Seeking Alpha
We cover over 5K calls/quarter
Profile| Send Message|
( followers)  

Comcast Corporation (NASDAQ:CMCSA)

Bank of America Merrill Lynch 2013 Media, Communications & Entertainment Conference

September 11, 2013 11:00 am ET

Executives

Steve Burke - President & CEO

Analysts

Jessica Reif Cohen - Bank of America Merrill Lynch

Jessica Reif Cohen - Bank of America Merrill Lynch

[Call starts abruptly]

You have done a phenomenal job improving operations. NBC has moved into a very strong third place and it’s just one example of the momentum you have created. So as we look at the next like three, maybe three to five years. What do you see as the core drivers of NBCUniversal’s upside and how these drivers evolved since you first took control in 2011?

Steve Burke

So we’re about two and half years into the deal. We had a mechanism in place where we would buy out GE’s remaining 49% over a seven year period and we bought them out five years early. We did that about six or nine months ago. So we did that because obviously we think there is a lot of opportunity and the opportunity. There are a lot of opportunity areas. I think the biggest one that we are most excited about that could be the biggest change quickly would be the performance of the broadcast business where NBC has made some progress we have the number one show in Sunday Night Football number two or three show in The Voice. We feel like we have some shows returning in very, very good development for this fall but the fact of the matter remains that we are significantly behind CBS, Fox and ABC in terms of the profitability of our broadcast business.

Roughly speaking if you include the own television stations the network and syndication which I think is the way you should look at the broadcast ecosystem we’re $500 billion to a $1 billion behind the other three broadcasters. And we have essentially the same physical plant we all have our own television stations we have production studios that make television show and we have networks that reach 100% in the United States. Essentially the same cost structure and the other three players make $500 billion to a $1 billion more than us. And I think that represents a huge opportunity. Retransmission consent is something that’s going to has changed and we’ll continue to change the broadcast business. NBC made virtually nothing on retransmission consent two years ago. This year we’ll make about $200 million and I think if you go out two or three or four years other broadcasters like Les Moonves and Chase Carey had really said how important retransmission consent will be for anybody is in the business.

So retransmission consent is a big opportunity for broadcast but more fundamentally we’ve underperformed. We sell our ads at a discount about a 20% discount which we are working on closing. Ratings are lower than we would like them to be and so broadcast remains a very big opportunity. If you look at the company we are about two-thirds cable channels. Two-thirds of the operating cash flow and the company comes from our cable channels and we think there is real opportunity there. We have a very broad and impressive group of cable channels. USA the number one channel measured in terms of ratings Syfy, Bravo, E!, MSNBC, CNBC, NBC Sports a lot of regional sports networks very, very strong portfolio of cable channels. Seven of our cable channels make over $200 million a year and there are a very, very impressive set of assets that having been said we think there is a monetization gap that which is what we call it between how those channels are doing and how they should be doing measured by how peer cable channels are doing. And the monetization gap exist on both the affiliates side in other words we are not paid as much as we think we should be given our ratings and our positioning by cable and satellite companies we think that monetization gap is 20% or 25%. We think there is also a monetization gap on the advertising side where a channel like USA with its position we think should get the same kind of CPMs that similarly situated cable channels get and it currently does not.

We’ve made some progress on both the affiliate side and the advertising side in the last couple of years but we think there is still a real opportunity. And then the final area I’ll touch on in terms of opportunity is the Theme Park business where we would primarily attracted by the cable channels and actually put a very low valuation on the Theme Park business. So it’s a somewhat complicated because we only own half of the Florida the major Universal Studios complex and Florida-Blackstone own the other half. So when we did our original acquisition model that we showed to our broad we valued the Theme Park business at about $1 billion that business since we did that valuation we bought out Blackstone and we’ve taken EBITDA from about $400 million up to a $1 billion in the last 12 months attendance is up 40% or 50% in Florida and California and if you take a $1 billion of operating cash flow and you apply the multiple that Sea World currently trades at I think you value the business at something like $9 billion or $10 billion.

