Proposed Baltimore Nuclear Raising Budget Concerns 7 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
By Michael Kanellos
The nuclear debate is heating up in Maryland.
UniStar Energy, a joint venture between France's EDF (EDFEF.PK) and a local utility, is seeking approval for a 1.6-gigawatt power plant in the state, according to VentureBeat, as well as a portion of the $18.5 billion in funds for advanced nuclear research. Alhough UniStar has obtained key approval from some federal and state agencies, opponents say it will give a company owned by a foreign government too much say in rates (even though EDF is already involved in a few other joint ventures in the U.S. like Enxco and has a strong safety record).
More importantly, the opponents charge that the construction costs will run be more than double the $7 billion estimate. Cost overruns are epidemic in nuclear. At a recent conference, Amory Lovins from the Rocky Mountain Institute charged that nuclear, when the overruns are added, actually cost more than wind.
Some companies and national labs are trying to circumvent some of these problems with small, modular reactors, but final versions of those won't be ready for another few years.
Related Articles
|
























And yes, cost overruns ARE epidemic for nuclear, but so what.. The reason is that people like Lovins and various ignoramuses in important political and/or bureaucratic positions have filled the heads of politicians and voters with nonsense. Sweden is a perfect example here, because the moronic statement by Lovins about nuclear and wind that you cited was similar to the one made by a Swedish simpleton a few months ago.
Let me tell you how this should be handled. The government should lend 'Unistar' the 7 billion cost estimate, and if the cost goes over e.g. 10% of that they take over the project, and let the Corps of Engineers run it. Doesn't a nuclear facility make more sense than sending additional soldiers to Afghanistan?.
Didn't you know we're all going to have little personal, "green," power-generating windmills on our heads from beanies with propellers that the government will, no doubt, soon mandate that we all wear?
So far, the French seem to be the experts at operating and maintaining nukes. I doubt their designs are very current, which is too bad if that's what's being talked about in Baltimore. At 1.6GW, it probably is.
They really should use the money to try out one of the new designs, preferably from an American company to eliminate that issue.
What's with the budget concerns, nuclear is too cheap to meter?
From those of us in the big square states- we have counties bigger than Maryland.
I live two hours from the biggest nuke in the country.
Glad to hear the debate is actively restarted despite the politicians.