China's Solar Wafer Production Seems Out of Control 10 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
For Renesola (SOL) and LDK Solar (LDK) investors, the worst is yet to come. China's poly-silicon production increased dramatically in the last 12 months and two new companies just started to produce poly-silicon last month.
U.S.-listed solar wafer makers Renesola and LDK Solar are facing tougher and tougher competition, their futures have now dimmed further since two more companies in China announced plans to produce poly-silicon wafers: Puhong new energy Corp and Shengte new energy Corp. Puhong is expected to produce 1500 tons of poly-silicon by 2010 (a capacity compatible with Renesola's). Puhong won the bid in China's first 10MW solar project according to the China's official renewable energy website.
The two new poly-silicon companies sit just beside Renesola in the same industrial park in Zhejiang province. The amazing thing is that Renesola didn't win the contract to provide the wafer to the 10MW project, but a new company did. This is another example that indicates poly-silicon prices will tumble further if China's production goes out of control.
Renesola and LDK Solar did sign some solar projects, but the funding for those projects is yet to be established. Moreover, the future of these projects is still uncertain because the Chinese central government is slowing down the loan programs due to over lending in the first half of 2009. Also, the solar projects announced in the past few months in China will still depend upon feasibility studies, which will take a long time.
Solar investors may hope solar wafer prices will stablize, but the reality may disappoint. The good news is for PV module makers, such as Yingli Green (YGE) and Suntech power (STP) as costs go down with the declining price of poly-silicon, making them compatible with First Solar (FSLR).
Disclosure: Author is long YGE
Related Articles
|





















In other words "your own cheap supply" can be damn expensive!
On Sep 07 09:41 AM Dave Marsh wrote:
> I thought Renesola bought a module maker so they could supply poly
> internally, moving it more towards a Trina vertically integrated
> model. Kelvin: Was I misinformed? Why sell poly at a loss when
> you can supply your other (module) half with your own cheap supply,
> then sell the modules with some kind of positive margin.
Unfortunately, the author of this article clearly has no logic, and, as a Yingli stockholder, no moral fibre as he attempts to spread misinformation.
If poly prices fall, both Yingli and Renesola benefit. If poly prices rise, which they are, Renesola benefits from it's in-house supply whereas Yingli will need to buy the higher priced poly. Currently, spot poly prices are around $63/kg, Renesola is producing poly internally at $50/kg falling to $35/kg next year (500MW worth).
Yingli does not produce poly and is therefore not fully integrated and at a cost disadvantage. Renesola produces poly and also produces cells/modules/systems with the acquisition of JC Solar. They plan module capacity expansion to just under 400MW by the end of next year.
Perhaps the author, being long YGE, fears competition, since Renesola's lower cost structure and hefty module production, will enable them to undercut Yingli and pressure their markets too.
I am not sure that Renesola will wish to be 'compatible' with FSLR as the author states YGE will be. Renesola already has a far better product in terms of reliability, durability and efficiency than FSLR. It is now aiming to include comprehensively beating them on price....
On Sep 07 09:41 AM Dave Marsh wrote:
> I thought Renesola bought a module maker so they could supply poly
> internally, moving it more towards a Trina vertically integrated
> model. Kelvin: Was I misinformed? Why sell poly at a loss when
> you can supply your other (module) half with your own cheap supply,
> then sell the modules with some kind of positive margin.
On Sep 07 02:43 PM spuddle wrote:
> Dave, you are quite right.
>
> Unfortunately, the author of this article clearly has no logic, and,
> as a Yingli stockholder, no moral fibre as he attempts to spread
> misinformation.
>
> If poly prices fall, both Yingli and Renesola benefit. If poly prices
> rise, which they are, Renesola benefits from it's in-house supply
> whereas Yingli will need to buy the higher priced poly. Currently,
> spot poly prices are around $63/kg, Renesola is producing poly internally
> at $50/kg falling to $35/kg next year (500MW worth).
>
> Yingli does not produce poly and is therefore not fully integrated
> and at a cost disadvantage. Renesola produces poly and also produces
> cells/modules/systems with the acquisition of JC Solar. They plan
> module capacity expansion to just under 400MW by the end of next
> year.
>
> Perhaps the author, being long YGE, fears competition, since Renesola's
> lower cost structure and hefty module production, will enable them
> to undercut Yingli and pressure their markets too.
>
> I am not sure that Renesola will wish to be 'compatible' with FSLR
> as the author states YGE will be. Renesola already has a far better
> product in terms of reliability, durability and efficiency than FSLR.
> It is now aiming to include comprehensively beating them on price....
>
>
> On Sep 07 09:41 AM Dave Marsh wrote:
On Sep 08 10:40 AM Mad Hedge Fund Trader wrote:
> potym. The solar industry is suffering some 19th century Darwinian
> style competition, with Chinese manufacturers ...
Babelfish translation:
.... ramble ...Oldsmobile, GM, greatest generation... is anybody out there... drunken ramble... this is Robert Neville... ramble, spam ... Cetin, come upstairs, boy... incoherent ramble, spam...