We love the Theme Park business. We think there is a real opportunity to increase the pace of new attractions. We have far too few hotel rooms in Orlando and the one thing we know when people stay in our hotels they stay they visit our parks an extra day or two and so we have 2400 hotel rooms. We think we have room and capacity for 10,000 hotel rooms. So you’ll see us add attractions at a more rapid rate at hotel rooms at a more rapid rate and we think returns in that business are great and there is great running room. So in general we see lots of different opportunity areas and a big part of our goal, our job is to try to prioritize those make sure that we do those and execute against them. And the good news is I think we are making progress when we first looked at these assets it’s a little complicated because some of the assets content assets like E! and Golf and some of the other cable channels existed inside Comcast but if you look at the assets that are now NBCUniversal on a pro forma basis in 2009 when we put the deal together. These assets generated about $3.1 billion with the OCF and in the last 12 months that $3.1 billion has gone to about $4.5 billion and we think there is lots more opportunity to go.

So we’re pleased with how we started but I think there is a lot more upside and we have to execute and some of these businesses are not very predictable that film business and NBC Primetime some of that has to do with good fortune but we think there is tremendous opportunity for this company.

Jessica Reif Cohen - Bank of America Merrill Lynch

Before we’re going to the divisions just wanted to ask you one broader question which is how much progress have you made with project symphony?

Steve Burke

Well you have to start from a philosophical point of view that says it’s extremely hard in a world that’s fragmented with so many opportunities that exist is very, very hard to get a new show or a new movie launched. And you have to start from a point that says one of the reasons why you put a company together with scale is to allow you to have all the piece parts of the company work together to help major project succeed.

Not everybody shares that point of view not everybody believes that distribution in content can work well together but we look at it and say if you have a company with 22 different businesses representing about 20% of the ratings if you go broadcast and cable ratings cumulatively we have about 20% of the ratings we’re the country’s biggest supplier of television advertising and we also as a sister company have 20 million video customers closed to 20 million high speed data customers that if you put that all together and if you get the company working together and cooperating to help launch new television shows launch new movies launch important initiatives for Comcast Cable that you’ll do better than if you had all the different parts of the company not working together.

It's certainly a harder company to manage if that’s your starting point because it requires people to do things that are not always in the selfish interest of their particular part of the company but we feel that it’s an enormous benefit and we call it symphony because synergy is such a sort of old and overused word but really when we get all parts of the company working together we’ve been astounded by how successful we can be and some of the examples.

When we first launched The Voice we made that a real priority for the company and anywhere you looked on any of our cable channels any time you turned on Comcast Cable you would see promotions for The Voice and I think a big reason why The Voice got launched out of the gate a couple of years ago strong as it did with symphony.

The London Olympics we basically took the entire company and said everywhere you go everything you see we’re going to be reminding people that London is coming and the Olympics are a wonderful event and we actually for a completely tape-delayed Olympics. We greatly exceeded all of our estimates we’re up 20% versus Athens, 8% versus Beijing we did very, very well with younger people. We’re Olympics to Olympics, Summer Olympics to Summer Olympics. We’re up 25% with younger people and we think that’s because if you watched any of our channels or when anywhere near of our assets you couldn’t escape the fact that the Olympics were coming and they were important and it certainly harder to get a company to operate that way but we think it’s one of our real competitive advantages and if you talk to film makers if you talk to Chris Meledandri who runs illumination which is the part of our company that produced Despicable Me.

I think he tell you that he feels very fortunate when Despicable Me comes out you’ve got Despicable Me blimp at the Kentucky Derby you’ve got minion characters running across the screen on USA and E! and even in the Golf channel and at all parts of the company get behind it and if you can harness that I think you are we are likely to succeed in this very competitive world.

