Seeking Alpha
About this author:

When an entire sector - or the broad market as a whole - decides to take a dip, that's when I like to go on a buying spree and as investors of the biotech/small pharma sector well know, it's been a rough few weeks. The shorts have jumped on board and taken control after the previous run-up gave many biotech stocks a liftoff earlier this year.

There's no doubt that it's tough to sit there and look at your portfolio during the pullbacks, as the stocks that you've been accumulating for the long term will lose much of the unrealized profit value - or dip into overall negative territory; sometimes pretty significantly into negative territory.

It's at times like this where the longer-term investor needs to gut it out, ignore the red (or less green) in the portfolio and add shares to those positions that have not dropped as a result of bad news, but have dropped along with a sector or market pullback.

Truth be told, we need pullbacks like this one because it gives us a chance to buy in for prices that allow the small investor to average down, reduce the overall risk a little and make it easier to bank some profits during the next run.

Additionally, the reason why we sell stocks on the way up is not only to go on vacation or eat out a whole lot more, but to make sure that there is cash on hand in the event of a pullback. Those that were all-in during the market crash over the past couple of years missed out on a big buying opportunity late last year and early this year, but those that kept some cash on the sidelines to throw at the market while everything was on sale made off pretty well.

In fact, if there is any positive to come from the most recent economic collapse, it's that a lot of small-time investors had a once in a lifetime opportunity to jump in low and build a stockpile of investments that only a few years ago would have been unheard of. Who would have thought Citi (C) or Ford (F) for a dollar; GE for about six bucks? Nordstrom (JWN) for under ten bucks? And on the speculative side, Sirius (SIRI) for five cents and a slew of biotechs for a dime or two?

The point is that it's too easy to be scared away from the market on a significant drop, and it takes fortitude to be able to buy when others are selling - as long as you're confident in your Due Diligence and confident that the stock is not dropping as a result of bad news relating specifically to that stock.

BioDelivery Sciences (BDSI): I simply couldn't resist adding to my position of BioDelivery Sciences shares at or around the four dollar level. With Onsolis approved and on the market (according to a PR a few weeks ago that stated the Onsolis launch was imminent), this stock should rebound nicely when real revenues start rolling in early next year. With the heavyweight marketing help of Meda behind the Onsolis launch, I think that there's a good chance that significant revenue will start rolling in quick.

BioDelivery also has potential milestone payments coming the company's way and a pipeline of possibilities utilizing the now validated BEMA technology.

I'm a very patient investor, and while I'm sitting out this pullback, I'll be adding to my position of BDSI. While I do consider BDSI a growth stock for the long term at this point, I also consider a short to mid term speculative play because I think a quick double from these levels could be in order with the right news release.

Cel-Sci (CVM): The saga of Cel Sci continues, but I couldn't resist adding shares at eighty seven cents on Monday as the stock continued to slide. No news has been released to justify the recent price action, yet with so much possible news pending over the short to mid term, I couldn't help but add to my position of the stock near the low of the day.

Over the years I have accumulated CVM with strictly a long term outlook, but the lower the stock slides, it becomes a decent short term play as well.

According to an article released by BioMedReports on Monday, officials at Cel Sci will release an update on the H1N1 LEAPS program "very soon", and many longs of the stock have been 'long' awaiting an update. There are impatient investors out there who want to see the company respond to the day to day action of the stock price, but I'm the type that doesn't believe it should issue news unless it's 'quality' news; meaning no fluff.

Remember, earlier this year I thought that Cel Sci was issuing some 'fluff' with the early swine flu PRs, but the one PR that indicated that the FDA had cleared the company to conduct some initial testing is the one that validated the 'LEAPS to potentially treat H1N1' platform, in my opinion.

Additional news that should be released within the next couple of months regarding Cel Sci is the validation of the Baltimore area facility and the commencement of the Multikine Phase III trial.

It's tough to predict day to day price action in a stock that is being played such as CVM, but I'm sure of one thing - the lower this one goes, the more I will buy.

My ultimate horizon for investing in CVM is for the long term - to see how Multikine plays out - but there's enough potential news that could hit the wires over the short term that the impatient investor could also be quickly satisfied.

Antigenics (AGEN): The recent news regarding Oncophage in Europe hit the stock pretty hard, but the long term potential of Antigenics is still alive, in my opinion.

