Apple's Snow Leopard Takes Two Steps Back 25 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Like a lot of Mac fanboys, I went out and bought Snow Leopard (Mac OS X 10.6) when it came out. It was cheap ($49 for the family pack, $29 for the single copy) and supposedly was faster and more compact.
After installing it on one computer, so far as I can tell, there’s no news there. Yes, it’s 64 bit — which makes sense for a server but not my underpowered laptop or bottom of the line desktop.
What’s clear is that there are two major ways that 10.6 is less than 10.5. The first is eliminating PowerPC support. OK, we knew it was coming, as they announced in the runup to 10.6, and these are the oldest machines around. However, at our house, half of the machines in daily use are PowerPC (not counting two archaic laptops we keep in reserve). This makes the economics of the family pack more suspect.
It was also interesting that Rosetta — the PowerPC emulator for Intel Macs — is not installed by default, although the OS will install it for you when needed. Given Apple’s (AAPL) desire to wipe out compatibility mode as quickly as possible (cf. PowerPC, Classic, etc.), I suspect that it is trying to find out how many Macs actually have it running — e.g. from crash logs — and then will use that to decide how quickly they can kill it.
Which brings me to the other major step backwards. Snow Leopard deletes AppleTalk.
I know the Nexties who came to Apple in the reverse takeover of 1997 have been wanting to kill AppleTalk for years. When I was a developer, I heard numerous speeches that justified killing “legacy” code. So I can’t say they didn’t warn me.
Without AppleTalk, almost any laser printer can be used via LPR/LPD. But this is a giant step backwards, because it provides no feedback — paper out, paper jam — which is something that has been available on Mac network printing for 25 years.
The bigger problem is that AppleTalk is the only way to discover most older printers — including my 2002 laser printer at home. So if I go to a strange office and don’t have AppleTalk on my laptop, I won’t be able to find the printers unless I can manually figure out the IP address of the printer. This is very un Mac-like.
So right now the 10.6 is installed on the iMac where it does little damage, but it’s definitely not going to mess up my main machine, the MacBook Air. Paying more for less? Doesn’t make a lot of sense to me.
Related Articles
|




















Now looks like the same upgrade cycle for the PC.
And YOU'RE both rude and semi-literate.
Apple tries to keep it's OS lean with tight code. It's harder to hack and works faster. But that does mean streamlining and some things that are older will be left behind.
Microsoft keeps a lot...but it's very messy and easy to hack into...and sloooow. So I think that's the choice. I choose Apple products and I think they will continue to grow market share in everything they do so it's a great stock.
Long APPL
Having to install Rosetta was a minor inconvenience to keep using Appleworks. Biggest problem is the database won't scroll using 2 fingers on my laptop like every other program I use. This is truly annoying and may eventually persuade me to switch to Filemaker, which I should have used in the first place.
Another option for someone like yourself, is to use another mac on your network thats still running an earlier system, to share the printer out, all other macs will pick it up using Bonjour.
Appletalk was really old and dated, slowing the entire OS down with constant needless network polling. That is why it was killed off, just doesn't match with the current scheme for modern OS or modern printers.
Explains some nice workarounds. Not sure if it gives you everything for Appletalk, but it is good to hear there are some. I suggest Googling Appletalk Snow Leopard to see if there are others.
Just sayin.
On Oct 05 08:36 AM applefan_not_enthusiast wrote:
> Your an idiot. While these may be big issues to you, most people
> are up to date with technology and don't have a Powerbook or an old
> laser printer. Stop worrying about yourself and think about what
> most people want. Apple doesn't think about the individual such as
> yourself, they think about what the general public wants.
> of about 10,000 customers, and Apple hasn't given me an easy way
> to move to Filemaker, so I'll use Appleworks until I can't.
Have you heard of iWork?
It can open AppleWorks documents, but if you wait too long, that feature might be dropped too in the next revision.
This is reflective of the changes Apple has been making since iMovie 8 -- dumb down apps for the masses, and short shrift the pro users.
SL seems to have compatibility issues with Microsoft Office 2008. Apple should have used MS strategy to get more people involved to test the software.
My strong advice: WAIT!