Jessica Reif Cohen - Bank of America Merrill Lynch

Okay. Let’s move on to the divisions. We have a lot to cover. So on the NBC broadcast you’ve moved up from four to third how important is it for you to become a number one?

Steve Burke

Well there are a couple advantages. First of all advertisers because NBC’s ratings have not been as strong as the other three. We currently sell spots at a discount. So our CPM is on the order of 20% lower than the CPMs for certainly CBS and Fox. We made some progress in the recent upfront. We actually sold advertise instead of 7% or 8% increase which we think was after CBS higher than the broadcasters so we’re chipping away at that discount but the fact of the matter is that discount exists because we haven’t had the ratings to sort of change it to the degree we could continue to build on the momentum and get a couple of more shows to really connect that discount will go away, may not go away in a year but it will go away and that discount represents a lot of money. Also just by the shear factor we would increase the ratings that would also be an increase and the wonderful thing when it works the wonderful thing about the broadcast business there is no variable cost associated with that improvement in revenue.

So if you add hundreds of millions of dollars of increased advertising that really all falls to the bottom line. In addition to the degree we start to get some hit shows that we own and we try to rejuvenate and reinvest in Universal television which produces a lot of our shows we would then have an increase indication flow from that but I think really job one is trying to make sure that we build on the momentum that we have and two-thirds the next broadcaster is very special here because not only do we have Sunday Night Football which is doing very well and should be the number one show. We have The Voice coming back. We have a little bit of momentum from last year with shows like Revolution, Chicago Fire and Grimm, with some very good new development.

And most importantly we have something that occurs only once every four years which is the Winner Olympics is right in the middle of the broadcast season this year which not only is going to provide a lot of revenue and sort of ratings and profitability for us right in February during the time of the year when we were slow this year but it will be a great launch pad for all of our spring shows and I think one of the reasons why we did so well last fall we were number one NBC was number one last fall one of the reasons was because we were able to use the London Olympics to promote our fall shows and we’ll be able to do that with Sochi. So I spend a lot of time with Bob Greenblatt who runs NBC Entertainment and his team yesterday and you never totally confident and are totally optimistic in a business that has so much variability and so much resting on consumer case and sort of getting lucky with a hit but we feel like we are putting ourselves in a position to do better this fall and spring.

Jessica Reif Cohen - Bank of America Merrill Lynch

Consumers are watching TV very differently than a few years ago different devices, different times. How do you think about the kind of content that you need to produce whether it’s sports or drama, comedy. How is that changing the way you guys thinking about that part of the business?

Steve Burke

Well, it certainly a much more complicated world today and measurement is more complicated, monetization is more complicated. The kind of deals you do with Netflix and Amazon and others international, how you structure deals to acquire programming. It’s a much more complicated world. That having been said, some things have not changed, I think our feeling is if we’re going to be in businesses we need to invest and we need to play to win. So, we made major investments in the Olympics and football shortly after doing the deal, we did long eight or nine year deals for the Olympics and football and those deals I think with 20-20 hindsight have turned out to be very good deals for us, very strong programming and those deals are in a position now with a – it can be profitable as oppose to lose leaders.

We’re going to continue to invest in sports. We recently did a deal with NASCAR, a very long deal with NASCAR to put NASCAR programming on in NBC sports channels we now have Hockey, NASCAR English Premier League, we’re really building out a full year round blaster of professional sports. And we think sports is a good business, if you look at 10 years it’s hard to figure out exactly how people are going to use technology but I would bet a lot of money people are still going to love, NFL football and Olympics and NASCAR. Some live sports we like live event programming like the Boys or America’s Got Talent. We think that that’s a very important part of getting people to watch linear television on a live basis not DVR.

