Q2 Earnings: Factoids And Takeaways - Markets May Be Selling Off For The Wrong Reason

|
 |  Includes: SPY
by: Soos Global Capital

With Q2 earnings season almost complete, it's worth looking at some of the results and considering market implications. The tweet below from FactSet is chock full of charts that slice and dice the earnings, revenue and guidance data.

Q2 2013 S&P 500 earnings round-up http://t.co/gJkBR4sA8l

- FactSet (@FactSet) August 16, 2013

In addition, this link to S&Ps "Lookout Report" has its version of the earnings analysis. (Note that it appears to use different methodologies in calculating the data. Sometimes that's due to a focus on different levels of the earnings reports such as "operating" vs "net" and sometimes it's due to the year-over-year comparison of companies in the S&P, some being there today but not a year ago, and vice versa. There might also be some other accounting details that differ, but in general, many themes resonate from both reports.)

Below are a mixture of factoids and personal takeaways regarding the S&P 500 companies that have reported so far, in no particular order:

  • Roughly 70% have beat earnings estimates.
  • Roughly 50% have beat revenue estimates.
  • Cynics might say (me included) that "estimates" had already been lowered so much that the bar to beat was already quite low, so "beating" is not such a great feat.
  • Non-cynics would have to admit that despite the "beats," the picture seems clear that revenue growth is underwhelming and according to S&P with regard to revenue growth rate, it is

"... currently still in negative territory at -0.56%, which would be the first negative revenue growth rate we've seen since third quarter 2009."

  • Earnings, therefore, seem to be benefiting from continued cost-cutting and increasingly lean and mean operating leverage.
  • How about the forecast for Q3? Good question. FactSet's data shows roughly 80% of the companies that have proffered forward guidance were negative, 20% positive. S&P's take is somewhat different: It has roughly 60% negative, 20% positive, the rest inline. Either way, it appears that there's agreement on the fact that more companies have reported negative guidance for Q3 by a wide margin over those who've reported positive guidance.
  • Interestingly, S&P notes that the ratio of negative to positive is lower than it has been for some time, which it views as good news for Q3 earnings. To quote S&P:

This produces a negative-to-positive ratio of 2.3, meaning that for every two or so companies that have issued negative guidance, one has issued positive guidance. This is below the historical average of 2.4, and much lower than the trailing four-quarter average of 3.6, a positive sign for future earnings performance. The last time the warning ratio was this low was in first quarter 2012.

  • My takeaway, however, is not as sanguine. While the second half of 2013 is seen by many companies and analysts as being better than the first half, it's still apparent that earnings outlooks suggest significant headwinds to earnings growth. Despite this, however, keep in mind, that until recent days of stock market sell-offs, which btw were largely led by tapering fears of less central bank stimulus and in turn, higher rates, most stock market averages in the US were hitting new record highs.
  • Finally, forward EPS and P/E estimates appear to be at higher levels than such estimates have been historically. This would suggest that analysts are still quite optimistic about the second half of the year. The FactSet charts (on page 16 of the report) show them to be only slightly above longer term averages, not a levels that are even close to historical high points. Furthermore, the FactSet charts on page 17 show that trailing 12-month P/Es are actually in line with 10-year average levels (roughly 15.7) and not at levels in the higher teens that existed just before prior stock market selloffs. So based on these stats, many are arguing that stocks still have room to the upside. This kind of thinking was articulated in the following piece by John Authers of The Financial Times along with the follow-on commentary in which its noted that most indicators of equity valuations still show stocks to be fairly to cheaply priced with the exception of Shiller's cyclically adjusted P/E ratios.
  • The CAPE of Less Hope: taking on Merrill Lynch with help from Prof Robert Shiller (in FT Long Short blog) http://t.co/1TOmSh8pGu"

    - John Authers (@johnauthers) August 13, 2013

  • Bottom line on earnings? The overall message is far from euphoric. Plenty of headwinds are lined up to challenge future earnings growth, yet optimism seems to abound for accelerating growth in the second half of 2013. Is the tug of war between those dynamics playing out in recent market malaise? Or has recent equity market weakness not yet factored in potential earnings woes later in the year?
  • As I've indicated in several recent posts and in our last Newsletter, I believe that markets are seemingly myopically focused on "tapering," concluding that a lessening of the Fed's stimulus means immediate trouble for stocks. That might be true over the longer term if we were to have a protracted period of much higher interest rates, but the Fed has remained steadfast in its message that tapering will only start to occur once the economy is revving and running on its own power, without the need for all of the Fed's tail-winds. A more convincing argument, in my mind, for being negative on stocks at this time would be to focus more on the relative gloom that has been expressed by a number of S&P 500 companies in their forward guidance. Add to that the issues of Washington's upcoming negotiations on the debt ceiling, sequestration impacts, Middle East "Arab Winter," China's de-bubbling efforts, and Emerging Market countries forced into policy dilemmas as to whether to defend their currencies and fight inflation or to stimulate their economies, and you have a potential formula for a currently overly optimistic earnings valuation in equities. Admittedly, recent equity market selloffs have re-priced some companies to levels that seem to be more realistic valuations, but on the whole, defensive portfolio positioning would still seem worthy of consideration.

Stay tuned for more....

Please continue to visit Soos Global Market Musings for updates.
(Sign up to "Follow by Email"! And share with others!)

(Please note: This article is solely meant to be thought provoking and is not in any way meant to be personal investment advice. Each investor is obligated to opine and decide for themselves as to the appropriateness of anything said in this article to their unique financial profile, risk tolerances and portfolio goals).
Disclaimer: Please read and consider important information related to all communication made by Soos Global on this site by clicking here.
Additional Disclaimer: currently long many stocks/ETFs. Positions may change at any time without notice.

Disclosure: I am long WAG, PAYX, EMC, KYN, C. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Additional disclosure: Currently long many stocks/ETFs including WAG, PAYX, EMC, KYN and C. Positions may change at any time without notice