The Semiconductor Industry Desperately Needs to Go Private
The unexpected reports that Freescale might be a takeout candidate certainly benefited its current investors. Shares shot up 20% to $37 to start the week and are still holding those gains. The potential that other companies might also be targeted could result in similar pops. Intersil (ISIL) shares are up 13% to $26.25 since the week began.
Of course, we were quick to point out that those premium prices apply only when the price hasn’t already run up. By our logic, today’s Intersil buyer has already given 13% of the 20% premium to speculators.
But regardless of how much investors will gain from semiconductor consolidation, we believe the industry has a great deal to gain. The Forbes article also notes:
Chip companies’ cash piles are particularly attractive to private equity. It can help buyout firms pay off the debt that they take on to buy the company, and it’s also a prime reason why these target companies aren’t showing explosive growth or generating their market multiples of years past. If companies have a use for their cash they should put it into play, something that might be easier if they are not publicly traded and are out of the glare of investors focused exclusively on the short-term. With more flexibility, private companies can pursue other acquisitions and strategies that may not immediately add to earnings but will be beneficial only after several years.
“The willingness of sophisticated private market buyers to employ leverage in an industry where leverage has historically been a wretched idea is highly noteworthy–and likely to be of no small relevance to chip sector investors in the medium term,” wrote Arnie Berman, chief technology strategist for Cowen & Co. in a research note on Wednesday.
As we have noted frequently, semiconductor manufacturers are… well… manufacturing too many semiconductors. What’s worse, they continue to order equipment to manufacture even more semiconductors at a faster rate than the underlying demand can support. Although some companies are starting to get the hint (Intel said it would “avoid” $1 billion of new equipment purchases it had originally planned for next year) there are many who still don’t get it. Perhaps the only way to slap some sense into them is to buy their company and take away their cash hoard.
Again, Forbes gets to the heart of the matter:
“The problem here is that while the industry is gradually slowing down, the costs are not slowing down,” said Jim Tully, chief of semiconductor research at Gartner. “Something has got to give.”
Tully predicts that 350 of the roughly 1,000 companies making semiconductors will be either absorbed or disappear in the next ten years and that the number of companies able to build their own factories will fall by half.
For the sake of the industry, we hope so.
Get Seeking Alpha Free Stock Alerts by Email!
Get Free Stock Alerts by Email!
ETFs In Focus
-
Editor's Picks
-
Most Popular
- Cap-and-Trade in the U.S.
- Of October CDS Auctions and Helicopter Ben
- Big Troubles for the Euro
- Asset Securitization Crisis: The Butterfly Effect
- @VIC: Top Hedge Fund Picks
- Can Google Reach Its Pie in the Sky?
- Full list of Editor's Picks »
- Cramer: Dow Could Drop Another 14%, Oil's Going to $50 »
- iPhone Sales Drastically Surpass Q4 Consensus; Apple Reaches 10m Goal »
- 36 Opportunities for the Beginning of the Bull »
- Cash Position Best for Apple Investor »
- Why Is Everybody Selling as Buffett Is Loading Up? »
- 25 Cash Cows to Ride Out the Storm- Barron's »
- 3 Stocks That Are Begging To Be Bought »
- The Cramer Crash? »
- Bill Ackman Piled Into Wachovia and AIG Shares »
- Four Energy Bargains »
- GE Looks Very Attractive Here »
-
Long Ideas
-
Short Ideas
-
Cramer's Picks
- Market Jitters Enable Even Small Investors to Get a Piece of BUD
- Attractive Values - Fast Money Recap (10/7/08)
- Another Analyst Likes Capstone
- Dell Looks Cheap
- @VIC: Jeffrey Schwartz of Metropolitan Capital Advisors- Taking What the Defense Gives You
- Fear, Panic & Opportunity in the Markets
- Borders: Interview with CEO George Jones
- Five Investment Principles To Remember Now
- Yesterday's Market: Advantage, Bulls
- Two Currency ETFs For the Resurgent Dollar, Yen
- Full list of Long Ideas »
- Michael Page International: Stock Down on Market Weakness
- Gaming Stocks Still a Poor Bet - Barron's
- After Coming Rate Cuts, Some Appealing Short ETFs
- M/I Homes: Common Share Price Perplexing
- Trading ERO This Week
- Talk Me Down From the Wells Fargo Ledge
- SKF Regaining Its Old Form?
- Continuing Haircut in DST's Investment Portfolio
- Fortis and Bradford and Bingley Banks Thrown Lifelines
- The Short Case on KBH Homes
- Full list of Short Ideas »
- Chocolate Lover - Cramer's Mad Money (10/7/08)
- Yield is King - Cramer's Lightning Round (10/7/08)
- Goldman Disses Solar - Cramer's Stop Trading ! (10/7/08)
- Time to Hoard Cash - Cramer's Mad Money (10/6/08)
- Buyers On Strike - Cramer's Stop Trading! (10/6/08)
- Still Bullish on RIMM - Cramer's Lightning Round (10/6/08)
- The Cramer Crash?
- Cramer: Dow Could Drop Another 14%, Oil's Going to $50
- Musical Chairs - Cramer's Mad Money (10/3/08)
- Not Much to Recommend - Cramer's Lightning Round (10/3/08)
- Full list of Cramers Picks »
Trading Center
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »



This article has 4 comments:
I don't follow Freescale but I'd expect it has a good amount of capex and is highly cyclical, I have no idea why the PE firms would go after that company, I'm suspecting it's mostly because they actually believe in the "secular growth" in portable media and wireless consumer devices that FSL has a strong niche in. Plus they have more money than they know what to do with. A lot of LBO firms blew up from the 98-00 telecom deals they did, the same will probably happen again.
Trent
I agree, though, that the LBO firms have more money than they know what to do with, and may likely not know what they are doing by going into something so capital-intensive and cyclical.
Also, how easy is it to reduce capex at FSL or other semis? Aren't these facilities multibillion dollar plants, I'm sure the maintenance capex is very high? Sure they don't need to build new plants but most semis don't do that until the top of chip cycles either way so I'm assuming (and maybe wrong) that a lot of that capex can't be shut off.
I think, having good familiarity with the LBO world from a prior life, that buying a cyclical business like semis is pretty risky for an LBO firm. You have massive fixed costs so when the cycle turns your cash flow will take a big hit, not to mention the capital intensive nature of the business. Oh well, these guys have billions so I'm pretty sure things will work out. As most LBO deals go, the PE firms are going to pay themselves an M&A fee up front which will prob be 0.5% to 1.0% of the deal so they're on their way to making money already.
Trent