When it comes to uranium market sentiment, "it's all about Japan," says David Talbot, senior mining analyst at Dundee Capital Markets. With restart applications trickling in and reactor construction underway throughout the world, a turnaround looks less like an "if" and more like a "when." In the meantime, Talbot sees many investors sitting on the sidelines. In this interview with The Energy Report, Talbot discusses the catalysts that could trigger the next uranium boom and the companies that could make investors wish they had arrived at the party a little earlier.
The Energy Report: In your last interview with The Energy Report in December, you were expecting that 2013 would be the turnaround year for uranium. What's your assessment of where things stand now?
David Talbot: Our long-term outlook remains essentially the same as last year. What we and most of the industry underestimated was the possible impact of cash-strapped sellers on the spot market. Despite recent spot market weakness, uranium producer equities have pushed ahead 10%, developers 12% and explorers 17%, on average. A uranium supply crisis is still brewing and the fundamentals do remain strong. Demand is stable and reasonably predictable. The weak spot price still threatens future mine supply with more closures, cancellations and deferrals of mining projects. The all-important catalyst at the end of this year is the end of the Russia-U.S. HEU "Megatons to Megawatts" program, which in our view will not be renewed. That means 24 million pounds (24 Mlb) of secondary supply comes offline with no replacement − equivalent to the entire production of Cameco Corp. (CCJ). Uranium prices are too low to incentivize new builds right now. We think prices must rise, as will the equities. The Uranium One Inc. (OTC:SXRZF) takeout deal approved in March indicates Russia wanted to lock down a reliable uranium source. Guangdong's (CGNPC) purchase of Extract Resources Ltd. is the preeminent takeover after Uranium One. As these utilities purchase these big projects it leaves less supply on the table for the rest of the utilities.
TER: The big price drop in early July sent uranium down to a seven-year low. What happened there? Was this the bottom or is there more to come?
DT: Uranium prices have dropped significantly in the past month or so. A few weeks ago, near-term requirements appeared low and the first applications for Japanese reactor restarts were not yet filed. Restrictions were also removed from the U.S. Department of Energy regarding how much uranium it's allowed to sell in any given year. That added to the already negative sentiment.
The following week, a few suppliers failed to sell to a certain utility and were forced to place that material on the market relatively cheaply. That led to the spot price retreating even more. More positive news coming out of Japan on restarts should help the price edge back up. But during the summer lull, negative sentiment could still dominate, and prices could drop further.
TER: What catalysts might cause a significant uptrend in prices going to this predicted $70+ per pound ($70+/lb) level?
DT: It's all about Japan. Japanese restarts should provide a psychological boost. Fukushima really ended the last uranium bull run and reactor restarts will likely get that going once again. Once Japan moves forward, the rest of the world will start to catch up on the uranium purchases they've been deferring.
Investors are likely to return at that point. Utilities will also have to return to term contracting as they do have significant unmet uranium requirements over the next four or five years. There are more reactors planned or proposed now than ever before, and we are seeing contract awards for construction of reactors, like in Turkey for example, and the UK reaffirmed its commitment to nuclear only a few months ago. We continue to forecast a supply/demand deficit by the end of 2014. By 2020, we expect about 240 Mlb of demand to be offset by only ~200 Mlb of total supply, including secondary supplies.
TER: The U.S. imports about 90% of its uranium, yet we still have significant recoverable deposits. What do things look like for domestic production?
DT: Things are moving forward on the permitting front in the U.S., which remains the largest uranium consumer in the world with the largest reactor fleet. It produced only about 4.1 Mlb last year, which was about a 4% increase from the prior year. We'd expect that number to increase to perhaps 4.5-5 Mlb this year. Cameco is by far the largest producer in the country and plans to increase production at both its Smith Ranch-Highland plant in Wyoming and its Crow Butte plant in Nebraska. We expect combined production to improve from 1.9 Mlb last year to about 2.6 Mlb this year. That should offset some production losses from, say, Uranium One, which decided not to develop any more well fields at its Willow Creek in-situ recovery (ISR) project in Wyoming.
We're also expecting increased production from Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) from its Palangana operation in south Texas. We're expecting initial production out of Ur-Energy Inc.'s (URG) Lost Creek mine in Wyoming. The U.S. still imports about 90% of its 55 Mlb per year consumption. Producers such as Ur-Energy have had some preferential contracts in the past. For example, we believe that Ur-Energy's contracts with utilities are in the $60/lb or greater range. That's a pretty good premium to existing spot prices.
TER: You've been out on some site visits. Tell us a little about what you've seen.
DT: I enjoy site visits and have been to about 80 different uranium projects around the world. I went back to Wyoming in July and saw a couple of ISR mines, Ur-Energy's Lost Creek, and Cameco's Smith Highland Ranch operations. Ur-Energy is the best performer this year out of the developers. It's up 70% over the past few months. We were very impressed with the innovative design of the Lost Creek plant and feel very comfortable with the expertise, depth and competence of the company's team.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission pre-operation inspections are underway at Lost Creek and we expect production by August with first deliveries in October. We're looking for about 200,000 pounds (200 Klb) of production this year. Maybe 800-900 Klb next year with production costs under $25/lb. The Pathfinder acquisition brings two high-quality assets, primarily the Shirley Basin, which is the next project to be developed. There's a little bit of financing risk remaining, but we expect that to be largely sorted out. We maintain our buy on Ur-Energy and target price of $2.30 per share from the current $1.29 level.
