Seeking Alpha
About this author:

If you’ve been reading the popular press for the past 6 months, there’s been a slew of articles talking about deflation. I’ve been somewhat skeptical of the long term probability of deflation and have been investing in gold and commodities in anticipation of inflation. Looks like I was a little early to the game (which, on Wall Street is just the same as being wrong!).

Now however, it looks like we are warming up the printing presses and gold has hit $1,000 twice in a week in anticipation of future inflation. Legendary hedge fund manager John Paulson, who made $2.5 Billion last year from his trades, has been betting heavily on gold and his fund has nearly 50% of its assets in gold or gold-related investments like gold mining stocks and ETFs. The gold ETF, GLD reportedly makes up 30% of his fund! He has also taken a large 12% stake in AngloGold Ashanti (AU) making him the largest shareholder.

According to Reuters, this is not a bet on the company being acquired but rather a bet on inflationary pressures pushing up the price of gold. As opposed to the popular theory of rising prices being a cause of inflation, I like to consider it as an effect of inflation, which is caused by printing money, a side-effect of fiat currency. If you’re unaware about the effects of inflation and how it can ravage the economic (and social) structure of a society, I strongly recommend watching these excellent videos on hyper-inflation.

Another fund which has done well with the gold mining ETF is David Einhorn’s Greenlight Capital, which picked it up at the lowest point of last year and which has more than doubled its investment so far. They both join China in being bullish on gold. Between Paulson’s bullion dollar gold ETF purchase and China’s multi-billion gold bullion purchase, it’s no wonder gold prices have been trending upwards.

Print this article with comments

This article has 32 comments:

  •  
    I am betting on gold too!
    Sep 13 04:54 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Your comment about deflation and the popular press are key. All these articles in the mainstream press tell me one thing - deflation is not a problem, that the problem will be the opposite - inflation.
    Sep 13 04:25 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I'm certainly not betting on inflation, but one would be foolish to disregard the significant indications of rising prices.

    The governments media blitz is deflation. The actual real time inflation for August is 5% plus.

    Go figure, then place your bets.
    Sep 13 04:53 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Even moderate inflation (eg at a 5% 'official rate') plus real gold price increases could easily push it to $3k in three or four years. Lots of profit for the miners.
    Sep 13 06:10 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Ron Paul is an alarmist but (since I don't know that much about the markets) I think he's right. Makes me wonder why youtube removed his video (that I favorited). Perhaps we should all quit paying registration and insurance... and buy gold instead!
    Sep 13 06:34 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I guess I'm looking at the wrong stuff. Everywhere I look, people are expecting inflation, and even hyper inflation. I dont think the deflation is done because banks are done imploding! In other words, I think you're still early.
    Sep 13 07:15 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    All this money is being pumped into commodities, but without wage inflation who is going to buy them. From Felix Salmon's article last week on depressing income stats: US median household income $51,295 in 1998, $50,303 in 2008.
    Sep 13 08:16 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Anthony,

    Asia, Europe and Russia love gold, likely more than Americans.
    Sep 13 08:23 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    On Sep 13 06:34 PM fireofenergy wrote:

    > Ron Paul is an alarmist but (since I don't know that much about the
    > markets) I think he's right.

    You get 50% on that test... barely a "pass".

    Ron Paul is not an alarmist, and he's right.
    Sep 13 09:00 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Anothy

    Got C-H-I-N-D-I-A ?
    Sep 13 09:40 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    So you are basically a supply side monetist? I am going to do the smart thing and admit I don't know. So, I am going to ride the fence until I get my head around it, riding the fence being 50/50 for and against the dollar. From what I observe the inflation mongers seem to command the air waves. Meanwhile, the US has actually found a little religion and the savings rate is increasing which strengthens the dollar, international speculative money still flows into treasuries way more than SDR's this also strengthens the dollar, consumption of imported(all) goods is way down also strengthens the dollar. Huge demand decreases in oil lend pressure to it also indirectly strengthening the dollar. A general lack of demand environment. Also, the winding down of our crapass wars will help bring in the balance sheet. I don't see inflation without demand. Who knows maybe we will have a stupendous recovery and demand will pick up and then maybe inflation. About the only inflationary thing I see here is that we printed a ton of money and gave it to the banks. I do think once we start pulling in our support to banks and money gets harder to borrow we could see some increased interest rates.
    Sep 14 12:35 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    gold is hitting $1000-mark mainly because of the falling dollar. The greenback is not going to stay low forever, and it will bring down gold and other commodities when it eventually rises. Till then enjoy the glitter! Paulson wouldn't be investing in gold at these prices, so shouldn't you. jmho. In fact, when gold returns to the 900 level or below in a few months, we'll see news articles that Paulson was selling loads of Au investments around the 1000-mark...
    Sep 14 01:34 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Is it a bet on inflation, or strategic asset diversification to protect existing equity value? Gold doesn't have to move much higher to make diversification into AU a sound hedge as an asset manager, rather than an outright bet on the commodity driving ridiculously higher.

