Countrywide / Bank of America REOs Fall to February 2007 Levels 11 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
The Countrywide Foreclosure Blog reports that there are currently 5,959 foreclosed homes being offered for sale on the Bank of America/Countrywide website, down from the peak of 21,500 in November 2008, and back to levels of February 2007 (see chart above, click to enlarge).
Below are charts for the individual states that had some of the worst foreclosure problems (AZ, CA, FL and NV), showing significantly reduced levels of lender-owned (REO) properties in October 2009. In all four states (AZ, CA, FL and NV), the REO levels are at two-year lows.
Comment: Although these foreclosure data are for just one mortgage company, Countrywide was (or still is) the largest mortgage company in the U.S. and it financed 20% of home mortgages in 2006, so this reduction of foreclosed homes for sale by Countrywide to early 2007 levels provides evidence that the real estate market has recovered significantly from the fall 2008 peak in REOs. Previous CD posts have presented evidence that the real estate markets in Florida, California and elsewhere have exhibited ongoing sales gains in recent months, increases in median home prices, and reductions in inventory levels. And with 30-year mortgage rates falling to 4.87%, all of the ingredients are in place for a continued real estate recovery, along with a general economic rebound.
Related Articles
|

























Question: Has Countrywide (like other lenders) slowed the flow of delinquent properties into the REO category? For many banks, delinquencies continue to rise, but the REO line has not. This is because they've extended the holding period for bad property. In other words, they've put off foreclosure because they don't have the capital to absorb the kind of writedowns that come with moving a large number of homes to the REO category.
On Oct 09 01:15 PM c smith wrote:
> REO = Real Estate Owned
>
> Question: Has Countrywide (like other lenders) slowed the flow of
> delinquent properties into the REO category? For many banks, delinquencies
> continue to rise, but the REO line has not. This is because they've
> extended the holding period for bad property. In other words, they've
> put off foreclosure because they don't have the capital to absorb
> the kind of writedowns that come with moving a large number of homes
> to the REO category.
So I do not buy your rosey optimism at all! I have read several of your posts and for the most part, I think you are, respectfully, out to lunch.
There is not one piece of fact to most of your articles. You use twisted statistics to prove your points without any kind of factual use of truth.
Fact 1: foreclosures continue numbers continue to rise. Institiutions are just not finalizing the foreclosure process or releasing them into the present market. Banks are hiding their bad assets to prevent the FDIC from closing down their businesses. The Obama plan is to present a message of good news to stimulate the economy (which may not be that negative) and buy some time to get his health care plan moving forwards. By the way, I did vote for him.
Fact 2: Commercial real estate is getting ready to begin its time of foreclosure and workouts. Which in turn will lead to more job layoffs and weakening of the economy.
Fact 3: You will see an increase in REO properties in the first quarter of 2010. This will bring your whole argument down the drain.
The bad news is far from over and things will get worse before they get better. I predict a further decline in the housing market in 2010-2011 from 10-15% as inventory levels increase. Industry experts predict that 50% of homeowners accross the nation will be underwater on their homes in 2011.
Let's look back in a year or two and see who was right...I am sure it will not be your silly opinions.
You don't really believe this statistic that you pulled out of your.....well, I'll keep it clean.
On Oct 10 12:59 PM tmarch wrote:
> Mr. Perry!
>
> Industry experts
> predict that 50% of homeowners accross [sic] the nation will be >underwater on their homes in 2011.
www.reuters.com/articl...