Seeking Alpha
About this author:
Submit
an article to

In response to a number of requests that I've received via email or comments asking for 'VFC's Take' on numerous stocks that readers have found, I'll do my best to address as many as I can, as long as everyone takes a few things into account while reading:

- I have not thoroughly researched all of the stocks that I'm about to comment on. I've done the initial DD but my opinions are mostly based on my first impressions of the stock. I'm merely providing VFC's Take, as requested. Use that as a starting point to do your own DD.

- Don't get testy if I don't like your stock. Remember, this is just my initial impression and I take into consideration some variables that other people don't, that's why VFC's Take is not always the mainstream impression.

- I appreciate all the recent feedback, and keep the stock tips coming; this is a great forum for all investors of all levels to share tips and insights. There's a whole lot of stocks out there, but there's only a few gems. Let's keep trying to find those gems.

SpongeTech (SPNG.OB)

Here's my problem with the Spongetech move. They should have gone 1-10. By going 1-100 they take themselves out of the "speculators" domain. If I am in SPNG (which I am, avg .11), I am looking for a big hit. I don't want to buy SPNG at $14.00 a share! I'll take a potential ride up from $1.40, but no way am I buying at $14 when I don't know if as you say "the products are going to take hold". It would have to hit $100 a share to make the big hit I am in for. I sold half yesterday at .155 and may sell the rest. This is not a potential homerun anymore.


VFC's Take: I do see this poster's point, however the outcome does not have to be quite so bleak. The market cap is not going to change as a result of the reverse split, so if sales growth can support a higher market cap, then the stock price is going to rise the same amount (in terms of percentages) regardless of the price for which the stock trades.

By doing a 1-100 vice 1-10, the company is trying to weed out the speculative traders, in my opinion, and keep the long term growth investors. If the company can grow the business and sell the products then investors will be rewarded in the end.

As for the potential of a ten-bagger here, a ten-bagger from this point would mean a market cap of roughly one billion - regardless of whether the stock trades for ten cents or ten bucks. That is a bold prediction in any case, but if Spongetech can generate sales that support such a high market cap, then the stock will trade accordingly; again, I emphasize, it's a percentages game, not a stock price game.

If you thought Spongetech would sell that much product, then it's just as much worth the buy on September 23rd as it is today. I understand the newfound fear of the potential downside, but if you're in SPNG for the future of the potential sales growth - nothing has changed. Don't alter the amount of money you put in, just accept the fact that you'll have far few shares in the account - the percentages will play out regardless of price.

I'm going to add shares now - pre-split - and if the stock dips significantly post-split, I may add again; then I'll wait and see how well these products catch on and hold the market place.

As for the "home run" call, in my opinion, if you can double your money in a stock - I tend to consider that a home run, especially when most of America is satisfied with a 15% annual gain in a mutual fund.

I still think that SPNG could eventually be at least a double, even after the reverse split. For that potential double - I'll hold.

Disclosure: VFC is long SPNG.

Telanetix (TNXI)

Would like to know what you think about Telanetix (TNXI). It's in the visual conferencing field and was featured in Barron's a couple of years ago. It's way down since then, but it seems to be a solid business in a field that when it comes back again, should lift up the stock as well. Would you care to express and opinion on that? Thank you, one of your regular readers...ds


VFC's Take: I'll refer back to my earlier comments on TNXI (CLICK HERE) and since nothing has significantly changed since then, I won't alter my stance.

That being said, it's a lot more attractive buy right now for under ten cents than it was before; if it hits five cents, I might buy a few shares myself in order to sell them into any potential spike.

It's on the watch list, but I'm not yet a buyer.

Disclosure: No position.

Trubion Pharmaceuticals (TRBN)

VFC, you should check TRBN. Look at it's brakeout and news... It should move up a lot from recent level. Have a nice time.http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/top story/2503027/

Mark

VFC's Take: Ordinarily I'd shy away from a pharmaceutical stock after it has enjoyed a run such as the one Trubion had - in order to avoid chasing - but I think that this one is worth keeping on the watch list and, if you're looking for a long term speculative play, buy TRBN on the dips.


Trubion's pipeline is still in the early stages of development, although a recent partnership with Facet Biotech Corp. for the development of TRU-016, a treatment for Chronic lymphocytic leukemia [CLL], makes TRBN a bit more stable of a speculative investment than most, in my opinion; although partnerships mean nothing if the drug is proven to not work (see: Cell Genesys). Of note, Facet recently rejected a buyout offer by Biogen.

