Wednesday Outlook: Commodities, Global Markets 18 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
<< Return to page 1 - Oversold Bounce Time?
The Shadow? Well, this just shows how old I am. It just occurred to me as many are still coming to grips with malfeasance and insider deals on Wall Street and with the government. So then, “what evil does lurk in the hearts of men”? It’s in the news every day it seems.
The McClellan Oscillator argues for a bounce-back rally now. It could come tomorrow or the next day. The worst I’ve seen the reading is -100 so we’re just about there.
Tonight Visa (V) reported and the stock, which was down 5% early, came back in after hours trading to trade higher. I guess all that interest on unpaid balances is kicking-in rather than new charges. Below is the current summary courtesy of MarketWatch:
click to enlarge
Tomorrow we get Durable Goods orders and New Home sales plus more bond auctions.
Let’s see what happens and you can follow our pithy comments on twitter.
Disclaimer: Among other issues the ETF Digest maintains positions in: SPY, RSP, VTI, TZA, XLY, UDN, GLD, DBC, USL, XLE, BDD, EFA, EEM, EWC and FXI.
The charts and comments are only the author’s view of market activity and aren’t recommendations to buy or sell any security. Market sectors and related ETFs are selected based on his opinion as to their importance in providing the viewer a comprehensive summary of market conditions for the featured period. Chart annotations aren’t predictive of any future market action rather they only demonstrate the author’s opinion as to a range of possibilities going forward. More detailed information, including actionable alerts, are available to subscribers at www.etfdigest.com.
Related Articles
|
























This article has 18 comments:
The again, the oscillator hit a high on September 17 and a low on October 02. Over the same time period, the S&P500 fell 3.9%.
I haven't studied the value of the McClellan Oscillator in depth and I do not use it in my own timer. Does anyone find the MO to be of much value?
No one should use it in isolation.
That said, the typical patter is that equities see a late day "rally" that bumps the Dow to maybe 30 or 40 on the plus side.
What you don't see is that the bump is usually shill-buying through various firms and thanks to Ben and Tim's hot printing presses.
We have a typical Bloomberg "pump" story:
"U.S. Durable-Goods Orders Rise Fourth Time in Six Months in Recovery Sign" (If you look closely at the report, this is an absolute fabrication...)
Then the most active, as is almost typical (one would have thought some of these firms are involved in finding the cure for cancer):
CITIGROUP INC
SPDR TRUST SER 1
BANK OF AMERICA
E*TRADE FINANCIA
ISHARES-EMG MKT
To top all of this off we have GMAC wanting more government money...
The governments of the world better have some deep pockets with resources to back it up as this appears to be a slow, but calculated, decent into the abyss.
Some would argue that a failure to observe a 50 day moving average, at a time when short term momentum indicators like the NYMO are already at oversold extremes, suggests we are at the front end of an intermediate downward trend (or worse). If so, then we will be in the most heavily and widely anticipated market correction in recent history. Yes, we are all conditioned to believe that the market rarely rewards the majority-held view, but perhaps this truly is The New Normal - to borrow a phrase from Bill Gross. In the New Normal, the majority actually get it right, and are richly rewarded by the market.
Which reminds me, anyone notice Abby Joseph Cohen stepped down this year at Goldman? Ahhhh, at the highs of the market bubble back in the late 1990s, Abby Joseph Cohen was practically a household name, offering up her widely accepted views that the stock market had nowhere left to go but up, thanks to the miraculous and new dynamics of the tech industry. In the late 1990s, we all knew we were in a fundamentally new era, that markets would absolutely go higher and higher, perhaps forever, and Abby Cohen was quite the spokesperson.
But no longer. Bill Gross is rapidly becoming today what Abby Joseph Cohen was to the financial media in the late 1990s. Like her, he points to a New Normal, a fundamentally new era that supports a continued slide in equities (and other risky asset) prices.
Have we come full circle, then? Do we all have a high degree of conviction that asset prices must drop, that the economy is fundamentally different this time, and have we finally settled on financial celebrity spokespeople who will articulate this belief on our behalf? If so, with history as any guide, we are wrong. Unless, of course, we are all collectively smarter than we were in 1999.
On Oct 28 05:57 PM Alex Trias wrote:
> Alas, what a difference a day makes. The big excitement today is
> how many ETFs sliced through their 50 day moving averages. I expect
> Dave will have something to say about that in his next article, which
> I await with great interest.
>
> Some would argue that a failure to observe a 50 day moving average,
> at a time when short term momentum indicators like the NYMO are already
> at oversold extremes, suggests we are at the front end of an intermediate
> downward trend (or worse). If so, then we will be in the most heavily
> and widely anticipated market correction in recent history. Yes,
> we are all conditioned to believe that the market rarely rewards
> the majority-held view, but perhaps this truly is The New Normal
> - to borrow a phrase from Bill Gross. In the New Normal, the majority
> actually get it right, and are richly rewarded by the market. <br/>
>
> Which reminds me, anyone notice Abby Joseph Cohen stepped down this
> year at Goldman? Ahhhh, at the highs of the market bubble back in
> the late 1990s, Abby Joseph Cohen was practically a household name,
> offering up her widely accepted views that the stock market had nowhere
> left to go but up, thanks to the miraculous and new dynamics of the
> tech industry. In the late 1990s, we all knew we were in a fundamentally
> new era, that markets would absolutely go higher and higher, perhaps
> forever, and Abby Cohen was quite the spokesperson.
> But no longer. Bill Gross is rapidly becoming today what Abby Joseph
> Cohen was to the financial media in the late 1990s. Like her, he
> points to a New Normal, a fundamentally new era that supports a continued
> slide in equities (and other risky asset) prices.
> Have we come full circle, then? Do we all have a high degree of conviction
> that asset prices must drop, that the economy is fundamentally different
> this time, and have we finally settled on financial celebrity spokespeople
> who will articulate this belief on our behalf? If so, with history
> as any guide, we are wrong. Unless, of course, we are all collectively
> smarter than we were in 1999.
Good Question. I was not sure about David's gap comment.
As a general rule.....most gaps usually fill within a few days. However gaps are also indicators of strong directional movement.
Hmmmm???
On Oct 28 07:28 PM apirri wrote:
> David, UNG has only $10 to go before it is zero. What do you think?
This time of year, (open-end) mutual funds declare and get ready to pay out their year end cap gains. The folks who hung in there through the melt down will get a rude awakening. In spite of this year
This time of year, (open-end) mutual funds declare and get ready to pay out their year end cap gains. The folks who hung in there through the melt down will get a rude awakening. In spite of this year's market rally, many of the well-known funds will not be declaring/paying a cent in cap gains! My five cent's worth: folks will not be happy....