Markets Are Starting to Roll Over 9 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Macro Man's back in the saddle, or at least his office chair, this morning. Just in time for that noisiest of days, the US payroll report. Unwillingly or not, it is difficult for a macro manager to avoid getting sucked into the mosh pit of NFP. One can only hope that the end result produces more of a Ode to Joy.
Speaking of Beethoven, it certainly looks like a lot of things are starting to roll over. Going beyond the usual peaks and valleys of market price action (more on which below), it certainly does seem like the second derivative of growth data is starting to look decidedly weedy.
A roll over in economic surprise indices, noted in this space on several occasions, is axiomatic as forecast profiles are adjusted. But it looks like we are now seeing an adjustment in the actual underlying trend of economic data....potentially heralding the onset of the second half of the much-ballyhooed "W" profile?
Last night's auto sales figures, the first after cash for clunkers came to an end, is a case in point. Sales fell back nearly to their early year lows, with domestic sales in particular undershooting expectations. So while consumption should show a nice rosy pop in Q3, we're setting up for a rather less positive figure in this, the new current quarter.
Similarly, the inventory cycle appears to have finally turned. The ISM new orders-inventories spread, which soared earlier in the year, fell sharply in yesterday's report. While this suggests that inventories are being built in real time, which is actually accretive to GDP, there is likely to be a decent offset as some of that build comes from imported goods, widening the trade deficit.
At the same time, in the absence of a sustained rebound in final demand, the end result will just be another undesired increase in inventories, which will then need to be run down next year.
Looking back at the last cycle, the ISM orders/inventories spread peaked in March before heading back down over the next several months. The stock market swiftly followed suit.
In that vein, this week's weakness in the SPX (and other risky stuff like Eastern European currencies) could be telling. As readers have no doubt observed, many major indices, including the SPX, have broken what appears to be a pretty important support line.
But wait.....stop me if you've heard this one before. One could have (and, in the case of your author, has) drawn a large number of similar trendlines over the past six and a half months.....none of which have worked terribly well.
So while bearish risk structures are making some pretty sweet music this week, from Macro Man's perch the jury remains out. Yes, the data has rolled over like Beethoven...but having been burned before, he will reserve judgment before playing the Victory March....it could all still go to the dogs.
Related Articles
|























Either way, nice one Mr. Man.
Victory March?
Chopin, Funeral March
Astonishing to witness.
cyclingscholar
Personally we have done just fine with selling well out of the money puts, collecting the premiums, and waiting for much lower prices. They have certainly provided a much better return, with much less risk than cash or treasuries.
On Oct 02 01:03 PM punk_ash wrote:
> there were plenty of posts like these from march until August. One
> down day and we got these posts again. This is a bear market rally
> and only the best traders will be able to get out in time. Most of
> us are better served if we do not play.
Have you noticed, that the late day spikes that have supported the market since March have pretty much disappeared now. In fact, in the last few weeks it seems that the spikes have been accelerated selling into the closes (in spite of mid-day attempts to support the markets after big early morning sell-offs). Any thoughts or comments on the change in spike behavior in the markets lately?
Maybe GS and the prop. desks have finally figured out that they have made about as much as they can on driving the markets higher. If they want to keep booking those multi-billion dollar trading profits and bonuses, then maybe they will have to do it on some big short sales and some serious downside corrections. Any thoughts or comments on that possibility?
Sooner or later that will have to end. That's why I've contended that the more the market is pumped higher based on the bankers' agenda rather than on any fundamental logic, the more violent the fall will be. In fact, I think the so-called "dumb money" retail investor has grown so suspicious that he's not even in this market yet, in any great numbers.
So even though it makes no sense to me, it's possible that the table is set for higher prices if, and it's a big "if", the market makes some sort of rally almost immediately from these levels. The internals are breaking down, the air is full of suspicion, and the pattern (if you're an Elliott wave enthusiast) more or less dictates that this is a crucial decision point. It's on the cusp, and as absurd as it sounds, the markets could still go either way. It's at the point now, that if the "dumb money" retail investor has indeed waited this long, and if we see a serious enough tank job this week, the "dumb money" is going to see it for what it really is and won't get sucked in at all. He's going to look a lot smarter than the condescending bankers ever imagined. I think Monday is the most important trading day since the March lows.
Stay sharp my friends!