The glioma trials look promising enough to date. I don't believe that Oncophage for the treatment of kidney cancer is DOA just yet and QS-21 is alive and well.

While I do believe that any positive news from Russia regarding the Oncophage launch in that country (combined with news of Russian government reimbursement) would be good for both the company and the stock, I consider AGEN more in the 'Phase II' portion of my portfolio - alongside Pharmacyclics (PCYC), Peregrine (PPHM) and Keryx Biopharmaceuticals (KERX).

I'll wait and see how low this one goes before adding more shares, but I consider Russia news a possible short term mover, QS-21 updates a mid term mover and Oncophage a long term mover.

Generex Biotechnology (GNBT): I continue to look at Generex as a speculative mid to long term play, based mostly on the potential of Oral-Lyn, but I'm set on shares for now unless the stock dips any further. I bought at sixty five cents and fifty five cents, so I'll probably wait and see if we see forty five cents before buying again.

I maintain my position that I think that GNBT will move up to the dollar mark as soon as either the sector starts to turn around or positive Phase III data is released (interim or actual), whichever comes first.

Disclosure: VFC is long AGEN, CVM, GNBT, BDSI.

Print this article with comments

This article has 33 comments:

  •  
    Great article Vince
    It's good to read encouraging articles from someone that knows a whole lot more then me.
    You have hit the nail square on the head
    Thanks and keep up the good fight..
    Nov 03 09:50 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    This guy is a pumper. Trace back his articles, he's wrong almost all the time!


    On Nov 03 09:50 AM User 50802 wrote:

    > Great article Vince
    > It's good to read encouraging articles from someone that knows a
    > whole lot more then me.
    > You have hit the nail square on the head
    > Thanks and keep up the good fight..
    Nov 03 10:01 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Somebody who says positive is a pumper and somebody who is a negative is a basher.. Atleast there is a stand there.
    Nov 03 12:04 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Keep on eye on the Iroquios litigation against Cel-Sci in the Southern District of New York Federal Court. Cel-Sci claims they elminated those debentures in early Sept and Oct. The Iroquois complaint filed 10/21/09 claims they still own them - and that the the Byron financing earlier in the year should reprice the debentures and warrants to something under .20 cents a share - not sure how Cel-Sci can claim they are eliminated while Iroquios can claim in Fed'l Court they aren't - fishy and smelly.
    Nov 03 12:36 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    U.S. District Court
    United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Foley Square)
    CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:09-cv-08912-HB

    Iroquois Master Fund, Ltd. et al v. CEL-SCI Corporation
    Assigned to: Judge Harold Baer
    Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
    Date Filed: 10/21/2009
    Jury Demand: None
    Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
    Jurisdiction: Diversity
    Plaintiff
    Iroquois Master Fund, Ltd.
    individually represented by Dan Brecher
    Law Offices of Dan Brecher
    99 Park Avenue
    16th floor
    New York , NY 10016
    (212) 286-0747
    Fax: (212) 808-4155
    Email: brecherlaw@compuserve.com
    LEAD ATTORNEY
    ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
    Plaintiff
    Iroquois Master Fund, Ltd.
    as agent for 13 purchases under a Securities Purchase Agreement dated August 4, 2006 represented by Dan Brecher
    (See above for address)
    LEAD ATTORNEY
    ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    V.
    Defendant
    CEL-SCI Corporation

    Date Filed # Docket Text
    10/21/2009 1 COMPLAINT against CEL-SCI Corporation. (Filing Fee $ 350.00, Receipt Number 704143)Document filed by Iroquois Master Fund, Ltd.(individually), Iroquois Master Fund, Ltd.(as agent for 13 purchases under a Securities Purchase Agreement dated August 4, 2006).(laq) (Entered: 10/23/2009)
    Nov 03 12:41 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I can't recall ever reading a blogger (or anyone for that matter) who is as consistently WRONG as this pumper clown.

    BDSI? - Down by 40%. Read recent PR about MORE generic competition. This one's going nowhere.

    AGEN? - Down by 65%. Who gets a legitimate drug approved in Russia for crying out loud? How much have they actually sold? ZERO. This is a crap drug recycling outfit, its only true product is empty investor pockets and fat and happy insiders and hedgies.

    CVM? - Down by 50%. A bunk outfit breathing the fumes of H1N1 hype pure and simple. I thought he said the facility was "ready for action", now he says in "couple of months." This clown has no clue what he's talking about. I mean he actually wrote a "tour report" and stated that "the really impressive stuff was the stuff I couldn't see" !

