Back to School? Where? 20 comments
September 01, 2009
Submit
an article to
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Uh, what back-to-school sales?

That's nasty - one week before school starts in most of the country, and both weekly and year-over-year changes are deeply negative!
Note that the week/over/week change was expected to be strongly positive, which correlates well with the "back to school" surge.
No dice - that's a miss of 1.1%, enormous by any standard.
The reason is simple: The consumer is tapped out.
Those "green shoots" are in fact hallucinogenic weeds.
Related Articles
|






















:)
Government has refused to help small businesses as well. With these types of policies geared to save the Financial Warlords were are doomed to stagflation.
The inventory build will not be in holiday items.
Christmas is anywhere from 30 to 90% of the total year for retailers, if it falls short the effects will back down on CRE and bank credit and consumer sentiment.
This could be the worst holiday season of some time.
On Sep 01 11:55 AM expat in China wrote:
> why is buffet selling WFC?
On Sep 01 11:56 AM conceptwizard wrote:
> I agree Karl. People simply believe what they hear or what they want
> to believe. There is no recovery without the consumer in a 70% consumer
> based economy, there is no consumer without housing and 30% or better
> of mortgages are underwater, as consumers were using housing equity
> and credit to buy everything. With 126% average debt burden on consumers
> they are tapped out as you say. And even if they wanted to borrow
> credit is so tight you have to give up your firstborn.
> Government has refused to help small businesses as well. With these
> types of policies geared to save the Financial Warlords were are
> doomed to stagflation.
On Sep 01 12:38 PM Mark Bern wrote:
> Warren (we grew up less than 30 miles from each other in Nebraska),
> the Omaha Oracle, knows something. What he knows, I'm guessing, is
> that FASB will require all off-balance sheet assets to be reported
> on balance sheet beginning in January 2010. He also knows that WF
> has nearly $1.8 Trillion in off balance sheet assets. When those
> assets get included in their reporting they will need to raise over
> $70 Billion in additional capital to meet reserve requirements. And
> I suspect he thinks they'll have a very hard time doing it without
> diluting its current shareholders. I can't help but agree with him.
>
On Sep 01 05:55 PM mlonz wrote:
> I was in home depot Monday @ 10 am. Ghost town.
During the Night-Cycle, the society divides into two. This division makes it impossible to make progress. No one is to blame for this division -- it is part of the process. The Night-Cycle is a time of rest, a time of contraction and of unwinding. (During the Day we wind-up; during the Night we wind-down -- and, in this case, winding-down also includes winding down credit.)
The Earth needs to rest, humans need to rest. But this division of society must be understood as a way of understanding that this depression is NOT just a matter of financial statistics accumulating in a one direction or the other. Night-Cycles are not ABOUT the economy, but about the human psyche (the consumer) going to sleep. The economic breakdown is CAUSED BY the hman psyche going to sleep, and winding down.
"The customer is never right."
On Sep 01 11:56 PM lynnybee wrote:
> good. now, maybe, that store will go away.
>
Without job creation at all levels, not just health care & "green" tech, where are these talked about consumers going to come from?
For the past decade we came from Zero percent teaser rates on credit cards that has turned into 30% interest rate, family crushing bricks.
On Sep 01 11:56 AM conceptwizard wrote:
> I agree Karl. People simply believe what they hear or what they want
> to believe. There is no recovery without the consumer in a 70% consumer
> based economy, there is no consumer without housing and 30% or better
> of mortgages are underwater, as consumers were using housing equity
> and credit to buy everything. With 126% average debt burden on consumers
> they are tapped out as you say. And even if they wanted to borrow
> credit is so tight you have to give up your firstborn.
> Government has refused to help small businesses as well. With these
> types of policies geared to save the Financial Warlords were are
> doomed to stagflation.
IMHO, banks are in a lot worse shape (read: desperate) than the Fed, Administration, or MSM is letting on. I think those entities know it (well, maybe not the talking heads because I'm not sure if they come with gray matter) and are doing their best to try holding things together long enough for the banks to work their way out of their messy condition. I also don't think there is enough time left before the next shoe drops, to get the banks adequately capitalized. So, I expect that we will see the great recession, part II playing soon in an economy near you.
On Sep 01 11:56 PM lynnybee wrote:
> good. now, maybe, that store will go away. i remember when there
> was no HOME DEPOT (does anyone remember BUILDER'S SQUARE ? )
>
I have said in earlier posts: Take 1/2 a day and drive around to 12 towns in your area. Here on Long Island NY, where people still have plenty of cash to spare, guess what? Even the rich are not spending it. Towns that were once vibrant and stores full, you now have vacant stores and available seating at restaurants on weekends.
The spin will keep being spun, but as each month and year passes people are finally going to wake up to the fact that consumerism in this country is dead.
I-phone sales and tattoo sales won't be enough to pick up the slack.
On Sep 01 05:55 PM mlonz wrote:
> I was in home depot Monday @ 10 am. Ghost town.
TIA!
MM
Could end a few wars as well.
On Sep 01 11:47 AM The EconomicJoker wrote:
> Hallucinogenic weed. Now there's a green shoot worth cultivating!
>
>
> :)