Dollar Hegemony Is Ending 32 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
I have not published a chart of US public debt in some time, having mostly concentrated on household and corporate debt with its various alphabet-soup permutations (CDOs, CLOs, CDSs, etc.).
However, after almost two years of financial sector bailouts (handing out borrowed public money to mega-rich junkies addicted to sophisticated gambling) the amounts wasted are hitting the books in a rush. They give full meaning to the title of this blog (see chart below, click to enlarge).
Public debt has increased by $2.5 trillion since just the end of 2007, when the current Great Recession is deemed to have started. It now stands at $11.7 trillion and represents 83% of GDP, up from 62% at the end of 2007.
It stands to reason, therefore, that the entire world is closely re-examining the status of the dollar as its global reserve currency. Those that are most directly affected by such a flood of new dollars (remember, more debt = more dollars) are commodity producers who price their goods in our currency, chief amongst them the oil producers.
According to Reuters, Gulf Arabs are meeting in secret (please see P.S. below) with representatives from Russia, China, Japan and France in order to agree on a basket of currencies that will be used for the daily pricing of crude oil. This is very different - and much more important - than merely settling oil trades in euro or other currencies, which is already taking place (e.g. Iran).
Unless the United States takes immediate and convincing steps to prove its commitment to a strong, valuable dollar, it will very soon face the catastrophic end of Dollar Hegemony, the foundation upon which it erected its economy post-WWII. It will lose the ability to finance its massive deficits on a global scale via its own printing presses and will be forced to accept a much lower living standard.
What should be done?
It is of paramount importance to realize that the Dollar Hegemony must end, anyway. Not because other global powers desire it, but because it is in our best interests. We ourselves should base our economy upon a more robust foundation, one that is in tune with today's challenges and opportunities: environmental and climatic change, resource depletion, transformation of energy sources and networks, transportation overhaul.
We must realize that energy security is no longer achieved by waging war in Central Asia and patrolling the sea-lanes with staggeringly costly carrier forces, but by developing renewable and inexhaustible local sources. Solar, wind, geothermal, biofuels - all must come into play as quickly as possible and transform the economy into one that grows based on infrastructure capital investment, financed with domestic saving.
Expensive? I say it is cheap, considering the alternatives.
And, anyhow, we should keep honest accounting books if we wish to compare prices honestly. Once all of the external costs of Dollar Hegemony are included and properly apportioned (defence, healthcare, environmental degradation, finance) I doubt anyone in his right mind would want to keep it going - apart from those benefiting directly from it, of course. But even they have children , don't they?
____________________________________________________
P.S. The Reuters story mentioned above has already -within hours- changed title to "Oil states say no talks on replacing dollar". It is originally based on reporting by Robert Fisk, the legendary Middle East correspondent whose book The Great War for Civilisation: The Conquest of the Middle East I highly recommend.
I am sure Bob Fisk would never stake his reputation on a story of such obvious importance unless he was absolutely certain of its validity.
Related Articles
|
























ALL currencies are fiat - not backed by anything real - $ just happens to be the biggest - in the end countries like US (that produces 83% of its own energy) will have advantages over countries like Ireland and Switzerland that have huge debts and small resources (however, American social pathologies - addiction, bravado, entitlement, etc are much worse than elsewhere).
This is skirmish in the larger battle of denominating transactions in things that are real.
> You are right about debt but wrong about bigger picture. Most European
> countries have far more public debt than US....
Sure, as % of GDP some do, but certainly NOT the big ones like Germany and France.
And, in fact, absolute size does matter. There is not a single country in the world whose government owes nearly $12 trillion AND issues the global reserve currency.
Please consider the meaning of "reserve currency". Who wants to hold on to rapidly depreciating money as a "reserve"?
Our national leadership probably needs to learn how to beg for money in Chinese.
The Federal Reserve is keeping the Printing press warm and ready....
only if you're a right wing nitwit......
Nearly all other currencies have problems of their own, such as a lack of transparency and/or artificial government pegging. And not sure why the Euro is so often mentioned, considering that the state of most European economies is worse than the US.
I thought those guys always eat their young... they act like they do....
On Oct 06 05:44 PM ryanclarke wrote:
> The U.S. has +11 TRILLION dollars in public debt but the federal
> government only currently takes in as income - through taxes (mainly
> upper middle class income taxes I might add) - of about 2 TRILLION
> dollars. Now if my household income is $20,000 a year and I've got
> bills to pay other than paying down debt and my debt total is $110,000
> maybe you can understand why I run down to the mortgage refinance
> company to get a new mortgage at a lower interest rate every time
> Bernake kicks the can down the road with a new interest rate cut.
