markets Committee, the Fed’s ruling body which systematically stoked and disguised the American financial crisis. While there, he consistently downplayed the danger signs that others brought to his attention.

It appears that these experiences failed to widen the Chairman’s perspective, as he continues to ignore the same voices now warning that current policy will make our fiscal wounds deeper.

From his senior position under former chairman Alan Greenspan, Bernanke watched as President Bush doubled the U.S. Treasury debt to $10 trillion and raised the total federal debt to a staggering $48 trillion. He stood on the sidelines as Greenspan pushed a decline in the dollar’s value of more than 50 percent since 1987. This effectively robbed not just taxpayers, but all holders of U.S. dollars of half their wealth!

Most troubling is the fact that Ben Bernanke was a chief advocate of ‘easy money’ in the Greenspan-led Fed, earning the nickname ‘Helicopter Ben’ for his threat to throw cash from helicopters to boost spending. This, along with risk-eliminating federal policy, encouraged the formation and hugely profitable growth of casino-style behemoth banks, which became ‘too big to fail.’

Thankfully for his friends on Wall Street, Helicopter Ben was still at the helm when the system came crashing down. This translated into massive bailouts, funded with trillions of dollars of taxpayers’ wealth. Accounting rules were changed to allow for the further camouflage of toxic assets held by the banks. Bernanke himself engaged in some mafioso behavior in forcing Bank of America to absorb an ailing Merrill Lynch.

On top of it all, to keep the appearance of solvency at bankrupt institutions, banks were allowed to borrow from the Fed at zero percent and were paid interest on the reserves they held at the Fed!

Now, the same behemoth banks are even larger, with the same pit-boss managers in charge, continuing to pay themselves tens of billions of dollars in bonuses.

The federal government, already encumbered with a staggering debt, has had to rely on the creation of dollars by the Fed to finance its economic ‘stimulus’ and its massive corporate bailouts. This has led Congress to question where sovereignty truly lies: with the people or the bankers?

Judging by the recent spate of tea parties and town hall meetings, significant forces are rumbling at the grassroots level. Though the protesters are not so versed in economics as to understand the source of their grievances, it most certainly lies with the Fed first and foremost. Fortunately, they are sophisticated enough to understand that they are being cheated – and Bernanke is the Chief Cheat.

While keeping Helicopter Ben in office was a politically safe decision, it comes with its own dangers. There are efforts to cast this crisis as a failure of capitalism, as personified by Alan Greenspan. Greenspan has gone so far as to claim that his faith in markets was misplaced, and that more regulation is needed. Bernanke concurs, and his continued professional success only serves to cement this erroneous viewpoint. The line of official history is hardening, and the characters are becoming more firmly cast. Bernanke is emerging as the anti-Greenspan, the banker who resisted the ‘seductions’ of the free market.

Of course, this plot fits nicely into the current Administration’s plans for greater government control of everything.

The truth is that the Greenspan-Bernanke Fed was to blame for the asset bubble, but not because it trusted too strongly in capitalism. Quite the contrary, Greenspan-Bernanke ushered in a new era of big government through their Faustian bargain with Administrations from Reagan to Bush Jr. In this deal, popular social and military spending could continue indefinitely, to be repaid through the printing press.

In turn, the federal government would become dependent upon the Fed for funding, and the central bank could paint itself as the savior of a disintegrating financial system. This wasn’t so much a conspiracy as an alignment of interests, and it developed quite organically. To call this a failure of capitalism is to call pollution a failure of air – it is not inherent to the thing, but a corruption of it.

If Ben Bernanke is distinguished by posterity, it will be in the manner of Juan Peron, a man who was popular, powerful, but ultimately destructive. Perhaps after another four years of Bernanke’s ‘courageous’ intervention, and its disastrous effects, America will tire of populist economics and return to the calm and wisdom of the free market.

Comments

[Roger Knights:]

Can the kicker!

Sep 01 05:54 AM

[User 353732:]

We now have the government of the status quo by the entrenched for the corrupt.

Our Govt fears transparent, ethical and competitive markets in all things not just finance and real eatate because real markets are a threat to the status quo: they are the destroyers of entrenched positions and accumulated undeserved priviliges and creators of happy surprises and unexpected opprtunities for the majority.
The unnatural policies of the Govt are against the design of nature and the nobler impluses of Americans because both seek healthy change. The status quo leads to stagnation which can only result in decay.

The Bosses practice the politics of exclusion and control because that is how the status quo is maintained; exclusion from the gated privilges of the annointed elites and favors and patronage for the clients of the elite; control of the many by the few through transfer payments, deadening regulations, fear and propaganda.

The status quo can be prolonged but it cannot be maintained for very long . The more change is suppressed the more explosive the force with which change manifests itself and the more unpredictable the consequences.

Sep 01 07:57 AM

[John Galt:]

> While it is true that markets tend to crave predictability from government, rewarding the continuation of horrible Bush-era policies is perhaps pushing the boundaries of nostalgia. More interestingly, President Obama, who campaigned for ‘change,’ has clearly come >down once again on the side of continuity.


Fed Chair Bernake = Economy
Defense Secretary Gates = War

Obama is keeping the same the same key people as George Bush in key positions on the Economy and the Military. If anything, those were the areas his supporters wanted him to "change" the most and he has kept the status quo.

Then we have bailouts, tax cheats all over his administration and our "next American Idol president". Congrats America, you've been duped.

Sep 01 09:50 AM

[LKofEnglish:]

faustian bargains of increased defense spending? apparently you weren't around in the 90's. how else to get those huge budget surpluses. the spending comes from the sacred cows of entitlement programs and, obviously, interest on the debt. this "bargain" has been in place since WWII and its been all down hill ever since. This great nation can't even field a force of a few hundred thousand for its "clash of civilizations." In WWII the USA had 12 million military personnell ready to roll with half the population of what we have today. Clearly there is no political will to literally fight anymore but instead just roll over and die when confronted by a bunch of terrorists living in caves. On the other hand when it comes to making money, "greed" as Alan Greenspan so aptly named it, apparently no one can beat the good old USA. Didn't take long for your fear to be subsided by the reality of the market place did it Sir John? Don't tell me you were surprised...

Sep 01 10:45 AM

[Rob Viglione:]

Mr. Brown, another great article. Please keep spreading the word. I'm doing my best to spread your writing via Twitter & Facebook.

My question is how historians will ultimately paint the picture of America's decline & fall? Will it be attributed to pollution, barbaric incursions, destructive emperors, etc.? Or will history remember the words of the few, like yourself, who have been predicting this for decades?

Sep 06 12:29 PM