The Unsustainable Lie of Inflation 138 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
“I continue to believe that the American people have a love-hate relationship with inflation. They hate inflation but love everything that causes it.”
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”
“By a continuing process of inflation, government can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens.”
You are being lied to.
In fact, it has been going on for almost a century. Your government wants you to believe – based heavily on the work of John Maynard Keynes and his disciples – that the only way an economy can grow is by creating moderate inflationary price increases, through the use of monetary and tax policy.
Some of you will notice that I’ve used both the Keynes and Goebbels quotes, above, in past articles, and I hope you’ll forgive me; I felt they bear repeating because they are so poignant and germane to the way the global economy is being manipulated. You may or may not agree with me, but the propaganda being employed to scotch-tape this crisis at its swelling seams is nearly as imperceptible as it is astonishing.
The word propaganda, in its current accepted usage, has been around for centuries. And just for the sake of thoroughness -- and to avoid any misunderstandings -- I’m going to define what I mean by current usage:
propaganda |ˌpräpəˈgandə| noun. information, ideas, or rumors deliberately spread widely to help or harm a person, group, movement, institution, nation, etc. (Dictionary.com Unabridged. Random House, Inc. 07 Nov. 2009.)
Many historians agree that Joseph Goebbels was the “master” propagandist, and after reading the quote at the beginning of this article, it’s pretty clear he took his duty to his government seriously. But how hard was his job, really? I mean, come on… you plaster a few swastikas all over a well-pressed black suit, throw on some jackboots, put on a fancy military hat, and say something like, “Homosexuals, Jews, and Communists are evil. So we’re going to kill all of them.”
Then you point guns at your audience, at which point, its members shrug and say, “Okay.”
Goebbels was, of course, the antithesis of everything I hold dear and beautiful in this universe. But you’ve got to admire a man who has the stones to be so blatantly honest about the fact that he’s a liar. Granted, he did have brute force on his side. But still.
In terms of human rights, I’d like to think things are improving -- that the world is a better place than it was through most, if not all of the 20th century. I’d like to think the governed have become smarter. At the very least, I’d like to think the average human being is more suspicious of, and cautious about his government. And maybe he is.
But then again, maybe he’s not.
The application of propaganda obviously didn’t stop with Nazi Germany. It has been applied with great success by Joseph Stalin, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot, and many others, to hide all measures of truth from the people these leaders suppressed and murdered. Thank God we live in the United States! Home of the Free and the Brave! Our government would never use propagandist techniques to persuade its population of anything! We don’t work that way. Right?
Wrong.
It’s time to wake up; even if the average human being has become a little more sophisticated and leery, governments (and their co-conspirators) have simply upped the ante -- taking propaganda to newer, subtler levels. In fact, the more I think about it, the more galvanized I am toward the tragic conclusion I used to start this article:
We are being lied to. And we still believe every single word of it. But the most revolting part of all this? Unlike decent German citizens forced to endure the tyranny and coercion of the Nazi regime, we actually have a choice not to believe the nonsense being crammed down our throats. And yet we do.
It’s not just governments anymore, either; it’s lobbyists, religious institutions, social movements, and advocacy groups of every sort. It seems like everyone has a sound byte these days. If you haven’t already figured it out, I’m the world’s most cynical skeptic, but some of these campaigns have even given me pause for a moment or two (just before I recognized them for what they were and became nauseated).
Before I bring this topic full-circle to its financial and economic implications – if only to illustrate the subtlety, sheer pervasiveness, and impact of some modern propaganda -- I want to share a few of my favorite contemporary phrases:
Ethnic Cleansing – This is a polite, yet important-sounding way of saying “If you don’t mind, we’d appreciate it if you, and everyone like you, would dig a ditch so we can shoot you and bury you in it. Thanks.”
Political Correctness – This phrase is just a haughty way of saying, “If you can’t say anything nice, don’t say anything at all.” Am I the only person in the world who finds this hackneyed little Clinton-era lyric to sound a lot like the noise a goat makes when it’s being slaughtered? I’m sorry, was that metaphor politically incorrect? I think I hear an angry PETA member throwing a computer monitor out a window somewhere.
Eminent Domain – This is an extremely sophisticated, legalistic way of saying, “We’re stealing your house. Get the hell out. Now.”