And then we’re investing a lot in scripted programming both at NBC, we’re investing enough in the development process in our ownership of shows to compete effectively. But also places like USA where we have a 11 scripted shows Suits, Graceland, Burn Notice, Covert Affairs. So, I think we’re investing where we need to compete and when we’re in a business we want to be competitive, we don’t want to try to cut away the profitability. When we first started we increased the investment profile in a lot of these channels, we’re not having the kind of large increases that we had before. But we’re investing what it takes to compete in. It’s always easy to say that world is fragmenting and measurement is more of a challenge and you should pull back. But we look at it and say with all the new technologies those can be good for the ecosystem. And the amount of money we’re making from Netflix and Amazon and international television sales, is far greater than we ever dream five years ago. And part of our philosophy is if you create great content and you’re competitive in these businesses and have a certain optimism about these businesses that’s the way you win over the long term.

Jessica Reif Cohen – Bank of America Merrill Lynch

And you mentioned retrans is obviously a key driver for some of your peers but where is NBC in terms of capitalizing on that, there is been a lot of pushback Time Warner Cable and CBS most recently. So, can you just tell where you are and what the challenges are in terms of meeting your potential?

Steve Burke

Well, the key to retransmission consent is to have contracts expire with the big distributors that allow you to reopen the existing retransmission consent contracts. When we did the deal two and a half years ago, NBC was essentially making no money in transmission consent. So, the existing contracts spelled out the ability for those distributors to carry NBC and not have to pay. One thing that we really hadn’t figured on when we did the deal was how rapidly retransmission consent was going to establish itself. We underestimated that frankly. That’s a very good thing for NBCUniversal not so good I think for Comcast Cable.

But, over time as we reopen and renegotiate deals, I think what’s happening is there is becoming a rate card for retransmission consent, the negotiations that CBS, FOX, ABC and we are having, the marketplace is settling around numbers and those numbers are sort of a rate card that exist over time. And we will as our contracts come up, we will get those revenues the same way CBS, ABC and FOX have. There maybe a little bit of a lag because our contracts may come up at a later date than some of the other broadcasters but we’ve gone from essentially zero a couple of years ago to $200 million this year and I see no reason why we won’t sort of dropped behind the other broadcasters and get paid in a similar fashion as the way that they get paid in the future.

Jessica Reif Cohen – Bank of America Merrill Lynch

And it somehow the retrans is regulated away or their workaround services like Aereo are successful legally. What can you do to ensure the value of the – that you receive the value of your content?

Steve Burke

Well, I think Aereo is going to be found unlawful. So, I don’t think that’s something that we’re not necessarily worrying about and I know there is been a lot of talk about taking broadcasters and turning them into cable channels which is something that we’ve looked at. But my bet is that what’s happening here is that the broadcast channels are turning into do a revenue stream businesses and they’ll remain do a revenue stream businesses for a long time I mean the fact of the matter is ABC, NBC, CBS and FOX aggregate the biggest audiences in the country and those audiences are valuable. And now there is a marketplace establishing itself and that marketplace we need to get the same kind of retransmission consent dollars with CBS and FOX and ABC get if we want to be competitive with them and invest in programming the way they do. So, I think that’s now part of the ecosystem, I’ll be surprised if that changes.

Jessica Reif Cohen – Bank of America Merrill Lynch

Okay. On advertising, you got a wide range of properties as you mentioned. Can you give us an update on what you’re seeing in the national level, the local level and any – if you can give us into Q4 2014?

Steve Burke

Well, I think national advertising is still strong. If you look at scatter prices are still double-digit, we’re starting to broadcast season. So, upfront pricing will start to manifest itself but I think the national advertising market is quite good. The local markets are not as good as national and we do have pockets of local markets that are not doing as well as we wish. But I think in general, advertising is strong and I think if you look at the most recent upfront, people were tentative and it may have taken longer to do deals but we did 7% or 8% deals for our big cable channels like USA and Sci Fi, 7% or 8% deals for NBC. And I think that’s the sign that the market is good and all the indications we get more recently since the upfront has closed is that the market continues to be strong.

