Seeking Alpha
We cover over 5K calls/quarter
Profile| Send Message|
( followers)

InnerWorkings, Inc. (NASDAQ:INWK)

Q2 2013 Earnings Call

August 8, 2013 5:30 pm ET

Executives

Eric Belcher - CEO

Joe Busky - CFO

Analysts

Nate Brochmann - William Blair & Company

Randy Hugen - Feltl and Company

Matthew Kempler - Sidoti & Company

George Sutton - Craig Hallum

Operator

Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the InnerWorkings Second Quarter 2013 Earnings Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will follow at that time.

I would now like to turn the call over to your host Joe Busky. Please go ahead.

Joe Busky

Thanks, Patrick, and hello everyone, and thank you for joining us on our second quarter 2013 earnings call. This is Joe Busky and I’m the Chief Financial Officer at InnerWorkings. And joining me on the call today is our Chief Executive Officer, Eric Belcher.

Before we begin, I’d like to note this call will include forward-looking statements related to future results that are made pursuant to the Safe Harbor provisions of the federal securities laws. These statements are subject to a variety of risks, uncertainties and assumptions that may cause actual results to differ materially from those stated or implied by the forward-looking statements.

Any forward-looking statements represent our views only as of today and should not be relied upon as representing our views as of any subsequent date. Listeners to the call are advised to review our SEC filings, including the risk factors contained in our most recent Form 10-K. This call will discuss, among other financial performance measures, non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA and non-GAAP adjusted operating cash flow, which are non-GAAP financial performance measures.

Please refer to the company’s earnings release issued earlier today for a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the nearest comparable GAAP measures. This call is intended for investors and analysts who may not be reproduced in the media in whole or in part without our prior consent.

I would start by covering the financial results and then I’ll turn it over to Eric to discuss the second quarter activities and then, of course, we’ll open it up for your questions.

So, in total, for Q2, we generated revenue of $211 million, an increase of 5% compared with the second quarter of 2012. And walking through the growth table on the press release you can see the growth in the second quarter was primarily attributable to $20 million or 10% of organic new enterprise account growth. Middle Market revenues were flat to Q2 last year due to lower than projected results from inside sales.

In addition to our organic growth, we realized $6 million of incremental revenue growth from acquisition and excluding an $8 million drop in revenue due to a previously announced loss of a portion of a significant customer order this year. Total company same-customer spending in the second quarter was down 4% versus Q2, 2012.

Now, for the six month period ended June 30, our revenue was up $25 million or 6.5% versus the prior year period. This growth was driven by $38 million of organic new enterprise growth plus $8 million of acquisitive growth. This growth was offset by $8 million of revenue decline from the previously announced loss of a portion of a significant customer and a 4% or $14 million same-customer spend drop.

Now, the same-customer spending for the Europe and Latin American regions have performed as expected, but our U.S. same-customer spending is down approximately 2% compared to our original expectation, which was for this spend to remain flat versus the prior year.

Middle Market was up $2 million for the first half of the year largely driven by growth in inside sales, and while the inside sales area has grown our expectations were higher, and Eric will touch on some initiatives we are pursuing to stimulate additional growth in the group moving forward.

Looking at our sales channel mix for the quarter, our enterprise channel accounted for 77% of revenue and middle market was 23% which is up slightly from our 75%, 25% mix in the second quarter of last year.

Gross profit for the quarter increased $400,000 from $47.8 million to $48.2 million. From a gross margin standpoint at 22.8% we had a 90 basis points decrease in the second quarter due primarily to enterprise, middle market mix as well as by timing as our six month gross profit margin is only 20 basis points lower than the same period last year.

Turning to expenses, SG&A expense was $42.3 million or 20% of revenue in the second quarter versus $37.6 million or 18.7% of revenue in the year earlier period. This increased SG&A expense was driven by, one, additional cost to expand to new geographies ahead of the revenue; two, the revenue shortfall from the previously announced customer loss; three, from lower than projected inside sales results; and four, from increased professional fees of $900,000 due primarily to the defense of the e-LYNXX patent case. These impacts were partially offset by a release of $1.6 million of contingent consideration liability.

For the six month period ended June 30, SG&A as a percent as a revenue was up 210 basis points to 20.2% for the same reasons just mentioned regarding the quarter’s SG&A.

Now, regarding the e-LYNXX patent case we received some very good news on July 25. The court granted our motion for summary judgment. This means the court has agreed that InnerWorkings did not infringe the patents-in-suit and that a trial is unnecessary. As a result, we do not expect to incur professional fees in the same magnitude in the second half of the year.

EBITDA, adjusted to exclude stock-based compensation and contingent liability consideration expense, was $5.4 million for the second quarter compared to $11.9 million in the year earlier period. Due to the same reasons just mentioned regarding SG&A, we do expect margins to improve in the second half of the year due to the new enterprise business wins, contribution from recent acquisitions we’ve done and just the overall seasonality of the business.

The GAAP diluted earnings per share for the quarter were $0.04 versus $0.09 in the year earlier period. The drop in GAAP EPS year-over-year in the quarter is driven by a $0.02 greater loss in inside sales, a $0.02 greater loss in the EMEA region due to expansion efforts into new geographies was little or no revenue, a $0.01 drop in the loss of a portion of a significant customer in the U.S., and a $0.01 negative impact from increased professional fees in the U.S. mostly legal fees to defend in the e-LYNXX patent case.

Moving on to our liquidity and balance sheet. We had $3.9 million of adjusted operating cash flow in the second quarter of this year as compared to adjusted cash of $800,000 in Q2, 2012.

For the six month ended June 30, we had $10.3 million of adjusted operating cash flow versus a $2.5 million in cash outflow in the prior year period. This compares well to our $11.2 million of current year-to-date adjusted EBITDA. Driving this was our DSOs continue to improve in the second quarter. Since December 2012 the total AR, unbilled AR balance is flat despite sales being up 7% and as evidenced in our time to invoice efforts are paying off, the unbilled AR balance dropped again in Q2 and remain flat or dropped for the fourth consecutive quarter despite the rising revenue.

At June 30, our net debt increased by $4 million from Q1 to $64 million. We had $5 million of cash outflows for new acquisitions and $1 million of earn-out payments for previous acquisitions. Second half earn-out payments are expected to be approximately $3 million. Our gross debt to leverage ratio is at 2.2 times trailing 12 month adjusted EBITDA and we’ve retained $86 million of available liquidity. We anticipate our leverage ratio returning to our internal goal of 1.5 to 2 times by the end of the year.

Now, looking at our guidance for the remainder of 2013, we are increasing our full year revenue guidance from $900 million to $930 million to $910 million to $940 million of revenue which represents 14% to 18% growth for the year. And we are reaffirming our diluted GAAP earnings per share guidance of $0.45 to $0.50.

Now, regarding the revenue guidance, the projected revenue from our second quarter tuck-in acquisitions and our recent acquisition of EYELEVEL is expected to be partially offset by lower inside sales results and lower same-customer spending projections in the United States. Regarding our EPS guidance the projected profit from our recent acquisitions is expected to be fully offset by the same factors impacting revenue guidance.

In addition, our GAAP EPS guidance contemplates either improved performance in the second half of the year by the large company we acquired in Europe in 2011 or the potential release of contingent consideration liability of service underperformance. As a reminder, these contingent considerations have been structured so that our actual purchase price paid depends on performance. If our acquired partners grow and perform well our results will benefit from these additional earnings, but if they don’t perform as well as we anticipated we release some of the contingent consideration and regain these earnings. The structure makes sure that the purchase price is fair to both parties and has proven to be very effective over our history.

And so, with that, I’m going to turn the call over to Eric.

Eric Belcher

Okay. Thanks, Joe, and good evening everyone. I’ll first touch on the areas that fell below our expectations for the quarter, same-customer spending and inside sales. Then, I’ll take you through the momentum we’re experiencing with our enterprise business where we’re seeing growth both by winning new clients and within our existing client base. And finally, I’ll cover our recent M&A activity.

So, first our inside sales operation. While revenues for this group have grown 15% year-to-date our expectations were even higher. We’ve recently reorganized the management of the group which has already made an impact. And we are in discussions with the strategic channel partner that would significantly enhance our client acquisition capability. With both the internal changes we’ve made and the dialog we’re having with a potential channel partner we remain very confident about the play in the long-term growth of our business.

Regarding our same-customer spending, as Joe mentioned, we're down a few percentage points in the second quarter. This follows broad print industry trends but doesn’t diminish our print management model and our ability to take market share. In fact, now that corporations are devoting more internal resources to new media platforms, the benefits have turned into a solution like ours to manage their printed materials becomes that much more compelling.

And on that note, we are excited to announce that this week we were awarded a new large agreement from Mondelez, one of the world’s largest snack companies. Under the agreement, we’ll manage $45 million a year of annual spending in Brazil. Our scope of work will include management of their point-of-sale materials and promotional products as well as sales promotions, events, and sponsorships.

This award represents one of the largest contracts in our company’s history. It’s a terrific win for our company and our Latin American region, a segment of our business that grew 50% in the second quarter. I couldn’t be more proud of our team in Brazil and throughout Latin America led by Alex Castroneves.

And one of the most exciting aspects of the Mondelez win is that the agreement includes new categories such as events and below the line agency spend which demonstrate the applicability of our model beyond our traditional product categories and into the broader marketing supply chain.

Establishing our presence in Brazil last year required the trust of our shareholders as we made a substantial investment in the future of that region. Today’s announcement along with the potential for Brazil that we see moving forward demonstrates the value we’re creating with these investments.

Looking more broadly at the Latin American Continent, we’ve reached an agreement with 3M and we’ve begun doing work on behalf of (Dannon). By year end, the region’s annual revenue run rate will be approximately $150 million compared to the $43 million at revenue we recognized in 2011, and there's plenty of opportunity in front of us.

In the United States, we signed a major agreement with the Hearst-owned Houston Chronicle to manage advertiser inserts, direct mail and specialty publications along with the enterprise contract we signed with (inaudible) last year and a few other recent contracts with smaller publishers. This has become a strong and growing vertical for us.

We recently reorganized some key personnel within our business to capitalize on our momentum in this sector and accelerated growth led by Harris Atkins. I couldn’t be more impressed by Harris and his team and their potential moving forward.

Another new agreement we signed in the second quarter with a major U.S. based financial services firm carrying over $80 billion of assets under management. Under this agreement, we’ll manage the client’s commercial print and marketing collateral. As exciting as it is to bring new major clients like these into our portfolio, we’re also having success expanding with our existing clients in the new geographies. So, for instance, we recently received the commitment from Unilever to begin supporting them in Russia and in Turkey. And we’ve reached agreements with Reckitt Benckiser to support them in Brazil, South Africa and Spain. We expect to realize approximately $20 million of incremental annual revenue from these commitments alone when they are fully implemented.

Moving into these and other new markets require some upfront investment which we won’t shy away from, given our firm belief that the future of our company and the industry we’re pioneering will require a global support infrastructure.

All right, turning to our M&A activity. M&A continues to be a proven vehicle for us in terms of acquiring the top talent in our industry, strengthening our capabilities and our global footprint, as well as gaining access to major new clients. We completed two small tuck-in deals in the second quarter one with a Baltimore-based promotional products company and one with a UK-based luxury packaging provider. We welcome these entrepreneurs and their teams to InnerWorkings and we look forward to long term successful partnerships.

And last week, we announced the acquisition of EYELEVEL, a growing provider of in-store permanent displays. EYELEVEL is based in Prague and Portland, Oregon with additional operations in Australia, Brazil, China, Russia and the United Kingdom. Their impressive client roster includes companies such as Adidas, North Face, Vans and Calvin Klein. In addition to the access we gained to these new clients, we’ve added some very ambitious and creative entrepreneurs to our team. EYELEVEL’s capabilities and geographical footprint strengthen our position as a leading global provider of high end permanent retail displays, a category that complements our core print and promotional management services. Welcome to Filip, Ed, Tomas and the rest of the EYELEVEL team; its great to have you on board.

So, in closing, while our growth for the first half of the year was modest by our standards, the long-term outlook for the company is never been brighter. The demand for our enterprise solution continues to grow as evidenced by the new business we’re winning with large corporations around the globe. Our team is as upbeat as ever as we remain focused on profitable long-term growth and our continued penetration of a huge addressable global market.

So, Patrick, let’s open up the call for questions now please.

Question-and-Answer Session

Operator

(Operator Instructions) Our first question comes from Nate Brochmann with William Blair & Company. Your line is open.

Nate Brochmann - William Blair & Company

Good afternoon guys.

Joe Busky

Hi, Nate.

Nate Brochmann - William Blair & Company

I want to talk a little bit in terms of just that same-customer spend kind of fall off a little bit this kind of second quarter in a row where its been a little bit weaker after being pretty flat to up. Are you seeing that and any specific is that kind of tied the Europe, is that across the board, is that any specific sectors or companies? And then also kind of tangentially to that, Eric, you listed a what of new business wins and I was just wondering collectively if you could share what the run rate of some of the greater penetration plus the new wins collectively is that maybe help offset that.

Joe Busky

Okay, Nate, its Joe here. Let me take the same customer spend question first and then I’ll shoot it over to Eric to finish with the other part of the question. The expectations that we had at the beginning of the year for same customer spend were that Europe would be roughly down approximately 10% versus prior year. The LatAm region will be up 4%, 5% versus the prior year and that the U.S. would be flat. And the Europe and Latin American regions have largely performed to those expectations. We haven't seen any significant variance from those expectations. U.S., however, is down about 2% for the first six months.

And so, with the part of the guidance change that we made just today is to include an assumption that that same customer spend in the U.S. will continue to be about down 2% in the second half of the year as well. And we see that as largely in line with what we’re seeing in the industry with other players in the print market and it’s based on discussions that we have with our customers and the forecast we’re looking at we think that’s a pretty good realistic assumption for the second half of the year.

Nate Brochmann - William Blair & Company

Okay. Thanks.

Eric Belcher

All right, Nate, and then to your second question regarding the run rate associated with the string of wins we’ve had recently. First of all, you are correct in pointing out that this has been this last few months have been a very good run for us with large new clients coming onboard all around the globe as well as quite a bit of new work coming from our long-term clients as we continue to grow with them.

We gave a couple of numbers, the annual rate associated with the new Mondelez win. In terms of how that will ramp up over the course of the next three to six months it will be very similar to the way in which historical large enterprise contracts have come online but this will be a process of a matter of a quarter or two prior to us getting to that full run rate. And we also mentioned with the additional work coming from Unilever and Reckitt Benckiser that when that is implemented, again in the coming months, that we’ll be looking at additional $20 million.

And then on top of that, we’ve got a handful of wins, which create once again more upside. We haven’t put exactly what that number is but I will say that our goal overall has been 15% organic enterprise growth. We’ve been ahead of that over the last few years most of the time; slightly behind that recently as we haven’t had a major announcements like the one today in the last six to nine months or so just because of the lumpy nature of when these deals close. And so, I believe that the wins today get us right back on track with where we’ve been historically and where we expect to be.

Nate Brochmann - William Blair & Company

Great. Yeah, I mean that’s good to see that the model still very vibrant and despite the lost of the customer, obviously you have a lot of additional opportunities there, so that’s great. Second question on the kind of middle market inside sales effort, obviously, you have had some starts and stop, some successes, and I know it’s a new business for you and obviously you are going to have some issues in lumps kind of in starting that. Do you really feel that at this point you have the business kind of where you need it to be to be able to grow it and leverage it? And I know you talked about some new discussions and what not, but I mean have you learned enough mistakes to know what you had to change and obviously with some new leadership that those things are in place now or do you feel like there still may be some trial and error in terms of things you haven’t learned yet?

Eric Belcher

It's a little bit of both, Nate. We originally had hoped that, that business would be 4% of our revenue this year now we think it will be 2% to 3% of our revenue, just to put into context. However we do believe that the SMB market is a beautiful market for our model. And we’ve learned a tremendous amount. We continue to lean a tremendous amount. No one's ever done what we’re doing with this group, with this business. We’ve got some bigger picture strategic ideas for the group as well that will be coming online here late in the year. And so, we’re as committed as we’ve ever been to this market.

And as you said, we’ve had some starts and stops. We’ve had some learnings along the way, which I guess in hindsight would be anticipated, always the case when you try something new and bold like this. But as we move forward this group is it’s as switched on as any part of our business is right now and we’ve got big plans for SMB group.

Nate Brochmann - William Blair & Company

Okay, great. And then just one clarification question and I’ll turn it over. Joe, you were talking in terms of your guidance that assumes that the production graphics business in Europe kind of performs little bit better but if it doesn’t you kind of have a backstop in terms of the contingent liabilities there. And but I assume that’s referring to your revenue guidance for the remainder of the year, and I would assume that wouldn’t have as much of an impact on the profitability given the fact that you have definitely laid out broader profitability plans for the second half and you disclosed many a times now on why you are comfortable with that. I just want to make sure that, that’s still the case in terms of the various investments turning around getting the leverage on some of this new revenue etcetera just in terms of the confidence on profitability? Thanks.

Joe Busky

Nat, first of all, I just want to make sure it’s clear that the contingent liability structures in our deals really don’t have anything to do with the revenue, its more to do with the EBITDA target that are in those agreements. And again if there is underperformance against those EBITDA targets the structures are such that the purchase price will be reduced and that reduced purchase price offset the underperformance of the EBITDA. It really doesn’t have anything to do with the revenue.

If you recall this is a business -- our business in Europe is fairly seasonal to the Q4 quarter and so a large amount of the profit that we see from that region comes in Q4. And so, our forecast right now fully support that they are going to achieve the earn out target. But nonetheless, there is risk there that with that such a huge steep jump in the profitability in Q4 I thought it to be prudent just to remind everyone of the structures that we built into not only that deal but all of our deals that protect the shareholders in case there is underperformance.

Nate Brochmann - William Blair & Company

Great. It makes sense. Thanks.

Eric Belcher

All right. Thanks, Nat.

Operator

Our next question comes from Randy Hugen with Feltl and Company. Your line is open.

Randy Hugen - Feltl and Company

Thanks. I just wanted to follow-up on that U.S. same customer spend. Is there a particular customer industry or that’s just kind of broad based trend?

Joe Busky

Randy, welcome to the call, first of all. Its, there is no specific customer or small set of customers that are contributing to that decline in same customer spend its quite broad throughout our customer base in the U.S.

Randy Hugen - Feltl and Company

Okay. Thanks. And it’s nice to see that investment in Brazil is paying off. Do you expect that business to have somewhat profitability? And then also, do you I guess foresee any challenges you're having a new contract win of that size in a relatively new operation?

Eric Belcher

The economics of this win and our other contracts in Brazil are similar to the overall economics of InnerWorkings. So, no, there won’t be any meaningful differences on that front.

In terms of challenges associated with ramping a large contract, there is quite a bit in the way of work that’s already been done. We’ve been in conversations with Mondelez in Brazil, as you can imagine, for close to a year now. And we already have a team in place despite the fact that that we're only just beginning now to actually manage the supply chain for them. So, there is an expense and there is a process of implementation that we’ll be going through.

I don’t expect there to be any challenges given the fact that some of the categories are reasonably new. We’ve been working on sourcing those categories in Brazil from Mondelez for quite some time. And we’re very confident that our solution will work equally well in some of these newer services. So, it’s a fantastic win for our company and it really I think is a good indication of where things are headed in Brazil, as well as some of the other countries that we’re just now beginning to introduce to our services.

Randy Hugen - Feltl and Company

All right. Thanks a lot.

Eric Belcher

Thanks, Randy.

Operator

(Operator Instructions). Our next question comes from Matthew Kempler with Sidoti & Company. Your line is open.

Matthew Kempler - Sidoti & Company

Thank you. I was wondering if you could first follow-up on Mondelez and how that relationship came about. And it sounds like it goes beyond the scope of your typical contract, maybe you can talk about some of the areas that are new to InnerWorkings?

Eric Belcher

Well, when begin talking to them quite a while ago, we conducted as we always do with large corporations an opportunity assessment. And in doing so, we found that in addition to us being able to drive a meaningful improvement to some of the categories that are more traditional to InnerWorkings are point of sale and printed materials and other related products. In talking to them, we discovered that they also had a large opportunity to centralize and put some accountability around and some proper bidding structure into the procurement practices of a very large decentralized spend associated with things such as sales support and large events that they maybe conducting and various other marketing efforts and the agencies that they may bring online for a specific purpose and many things like that. It’s basically called the below the line services that are provided to the CPG firm. And we began together with them conducting a detailed analysis setting up a historical baseline to understand what the performance has been in making these purchases and then deciding what it could be if they centralize that’s been under us. And that’s how the discussions evolve to get it in today’s announcement.

Matthew Kempler - Sidoti & Company

Okay. And then I wanted to ask on the international cross selling side, obviously some nice wins expanding with some of your existing customers. But can you comment on the strategy of expanding to a couple of select geographies rather than more broadly with these clients?

Eric Belcher

So, we do advocate that a corporation would seek to outsource its entire marketing supply chain, all of its branded materials all over the globe to InnerWorkings. Now, the reality of doing that within one step or one contractual agreement, we have yet -- I believe that one day we might but we’ve yet to be able to convince the company to take that giant leap all at once. The reality of it is there are existing contracts and providers in place the need arise around the globe at different times for our clients.

And so, as the need arises and a discussion begins we evaluate the potential of the market not just for that client but what other growth opportunities we may have in, for instance, a Russia or a Turkey and then make an informed decision about whether or not we’ll go in first with our existing client but then in a manner that allow us to add scale in that region. And so, that’s the way in which our business has been expanding recently with our existing clients.

Matthew Kempler - Sidoti & Company

Okay. And then if you could touch on the EYELEVEL acquisition combined with DB Studios it sounds like you probably got a $60 million plus business on your hand. Maybe give us sense do you have any idea what the size of the market t is for these permanent store fixtures and are the majority of -- is the majority opportunity convincing retailers to outsource to somebody like InnerWorkings or is it taking share from competitors?

Eric Belcher

Well, the size of the market is massive there. They are huge providers of these products in the marketplace and EYELEVEL and DB even in combined makeup a very, very small portion of the overall market opportunity. Now, we believe that these entrepreneurs have the ability to assist our clients with these product categories. Of course, we work with a lot of retailers and we historically have not engaged them in a discussion of supporting them with these materials even though they are branded materials and we do semi permanent displays. It perfectly makes sense to do the permanent displays as well but it requires a certain specific type of technical knowledge and design expertise that we didn’t have and now do have and we don’t have it just in the U.S. but we today have it globally. So, the ability to work together with these entrepreneurs, who are also looking to grow within their existing client bases by adding our products and services combined with the ability to now offer our existing clients their services as well as additional benefit such as geographic benefits and the ability to work with young, ambitious entrepreneurs who signed up for very long-term relationships with InnerWorkings is the reason why you have seen us strike these two partnerships here in 2013.

Matthew Kempler - Sidoti & Company

And then, just a couple of quick follow ups on EYELEVEL and I’ll get back into the queue. Do large enterprise deals in the EYELEVEL space look similar to what you do on the procurement side? And then what kind of revenue contributions are you expecting from EYELEVEL on the other small acquisitions you made this year?

Eric Belcher

Joe, do you want to answer the second.

Joe Busky

Matt, the revenue contribution from the two small companies we did in the quarter LG and PPS as well. They have - we think we’ll contribute roughly $30 million to $35 million of revenue balance of the year.

Matthew Kempler - Sidoti & Company

Okay.

Eric Belcher

That’s the way in which they work with their clients. In some regards it’s very similar to us. They, like us, will carry inventory and run a fulfillment and component to their business, there are design services that are involved. But the nature of these displays are that they tend to be much larger projects on a project-by-project basis and they come in a more sporadic manner depending on for instance whether Nike is opening up a new outlet store in Moscow. And so, there is a little bit of difference versus the standard enterprise agreements that we have. But overall the business is essentially the same.

Matthew Kempler - Sidoti & Company

Okay. Thank you.

Eric Belcher

Thank you.

Operator

(Operator Instructions). Our next question comes from George Sutton with Craig Hallum. Your line is open.

George Sutton - Craig Hallum

Thank you. Hi, guys. I hopped on late, so this may end up being a naïve question but I didn’t hear the $30 million to $35 million discussion for the back half of the year but wondering if you Joe could just do quick walk through of the old range and the new range and sort of what the deltas are?

Joe Busky

Hi, George. So, the previous revenue guidance was $900 million to$930 million and we’ve revised that to $910 million to $940 million and so that’s made up of the [EP] acquisition impact of LG, PPS and EYELEVEL and $30 million to $35 million that offsetting that as we said in the prepared remarks due to the softness in inside sales and then the additional assumption of a continued roughly 2% declines same customer spend in the U.S. and so that’s going to net to a $10 million increase on both the top and the bottom of the range.

George Sutton - Craig Hallum

Okay, great. Thank you. And you guys in past calls you have talked a lot about the competitive landscape and have suggested there maybe some more competition but I’m wondering with these wins you have had my assumption is and correct me if I’m wrong but probably not particularly competitive meaning its mostly you working with the potential customer but can you talk about win rates and any changes you have seen there?

Eric Belcher

Your assumption is right, George. In many cases that’s working directly with the prospect over a long period of time to help develop a solution with them. But that said in many of our campaigns, we do find that our clients will go out and look for what other alternatives to us might exist even if other ones introduced this new concept to them, which is a prudent thing to do and we encourage it. And so, we do find ourselves being benchmarked at some point along the process with the alternatives that exist out there. Those alternatives aren’t meaningfully different than they were last year or two years ago and so, so we haven’t really seen a major change in the way in which our sales cycles operate and how we prospect. So, does that answer your question George?

George Sutton - Craig Hallum

I think that’s, I think that’s very well put. Really there is to the acquisition side, you have been starting to move into some ancillary areas I guess, I would call but not necessarily write-down the print outsourcing world. Can you just give us a sense of how broad you are thinking about the potential outsourcing opportunities you might go after and I’m thinking out three to five years more than today?

Eric Belcher

George, we believe that a corporation should look to InnerWorkings do support them with anywhere their branded materials might exist and anywhere within their marketing supply chain, where their marketing teams are working in conjunction with procurement to make decisions to purchase on behalf of the marketing function. And so, that’s relatively a broad in terms of the scope you can see with the, new win with Mondelez we’ve expanded into the broader marketing supply chain and with EYELEVEL we find ourselves in DB able to support the branded materials that are more permanent in nature within the retail environment. I don’t, we’re not thinking though beyond that. We’ve a massive market opportunity in front of us its jus those, its just the marketing supply chain of these large global corporations and that’s been our primary focus and will be going forward.

George Sutton - Craig Hallum

Okay, perfect. Thanks, guys.

Eric Belcher

Thanks, George.

Joe Busky

Thank you, George.

Operator

That concludes our call for today. Thank you for joining InnerWorkings second quarter 2013 earnings call. Have a good day.

Copyright policy: All transcripts on this site are the copyright of Seeking Alpha. However, we view them as an important resource for bloggers and journalists, and are excited to contribute to the democratization of financial information on the Internet. (Until now investors have had to pay thousands of dollars in subscription fees for transcripts.) So our reproduction policy is as follows: You may quote up to 400 words of any transcript on the condition that you attribute the transcript to Seeking Alpha and either link to the original transcript or to www.SeekingAlpha.com. All other use is prohibited.

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE IS A TEXTUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S CONFERENCE CALL, CONFERENCE PRESENTATION OR OTHER AUDIO PRESENTATION, AND WHILE EFFORTS ARE MADE TO PROVIDE AN ACCURATE TRANSCRIPTION, THERE MAY BE MATERIAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURACIES IN THE REPORTING OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE AUDIO PRESENTATIONS. IN NO WAY DOES SEEKING ALPHA ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS MADE BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEB SITE OR IN ANY TRANSCRIPT. USERS ARE ADVISED TO REVIEW THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S AUDIO PRESENTATION ITSELF AND THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S SEC FILINGS BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS.

If you have any additional questions about our online transcripts, please contact us at: transcripts@seekingalpha.com. Thank you!

Source: InnerWorkings' CEO Discusses Q2 2013 Results - Earnings Call Transcript

Check out Seeking Alpha’s new Earnings Center »

This Transcript
All Transcripts