Seeking Alpha
About this author:
Submit
an article to

If our response focuses only on the symptoms rather than the underlying causes of the crisis, then we shall bequeath to future generations a serious risk of another crisis even worse than the one we have experienced.

-Mervyn King, Governor of the Bank of England

The Bank of England head has come out unequivocally against continuing with the status quo. He sees grave risks at large global institutions like HBOS (HBOOY.PK) and RBS (RBS), which lent recklessly and leveraged up to a point where they threatened collapsing the entire U.K. financial system. As a result, he is now calling for them to be broken up or we risk a more severe crisis down the road.

However, Gordon Brown has rejected this notion and is looking to move forward with a tweaked version of the status quo.

The Telegraph reports:

Mr Brown told MPs that "the difference between having a retail and investment bank is not the cause of the problem."

The Prime Minister added that "the cause of the problem is that banks have been insufficiently regulated at a global level."

Mr Brown was responding to Mr King’s fiercest attack yet on big banking in a speech he gave in Edinburgh last night. Mr King indicated the country’s high street banks should be separated from their risky investment banking arms.

"“It’s clear King’s not happy with where we are now,” Colin Ellis, an economist at Daiwa Securities told Bloomberg. “He said the regulatory structure was inadequate, and coming from the governor of the Bank of England that’s as damming as it could be."

Lest we forget, Mr. Brown is the architect of the present regulatory structure in the U.K. It was under his guidance as Chancellor that the regulatory structure was divvied up into the tripartite authorities of the FSA, the Bank of England and the Treasury. As with any incumbent, Gordon Brown has a legacy to protect and this puts his interests at odds with ours. So, it should be a given that Brown is not going to break up the banks, especially since he was the architect of the Lloyds (LYG)-HBOS merger to begin with.

But, it is disingenuous for Brown to claim that right-sizing these institutions means abandoning the Universal Banking model. There are 100 different ways to downsize a bank as the forced downsizing at Citigroup (C) demonstrates.

Below is a video of Governor King speaking on the subject, making his call for greater regulation and an end of too big to fail.

Popout

In related news, Goldman Sachs’ Vice Chairman Lord Griffiths has defended Goldman and their outsized bonuses with the unfortunate phrasing that Britons must:

tolerate the inequality as a way to achieve greater prosperity for all.

To make matters worse, he threatened Britain with a loss of tax revenue by explaining bankers will just move to Switzerland if the U.K. tries to take their money away.

Are we looking at “the biggest moral hazard in history?” That’s how the Mervyn King video ends.

To be continued.

Print this article with comments
Comments
5
Comments 1 - 5 out of 5
You are viewing the latest 20 comments
  •  
    Good article but I think you mean UK in the title rather than England. Minor point.. but mildly irritating for the non-English Brits amoungst us.
    Oct 22 09:40 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I find it irritating as well. The title on my blog was:

    PM Brown rejects BoE Head King’s call for breaking up big banks
    www.creditwritedowns.c...

    Somehow this gets changed to something with England in it. Obviously someone doesn't know their geography (or history).

    Apologies.


    On Oct 22 09:40 AM CraigB wrote:

    > Good article but I think you mean UK in the title rather than England.
    > Minor point.. but mildly irritating for the non-English Brits amoungst
    > us.
    Oct 22 04:54 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The tricky bit is to move from the stabilization phase of the recovery (this began in the fall of 2008 and is not yet fully completed) to the restructuring of institutions phase which must entail the reorganizing of UK and US investment banking including the breaking up and refocusing of the ‘too big’ banks.

    Obviously one doesn’t want to panic the banks until ready to act decisively and coordinated action by the US, UK, Switzerland etc. is vital when the time comes to avoid the very blackmail to which Mr. Harrison’s excellent article alludes.
    Oct 22 04:54 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I agree with King. This is another mess waiting to happen. See my earlier post on Why do We Need Banks at All? seekingalpha.com/artic...
    Oct 24 01:17 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Hi Edward,

    Sorry about the headline mixup. I hope the current version is satisfactory (adjusted slightly from yours for length).
    Oct 24 05:30 PM | Link | Reply
Viewing Comments 1-5 out of 5