Jessica Reif Cohen – Bank of America Merrill Lynch

And on the upfront, you had a very different strategy, you sold your NBCUniversal properties as a package, to broadcast and cable. How much incremental CPM what you mentioned the 7% to 8% but how much you feel with the entitlement gap with the monetization gap I think you’re calling it now. Do you feel you achieved through bundling?

Steve Burke

Well, just for a little historical perspective, prior to this year, we had never sold broadcast cable and digital together. So, USA had a sales force, Bravo had a sales force, NBC Entertainment out of sales force. And we didn’t even really sell the individual day sports inside NBC together. So, NBC Sports had ahead of sales in a group selling NBC Sports, NBC Entertainment had ahead of sales in a group selling NBC Entertainment and we never really put everything together. And again going back to our core sort of philosophy that this scale is helpful, this year we put all of our advertising businesses under one executive of good strong executive named (inaudible).

And we went to market with one approach. So, if you wanted to buy Sunday football we wanted to have a discussion with you about Modern Family on USA. If you wanted to buy the voice, we wanted to have a discussion with you about buying some time in Bravo. And our feeling is that when you have our scale and you can put all these assets together, first of all it’s one-stop shopping for buyers. So, I think it’s a more efficient way of dealing with the company than having eight different discussion on eight different parts of the business.

I think it also helps you when you’re dealing with large buying groups to have a large portfolio of assets to talk about. And I think we’re chipping away at the entitlement gap. I think we probably made 2 or 3 percentage points or 200 or 300 basis points of improvement. We still have a long way to go but in my opinion if you manage it well, clearly you’ll do better as a group of assets sold together than you will having a variety of different discrete sales forces.

Jessica Reif Cohen – Bank of America Merrill Lynch

And the other part of the entitlement gap or again monetization gap, that you’ve been calling it lately, are the affiliate fees. So, you’ve done 25% of your contracts so far and other 75% to go. How much have to achieved in terms of closing the gap and what do you think the timeframe is for the rest?

Steve Burke

So, we had a lot of distribution deals to do over the last 12 months or so, it’s just the way they fall and where they bunched up. We reset rates in about 25% of the multi-channel home universe. And we established rates that we feel are fair and rates that if we got those rates for the other 75% when those contracts expire, we will have closed the entitlement gap. Those – the other 75% of contracts expire roughly over the next three years and we don’t see a real reason. Some of the 25% that we’ve done in the last 12 months were with very big distributors. So, we don’t see a real reason why we can’t get the kind of value for the other 75% of contracts that we got for the first 25% over time.

Jessica Reif Cohen – Bank of America Merrill Lynch

Okay. I want to theme parks and film before we open it up, we don’t have that much time. So much to talk about. So, I guess on theme parks, if you exclude like the noise of the user timing in last quarter I mean you still had a great quarter. What do you seeing, what are the underlying trends that you see in the parks? And can you talk about from an attendant standpoint, revenue, et cetera?

Steve Burke

Well, our park business continues to be strong where we were on a cadence now of opening one attraction in Florida and one attraction in California every year. We opened Transformers the Transformers attraction in Hollywood three years ago and it was so successful. We sped up the development of Transformers in Orlando and opened that in the beginning of this summer. We have two parks in Orlando but the park where we opened Transformers has been up 20% most week since that attraction opened.

And our feeling is that if we open the right kind of attractions, that have to be well executed that to be think that our easy include a market that we can really grow these businesses. The thing that we’re most excited about, what really transformed our park in Orlando was opening Harry Potter which happened a few years ago. We’re opening a second Harry Potter attraction in Orlando which I think is one of the most creative ideas I’ve ever seen in the theme park business but first attraction is in the one of our gates it’s called Islands of Adventure.

