Seeking Alpha
About this author:
Submit
an article to

click to enlarge

Print this article with comments
Comments
2
Comments 1 - 2 out of 2
You are viewing the latest 20 comments
  •  
    A better graph would be the number of on-line transactions each has per month. That would be a far more telling measure.

    I'm surprised E*Trade is where it is in customer base as it's site is by far the best of this list, IMHO, for anyone "actively" trading. Not trying to pump E*Trade as it has a ton of mortgage baggage but for ease of use and response time, it beats virtually all of those above it hands down.

    I do wish to exclude ShareBuilder from my commentary as I don't have an account with them. They may be awesome???

    I do have very "active" accounts with the rest of those above E*Trade and have had accounts with some of those below. I'm in the process of closing my Scottrade account.

    Do note I have been categorized as a "pattern day trader" from time to time.
    Oct 19 11:55 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Yes I know...you keep getting Reg Teeeeeeeez...

    I don't charge for my knowledge.

    Mr. Stupid


    On Oct 19 11:55 AM Rick in Qatar wrote:

    > A better graph would be the number of on-line transactions each has
    > per month. That would be a far more telling measure.
    >
    > I'm surprised E*Trade is where it is in customer base as it's site
    > is by far the best of this list, IMHO, for anyone "actively" trading.
    > Not trying to pump E*Trade as it has a ton of mortgage baggage but
    > for ease of use and response time, it beats virtually all of those
    > above it hands down.
    >
    > I do wish to exclude ShareBuilder from my commentary as I don't have
    > an account with them. They may be awesome???
    >
    > I do have very "active" accounts with the rest of those above E*Trade
    > and have had accounts with some of those below. I'm in the process
    > of closing my Scottrade account.
    >
    > Do note I have been categorized as a "pattern day trader" from time
    > to time.
    Oct 19 11:57 AM | Link | Reply
Viewing Comments 1-2 out of 2