    GNBT? - Has been a scam BS PR generating machine for years and should have expired long ago.

    I don't know who is paying this weasel to write this crap, but I have to believe he's getting paid to do it, because no one is this bad at biotech stocks.
    Nov 03 01:02 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    VFC:
    You have been pumping the following stocks even when they were at their yearly peaks:

    AGEN 3.34 (today 0.90)
    BDSI 8.29 (today 3.97)
    BIEL 0.12 (today 0.066)
    CSUH 0.70 (today 0.43)
    CVM 2.10 (today 1.00)
    HEB 4.54 (today 1.10)
    ONTY 7.77 (today 3.66)

    By now I believe there is a group of pumpers including you, M. E. Garza and Mike Havrilla (BioMedReports) and at some point Michael Vlaicu (StocksHaven) which seem to be working as follows:

    You find cheap companies that have no future, buy tons of stocks, pump it like crazy (i.e. you with Agen), sell most of your stocks at their peak (but keep some so you can still say you are long), then just forget about it and the stock sinks to where it belongs. Then you move on to another cheap company and the process starts all over again.

    As Havrilla have said, the way to play is to buy when you start pumping a stock and sell it for a profit before the real info comes (i.e. trial, approval).

    I have found that none of you provide useful info but repeat what the company statements and PR say. A little input would not hurt.

    Your post about your trip to CVM's facility was a shame. It was what made me open my eyes and sell my stocks on CVM and AGEN.
    Nov 03 01:06 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    You are following 22 bloggers...so why are your only comments of a 'negative nature' and why are those aimed only at VFC? Curious!


    On Nov 03 01:06 PM User 476730 wrote:

    > VFC:
    > You have been pumping the following stocks even when they were at
    > their yearly peaks:
    >
    > AGEN 3.34 (today 0.90)
    > BDSI 8.29 (today 3.97)
    > BIEL 0.12 (today 0.066)
    > CSUH 0.70 (today 0.43)
    > CVM 2.10 (today 1.00)
    > HEB 4.54 (today 1.10)
    > ONTY 7.77 (today 3.66)
    >
    > By now I believe there is a group of pumpers including you, M. E.
    > Garza and Mike Havrilla (BioMedReports) and at some point Michael
    > Vlaicu (StocksHaven) which seem to be working as follows:
    >
    > You find cheap companies that have no future, buy tons of stocks,
    > pump it like crazy (i.e. you with Agen), sell most of your stocks
    > at their peak (but keep some so you can still say you are long),
    > then just forget about it and the stock sinks to where it belongs.
    > Then you move on to another cheap company and the process starts
    > all over again.
    >
    > As Havrilla have said, the way to play is to buy when you start pumping
    > a stock and sell it for a profit before the real info comes (i.e.
    > trial, approval).
    >
    > I have found that none of you provide useful info but repeat what
    > the company statements and PR say. A little input would not hurt.
    >
    >
    > Your post about your trip to CVM's facility was a shame. It was what
    > made me open my eyes and sell my stocks on CVM and AGEN.
    Nov 03 03:59 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Check out more info about CVM @ cherryinvesting.blogsp.... Also let the guy post his info stop bashing. If you think every stock he jumps on drops then short it, stop complaining about it! It is the stock market not HIGH SCHOOL!
    Nov 03 05:33 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I thought you knew what you were talking about with AGEN. But I was wrong. You told us you were a big buyer of AGEN if the stock closed under $2. Then you were a big buyer when and if it breaks $1. Now with the same info disclosed by the company after the major collapse from the 2 dollar range,you say your putting on your other list with companies for future approvals. You my friend should not be posting your opinions to the public. You have cost investors to lose alot of there hard earned money. I wonder how you made out on the stock pal.
    Nov 04 05:17 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I've made good money on the info provided by VFC & Biomedreports and have no complaints with them. You gotta start somewhere and then it's all about Due Diligence, which, by the way, is your responsibility.
    I sold out of CVM for a while until the issues of stock dilution get resolved. Not only the one with Iriquois, but with other warrants and options that have been given out in exchange for financing that I see possibly doubling the number of outstanding shares. There will also have to be an accounting hit on their books for this.
    In the mean time, I've found other stocks to invest my profits in.
    The only thing I have to say to Vinny is thanks.
    Nov 04 08:17 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    VFC-I am surprised you didn't include CELEGENE.
    I AM NOT SURPRISED THAT YOU LEFT OUT 'MRNA'.
    Which I have been requesting you to elaborate on for
    the weary shareholders.
    But VFC I think after this years turmoil on the stock market, economy, and many getting burnt financially already, it maybe time
    for you to take a vacation. Regenerate, physically & mentally and
    come back in January 2010 with a new attitude on investing.
    Starting with you wearing a pinstripe suit,blue shirt, and red tie,
    but sitting behind an oak desk, looking like a successful adviser
    to the general public.
    TIME TO WAKE UP VFC!
    Nov 04 08:28 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Man, I hope you have a day job, as investing isn't going to work for you if this is representative of your prowess. . . . .
    Nov 04 08:32 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    What about $HEB, $NVAX, and $SVA? They all got hammered by the hype. Will they come back?
    Nov 04 08:50 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    If you look at all of these Comment Bashings, I think you will recognize that they are all by the same person with different identies. Ignore them! This writer has been more objective and correct during the past year than Cramer and The Street and The Motley Fool (though the Fool has had some improvement during the past month). It has become a sad state when other writes start writing in under false identies to Bash writers that have been better at their predictions. All these guys are just SOUR GRAPES.
    Nov 04 08:55 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Several of these stocks -- notably Generex -- are trading vehicles, not investment vehicles. I have followed this and several of the other companies on your list and sadly do not think they have real potential given the paucity of marketing and trial partnerships. Antigenics is a fascinating play on intellectual property and will spike if Dendreon gets an approval for Provenge or collapse.
    Nov 04 09:06 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Vinny has made it his way with good old American initiative and a tiny bit of greed. His whole life (traveling, entertainment, meals, etc.) is a tax write of as long as he blogs about it on his site. I'm sure he is getting some shares of all these companies somehow and making a good deal of dough but this is America and this is how money is made these days -- Emptor caveat. If it's OK for Goldman it should be OK for Vinny. He's the one at the keyboard every day (unless he's paying some high school kid to write this stuff) so give him his due and move on.
    Nov 04 09:11 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Good try VFC.