Intelligent Design – This is how a bunch of envious Christians respond to a concept as cool as Natural Selection. I’m still wondering what they’re going to come up with in response to The Big Bang. Maybe Provident Ejaculation? Whatever it is, I’m sure it will sound positively scientific and rational. I can’t wait.
And now for my favorite…
Quantitative Easing – This is government’s modern, scientific way of saying, “We’re going to print money and lower interest rates, making you think everything is worth ‘more.’ But in reality, everything won’t be worth ‘more,’ because we are systematically destroying your currency -- along with the economy – as we manufacture this illusion.”
It’s just a lot easier to say Quantitative easing. Plus it sounds sophisticated, which is important when Ron Paul is all but chewing his microphone off its base as he makes you accountable for your irresponsibility.
Propaganda is an art form. Yes it is.
I love the Keynes quote at the beginning of this piece. I really do. I mean, here’s the architect of so-called quantitative easing basically saying, “By making you think your house is going to be worth more every year, your government is stealing your money. And you don’t even know it!”
Again, this isn’t Murray Rothbard, or Jim Rogers, or Peter Schiff, or Milton Friedman! This is John Maynard Keynes telling you your government is stealing from you!
There was a time, believe it or not when price increases were the exception, and falling prices were the rule. As humanity has progressed, technology has always increased our standard of living, and created more efficiency. And this has almost always resulted in falling prices.
If you don’t believe me, think about how much bananas must have cost in Norway during the 16th century. Or think about how expensive cinnamon must have been in England in the 10th century. Most people would never even see these commodities – let alone be able to pay for them. Today, bananas and cinnamon are accessible globally, to anyone, at very low costs. Technology caused them to depreciate over time – not increase in price, as your government would have you believe should have been the case.
Or how about the most contemporary – and perhaps best example of all: the computer industry, and Moore’s Law. Prices of computers don’t increase over time -- they decrease with obsolescence and improved technology.
This is the way the economy should work. Instead, however, in order to create the illusion that everything is increasing in value, your government has created a monopolistic fiat currency and a central bank. No one can compete with the primary medium of exchange, and so the Fed prints currency and manipulates interest rates with reckless abandon.
In theory, it’s a great idea. You buy stuff, the Fed keeps inflation at about 3%, and in most cases, after a long period of time, your stuff seems more valuable. You can boast to your friends at work and at parties, “I bought my house for $50,000 in 1977, and today it’s worth $200,000! I’ve quadrupled my money!”
In reality, your annualized rate of return is a little less than 4.5%, and unless you paid cash, your interest rate was higher (and probably a lot higher) than your rate of return, so you’ve actually lost money on your house. And that doesn’t even take inflation into account.
Of course, you did write off all that interest you paid, and you had to live somewhere, but that doesn’t really diminish my point: considering everything I just said, along with the fact that inflation has – in the best case scenario – averaged 3%-4%, your house hasn’t really gained in value at all. And that goes for anything else you’ve bought, for the most part.
Yes, there are exceptions; Warren Buffett has averaged a purported 23% rate-of-return per annum during the decades of his career. But unless you were both lucky and smart enough to have picked up 100 shares of Berkshire-Hathaway (BRK.A) when it was trading under $500, you probably haven’t been outpacing inflationary price-increases as much as you think you have – if at all.
But it sure feels like you have, doesn’t it? How many times have you heard this statement: “I can remember when [gas, a coke, a pack of cigarettes] was [insert really low price here]!”
And so the government perpetuates its myth. Why? Because it needs you to believe it’s doing a good job. And how does it achieve this? By creating the illusion that everything is going up in value, when in fact most things – in real terms – aren’t at all. In fact, most goods and services are actually falling in value, when you take into consideration the government policy of artificially perpetuating inflation.
And how does the government create inflation? Again, by printing currency and manipulating interest rates. Just to give you an idea of how consistently the government has been printing dollars since we went off the gold standard in the early 1970s, here’s a chart for you, courtesy of the St. Louis Fed:
click to enlarge
Okay, I mentioned the gold standard before, but I want to be clear about something: if the United States dollar ever was truly and directly connected to gold (and this is contentious), it was a very, very long time ago. But whether or not the relationship was ever direct or not, certainly in the 20th century while the dollar had some relationship with gold, the federal government – for instance, under Franklin Roosevelt – made it abundantly clear that it can, and will simply suddenly and arbitrarily announce how much gold is “worth” in dollar-terms.