> But the game's over AND EVERYONE KNOWS IT BUT WONT ADMIT IT because
> Bernake can only raise rates now. The Feds can only keep the game
> going by funding the Federal debt with massive amounts of short term
> Treasury notes of near ZERO percent interest rates which must continually
> be rolled over every 30 to 90 days. Do you think Japan is going to
> keep playing the game with the U.S. adapting the Japanese game plan?
> NO !!!!!! Japan is not and has not for some time ... which is why
> the Japanese currency has been gaining value on the U.S. for the
> past few months. Don't be surprised to see a Treasury auction "fail"
> .... at a time convenient for the power brokers currently ruling
> the game in Washington.
For starters, there has to be something worthwhile to replace it with. And a basket of currencies makes no sense for a reserve currency. Fundamentally, a reserve currency is a currency that is used for a majority of cross border transactions. Business transactions aren't going to take place in 30% euros, 20% yet, 5 % swiss francs, or whatever they're proposing. That's just silly. And none of the other currencies out there serve as a suitable alternative for a variety of reasons.
The question that the article mentioned was the currency that oil is priced in. They can price it in any currency they want, and it doesn't change the value in relative dollars one bit. They could price it in gold, coffee beans, pork bellies, or foam pellets. A dollar will buy the same amount of oil. Not to mention they'd have a hell of a time getting the oil traders on board.
So yes, there is a lot of unsustainable debt out there. It will cause huge problems in the future. But the arab states and the Chinese only bring this up when they want something diplomatically. It won't change the dollars predominate use.
On Oct 06 10:16 AM Living4Dividends wrote:
> Thanks for the article. I believe that the original article in The
> Independent and the now-deleted Reuters article were based on rumors
> and not actual sources. The fact that Reuters deleted the article
> gives credence to this argument.
>
> Japan, Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Russia have denied the allegations.
On Oct 06 11:15 AM OldFordTruck wrote:
> Domestic natural gas should help support the transition to a more
> renewable energy economy. We should have started converting our transportation
> system over to it years ago. Higher oil prices and loss of the reserve
> currency will help push it into the mainstream. 10 years would be
> enough time to build more nuclear power plants....assuming we have
> the funds to build them!
On Oct 06 11:15 AM OldFordTruck wrote:
> Domestic natural gas should help support the transition to a more
> renewable energy economy. We should have started converting our transportation
> system over to it years ago. Higher oil prices and loss of the reserve
> currency will help push it into the mainstream. 10 years would be
> enough time to build more nuclear power plants....assuming we have
> the funds to build them!
On Oct 06 01:59 PM Mad Hedge Fund Trader wrote:
> vhu Of course you knew it was going to happen like this. After churning
> around just below the old high, and sucking in as many profit takers
> and short sellers as possible, gold blasted through to a new high
> for the year of $1,038. Never mind that the triggering event is complete
> balderdash, a story in Britain’s Independent newspaper asserting
> that the Middle East is holding secret global talks to price crude
> in the yellow metal or other currencies (click here for story at
> www.independent.co.uk/...
> ). It didn’t hurt that Australia cut its interest rates by 0.25%,
> the first G-20 country to do so. There probably isn’t enough gold
> in the world to finance more than a few weeks of global oil production.
> Total gold holdings would only fill two Olympic sized swimming pools.
> But never let the truth get in the way of a good trade. The confirming
> moves couldn’t be more ubiquitous, with the Canadian, New Zealand,
> and Australian dollars all up big, commodities strong, and silver
> also going ballistic. Regular readers will all recognize these as
> old friends of mine, core longs that I have been strongly recommending
> since the beginning of the year. I have been trying to get investors
> into gold since it was at $800. If you aren’t in gold by now, I can
> only tear my own clothes and flagellate myself for my abject failure
> to convince you of gold’s merits. US government debt is exploding,
> and with foreigners holding a large part of our paper, the only way
> to get out of this mess is to devalue the dollar. It’s like Obama
> invited China’s president Hu Jintao to dinner at an expensive Upper
> East Side restaurant, and was suddenly called away by a crisis, leaving
> him with a big fat bill. Next stop $1,200, then $1,500, then the
> old inflation adjusted high of $2,400. If you want me to help you
> get set up to trade futures in any of this stuff, please email me
> at madhedgefundtrader@yah... If you want to know where to buy physical
> gold and silver in size with the tightest spreads over spot, check
> with the experts at www.millenniummetals.net/
Nope, lost me there, big time. This is not the answer, and unless I have inaccurate information, they fail wherever they are tried. And, it will only put us at a dangerous disadvantage because China and India, for example, will have nothing to do with it. Drill baby, right here...right now.