Does True Competition Among Credit Card Issuers Exist? 6 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
John B just left me an interesting comment on the subject of credit cards:
Your statement on banks needing to focus on competing, rather than pages of agate type is correct. but is there a substantially large enough market of major credit card issuers to sustain true competition? I don’t think so. And probably not in a more regulated environment.
It’s a good question, so I used the data here to chart the share of the credit card market held by the biggest issuers. The percentages aren’t of the total market, just of the top 15 issuers, but it’s close enough:

It’s pretty clear from this chart that between them, the big credit card issuers absolutely have the ability to set prices. It’s also clear just by looking at their marketing materials that none of them is particularly interested in competing with the others by reducing the maximum interest rate that they charge.
In most contexts, a chart like the one above would I think bespeak a competitive market. But in credit cards, I’m not so sure. On the other hand, do we want credit cards to be highly competitive? I’m not sure that we do: what we really want is for credit cards to be transparent.
At the margin, if the card issuers bring down their interest rates, that will only result in even more people borrowing even more money on their credit cards. But doing so is nearly always the worst possible way of borrowing money, except for maybe going to the loan shark down the street. Ideally we want the whole credit-card market to shrink, and for banks to go back to offering personal loans.
Related Articles
|




















Moreover, the statement that "we want the whole credit-card market to shrink" strikes me as odd. Who is this "we"? This is a market economy in which decisions are made by individuals, not some collective "we". If I feel a credit card suits my purposes, then I use it; if not, then I don't. I don't need some policy wonk making decisions for me.
as far as transparency is concerned, i'm certain that mr angry banker can read the journal of medicine and start performing brain surgery.
as far as the credit card companies shrinking, only people strung out on debt for survival should be paying usurious interest rates. like smoking cigarettes, the public should be weaned off credit cards. it's painful for a while but healthy in the long run.
disclosure: reformed credit card junkie. been clean for almost
2 1/2 years and only use debit cards.
Given that most credit card issuers are losing money right now, and have for the last year or so, it is hard to characterize the sector as lacking competition in any economic sense.
Folks would benefit from trying to separate their personal "beefs" with these companies from their economic/investment analysis
Their losses are not due to excessive competition!
On Sep 17 03:06 PM It Figures wrote:
> The most transparent and objective measure of competition in an industry
> is the profitability of the participants. Sustained above average
> profitability is a sign of lack of competition - think drug companies
> in the '80's and '90's, or MSFT a decade ago.
>
> Given that most credit card issuers are losing money right now,
> and have for the last year or so, it is hard to characterize the
> sector as lacking competition in any economic sense.
>
> Folks would benefit from trying to separate their personal "beefs"
> with these companies from their economic/investment analysis