The second attraction is in the other gate and the way you get from one gate to the second gate as you take a train and the train is the Hogwarts Express. And so, the actual transition or the movement from one gate to another gate is part of the attraction which is never been done before and it’s a wonderful creative idea, that opens next spring. We think that’s going to be a very big draw. And then we’re opening Harry Potter in Hollywood in Japan. So, I think our feeling is first of all the economy is seems to be positive for theme park attendance and people are coming to Florida and Southern California but within what’s going on in a macro level if we can continue to invest in innovative attractions, get the right kind of marketing that explains to people what Universal Studios is that it’s a family destination in and out of itself not an add-on attraction for somebody who spend three or four days on some place else that we can continue to grow that business and that’s our plan.

Jessica Reif Cohen – Bank of America Merrill Lynch

And so how should we think about the capital, what bring you on in terms of capital cycle? How should we think about this new attractions and what you can do to the business, hotel rooms et cetera?

Steve Burke

Well, we’ve taken the capital spend up to about $500 million this year and I think that’s about the level that you should assume capital is going to stay, that will allow us on an annual basis to open a couple of major attractions and continue to sort of invest in the ongoing maintenance and IT and other infrastructure that’s necessary. We do think – so I think that level should be a reasonable sustainable level which is much higher than the capital spend that we’ve had if you look over the last five years or so, five or ten years or so. In terms of hotels, we have 2400 rooms now, we’ll open another 1800 rooms with our partner Loews, next spring in advance to Harry Potter. And I think you’ll see us open hotels. We’ve done a study that says that we could have as many as 10,000 or 15,000 hotels, hotel rooms and still have occupancy that makes those rooms profitable and all of the people staying in those hotels would be more likely to go to our theme parks. So, I think strategically we need to get those hotel rooms open and build out the resort. But I think about a $500 million annual capital spend is necessary to increase our growth rate and keep that business moving.

Jessica Reif Cohen – Bank of America Merrill Lynch

Juts one question on film and then open it up because we don’t have that much time. But films actually had a really good year this year with Despicable Me and [Dr. Seuss'] et cetera is there anything you are doing differently or is it just like the cyclicality of the business and kind of what can you give some outlook on that business

Steve Burke

Well I think we are concentrating very heavily on franchises and very heavily on animated film. One of the real gems inside our company is Illumination the animation studio led by Chris Meledandri and Despicable Me 2, which came out this summer is the most profitable film in the 100 year history of the Universal and there will obviously be another reopening a film called Minions, which are the minions from Despicable Me next Christmas and then there will be Despicable Me 3. And so the animation business we think is a very, very important part of our future at Universal Studios.

We also are trying to do whatever we can to invest in our franchises take old franchises like American Pie and try to clean them up and reinvest in them franchisee and then take franchises like Fast & Furious and continue to evolve and invest and make those what they can be and then try to build some new ones movies like Ted and Pitch Perfect and others. So, that’s a part of our strategy.

We are also very eager to improve our performance internationally, improve our performance in terms of digital, improve our strategies in terms of how we take our films and move them around the world. There are huge, huge opportunities in places like China and with new technologies. And I think we have made a lot of progress in the last two and half years, we want to make even more progress in the future.

Jessica Reif Cohen – Bank of America Merrill Lynch

I’m going to open it up to questions and if we have time, I would love to come back to Telemundo question as well. But question here.

Question-and-Answer Session

Unidentified Analyst

Thank you. Good morning. I had a couple of quick questions one, a couple in cable. Can you discuss your brand USA, what is the brand USA means to consumers? How do you build that brand in a more fragmented world and as I understand it the idea is around with the name BlueSky and what that means to consumers? And then secondly on the Cable Group, your programming expense this year has been fairly subdued. The group has had kind of programming bubble or pig going through it for while. You pretty well controlled your balance sheet. It doesn’t appear to show that there is a pig coming through your programming costs but maybe there is. Can you discuss what the outlook for programming cost is? Thanks.

Steve Burke

Would you say a pig coming through?

Unidentified Analyst

Yeah pig inside a python yeah.