    I don't buy into the hyper-inflation myth because I believe asset deflation is far more real as a systemic risk than people recognize. Inflation means that housing prices would have to go up in value over time which, if that were the case, most people would be happy to drink from the kool-aid once again.

    To be in gold doesn't necessarily mean you believe it's going to $2,000 or $3,000 as infomercials on television have you think by pumpin' "semi-gold composite" coins!

    To be that bullish on gold doesn't mean you're betting on inflation--it means you're betting on the collapse of the entire global economy. This strikes me as underestimating global policy that injected liquidity into the system. And if this were the case, it's not inflation or hyper-inflation that is the risk--it's a currency collapse!

    Remember that all currencies trade relative to one another and with the entire global financial system in crisis, the U.S. dollar will hold up much better than people would have you believe.

    And the real risk remains global in nature due to a domino effect, if one falls they all fall, so where would you rather be if decoupling doesn't realize itself?

    Where would you rather be in currencies if the entire macro-economy worsened? Euros in a potential dismantling of the EU? Loons or Aussie dollars tied to commodity infrastructure demand--which requires bullish growth? Zimbabwean trillion-dollar notez?

    The U.S. dollar is still the currency of choice when the world panics. And last I checked, it's hard as hell to buy groceries or gas with gold fillings and chains.
    Sep 14 01:40 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Actually, buying gold IS NOT betting on inflation necessarily. Gold does very well during every Night-Cycle in American history:

    Night Cycles:
    2001-2019
    1965-1983
    1929 - 1947
    1893 - 1911
    1857 - 1875....

    Gold is scheduled to do well through 2019, deflation or inflation...with deflation being the most likely scenario.
    Sep 14 01:40 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I agree. We've already had 18 years of inflation. Now its deflation's turn.


    On Sep 14 01:40 AM C.S. Jefferson wrote:

    > Is it a bet on inflation, or strategic asset diversification to protect
    > existing equity value? Gold doesn't have to move much higher to
    > make diversification into AU a sound hedge as an asset manager, rather
    > than an outright bet on the commodity driving ridiculously higher.
    >
    >
    > I don't buy into the hyper-inflation myth because I believe asset
    > deflation is far more real as a systemic risk than people recognize.
    > Inflation means that housing prices would have to go up in value
    > over time which, if that were the case, most people would be happy
    > to drink from the kool-aid once again.
    >
    > To be in gold doesn't necessarily mean you believe it's going to
    > $2,000 or $3,000 as infomercials on television have you think by
    > pumpin' "semi-gold composite" coins!
    >
    > To be that bullish on gold doesn't mean you're betting on inflation--it
    > means you're betting on the collapse of the entire global economy.
    > This strikes me as underestimating global policy that injected liquidity
    > into the system. And if this were the case, it's not inflation or
    > hyper-inflation that is the risk--it's a currency collapse!
    >
    > Remember that all currencies trade relative to one another and with
    > the entire global financial system in crisis, the U.S. dollar will
    > hold up much better than people would have you believe.
    >
    > And the real risk remains global in nature due to a domino effect,
    > if one falls they all fall, so where would you rather be if decoupling
    > doesn't realize itself?
    >
    > Where would you rather be in currencies if the entire macro-economy
    > worsened? Euros in a potential dismantling of the EU? Loons or
    > Aussie dollars tied to commodity infrastructure demand--which requires
    > bullish growth? Zimbabwean trillion-dollar notez?
    >
    > The U.S. dollar is still the currency of choice when the world panics.
    > And last I checked, it's hard as hell to buy groceries or gas with
    > gold fillings and chains.
    Sep 14 04:31 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Ron Paul is a man of common sense. People of common sense understand that. Most of our culture and certainly the press have their heads buried in the sand.