Or, worse still, the government can simply dissociate the dollar with gold completely – as it did under Nixon. And – as the chart above demonstrates -- since the 1970s (when Nixon took us off the gold standard), the government has been printing money at will, and at an ever-increasing rate -- in its futile quest to manipulate inflation.
So what would the chart above look like if the dollar were tied directly and invariably to gold? It would be flat. And what would that mean? Simply put, goods and services during that period would rise and fall according to the principles of supply and demand only; there would be no distortions related to currency and rate manipulations. The fluctuations of goods and services would be pure, and their true value would be much easier to ascertain. This would mean more efficiency, more accuracy, and certainly fewer – and less dramatic – economic cycles.
Unfortunately, this has not been the case, and the government has persisted in its profligate and unrealistic quest to manipulate the dollar and the economy. The result? You’re living it: unemployment above 10% -- or, if you dismiss government statistics as unreliable (like I do), double that. Gold is breaking multi-decade highs. Oil and agriculture are climbing fast. These are the inevitable signs of inflationary price-increases, and the signs are huge.
In short, the dam before the Fed has 100 holes, but the Fed only has ten fingers to stop the leaks. The printing has been unprecedented. Rates are lower than ever in history. So what’s next? Well, it looks like the unsustainable myth is finally losing its power to persuade the multitudes, and that can only mean that the ultimate correction is looming before us. Some people call it “coming hyper-inflation.”
Disclosures: Paco is long TBT and Gold. He also holds U.S. dollars by necessity, pending the advent of private gold-backed currencies.
Related Articles
|
-
The Seeking Alpha 100
See allThe top 100 stock
market authors
selected for publication in the last week
Seeking Alpha 100 » -
Fastest Climbers
Those with the largestSee all
increase in followers
in the last week
Fastest Climbers » -
Top Commenters
Top commenters,
as ranked by their peers-
1
User 353732
-
2
Moon Kil Woong
-
3
doubleguns
-
4
optionsgirl
-
5
Mayascribe
Top Commenters » -
1
-
Top Instabloggers
The 100 most activeSee all
Instabloggers.
Top Instabloggers » -
Top StockTalkers
TopSee all
StockTalkers.
Top StockTalkers »
Street Journal, it's impossible to get the facts regarding issues. On top of this, the government keeps telling us that there is no inflation.
If that is so, how come prices on almost everything have increased
20-50%
Hope you will continue to make people aware of what's going on.
Dick Streich
5
Inflation is the rich stealing from the poor. The Keynes' quote is wonderful: In this case it is the State-Capitalists (Wall Street aligned with Washington DC) that is stealing from its citizenry.
Deflation is the poor getting even with the rich. Is it any wonder the power center in America (Wall Street and Washington DC) will do ANYTHING to protect their inflationary doctrine? They would rather destroy America that have to give back any of the money they've successfully stolen already.
Deflation is God's way of punishing the rich. Deflation will have its day.
Prices doubling every few weeks and days, sometimes by the hours.
No matter how much "money" the FED prints, true "hyperinflation" will not occur in the US unless the unemployment figures return to the 4-5% range.
People who are not working and subsist only on the fixed income of unemployment or SS or pensions are the great weight holding down any "hyperinflation."
The TBTF banks are hoarding this new "money" from the FED which leaves little velocity to ignite serious inflation, let alone hyperinflation.
The TBTF banks, and many smaller community banks as well, have giant black holes on their balance sheets that must be filled with all this money being printed by the FED.
Only if those balance sheet black holes are filled up would the velocity of money rise to maybe create hyperinflation.
If real hyperinflation was to ever take hold, it would not last long in the US as society would collapse and there would be a rebirth of a new nation.
The lie that is being repeated too often by folks who haven't any real understanding of Keynes is that QE is going to (or has already) caused an inflationary problem.
I share your extreme hatred of "euphemisms" (simply another form of lying) and you zeroed in on the ones at the top of my own hate-list.
Yes, inflation is ONE of the "big lies" of governments (most, if not all of them), with lying about unemployment a close second - and for similar reasons. The object is to convince people that official "statistics" are more reliable than their own DIRECT observations of their own society.
