LED Lighting for the Masses 5 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
By Michael Kanellos
Last year at Ceatec, the giant Japanese electronics fair, Toshiba (TOSBF.PK) showed off its new line of LED light bulbs. The 60-watt equivalent cost about $90 and the 100-watt equivalent, that could also be dimmed, ran around $360. Granted, the bulbs consumed 1/10th of the power of regular bulbs, but the prices looked difficult to swallow.
This year at the show, Panasonic (PC) showed off a 60-watt equivalent bulb with dimming that will cost 4,000 to 5,000 yen (about $44 to $55) when it comes out. It consumes 6.2 watts and lasts 40,000 hours. Sharp (SHCAY.PK) has a similar bulb, and the light quality is good.
So why the price whack? Electronics regularly drop in price at a rapid rate, but a drop like this is somewhat rare. Volume manufacturing can explain some of it, but there are also other reasons afoot.
One, governments are phasing out incandescents. Australia bans them in 2010 and Europe will phase them out from 2010 to 2012. The U.S. has adopted efficiency regulations that will lead to the demise of incandescents. The Edison bulb celebrates its 130th anniversary on December 31st, making it one of the longest-running and last vestiges of vacuum tube technology.
Second, competition. Small start-ups like Lemnis Lighting and Green Ray have started to market cheap LED bulbs for around $40 to $50. Last week I asked Lemnis CEO Warner Philips (the great-grandson of the guy who founded Philips Lighting) how a tiny manufacturer could undercut industrial giants. He said that, along with some techincal nuances, maybe Lemnis is willing to accept lower margins.
Lemnis and others are also looking at leases and layaway plans to make the price even more palatable. Ideally, the lease price will be less than the energy saved. The lease would also only run three or so years, but consumers would keep the bulb.
So there you have it. Get that light socket ready.
Related Articles
|
























CFLs with 850 lumens at 13 watts are what the LED bulb makers are going to have to match or exceed and undercut the price.
> Most of this appears as hype. The LED bulbs that I have seen do not
> have the maximum lumen output of incandescents or the proper color
> characteristics or dispersion. The lifespan may be cut short just
> by one or two of the LEDs quitting.
>
> CFLs with 850 lumens at 13 watts are what the LED bulb makers are
> going to have to match or exceed and undercut the price.
I agree that LED's are not as great as they say and for equal ight, CFL's are as eff. While LED's deserve a small premium, it's only 30-50% which means LED's for the same light need to be under $8 for a 100wt equivalent bulb. That's just not going to happen anytime soon.
www.newsobserver.com/n...