    On Nov 04 08:55 AM SouthernBeachGuy1960 wrote:

    > If you look at all of these Comment Bashings, I think you will recognize
    > that they are all by the same person with different identies. Ignore
    > them! This writer has been more objective and correct during the
    > past year than Cramer and The Street and The Motley Fool (though
    > the Fool has had some improvement during the past month). It has
    > become a sad state when other writes start writing in under false
    > identies to Bash writers that have been better at their predictions.
    > All these guys are just SOUR GRAPES.
    Nov 04 09:11 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The problem Jay, is that he tells you to buy the stocks while he is selling the ones he was given or bought before starting the pump. Do you think is fair?

    As bad as it is that A.F. is a basher, is also bad when VFC, BiomedReports and StocksHaven are pumpers. All of them make you lose your money. Imagine buying at the peak of the PPS of any company just because they try to make a living. Only if you are lucky enough you will buy and sell before the sink, but somebody will carry the bag.

    Do you see that they are lying?


    On Nov 04 09:11 AM jay brebner wrote:

    > Vinny has made it his way with good old American initiative and a
    > tiny bit of greed. His whole life (traveling, entertainment, meals,
    > etc.) is a tax write of as long as he blogs about it on his site.
    > I'm sure he is getting some shares of all these companies somehow
    > and making a good deal of dough but this is America and this is how
    > money is made these days -- Emptor caveat. If it's OK for Goldman
    > it should be OK for Vinny. He's the one at the keyboard every day
    > (unless he's paying some high school kid to write this stuff) so
    > give him his due and move on.
    Nov 04 09:25 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    look folks, the market for the long term does not look good, and to tell you the truth folks should use this market to sell into strengh, I'm not a buyer of any stocks right now, my positions are only temporary, and I will be selling into strengh. My target for gold still on track for 1200 to 1300 near term as I said many times.
    Nov 04 09:28 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    ...GAG!...I swear, some days I gotta keep a bucket next to me whe I read nonsense like this...I was going to point out that the author managed to pick four of the biggest scams currently available...however, I see several other posters got there before me...and then I saw this:

    www.thestreet.com/_yah...

