Seeking Alpha
Registered investment advisor, bonds, ETF investing, commodities
Profile| Send Message|
( followers)  

I was sufficiently pleased by the response to my strategy-in-a-box ETFs post that it seems appropriate to launch a follow-up post to address several questions raised or implied by readers.

The biggest issues seem to revolve around the history, performance and holdings of these ETFs. It is also important to understand the nature of the index and/or strategy that the ETF seeks to replicate, as well as the timing and methodology used to rebalance the ETFs. For each of the six aforementioned strategy-in-a-box ETFs, I have therefore also included links to a profile/summary page; the prospectus; a current list of holdings; the Morningstar performance data; and the StockCharts gallery chart:

As noted on Sunday, all but LSC have at least two years worth of track record. Normally I would not consider this to be a long time, but given that it covers both strong bull and bear markets, I believe it is an appropriate time period from which to draw some conclusions. Perhaps more interesting is the rebalance period, where quarterly rebalancing seems to be the norm. I have spent a fair amount of time playing with various rebalancing methods and at least in my experience, I find it difficult to gain a meaningful edge with quarterly rebalancing.

Source: Strategy-in-a-Box ETFs: Digging Deeper