Greenspan: Another Crisis Is Inevitable 15 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
It's not clear which is worse when it comes to former Fed chairman Alan Greenspan:
- That he was head of the central bank and left such a mess
- That, in retirement, groups continue to invite him to speak
- That the media covers these speeches so thoroughly
- That there isn't more outrage about items 1, 2, and 3 above
The most recent examples of items 2 and 3 come via this report at CNBC.
Another global financial crisis is inevitable because human nature always reverts to "speculative excesses" during a period of sustained prosperity, former U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said.
"The crisis will happen again but it will be different," he told BBC Two's "The Love of Money" television series. "That is the unquenchable capability of human beings when confronted with long periods of prosperity to presume that that will continue," he said.
Greenspan, speaking to the BBC to mark the first anniversary of the fall of U.S. investment bank Lehman Brothers, said Britain will be hit worse than the U.S. by the subsequent worldwide financial crisis and global recession because it has a globally-focused economy.
There is almost always a caveat in these reports and this one is no different, noting that "his record is under scrutiny", but that just doesn't seem like it's enough anymore.
Related Articles
|





"The crisis will happen again but it will be different," he told BBC Two's "The Love of Money" television series. "That is the unquenchable capability of human beings when confronted with long periods of prosperity to presume that that will continue," he said.
















It's not clear which is worse when it comes to former Fed chairman Alan Greenspan:
1) That he was head of the central bank and left such a mess
2) That, in retirement, groups continue to invite him to speak
3) That the media covers these speeches so thoroughly
4) That there isn't more outrage about items 1, 2, and 3 above
This is easy, the answer is 1.
So the Fed is designed to bring "stability" to markets, by setting an artificially high price of money during boom times, and an artificially low price of money during weak times. Throw in setting the money supply etc., and these quasi government workers are rigging our economy. These PHD's from district member banks and the Fed Chairman know more than thousands of decentralized individuals responding to price mechanisms? Or so they say. PS, it sounds a little socialist don't you think? Having these national string pullers behind the scenes who know what's better for you than you do?
When the Fed as an institution fails, and we have big market swings, then they say that "human nature" is the cause. But wasn't their job to bring stability? Didn't they fail?
I suppose you could say the economy would have been worse off if it weren't for Greenspan/Uncle Ben, but I don't think anybody really believes that.
Abolish the Fed!
Its a whole legion of exploded theories, embodied in freddies, fannies, and alphabet soup grannies of all kinds.
Granted, the Fed is certainly among them, and something that should go in the garage sale, but its hardly alone.
Oh wait, the Beige book report says we're out of recession, whew.
Well, that is a very bold prediction indeed.
But he ain't no Miss Cleo.
Simon Johnson at the Baseline Scenario has an article on SA today advocating doing just that, changing bankers' incentive structure so that they still get rewarded for success but they also get punished for failure just like any other failed business person suffers for his/her mistakes. In the linked essay Johnson and his coauthor describe how the Fed has been spoiling its kids--the banks who own the Fed--by saving them every time they screw up. And guess who gets to pay for the cleanup? Mr and Mrs Taxpayer of course.
With this "can't lose" incentive structure the kids have become risk addicts because for them there's only upside and the downside is always passed off to somebody else. So it's become like a nightmare "Bankers Gone Wild" video with the US financial house in shambles and the goodly old Fed coddling the kids who are causing the wreckage.
I agree with Greenspan. As long as this perverse "can't lose" incentive structure for financial risk taking remains in place, there will most certainly be another crisis.
His prognosticating needs work though, "in the future" is going to happen much quicker than geniuses such as him think.
They didn't see the last mess coming and they are completely ignoring the one being created in Washington & Beijing now.
Someone had to play the music that Chuck Prince of Citibank was dancing to.
On Sep 11 07:29 AM speculari wrote:
> Greenspan was Chairman of the Fed? My God, Tim - and here I thought
> he was just another clarinet player!