    ...I mean, what does it take to convince someone that a company is a five starred SCAM?!...
    Nov 04 11:13 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Buy something with strong potential....IMUC
    Nov 04 12:15 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    user476730 - I agree with you its wrong - especially when you are touting cancer stocks which carry extra emotional baggage for some investors. But that's the nature of the market - it aint kindergarten. Vinny is doing what many hedge funds do. it takes balls to do it but its a souless existence. but the pay is pretty good I'm sure. like I said emptor caveat.
    Nov 04 12:44 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    but hey if you can't beat em - join em.

    these stocks are sure to triple before ASCO 2010:

    LPTN, EXEL, PPHM, MITI,

    and big partnerships for these by q2 2010 XOMA and RNN .

    buy them NOW! please.
    Nov 04 12:50 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I don't see many people discussing clinical data. If you are not looking at this data that what in the world are you basing your valuation on???

    This may be news to most of you, but biotechs are very complex investments to analyze- and that's if you understand the technology.

    CVM-
    If you are a pharmaceutical veteran and understand Cel-Sci, then you know it's a roll of the roulette wheel right now.
    Anyway. Giving the benefit of the doubt, I'll assume everyone knows the difference between Multikine and other cancer theraputics. To the two of you still reading, remember it's a complex therapy without a defined mechanism of action. There is no guarantee it will pass Phase III trials, especially when anyone who read their previous trial data knows that there really isn't any previous trial data. Unless you consider 19 people proof enough. "Documented data were available for 19 of the 22 patients in thefollow-up portion of this clinical trial."
    www2.prnewswire.com/cg...=

    Why is this "drug" moving on? It has orphan drug status, which means it faces much lower statistical requirements when proving efficacy. Drugs of this status are moved through the system faster.

    As for L.E.A.P.S., Cel-Sci only has animal data. Animal data is no indicator of success, and only 11% of drugs make it from first in human to approval- www.genengnews.com/art...
    (Personally, I am especially skeptical of animal data because it has fooled me twice. Let's just say I made a great appetite suppressant for mice several years back.)

    CMV "Progress"- I have seen comments concerning the fancy new manufacturing facility- this does not mean they will make money- these facilities must be planned for and built far in advance. Many a manufacturing suite has been abandoned. The nicest one being the NIMO site built by Biogen Idec. Beautiful place, begun in 2002 way before Tysabri was approved. Tysabri was canned and they sold the facility.

    Also, I find it disturbing that the only person that seems to have questioned the phase II data is Adam Feuerstein at TheSteet. Nothing against Adam, I only found his article because I searched for Multikine/Phase II/bogus/clinical data. But I don't think he has a biotech background.

    There many better ways to make just as much money without taking such high risk. But if you are going to buy, do so based on data not fairies and pixie dust.

    I have no CVM position.
    Nov 04 06:34 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Hi VFC...
    AGEN: Develop critical vaccines fuel...Adjuvants...2 possibilities...Self development...Long Time...But depend Flu spread...or TakeOver...I don't see GSK accept to share his technology with a lot of others...
    My intime conviction at this share price..TakeOver...See the last transcript from AGEN...Adjuvants are the keys...

    CVM...like NVAX...and Inovio...Strongly Depend of Flu spead development...
    CVM...New Tech and potential abiity to ramp up...who can interest a Big Giant....Wait future development...One thing is sure..;and it's for all over small biotech capital...They need monney to finalize their clinical phase...And it's why they need 10 millions $...Logical...

    NVAX...Take a look to their strategy...Development within an American company...GE and outside US contracts...In first time...on emergent markets...Their technology is not new...used for example by AZN...Take a look to their price for one dose...Higher than SP or GSK or NVS...Because New Tech...This development for NVAX or others will depend of US political strategy on new tech....
    Inovio...Take a look to their last Board recrutment...Big profile from SP...Need garantee...credility...In line with last CDC requirements on tech equivalence...between Eggs and new tech...From my point of view...I do not see this kind of profile to go in small Biotech with their great background...To play domino's....Same feeling than GNBT...

    GNBT...Few product and potential for takeover...
    My question for this company is ...Why one of the AMGEN's 3-4 foundators went to work with this company (Medical Board position...) to play also domino's...I understand new challenge...new spirit and capacities to create something new...But...
    For this company...You have to retrace their last decisions since this arrival...And to understand...why they won't sell shares...before end of this year and want to stay in Nasdaq...Except "Takeover"...and analyze also their product and AMGEN's porfolio for GNBT products...Diabets...m... is the question...
    From my pointof view...This copany is well managed...And better managed since this arrival...