    On Sep 13 06:34 PM fireofenergy wrote:

    > Ron Paul is an alarmist but (since I don't know that much about the
    > markets) I think he's right. Makes me wonder why youtube removed
    > his video (that I favorited). Perhaps we should all quit paying registration
    > and insurance... and buy gold instead!
    Sep 14 07:14 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    You are actually betting on deflation even though you don't know it!
    Despite the mythology of gold, it actually has virtually no correlation with the cpi, Gold has had long periods of negative return while inflation was positive ( 1980's).. The only period when gold has consistently done well is during recessions when the inflation recedes or actually goes negative.
    Sep 14 08:54 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    So, gold is going to decouple from other commodities? Possible short-term, but if gold is to remain that high commodity traders will move down to other commodities that are underperforming on their traditional price ratio to gold. At that point my previous comment is again important: "All this money is being pumped into commodities, but without wage inflation who is going to buy them. From Felix Salmon's article last week on depressing income stats: US median household income $51,295 in 1998, $50,303 in 2008."

    And then in response to China and India's growth, which I don't doubt can remain in upper single digits, I think Philip Davis has a good perspective, "China and India, which account for roughly 40% of the world’s population, consumed about $2.5 trillion of goods and services. The US, with 4.5% of the world’s population, has $10Tn of consumer spending. A 10% drop in US consumption would need to be offset by a 40% increase in China and India’s consumption - it’s not going to happen, folks! Just this weekend, in Member chat, our main topic was dead and dying malls (anecdotes by members) and poor retail sales. China can’t keep manufacturing goods if no one is buying them - Economics 101."
    Sep 14 09:17 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    A combination of Gold and Dividend-Paying Stocks has been a good way to play both inflation and deflation in the past and I think it will continue to work well in the future.
    Personally, I do not think that a Zimbabwe style runaway inflation is going to happen although inflation is in the cards if only because of all the printing going on. Deflation can easily happen also as the economy trys to run the narrow line between the two. On the other hand, Peter Lynch said many years ago "If you spend 13 minutes a year trying to predict the economy, you have wasted 10 minutes." I do not know if it actually matters if either one or both happen anytime soon. I have a balanced portfolio with Precious Metals, Bonds and Dividend-Paying Stocks with a record of 5+ years of paying them and I am comfortable and doing well over all kinds of markets with it over the years.
    Sep 14 10:53 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Once you invest a substantial portion of your wealth in gold, or anything else, it gets a lot harder to be objective about its prospects.

    www.lewrockwell.com/no...
    Sep 14 11:49 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    What the hell is a night cycle? You are suggesting gold goes up at night? WTF are you talking about?

    You made this crap up didn't you?


    On Sep 14 01:40 AM Michael Clark wrote:

    > Actually, buying gold IS NOT betting on inflation necessarily. Gold
    > does very well during every Night-Cycle in American history:
    >
    > Night Cycles:
    > 2001-2019
    > 1965-1983
    > 1929 - 1947
    > 1893 - 1911
    > 1857 - 1875....
    >
    > Gold is scheduled to do well through 2019, deflation or inflation...with
    > deflation being the most likely scenario.
    Sep 14 01:04 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Good points, Anthony. India certainly isn't buying gold this year.

    "Demand will fall more," Suresh Hundia, president of the Bombay Bullion Association, said. "Only those who are short will buy at these prices."

    He estimated gold imports to fall to 350 tonnes in 2009 from 523 tonnes last year.
    in.reuters.com/article...

    According to Daman Prakash, a director with MNC Bullion, high prices have kept consumers away, with festival sales this year being 60%-65% below last year's sales.

    In a glaring example of how high prices have hit demand, Chennai, a major market in southern India, is likely to import only around 1-2 tons of gold in the festival months of August to November compared with 6-7 tons last festival season. Average imports during the festival season has been 10-12 tons in previous years before poor demand hit imports since last year.

    In the next three to four months, there are about 30 days Indians consider auspicious buying gold.

    During the January-August period, India's gold imports fell to 91.6 metric tons compared with 261 tons in the same period last year, according to preliminary data from the Bombay Bullion Association.
    online.wsj.com/article...