Trubion also has an alliance with Wyeth for the development of TRU-105 (it's most advanced candidate) and SBI-087.

Trubion's business plan of funding the pipeline products through partnerships somewhat alleviates the future risks of dilution and makes it a decent long term speculative play, in my opinion.

If you're looking to get in, I'd throw it on the watch list and wait for it to settle down again, a dip to below five bucks is a give, in my opinion; remember, this company is still a long way off from bringing anything to market. However, if you can't be bothered averaging down, buy a few shares now and throw them away for a while and check back in a year to see where they're at.

If nothing else, this one deserves to be kept on the watch list.

Disclosure: No positions.

Print this article
Comments
22
You are viewing the first 20 comments View all »
     
  • In regards to SPNG, as an investor, you should all recognize a significant red flag of possible problems. On 2 separate occasions, the stock tumbled an absurd amount. On the first instance, the stock dropped from around 28 cents all the way down to about 8 cents in less than an hour and traded over 1 hundred million shares in that time. These numbers might not be exact as I'm recalling this from memory, but I can promise the numbers aren't that far off. A drop like that, with such high and unusual volume over such a short period of time could indicate some questionable action by insiders. The second is the huge drop we saw this week. That is not normal action for any stocks unless there is something going on behind the scenes we don't know about.

    Another red flag is how they advertise. They constantly advertise where the security is traded. This is NOT a normal practice. Almost all the news is released solely by the company and often coincides when the stock is down.

    I also find it interesting that they have yet to offer a proven winning product (it's all speculation right now), but they are already "exploring" many other uses for their sponge. Generally, successful businesses excel at one thing before branching out to others. Everything they say and do appear to be for the benefit of the stock price.

    This stock smells funny. Don't get caught when the bottom falls out!
    2009 Sep 10 10:31 AM Reply
  •  
  • What due dillegence can you do from Yahoo news? The only stories they have came from the company. I'm neither long nor short. I wouldn't waste my time shorting something hoping to gain 12 cents and I wouldn't buy something that loses over 50% of it's value in an hour!

    I did however do my due dillegence after all I saw were advertisements. At least what information is out there. There is no real information other than filings that were prepared by an accounting company that lost it certification (now they actually have a real accounting firm). Go ahead and look up their transfer agent. It's in the garage of a house in NJ.

    Have fun when the bottom drops out just like what happened to anyone that bought at .28 and found the same day closing price around .13 or those who bought in the high teens only to find the following day the stock dropped to 12 cents the next business day. That is not normal activity. I could care less what people invest in but if this helped one person, than I'm glad I posted.

    You seem to be a misinformed investor that believes everything a company says in it's own press releases. I hope I'm wrong because I don't take joy in other people losing money but this might be a good learning leason for you. There are better things to buy than something that has so many red flags. Enjoy!


    On Sep 10 12:09 PM BittyMack wrote:

    > The guy above me is short. Read the Yahoo Finance articles yourself
    > and do your due diligence. This company is making money hand over
    > fist, no debt and their reorders are strong. They are in 40,000 retail
    > locations (adding Walmart and Target soon) and will be in 100,000
    > locations by the end of this year. They made more this past 3 months
    > than they did last year. 70 Million to be exact. Do not trust posts
    > from people here. They are either short or long. ONLY read the news
    > reports or PR by the company, look at the filings. This one is a
    > big fat triple from .12. Bought more today. With the 10K coming out
    > latest by Tuesday morning, we will see a nice shoot up then. I could
    > go on forever about why to buy, but better to read the yahoo, finance,
    > news. That will tell you exactly what you need to know. Anyone who
    > takes the time to bash a stock is either short OR wanting to get
    > in lower. So, you can't trust them. Good luck and let me know when
    > you double your money. Oh, here is an article about recent reverse
    > splits - they have worked out great - it creates a short squeeze:
    >
    > www.marketwatch.com/st...
    >
    > VERY LONG SPNG
    2009 Sep 10 01:08 PM Reply
  •  
  • The orders and repeat orders that SPNG receives will show you that their products are in demand. The base technology is simple and east to use for new products. This isn't rocket science but it strongly appears to be a growth consumer area. With a growth curve like theirs, what more could you ask for? Is it easier to mine gold or make sponges? Is it easier to make LCD TVs or sponges? I only worry about the money spent in the sports area. They should branch out to get people who don't go to ball games.
    2009 Sep 10 04:15 PM Reply
  •  
  • Quick point of clarification: Trubion is partnering with Wyeth to develop TRU-015 (not TRU-105) and SBI-087. As noted, TRU-015 is Trubion's lead product candidate. It is being developed for the treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, including RA.