Steve Burke

So, I’ll answer that one first. I think we stepped up our programming investment in the cable channels pretty significantly the first year after the deal. I think now, we’re sort of in a group, where we’re going to continue to invest in those businesses. One of the biggest questions we have during when we go through the budget cycle is what should the programming increase be and I think we’re in sort of the mid to high single digit range and you could argue it should be 5 you could argue it should be 9 and that’s, that’s a debate that we’re going through. We’ve not set our programming budgets for next year but I don’t think there is another major pig going through the python if that’s your analogy.

I think in terms of USA the simplistic answer for USA has always been that it was a BlueSky network and that it would produce one hour dramas that were very character driven. I think that’s a simplistic as to what USA is. I think USA has become a place where well written dramas with very, very strong characters exist. And it’s interesting the team at USA led by Bonnie Hammer and Chris McCumber and Jeff Wachtel. They are trying to continue to evolve and change their programming mix. We one of our biggest new initiatives is we bought all the rerun rights, the cable rerun rights for Modern Family.

So, in two weeks Modern Family will be on USA, which is a huge opportunity because the Modern Family audience is not necessarily - does not have a tremendous overlap of the USA audience, which is a challenge from a marketing point of view. But if we can get the Modern Family audience to come and watch Modern Family we think that will be beneficial for the rest of USA programming. But basically it’s a general interest channel with a very clear point of view and a belief that character based shows whether they are dramas or comedies are important and enjoyable and attractive to viewers.

Unidentified Analyst

Just I want to ask about you had some margin success with content. The overall industry is also seeing more benefit [of the] trends in terms of electronic sell-through and SVOD longer-term what’s your idea of the price for film profits?

Steve Burke

Well I, if you look at it right now there has been some technology that’s been beneficial to the film business. But the majority of the benefit I think from SVOD has gone to television shows not to film. I think electronic sell-through is not even in the first innings it s in the top half of the first inning. And I think with all this technology and all of these ways to securely get film content there were lot of businesses that are yet to be created that will be created over the next 5 or 10 years that can grow the pie.

My belief is that the theatrical experience going into a movie theater is going to be around for very long, long time as long as boys and girls who want to get away from their parents and go out and see a movie and parents want to get away from their kids and everybody wants to share that magic that you get when you’re inside a theater.

But that doesn’t, isn’t room for a lot of businesses that can be enabled by all these technology. I think there is something like 5 billion cell phones in the world not all of those phones are smartphones but I think some days they will all be smartphones and each of those smartphones and effect is a seat in the movie theater or a chance for a television set or a chance for someone to watch a motion picture. So, all that technology at some point I think can be harnessed to grow the pie and get more people to watch a movie in its first run even a movie that does $50 million it’s opening weekend only has six or seven million people going to that movie in a country with 320 million people.

So, the vast majority of people don’t see even the biggest hit movies and the vast majority of the people have the ability to see those movies at home or on the go with their mobile. So, it’s very, very hard for me to predict when and how and exactly what the financial ramifications will be but if I had to bet over the next 10 years, the movie business is going to get some technological help that will improve the profitability of that business.

Unidentified Analyst

Thank you.

Jessica Reif Cohen – Bank of America Merrill Lynch

Okay. I don’t see a question from here. So, let me just (inaudible) just on Telemundo like I’m trying to ask you have actually improved your share despite Univision’s unique advantage in having Mexico as like a test market. I guess the question is how what do you attribute the success so far to and what can you do to really move the needle on that business?

Steve Burke

Well we haven’t really talked about Telemundo but it’s another case, where we have infrastructure that’s very similar to Univision. There is really two major Spanish language providers in the United States Univision and Telemundo. We both have television stations. We have both affiliates and we both have national networks that reach the majority, vast majority of Spanish speaking people and yet before dead service, I think Univision makes over $1 a year in operating free cash flow and Telemundo makes about $50 million a year in operating cash flow.