    On Sep 14 09:17 AM Anthony B wrote:

    > So, gold is going to decouple from other commodities? Possible short-term,
    > but if gold is to remain that high commodity traders will move down
    > to other commodities that are underperforming on their traditional
    > price ratio to gold. At that point my previous comment is again
    > important: "All this money is being pumped into commodities, but
    > without wage inflation who is going to buy them. From Felix Salmon's
    > article last week on depressing income stats: US median household
    > income $51,295 in 1998, $50,303 in 2008."
    >
    > And then in response to China and India's growth, which I don't doubt
    > can remain in upper single digits, I think Philip Davis has a good
    > perspective, "China and India, which account for roughly 40% of the
    > world’s population, consumed about $2.5 trillion of goods and services.
    > The US, with 4.5% of the world’s population, has $10Tn of consumer
    > spending. A 10% drop in US consumption would need to be offset by
    > a 40% increase in China and India’s consumption - it’s not going
    > to happen, folks! Just this weekend, in Member chat, our main topic
    > was dead and dying malls (anecdotes by members) and poor retail sales.
    > China can’t keep manufacturing goods if no one is buying them - Economics
    > 101."
    Sep 14 01:15 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    gold is NOT a commodity u ignoramus
    Sep 14 02:33 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    All previous historical references to the use of gold as an inflationary hedge are invalid to our current situation. The U.S. dollar has never been tested in the last century as it is being tested now and it has never been challenged as the international currency and monetary reserve around the world as it is being challenged now by both Russia and China. And the drop in its value and the rise in the PM's costs attest to the stress on the dollar. The flight to this meta-commodity, gold, for capital preservation, will force its price higher and higher regardless of the decline of purchases in India or for Ramadan or Christmas. Gold and silver are the sublime de-facto currency of the world and this fact is not lost on those who do have the money to stash in its safe haven. No doubt that there will be pullbacks in the PM prices caused by good economic news and possibly even caused by central banks wanting to support the dollar. But now that the dollar is challenged and the prospects of inflation from the stimulus spending are at hand, the awakening public will invest more and more into PMs.
    Additionally, in my opinion, M&As will become rampant and large companies, preying upon competitors' weaknesses, will buy them out, strip their customer bases and assets, and close them down. We will see major names drop from the indexes and some will even belly up from the lack of consumer spending. With the unemployment skyrocketing next year, the government will be forced to make drastic revisions to support the unemployed, increasing the burden on the dollar's value. The PMs will be the only safe recourse for such a scenario.
    Sep 14 02:45 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Commodity - a product that is the same no matter who produces it

    Gold, Au, is an element in the periodic table of elements, no room for differentiation there. Is your gold made from superior quality protons, neutrons, and electrons!


    On Sep 14 02:33 PM Goods wrote:

    > gold is NOT a commodity u ignoramus
    Sep 14 02:53 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    In fairness Paulson bought this in the 2nd quarter.We have no knowledge if hes taken some profits off the table since he bought in. I like this article though well done
    Sep 14 03:01 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    In fairness Paulson bought this in the 2nd quarter.We have no knowledge if hes taken some profits off the table since he bought in. I like this article though well done
    Sep 14 03:01 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I've been writing about these ideas for some time and tend to forget that some people are new to this board. Here's a draft of a book I'm writing. It has the whole framework mapped out: the basic idea is that every living form passes through day and night cycles, as the earth does. Periods of activity, growth, expansion, empire, science, more masculine qualities -- this is the Day. And periods of rest, contraction, diisintegration, religion, more feminine qualities -- this is the Night. Economic cycles do the same.

    These ideas are actually very old. Hindus write about Brahma breathing out the world, a time of expansion of the bubble of the world, and that was a 'Day of Brahma'; and then Brahma breathed in the world, a 'Night of Brahma'. Economic expansion corresponds to the Day of Brahma idea; economic contraction and depression correspond to the Night of Brahma idea.

    Economic cycles in American history seem to correspond to 36 year cycles, 18 for a day, 18 for a night. Stocks do wonderfully during a day cycle, and gold does poorly; stocks do poorly during a Night-Cycle, but gold, historically, seems to do well.

    The idea is that everything goes through a spring (a fertility), a summer (a growth), an autumn (a harvesting), and a Winter (rest). These are very old ideas, really -- and they are the basis of all religious philosophy.


    www.hoalantrangallery....


    On Sep 14 01:04 PM Maxe Paul wrote:

    > What the hell is a night cycle? You are suggesting gold goes up at
    > night? WTF are you talking about?
    >
    > You made this crap up didn't you?
    Sep 14 04:00 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The 1970's was an odd period, because we had a depression and inflation at the same time. We had unemployment at 13 % and runaway inflation caused by the Oil crisis.