CNN is particularly notable for a SERIES of "news" items with the SPECIFIC theme that people "can't trust their own perceptions" or (the variation) "things are NOT as bad YOU think they are".
On Nov 09 02:25 PM Michael Clark wrote:
> Inflation is the rich stealing from the poor. The Keynes' quote
> is wonderful: In this case it is the State-Capitalists (Wall Street
> aligned with Washington DC) that is stealing from its citizenry.
On Nov 09 02:16 PM dick streich wrote:
> You are absolutely right. The sad thing is that most americans believe
> what they here or read. Unfortunately, with the exception of the
> Wall
> Street Journal, it's impossible to get the facts regarding issues.
> On top of this, the government keeps telling us that there is no
> inflation.
> If that is so, how come prices on almost everything have increased
>
> 20-50%
> Hope you will continue to make people aware of what's going on.<br/>
>
> Dick Streich
>
>
> 5
You state that inflation robs from people with money and helps debtors. This is true, except I would clarify that inflation doesn't hurt people with money, it hurts people with cash specifically. In times of high inflation, richer citizens who have more financial savvy will leverage their cash holdings into inflation-linked assets in order to not only maintain the purchasing power of their original holdings, but make gains from leverage. People without abundant access to credit can do no such thing.
On Nov 09 04:23 PM ThirtyNineWinks wrote:
> You've got it backwards. Inflation robs from people with money,
> and helps people with debt. As the government is the biggest debtor
> around, they'll be glad to borrow a dollar today, and repay you with
> a 10 cent dollar next week.
Paco, check out www.goldmoney.com They are setting up the infrastructure to hold physical gold in vaults and let you have a convenient way to use it to make payments.
It won't eliminate your need to hold dollars (yet), but it might be the wave of the not-all-that-distant future.
"It is the nature of the human species to reject what is true but unpleasant and to embrace what is obviously false but comforting."
That's why propagandists have such an easy time of it. Tell people the lies they want to hear and they will love you for it. Tell them the truth that they don't want to hear and they will hate you for it. Tell people they can have free health care and pensions and they will love you. Tell them there is no free lunch and they have to earn their daily bread and they will assault you. Tell them they have 'rights' that entitle them to material goods produced by others and they will love you. Tell them they have no right to anything that they have not personally worked to produce and they will try to kill you.
Is it any wonder that democracy tends inevitably toward socialism? People love hearing about all the free stuff the government is going to give them. And they will never elect an honest politician who tells them that the entire welfare system was a mistake and the country is now bankrupt and has to lay off most public sector workers and default on all the promises to pay pensions and Medicare and all the other welfare programs.
So it's not just the politicians' fault that socialism is rising. The people are demanding it. They are entitled to it. Lying politicians told them they can have it and the people will never abandon that belief because it suits them better to believe the lie.
Since prices advance at the same rate for everyone, but incomes advance based on a variety of factors, inflation being only one, it's very difficult to analyze for whom and on which items inflation has been a penalty. Absent such a detailed assessment, it's really impossible make blanket conclusions about the impact of inflation, deflation or the absence of either.
Generally, however, most global societies, as a whole, seem collectively to keep enjoying increasing living standards, so the Inflation "robbery" doesn't seem to be very efficient, if it truly exists at all, when all factors are viewed on a normalized basis.
On Nov 09 04:23 PM ThirtyNineWinks wrote: "You've got it backwards. Inflation robs from people with money, and helps people with debt..."
ThirtyNineWinks has it right. Mr. Clark has it exactly backwards. Speaking generally, the rich are generally creditors and the poor are debtors.
Monetary inflation make the dollar-denominated assets and liabilities both worth less. The positive net worth of the rich gets smaller and the negative net worth of the poor, while still negative gets smaller too. Deflation works the opposite way, helping the rich and hurting the poor.
Inflation helps the poor by reducing the value of their debt compared to their wages. The fact that it also reduces the debt of the biggest debtor on the planet, the U.S. government, makes it a certainty that there will be inflation, because the U.S. government controls the money supply and will guarantee inflation.
But in the end, inflation hurts everybody, because the primary unit of account (the USD) becomes corrupted and unreliable, making business decision-making, capital accumulation and resulting wage increases impossible.
www.marketwatch.com/st...