    Amy Petty
    Waggener Edstrom Worldwide for Trubion Pharmaceuticals
    2009 Sep 11 11:27 AM Reply
  •  
  • I am a new investor. I have made some decent money with sponges even after the big slide. I got greedy and wanted to see .30. o well.

    My question is what should I expect come sept 22 to stock prices. I think I understand that if prices is at .15 it would then be $15.Right? But will this slow growth of stock price greatly or what? Without the split I really need to see around .20 to feel I can sell and make any real money.

    Honest advice please.I may be a new investor but I know people and business real well. :)
    2009 Sep 11 01:40 PM Reply
  •  
  • bitty,

    could u explain what a "short squeeze" is please?
    2009 Sep 11 02:13 PM Reply
  •  
  • I seriously think that SPNG is already undervalued and that its true course should already be around 0.40!
    Be certain that when the shortages on 22 before the split, it could even reach 0.7-0.85!!
    Good luck!
    2009 Sep 11 04:45 PM Reply
  •  
  • I have considered investing in this....I just have a problem with how Profitable can a company that produces Sponges be and I remember a company 15 years ago that was a Capet cleaning company out of New York. They were doing Great and their stock numbers went out of site until it was discovered that they were cooking the books. Spongetech does advertise a lot which is Good, I have seen their ads in 10 different Major League Baseball Parks which give me a good feeling, but I still ask....how much can a Sponge selling company make. At todays PPS, I like it. At .15, I don't, but what do I know, I bought Washington Mutual. GLTA.
    2009 Sep 11 06:20 PM Reply
  •  
  • Where do you get that "All shorts have to settle their trades by then." I see nothing in SEC that "requires" it. The "short shares" would have the same 1:100 Split - Thus a Short of 50,000 pre split would be a short of 500 Post Split.



    On Sep 11 01:42 PM BittyMack wrote:

    > Yes, you need to expect a major short squeeze when the new cusip
    > number is given. All shorts have to settle their trades by then.
    > This will bring the stock price way up. You will get your .30 yet
    > and more.
    > Strong buy!
    2009 Sep 12 02:16 PM Reply
  •  
  • SPNG seems to be making very maturing moves, hiring well-respected accountants, R/S to upgrade bid for NASDAQ. Strong yoy earnings growth. Strategizing to flush out the naked shorts.

    I am a little worried about the Getfugu investment, and the behind-the-scenes opacity, but I feel that mgmt. is fully invested and looking to the future strategically.

    I will continue to buy on dips and think that this stock is a good gamble.
    2009 Sep 13 03:06 AM Reply
  •  
  • I have traded SPNG for several years. They are a always pumping this stock it is a classic pump and dump. Their sponges sound good only in ad's. The company has an habit of diluting share holders and will do it again. Be careful not an investment just a trade.
    2009 Sep 15 04:38 PM Reply
  •  
  • That is incorrect. You DO NOT NEED TO COVER during a reverse split. It is exactly the same as a long position. Do a little research before you give people investment advice.




    On Sep 14 07:22 AM BittyMack wrote:

    > When the cusip number is given, the shorts have to cover. All shares
    > are required to be settled with the new cusip number, so it will
    > induce a short squeeze. Shorts will be scrambling to buy back and
    > will shoot the price up.
    2009 Sep 15 04:42 PM Reply
  •  
  • You're dead on accurate. My only question is how long have they been around? I can only find info dating back to about Oct. 07.


    On Sep 15 04:38 PM sdfsdf wrote:

    > I have traded SPNG for several years. They are a always pumping this
    > stock it is a classic pump and dump. Their sponges sound good only
    > in ad's. The company has an habit of diluting share holders and will
    > do it again. Be careful not an investment just a trade.
    2009 Sep 15 04:50 PM Reply
  •  
  • I have a very hard time believing that the same people who were brilliant enough tomake the company synonymous with apple pie
    could be foolish and stupi enough to use an accounting firm that did not have a good reputation.