    But gold actually ran crazy at the end of this Night Cycle. Penny gold mining stocks went through the roof. Everyone wanted gold -- there was panic buying.

    Here's a few examples of what happened in later 1970-80: Lion Mines, selling at $.07/share in 1975 was selling at $380/share in 1980. Bankeno: 1975, $1.25/share; 1980: $430/share. Wharf Resources: 1975, $.40/1980: $560. Steep Rock: 1975: $.93/share; 1980: $560/share. Azure Resources: 1975: $.05/share; 1980: $109/share. Only a strange, very abnormal market will see these kind of panic-buying returns: but we are now in another Dark Age Cycle and Ben Bernanke is trying to make sure that such buying panic comes in to the precious metals markets again.

    I have charts of historical gold in Day/Night cycles at this instablog

    seekingalpha.com/insta...


    On Sep 14 08:54 AM Sterling Hayden wrote:

    > You are actually betting on deflation even though you don't know
    > it!
    > Despite the mythology of gold, it actually has virtually no correlation
    > with the cpi, Gold has had long periods of negative return while
    > inflation was positive ( 1980's).. The only period when gold has
    > consistently done well is during recessions when the inflation recedes
    > or actually goes negative.
    Sep 14 04:15 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The article is interesting but I think the author fails in one area: gold prices are inversely linked more to the US$ than to inflation. While the dollar usually drops in value during an inflationary period, it is not an absolute given; it really depends more on the level or degree of inflation relative to other factors like productivity and interest rates relative to those of major trading partners. So, the question is whether we are heading into a period of prolonged dollar devaluation relative to other global currencies. In such an environment, gold would rise, not only as a hedge against currency inflation, but in order to maintain its current value in other currencies relative to the dollar. Gold would not go up in price denominated in currencies that increase in value relative to the dollar. For instance, if the dollar declined in value against the Yen from 95 Yen to the dollar to a level of 80 Yen to the dollar, it would require more dollars to buy an ounce of gold. But it would still require approximately the same number of Yen to buy an ounce of gold at both points in time.

    The thing to remember is that if the US$ declines in value relative to other currencies, gold will not rise in price when denominated in the stronger currencies. So, expectation of increased demand for gold in the U.S. is based upon an expectation that the US$ is going to drop. The investment in gold will simply allow the U.S. investor to retain his/her buying power as all other prices will have increased due to the lower value of the US$. That being the case, one could just as well be investing in other commodities for which global demand is expected to rise. In the end, relative price is really a product of supply/demand.
    Sep 14 05:24 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    OK, you are Martin Armstrongs love child, i get it now!
    No problem, carry on.


    On Sep 14 04:00 PM Michael Clark wrote:

    > I've been writing about these ideas for some time and tend to forget
    > that some people are new to this board. Here's a draft of a book
    > I'm writing. It has the whole framework mapped out: the basic idea
    > is that every living form passes through day and night cycles, as
    > the earth does. Periods of activity, growth, expansion, empire, science,
    > more masculine qualities -- this is the Day. And periods of rest,
    > contraction, diisintegration, religion, more feminine qualities --
    > this is the Night. Economic cycles do the same.
    >
    > These ideas are actually very old. Hindus write about Brahma breathing
    > out the world, a time of expansion of the bubble of the world, and
    > that was a 'Day of Brahma'; and then Brahma breathed in the world,
    > a 'Night of Brahma'. Economic expansion corresponds to the Day of
    > Brahma idea; economic contraction and depression correspond to the
    > Night of Brahma idea.
    >
    > Economic cycles in American history seem to correspond to 36 year
    > cycles, 18 for a day, 18 for a night. Stocks do wonderfully during
    > a day cycle, and gold does poorly; stocks do poorly during a Night-Cycle,
    > but gold, historically, seems to do well.
    >
    > The idea is that everything goes through a spring (a fertility),
    > a summer (a growth), an autumn (a harvesting), and a Winter (rest).
    > These are very old ideas, really -- and they are the basis of all
    > religious philosophy.
    >
    >
    > www.hoalantrangallery....
    Sep 14 09:31 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    www.elliottwave.com/fr...

    The herd is with the inflation call... look no further than market action. Don't pretend to be contrarian when the facts are otherwise. Inflation is the debtors dream... and we have a lot of debtors in this country. Do markets typically like to reward the crowd? No.
    Sep 14 09:50 PM | Link | Reply