Oil Price Manipulation: Taking from the Poor to Give to the Rich 13 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
When oil was $30 a barrel (way back in 2003—when dinosaurs still roamed the earth) gas was $1.52 (avg), and ExxonMobil Corp. (XOM) made $21b in profits on $246b in sales—not too shabby!
So since they were doing OK financially, we can assume they knew what they were doing price-wise and, as an “integrated oil company,” they were able to process that oil and deliver it right to your gas tank all under one great corporate umbrella. The same corporate umbrella, by the way, that the Supreme Court of 1911 dissolved into 34 companies in order to protect the American people from this sort of price gouging.
Now I’m not going to pretend to know all of Exxon’s costs, but obviously they were able to refine and deliver oil for a nice profit by charging you just $1.52 a gallon. We do know that a barrel of oil in 2003 cost an average of $28, and there are 42 gallons in a barrel, so that’s $0.66 per gallon that we will say is something they can’t control (forgetting the fact that they own or lease the land, the equipment, the people and the production facilities that get oil out of the ground for an average of $8 per barrel).
Now here’s where I’ll start going slow so our legislators can follow. If oil, the main ingredient in gasoline, cost $0.66, and gasoline can be profitably delivered for $1.52, then that means all of Exxon’s costs were less than $0.86. In fact, that $0.86 they charged included an operating income (pre-tax) of $32b, or 13%.
That profit, by the way, is after paying salaries. Take Lee Raymond, the ex-CEO for example. He was paid an average of '$50m a year for running Exxon, but, when it came time to retire, all the company could do for him was give him a check for $140m—not even a gold watch!
Now when oil goes up to $64 a barrel, like it is today, and Exxon, Chevron Corp. (CVX), ConocoPhillips (COP), BP PLC (BP) testify and swear (oh sorry, they refused to be sworn in) to you that gas prices are not their fault, ask this very simple question:
When oil costs $0.66 a gallon, you add $0.86 and gas is $1.52. But now oil is $1.52 a gallon, and gas is selling for $2.60. Did refining and distribution costs increase to $1.08?
The truthful answer is—apparently not. Exxon’s operating income last quarter was $18.5b on $99b in sales, or 18.6%, a 43% increase in margins at the expense of the American consumer.
There is a reason the Supreme Court broke up Standard Oil in 1911; not only is it back together now, but it is part of an oligopoly, a cartel, that controls the lifeblood of this country with virtually no oversight (as the BP debacle clearly demonstrates).
So when you are filling up at the pump this weekend, think about how much you SHOULD be paying for gas versus how much you ARE paying for gas and thank your Congressmen, especially Energy Chairman Senator Stevens of Alaska and our own beloved Vice President Cheney for the excellent work done by his apparently secret energy task force, which first met in 2001, when oil averaged $20 a barrel.
There can be no doubt as to the task force’s effect (even though we are not allowed to know who was on it or what was said), as oil climbed 25% in 2002 to average $25 for the year. Our Vice-President (former Halliburton Co. (HAL) CEO) found this to be unacceptable and sprang into action, reconvening the secret society in 2002.
That must have really done the trick, because oil averaged just $27 in 2003. But by the end of that year we were well on our way to $35, and the rest is history! Having done their jobs to defend Americans right to make a decent living, free from the tyranny of taxes and regulations (providing, of course, you use the broad definition of Americans to include Oil companies, because the rest of us just got screwed), the committee did not seem to feel it necessary to meet again as oil hit $45 and $55 in ’04, $65 and $70 in ’05 and $79 in ’06.
“What’s the big deal?” you might say. “It’s just an extra 20 or 30 cents a gallon.” That’s the beauty of this kind of theft. Like credit card thieves (or credit card companies), they can get away with overcharging tens of millions of people a few dollars each day. It’s not enough for you to complain about, but for them... Well, Exxon earned $10b last quarter alone, more money than they earned in all of 1999 when those pesky democrats were in office!
Even if you don't need the money, don't you think that the extra $292b we are spending on oil every year could be put to better use in other parts of the economy? And that's just America. On a global scale, Cheney and Bush's circle of friends are raking in $1 trillion more per year than they did in 2000—Mission Accomplished for sure!
Related Articles
|
-
The Seeking Alpha 100
See allThe top 100 stock
market authors
selected for publication
Seeking Alpha 100 » -
Fastest Climbers
Authors with the largestSee all
increase in followers
in the last 7 days
Fastest Climbers » -
Top Commenters
Top commenters,See all
as ranked by their peers
Top Commenters » -
Top Instabloggers
The 100 most activeSee all
Instabloggers.
Top Instabloggers » -
Top StockTalkers
TopSee all
StockTalkers.
Top StockTalkers »
This article has 13 comments:
7/17/2006 energy.seekingalpha.co...
8/20/2006 energy.seekingalpha.co...
8/28/2006 energy.seekingalpha.co...
All the oil companies are working on a percentage basis and not on a cost plus basis! XOM stock may dip to 61/62, but as soon as Q3 earnings are in its back to 70. Have you noticed that XOM continues to buy back its shares below 65?
Disclosure: This personal comment by a CrossProfit analyst reflects the opinion of CrossProfit.com.
www.crossprofit.com
Here's an even easier way to look at it.
When gas was $1.55 per gallon, XOM made a 13% profit - so every gallon you purchased included a .20 profit for XOM - this is an audited fact!
Now gas is $2.50 a gallon (forgetting the past 6 months) and XOM is making an 18% profit. That means you are now giving XOM (or whoever) .45 for each gallon you purchase.
Just like with any utility (most of which are sensibly regulated), your demand is inflexible so they can charge any rate of profit they wish. You can say the money went here or this expense or that expense or tax or terror or speculators or any BS you wish to use but the absolute mathematical fact is that Exxon is making 38% more profits while you are paying 66% more for energy.
They could have maintained their margins or even let them drift up a few points but instead, they found you mugged and beaten on the street and they stopped to bend over and go through you wallet to get your last couple of bucks. Yeah God bless 'em, they're just patriotic Americans trying to scrape by as best they can...
Maybe they are just brilliant traders and make a lot of money that way, and just scrape by selling their petroleum based products.
Banks typically are squeezed when the price of their raw material (money) is going up, and make money as it is going down. Exxon is making more as prices go up... you've got to hand it to them, they are brilliant at recovering cost!
Disclosure: I am long XOM. I don't have to agree with it to profit from it.
From alta.org:
Philip R. Davis was the founder and president of Accu-Search, Inc., and is now the president of Accu-Title, LLC, a software provider and IT consultant to the title industry. He can be reached at: phil@accutitle.com.