    In retrospect, if the SEC would not have forced them to redo the 2008, and if 2009 was ready, the reverse would have been done with and the stock would have already settled into a zone.
    Right now it is an absolute mess
    2009 Sep 25 04:26 PM Reply
  •  
  • If there is a huge naked short position that has never been covered
    and if the stock as a corporate entity would have its trading status suspended
    by the SEC and the OTCBB because of what the company was doing in response to what the naked shorts were doing
    because of a lack of action by the
    SEC who were informed about the naked short nightmare (incidentally the naked short fraud was responsable for last year's global financial collapse)
    then every naked short would be scott free , and could continue to fleece the world because the world is allowing the fleece to happen.
    Yes or no? Can you blame any company for playing dirty against the naked short consortium who they themselves are playing dirty as we speak?
    Should the interests of naked short fraud artists who are
    wearing $2000 suits and working for Hedge Funds be protected so they can continue to rob the world of its wealth?
    How could this happen?
    Because in this country and in this world ; we are capable of sending people to the moon, but we are too dam lazy to come up with an effective way to track down every last naked short ,no matter who he is, no matter who his friends are
    and put the crooks in jail to be treated and tried with as much respect as any terrorist.

    The SEC does not have enough manpower, money and teeth.
    If that is the truth, then I say that America does not have its priorities straight.
    Neither does the rest of the world.
    The naked short war puts every dollar earned, saved and invested at risk
    and everyday the naked shorts, the bad guys, are giving "us" a bloodbath
    worst than anything we have ever seen on any battlefield..

    It may be convenient not to do anything.
    It may cost a fortune to clean up the mess and to build new prisons
    and
    to put the crooks away for life, but the cost "not to do anything"
    will be astronomically beyond any amounts the entire world
    could ever borrow-to-fix
    if the world just allows
    "naked short terrorism to continue"
    That's where the 3rd world war is being waged.
    That's where effort money and more money
    should be put.
    We don't need a band-aide that costs 1000 trillion dollars.
    What we need is to stop "naked short terrorism in its tracks
    and we need to do it now"

    Make no mistake about it.
    SPNGE may be collaborating with the SEC
    but if the SEC expects to use this company
    as a fall-guy to cover up their ineffectiveness
    towards nakeD short terrorism
    they will discover very quickly
    that the marketing geniuses
    who put the American Cleaning COMPANY in every baseball stadium
    CAN/WILL also use their media savy
    to cause justified public embarrassment
    to an administration
    that continues to drag its a$$ on this issue
    but is looking to avoid the weight of its
    public responsability by putting the blame
    on a company trying to survive

    www.squidoo.com/sponge...
    2009 Sep 26 04:45 PM Reply
  •  
  • www.squidoo.com/if-i-w...
    2009 Sep 29 03:52 AM Reply
  •  
  • An invitation to participate in the first
    spongetech daytraders opinion poll.

    Purpose of the poll is to accumulate data, in the form of
    the clicked votes, real sentiment per question answered.

    You can return to the sight anytime to review on going poll results
    and you can also post questions that may be added to the poll's list of questions for the readership to answer with a click of the mouse.
    Thank you to all those who have participated.
    www.squidoo.com/sponge...
    2009 Sep 30 09:34 PM Reply
  •  
  • www.squidoo.com/IF-I-W...
    2009 Oct 01 11:18 AM Reply
  •  
  • I ordered the bath and tile sponge and keep it in my shower for the glass door.I use it every other day.No spraying or shaking powder.Just wash and rinse.What an awsome product.When the hit the wall marts and such.This company will take off.
    On Oct 01 11:18 AM fanofgoodstocks wrote:

    > www.squidoo.com/IF-I-W...
    2009 Oct 01 11:40 AM Reply
  •  
  • Shorting is a mechanism whose sole purpose is to manipulate stock prices for the benefit of a few who has the large resources to do so. It should be outlawed because it does not serve the purpose of the stock market, which is to promote competition through prosperity in the Free Enterprise System and to give everyone the opportunity to build the wealth of a nation. The gambling on shorts destroys the market to the advantage of a few and belongs on the crap tables of Las Vegas.
    2009 Oct 04 01:44 PM Reply
You've only read the first 20 comments