We also visited Cameco's Smith Highland Ranch ISR operation, which has been in production for over 16 years. Cameco's U.S.-based operations have been core long life, low-cost projects for years. About 12% of Cameco's production comes from the U.S., accounting for half of total U.S. production. About 18% of our NAV comes from its U.S. operations. We're expecting increased production this year out of North Butte and see Cameco moving forward with the 15 Mlb Reynolds project, which is likely going to be permitted around yearend. We've got a buy on Cameco and target price of $25.20.
TER: Why did you only start covering Cameco now?
DT: With well over 20 analysts covering Cameco, I felt my value was better added covering earlier-stage development and exploration stories. I initiated coverage on Cameco in June as a clear defensive play in today's uncertain uranium environment. It's an industry leader with world-class assets. Cameco rarely misses its guidance and looks poised to continue the strong track record despite low uranium prices. The big catalyst this year is the commissioning of the Cigar Lake project, expected any day now. We're forecasting 23.4 Mlb of production this year, 25.4 next year and just under 36 Mlb by 2018. Cameco is where the big money is going in the sector.
Despite our belief that producers are where investors should be going right now, we do want to highlight an exploration company, Denison Mines Corp. (DNN). Who is exploring some exciting high-grade projects in the Athabasca Basin. Very few companies in the sector are receiving as much attention.
Denison Mines is an investor favorite that trades very well. We rate Denison as a buy with a $2.00 target price. The company has majority ownership in the world's third-highest-grade deposit, Phoenix, that already has 60 Mlb of uranium at 16.6% U308. We easily see 20-30 Mlb upside from here. The latest drill hole announced about two weeks back turned out to be the best hole ever on the property, 43% over 10m. A significant part of our NAV for Denison comes from a strategic value of its 22.5% ownership in the McClean Lake Mill. Its world-class mill is one of just three mills in the Athabasca Basin, and the only one capable of processing ultra high-grade ores. It represents near-term cash flow potential. Denison holds another large deposit called Midwest and a plethora of other exploration projects. This company is an attractive entry point for investors who want exposure to the basin. Between the takeover potential and the ultra high-grade Phoenix deposit, we clearly see investors supporting its premium valuation relative to its peers.
TER: Any others you'd like to mention?
DT: We like Uranium Participation Corp. (OTC:URPTF) as a buy, high risk, with a $7.50 target price. Uranium Participation is essentially a uranium ETF holding 13.4 Mlb of physical uranium and therefore it's easy to calculate an NAV for the stock. We estimate its NAV right now at $4.81 per share at $34.50/lb uranium. We view Uranium Participation as a proxy for sentiment from the sector and a low-risk investment vehicle for those who seek pure uranium price exposure with no operational permitting or geopolitical risk. We suggest getting in this name before uranium prices rally further.
TER: So what does the future look like for uranium and what should investors be doing to hopefully benefit and make some money here?
DT: Once we get through the summer doldrums and get some visibility on the Japanese nuclear power restarts, we expect uranium prices to firm and rise toward the end of this year and into next year. We are still calling for $65/lb uranium in the long term. To get to those levels, investors will need to see higher prices as incentives before any large uranium mines are built. Based on history, there's a chance that once uranium prices do start to rebound, stock prices could jump quickly. It's our expectation that many investors will sit on the sidelines, skip some of these early gains and likely come into the sector once it's clear what direction it's headed in. In the meantime, we suggest that investors look to the producers, especially those companies that are larger and more liquid. They should also look at select exploration companies, such as Denison Mines. All eyes are on those companies right now and their exploration programs are in full swing and expected to deliver significant news flow throughout the summer.
TER: Thanks for your thoughts today, David.
DT: Thank you for having me.
This interview was conducted by Zig Lambo of The Energy Report.
Dundee Capital Markets Senior Mining Analyst David Talbot worked for nine years as a geologist in the gold exploration industry in Northern Ontario. David joined Dundee's research department in May 2003, and in the summer of 2007, he took over the role of analyzing the fast-growing uranium sector. David is a member of the PDAC, the Society of Economic Geologists and graduated with distinction from the University of Western Ontario, with an Honors Bachelor of Science degree in geology.
1) Zig Lambo conducted this interview for The Energy Report and provides services to The Energy Report as an independent contractor. He or his family own shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: None.
2) The following companies mentioned in the interview are sponsors of The Energy Report: None. Streetwise Reports does not accept stock in exchange for its services or as sponsorship payment.
3)David Talbot: I or my family own shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. I personally am or my family is paid by the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. My company has a financial relationship with the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. I was not paid by Streetwise Reports for participating in this interview. Comments and opinions expressed are my own comments and opinions. I had the opportunity to review the interview for accuracy as of the date of the interview and am responsible for the content of the interview.
4) Dundee Capital Markets and its affiliates, in the aggregate, beneficially own 1% or more of a class of equity securities mentioned in this interview: None.
5) Dundee Capital Markets has provided investment banking services to companies mentioned in this interview in the past 12 months: Denison Mines Corp.
6) All disclosures and disclaimers are available on the Internet at dundeecapitalmarkets.com. Please refer to formal published research reports for all disclosures and disclaimers pertaining to companies under coverage and Dundee Capital Markets. The policy of Dundee Capital Markets with respect to Research reports is available on the Internet at dundeecapitalmarkets.com.
7) Interviews are edited for clarity. Streetwise Reports does not make editorial comments or change experts' statements without their consent.
9) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned and may make purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise.