Gold and Silver 'Bubble' Has Long Way to Go 12 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
On Oct. 27th, 2008 Goldcorp (NYSE:GG) closed at $15.06. Agnico-Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) closed the same day at $21.70.
Fast forward less than eleven months later to Sept. 16th, 2009. GG closed at $42.93 and AEM closed at $71.27. Over a 200% gain for GG and over a 300% for AEM. That would amaze even the most enthusiastic gold bug.
When it comes to silver, on Oct. 27th, 2008 Silver Wheaton (NYSE:SLW) closed at $2.59 and Silver Standary Resources (Nasdaq:SSRI) on the same day closed at $6.19. On Sept. 16th, 2009 SSRI closed at $23.34 and SLW closed at $13.21. Holy guacamole.
So in less than 11 months SLW is up almost 500% and SSRI is up almost 400%. And although this looks like a giant bubble, it is more like an upside correction to a greatly exaggerated, downside over-correction back last October.
Chris Weber, writing for Steve Sjuggerud's Daily Wealth made some observations that I have to agree with and is confirmed by my own experiences. He writes:
This bullish sentiment has led many people to ask me if gold is far too popular now... or even in a "bubble.
My answer: I see nothing like a bubble yet. Ask your friends or neighbors these questions:
"What do you think about gold or silver as an investment?" and if they answer in a positive manner, further ask: "What are the best ways to own it? How do you own it? What percentage of your assets do you have in the precious metals area?" If this seems too invasive, ask, "What percentage of a person's assets do you think should be in the precious metals area?"
Thursday gold slipped back below $1,000 and silver to $16.27. This scares the uninformed and the unconvincted, and sets the stage for the next big move upward for gold, silver, and the producing-mining stocks.
As Chris Weber said at the end of his article,
When everyone you know is talking about how to make "easy money" buying gold or silver, then we may be in a different era. But right now, I think both metals have more room, and most likely much more room, to go.
I couldn't agree more.
DISCLOSURE: I don't own any of the stocks mentioned directly, but they are in a mutual fund that I'm invested in (the DWS Scudder Gold & Precious Metals Fund, Symbol:SCGDX).
Please Note: This article is to inform your thinking, not lead it. Only you can decide the best place for your money, and any decision you make will put your money at risk. Information or data included here may have already been overtaken by events – and must be verified elsewhere – should you choose to act on it. Please remember investments can fall as well as rise. And they will! - Advanced Investor Technologies LLC accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage resulting directly or indirectly from the use of this content.
Related Articles
|























This article has 12 comments:
I know F has made a great run off the bottom, but my PM stocks have done even better! And unlike F, I NEVER ONCE doubted that my picks were threatened by bankruptcy, so to double down and increase my positions was not a gut wrenching decision!
1. I see jewelers take down the "Cash 4 Gold" signs and start putting up "Gold 4 Cash" signs
2. My 19 y/o sister-in-law begins trading gold online as a "job"
3. Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News have covers with a man hugging a gold bar on their covers
On Sep 25 09:08 PM KISSA wrote:
> FDIC keep their Bank Watchlist secret from the public and there is
> a reason to it because many US banks are already bankrupt and FDIC
> can't guarantee deposits anymore.
> We made this list free to all the public, take a look if your bank
> is on our Bank Run list too.
> www.nyse30.com/id45.html
Thank You for your work on this.
> Thanks, Marc. I track and sometimes trade GLD based on the charts.
> I've noticed gold challenging the $1,000 mark five times since March
> '08 only to be turned back each time. Last week though, gold closed
> above $1,000; perhaps an indicator that we gold bulls could have
> additional strength for higher ground. Will be interesting to see
> where gold closes today.
I think another way of saying it might be "in each of the 5 times gold has challenged the $1,000 mark since March, the FED and its tentacles have put a lid on it by selling as much as necessary to ensure the rally fails."
The price of gold is a direct reflection of the insanity at the FED and the amount of liquidity they're producing out of thin air. That amount of liquidity "should" result in rising prices for "everything", but it isn't. It isn't going to help the real estate market one iota. So far, the stock market has indeed been driven in part by the flush of liquidity but as long as the bankers opt to keep all the stolen trillions to prop up their balance sheets rather than lending it (which is what banks were created for), the stock market may not rise much further after all.
Having said that, since the theory is that such massive liquidity "should" make all the world's stock markets rise in a completely unrealistic phantom rally, so should it make gold and all other commodities rise. But the liquidity so far isn't doing everything it was intended to do.
How much longer will the FED insist on keeping a lid on gold? Or maybe more importantly... how long will they "be able" to keep a lid on gold? When I look at the chart of gold prices, I can't help but think of a pressure cooker that's about to blow its lid.
The US federal budget is about 3 $Trillion.
That's 3,000 $billions
The entire mining production of every single gold mine on the planet is 80 million ounces or $80 billion. IOW, the US budget (at today's paltry 3 $trillion) is 37 times as much as all the gold mined on earth every year.
And people are worried about a $30 pullback? When the world finally returns to some level of sanity and figures out what the word "trillion" really means, gold will hit $30,000 an ounce... at least.