    Will see who will be right...

    Nov 05 04:58 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The focus here seems to be on stocks nobody likes. CVM is high risk/big reward/big loss at this stage.
    Another of VFC's picks, AVXT, is cruising under the radar and my DD tells me it's a buy. NEOP is also making some good moves.
    As far as the other stocks under controversy here, I did the research and did not like them and did not buy them.
    Insider selling at IMGG doesn't do much for my "buy-it-now" impulse.
    Do your own research - make your own decisions - no whining - no crying.
    Nov 05 08:29 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Many of you sound like SPOILT AMERICAN CHILDREN. If more and more of you don't like CVM, then I buy more and more CVM shares, because I know none of you understand Bio Tech and you get your Infos from Feuerstein and TV because reading is not as comfortable then watching TV and see Cramer with his stupied Toy's.
    Keep on selling CVM, I like to buy more at a great price because I am not a FOLLOWER and I like to make real money !
    Nov 05 11:43 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    VFC...Good JOB....

    "CEL-SCI to Conduct First Clinical Study of Investigational LEAPS-H1N1 Treatment for Hospitalized H1N1 I."
    Nov 06 10:51 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    H1N1 flu vaccine—why the delay?
    www.youtube.com/watch?...
    Nov 06 11:03 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    CEL-SCI's L.E.A.P.S.(TM) H1N1 Flu Development Seen as Credibility Booster
    12:34 pm ET 11/06/2009- Business Wire
    LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--

    BioMedReports.com, the news portal which covers Wall Street's biomedical

    sector and delivers financial and investment intelligence to a community

    of highly informed investors, reports that one of several expected key

    news developments has been announced by CEL-SCI Corporation (NYSE Amex:

    CVM), today.


    An Institutional Review Board of The Johns Hopkins University School of

    Medicine (Johns Hopkins) has given clearance for the Company's first

    clinical study involving the much talked about L.E.A.P.S.(TM) H1N1

    investigational therapy.


    The initiation of CEL-SCI's rapidly-accelerated LEAPS-H1N1 clinical

    development program builds on CEL-SCI's pioneering work with its

    L.E.A.P.S.(TM) technology, whose reach goes beyond the H1N1 space, and

    whose responses can be designed to be directed at a great number of

    human diseases.


    Investors, who have sent the stock price up on the news, apparently also

    view the news as a much needed credibility boost in light of recent

    attacks by a single columnist against the company. Despite those

    published attacks, shares of the company have risen dramatically in the

    past few months and many expect that trend to continue as the company

    moves forward on several fronts, including a pending, and long

    anticipated launch of Phase III trials for Multikine(R), CEL-SCI's

    flagship cancer immunotherapeutic agent, which is being developed as a

    first-line standard of care cancer treatment.


    The complete report is available now at BioMedReports.com:


    biomedreports.com/arti...
    Nov 06 02:28 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    WHO experts forecast three waves of A/H1N1 flu in Ukraine
    Posted on November 7, 2009 by niarane
    The World Health Organization has forecasted three waves of A/H1N1 flu in Ukraine and in the world.
    Yesterday at 13:39 | Interfax-Ukraine The World Health Organization (WHO) has forecasted three waves of A/H1N1 flu in Ukraine and in the world, Head of WHO office in Ukraine Ihor Pokanevych told Deutsche Welle on Nov. 5.
    According to him, the first wave is being observed now, the second will come next spring, and the third during the autumn of 2010.
    Pokanevych said that imposing quarantines and vaccination should be the main focus of flu A/H1N1 prevention in Ukraine. According to him, it would be reasonable to continue quarantine measures in Ukraine’s western regions and to impose quarantine in the regions where a rate of infections may soon exceed the epidemiological threshold.
    Moreover, Pokanevych insisted on the need for the urgent immunization of the population against the A/H1N1 virus.
    Nov 08 06:55 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    In Bdsi 2500 @ 4.03 looks like the trend could be broken closing 4 days up and all. Im waiting on more volume to give me the confirmation i need to buy my other half of shares.hell of a pick bro can u say bargain basement/ =)
    Nov 08 08:44 AM | Link | Reply