So, huge, huge variance and Univision is a great company and they have invested wisely and have a unique relationship with Televisa and certain advantages that Telemundo doesn’t have. But to me there is clearly is room for improvement if we do the right things and invest smartly. Many of our television, Telemundo television stations don’t have strong local news, don’t even have local news in the morning don’t have strong local news franchises because they haven’t been given the money to invest and we need to build those. We need to make sure that we’re doing the right things in terms of telenovelas.

And I think the rest of NBCUniversal can help Telemundo. We took the voice, which is obviously been tremendously popular on NBC and did a version of The Voice called La Voz Kids, which is a kids version of The Voice on Sunday Nights on Telemundo instantly became a hug hit. And I think there are other franchises inside NBC and our cable channels that we can bring to that market as well.

So, I think there is real opportunity there. It’s going to require investment and being smarter it’s going to require time. But if there are two people in a market and one player has 80% share and other player has 20% share if you are the guy with 20% share I think you got to come into work everyday saying we’ve opportunity.

Jessica Reif Cohen – Bank of America Merrill Lynch

Right. The question there.

Unidentified Analyst

Yeah. I just wanted to ask about your current thoughts on 4K Ultra HD and the rollout the time to market. And if you the cable industry and Comcast views it as a tool to remain competitive with over the top providers?

Steve Burke

Well personally I’m skeptical that over the top is a good business. I looked at it many, many times and with or without high def or 4K or new technologies I’m just skeptical it remains to be seen maybe I’m missing something but I’m not sure over the top it’s a real business. 4K I think it’s a very interesting question. I have seen it and what I’ve seen it, its spectacular. It’s the picture quality it takes your breath away. I have no doubt 4K is going to occur to me the whole question is how quickly things go and having been in Comcast cable and living through 3D and then watching high def take away longer than people thought it would take and then all of a sudden it happened.

To me the only question with 4K is when it happens and I think the prices of sets have to come down a little bit of a chicken and the egg because the price of sets won’t come down until lot of people get it. But it’s a tremendous investment for cable companies and content companies to change cameras and my understanding is there are ways that you can simulate 4K without cameras.

You can do things technically to sort of make it look like 4K but the best way to really deliver a great 4K experience eventually will require a change in the infrastructure and I think it’s just a question if you are sitting in our shoes or other media companies what that timing is. But I would be very surprised if at some point 4K doesn’t become a very important part of the landscape.

Jessica Reif Cohen – Bank of America Merrill Lynch

I can’t get enough time with you, but we are out of time. So, I thank you so much for coming. Thank you, Steve.

Steve Burke

Thank you, Jessica. Thank you.

Copyright policy: All transcripts on this site are the copyright of Seeking Alpha. However, we view them as an important resource for bloggers and journalists, and are excited to contribute to the democratization of financial information on the Internet. (Until now investors have had to pay thousands of dollars in subscription fees for transcripts.) So our reproduction policy is as follows: You may quote up to 400 words of any transcript on the condition that you attribute the transcript to Seeking Alpha and either link to the original transcript or to www.SeekingAlpha.com. All other use is prohibited.

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE IS A TEXTUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S CONFERENCE CALL, CONFERENCE PRESENTATION OR OTHER AUDIO PRESENTATION, AND WHILE EFFORTS ARE MADE TO PROVIDE AN ACCURATE TRANSCRIPTION, THERE MAY BE MATERIAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURACIES IN THE REPORTING OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE AUDIO PRESENTATIONS. IN NO WAY DOES SEEKING ALPHA ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS MADE BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEB SITE OR IN ANY TRANSCRIPT. USERS ARE ADVISED TO REVIEW THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S AUDIO PRESENTATION ITSELF AND THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S SEC FILINGS BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS.

If you have any additional questions about our online transcripts, please contact us at: transcripts@seekingalpha.com. Thank you!

Source: Comcast's CEO Presents at Bank of America Merrill Lynch 2013 Media, Communications & Entertainment Conference (Transcript)
This Transcript
All Transcripts