Seeking Alpha
About this author:
Submit
an article to

Intel’s (INTC) CEO gave a very informative interview to London’s Financial Times on Thursday, in which he discussed reason for optimism for his company in the year ahead. Intel’s stock has recovered after hitting its lowest point in more than a decade in February of this year. The world’s largest chip-maker was pinned down by struggling sales, especially from corporate customers who were left reeling by financial crisis over the last year.

Intel’s Paul Otellini has not been shy about his belief that the worst is behind his company. Analysts have taken notice to his upbeat outlook for Intel and apparently they agree, as the estimates for Intel’s current quarter and fiscal year have edged up considerably in the last 90 days. Below is the key section of Otellini’s interview, but you can find the full article here.INTC

“I think corporations’ capital budgets got clamped down fairly aggressively at the end of last year. But in terms of PC refresh I would expect that now to happen in 2010 … The fleet of PCs is getting fairly aged; most corporate notebooks are now over four years old, desktops are over five years old, they need to refresh,” he told the Financial Times in a video interview.

Mr Otellini also highlighted the upcoming launch of Windows 7 operating system by Microsoft next month, saying it would have a big impact on corporate spending: “I think that Windows 7 will help drive a refresh in corporations and we’re cautiously optimistic we’ll see that in 2010.”

Otellini sees a bright future with the aging fleet of computers in companies across the globe. It has been the consumer who has helped the industry plod along during this difficult period, but there is much more potential in corporate IT spending. Obviously, Intel and Microsoft (MSFT) were disappointed by the adoption rates of Windows Vista operating system. Both firms are optimistic that Vista was simply a one time hiccup and Windows 7 has a more successful launch. One thing we know is that technology continues to evolve and chips will need to be bigger and faster to run Windows 7 versus the soon to be two generations ago, Windows XP.

At Ockham, we currently have a Fairly Valued rating on Intel after the stock has had an impressive run since its lows. INTC is trading within its historically normal range of price-to-cash earnings, but it is trading well below its historically normal range of price-to-sales. It is clear that Otellini believes his stock is undervalued, and he may be right. As of right now, Intel is trading within our expected price range of $18 to $25.

Original post

Print this article with comments
Comments
2
Comments 1 - 2 out of 2
You are viewing the latest 20 comments
  •  
    > "most corporate notebooks are now over four years old, desktops are over five years old, they need to refresh”

    This time it's different 0_o:
    Unlike in earlier cycles, 4-5 year old hardware still performs reasonably well, so there's no "need" to refresh.

    In the place where I work, having reduced our staff by 10%, there's a glut of computers. In case I needed a new comp, IT department would upgrade an old one with plenty of RAM, but there's no chance to get a new one while the economy is so bad.
    Most applications are more than 4 years old anyways, so is the version of MS Windows.

    I think Otellini is talking his book...
    Sep 06 06:26 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    This Intel statement is free advertising from the industry, but may foreshadow a dirty deal too.

    The fact that MSFT has plans to launch its new horror show, "system 7", is no reason to buy a box to run it, unless (don't count this out) the idiots at Softy failed to make it fully backward compatible with prior MSFT OSs. The backward compatibility issue has occurred with MSFT before and we can not preclude some collusion to force the corporate markets to buy or go blind.

    They are a lovely group feeding Africa and stomping on the toes of the US market. No wonder the EU/UK hate the company.
    Sep 08 01:41 PM | Link | Reply
Viewing Comments 1-2 out of 2