Oversupply Issues Plague Solar Manufacturers 13 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
By Ucilia Wang
General Electric (GE) plans to close its only U.S. solar panel factory because production costs have exceeded sale prices.
The Fairfield, Conn.-based company told the Dow Jones Clean Technology Insight that silicon panel manufacturing at its facility in Delaware, will stop in January.
GE will shutter the factory all together by June. The factory can produce 34 megawatts of solar panels per year and employs 82 people. GE plans to layoff the workers with severance packages.
The move reflects the tough times experienced by solar energy equipment makers worldwide as supply far exceeded demand over the past year. Recession and a big reduction in solar subsidies in Spain - once a booming market - are key contributors.
Some manufacturers have seen prices for their products fall by anywhere from 30% to 50% over the past year.
Some solar company executives say the decline has slowed in recent months as demand picked up, mostly in Europe. But they remain worried about the pace of market recovery.
Earlier this week, Marlboro, Mass.-based Evergreen Solar (ESLR) said it would move panel production from its factory in Devens, Mass., to China next year in order to cut costs.
Earlier this year, BP Solar announced it would close its solar panel factory in Maryland and outsource that work to a contract manufacturer. BP (BP) said back then that it would continue to make silicon ingots, wafers and cells in Maryland.
Last month, BP said it had hired Jabil Circuit to assemble panels at a Jabil factory in Poland.
Related Articles
|

























This article has 13 comments:
Jobs? The solar industry is creating installation jobs at a feverish pace. If you don't know it, one of the biggest panel factories in the U.S. only employs 200 people. We're creating 10x that many jobs on the installation and services side with cheap panels. And inexpensive, plug & play panels that are easy to install will put even more electricians and roofers to work installing solar.
So the way to create the most net U.S. jobs is to make solar panels as inexpensively as possible in China, not to insist that panels are made -- at a high price -- in the U.S. Because those high-priced U.S. panels won't result in a lot of installed customers (unless we also naively require U.S.-made content, which further distorts the economics).
On Nov 06 06:16 PM rooferguy wrote:
> Jobs? The solar industry is creating installation jobs at a feverish
> pace. If you don't know it, one of the biggest panel factories in
> the U.S. only employs 200 people. We're creating 10x that many jobs
> on the installation and services side with cheap panels.
the installation jobs last a few days & then that's done.
maintenance jobs might pick up some of the slack for a while, if the stuff is cheaply made & breaks often enough.
in autos, we have local-content requirements which help preserve some of our industrial base (like rubber hoses & hose clamps).
should we have local content requirements in solar too?
> jack
In September I wrote a press release entitled "Solar crisis set to hit in 2010, 50% of manufacturers may not survive, says The Information Network" You can read it here - hhttp://digitimes.com/print/a2...
So now it has begun.
I've been saying for quiet a while that those companies that can't build solar for under $2/wt retail are going to die.
Oversupply isn't the problem, under supply was allowing many expensive panel makers to keep going. The huge German, etc subsidies inflated the market so bad over 30 yrs the price of panels went up!!
Now it's just seeking it's correct level. But at $2/wt retail, magic things start to happen as PV become competitive in home installs with coal, making a far larger market. Don't forget homeowners pay 2x's as much for their power vs utilities so their profit is 2x's as much, payback in 0% less time. Also the homeowner doesn't have extra land, transmission line, overhead or stockholders costs.
Only separate cell panels take much labor and even then not much. Those sending jobs out of the country are just not being smart to save a few pennies. But thin film is almost untouched by human hands so labor is not a problem.
So too much supply? Bring it on!!
Also, the US is still the number 1 manufacture in the world. The loss of US manufacturing has been far overstated. The news media loves to talk about job losses because it gets people to tune in.
On Nov 06 05:20 PM MichaelAK wrote:
> So much for Green Tech Jobs even those are going overseas as a fast
> rate. We need corporate tax, regulator and labor laws reforms if
> we are ever going to rebuild our manufacturing base. Heck when the
> promise of the new Green Manufacturing Revolution goes overseas you
> have a domestic problem that needs fixing at the Macro Level to correct
> the inablances in cost.
On Nov 06 05:20 PM MichaelAK wrote:
> So much for Green Tech Jobs even those are going overseas as a fast
> rate. We need corporate tax, regulator and labor laws reforms if
> we are ever going to rebuild our manufacturing base. Heck when the
> promise of the new Green Manufacturing Revolution goes overseas you
> have a domestic problem that needs fixing at the Macro Level to correct
> the inablances in cost.
On Nov 06 06:16 PM rooferguy wrote:
> Oversupply - TERRIFIC, bring it on. That reduces the installed price
> for solar power systems. Lower cost=higher volumes=greater energy
> savings.
>
> Jobs? The solar industry is creating installation jobs at a feverish
> pace. If you don't know it, one of the biggest panel factories in
> the U.S. only employs 200 people. We're creating 10x that many jobs
> on the installation and services side with cheap panels. And inexpensive,
> plug & play panels that are easy to install will put even more
> electricians and roofers to work installing solar.
>
> So the way to create the most net U.S. jobs is to make solar panels
> as inexpensively as possible in China, not to insist that panels
> are made -- at a high price -- in the U.S. Because those high-priced
> U.S. panels won't result in a lot of installed customers (unless
> we also naively require U.S.-made content, which further distorts
> the economics).