It explains how we have been artificially manufacturing demand for our own debt when it isn't really isn't there and about how it wil soon end.
"The usual argument in favor of inflation is debt-based. That is, inflation is wonderful because it enable us to pay off our debts with future "cheaper" dollars. But if our incomes are being robbed by inflation, then is that "benefit" of inflation really so valuable? If I lose a third of my purchasing power in a decade does being able to pay down my mortgage with depreciated dollars offset my loss of purchasing power? No--unless my mortgage payment exceeds my income by a fair margin, which is essentially impossible.
Deflation is excellent for those with cash and earnings and awful for kleptocracy governments and those with over-leveraged debt. The entire idea that "inflation is good" masks a perverse incentive: take on as much debt as you possibly can because interest will become "cheaper" to pay in the future (assuming your earnings keep up with inflation).
If your earnings don't keep up with inflation, well, too bad."
Steve: Do we want to encourage more debt or more saving? The banks want us to be in debt, because debt -- paying $150 for a $100 item -- is where the banks make money. The inflation argument is an argument for a society of debt addicts, dependent upon banks for their fix.
Start paying people to save and they will save. Steal the money from savers (0% interest rates) and they are forced into risky investments or dwindling real returns because inflation robs people of the value of their money.
The idea that currency devaluation -- inflation IS a form of currency devaluation -- is good for the poor is ludicrous. Inflation PUTS poor people into debt. The GOAL of inflation is to put poor people into debt -- because they need more and more income to live, as the real value of their income declines -- and the banks lure them into debt with great deals, almost free money: Come be a debt slave; it feels good; and its ALMOST free money....
Saying inflation is good for the poor is like saying venereal disease feels good -- it is confusing the world of causes and effects.
“By a continuing process of inflation, government can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens.”
-- John Maynard Keynes
"This is deflation in action: falling prices that are, in effect, a transfer of wealth from landlords, goods producers and retailers to consumers."
Tom Petruno
On Nov 09 09:26 PM Steve in Greensboro wrote:
> On Nov 09 02:25 PM Michael Clark wrote: "...Inflation is the rich
> stealing from the poor....Deflation is the poor getting even with
> the rich...."
>
> On Nov 09 04:23 PM ThirtyNineWinks wrote: "You've got it backwards.
> Inflation robs from people with money, and helps people with debt..."
>
>
> ThirtyNineWinks has it right. Mr. Clark has it exactly backwards.
> Speaking generally, the rich are generally creditors and the poor
> are debtors.
>
> Monetary inflation make the dollar-denominated assets and liabilities
> both worth less. The positive net worth of the rich gets smaller
> and the negative net worth of the poor, while still negative gets
> smaller too. Deflation works the opposite way, helping the rich
> and hurting the poor.
>
> Inflation helps the poor by reducing the value of their debt compared
> to their wages. The fact that it also reduces the debt of the biggest
> debtor on the planet, the U.S. government, makes it a certainty that
> there will be inflation, because the U.S. government controls the
> money supply and will guarantee inflation.
>
> But in the end, inflation hurts everybody, because the primary unit
> of account (the USD) becomes corrupted and unreliable, making business
> decision-making, capital accumulation and resulting wage increases
> impossible.
On Nov 09 11:37 PM awgie wrote:
> Powerful piece. Powerful comments. The only part I disagree with
> is the part about prices of computers rising. They aren't, in terms
> of computing power. That's the one consolation in this world. Someday
> computers will be ubiquitous and they'll be smarter than us, then
> all our stupidity and gullibility to the fraudsters in power will
> be moot. Computers and the internet will level the playing field
> -- unless they figure out a way to regulate the internet and free
> speech.
> Computers, and computer chips -- actually everything made with computer components -- is the only place in the ENTIRE global economy where capitalism is to be seen, where competition is actually driving down prices. Show me another place in the economy where price-fixing is not at work...and I will appreciate it. >
--------
One example I've seen given is in the health care field. Lasik surgery is typically not covered by health insurance, and because of that people are using their own money rather than "other people's money" to get the surgery, should they decide to do so.
Innovations have been pretty swift and prices have dropped significantly from earlier levels.
That is one argument used for purchasing high deductible "Health Savings Accounts" and putting the savings from the high deductibles into the savings portion of the plans. People paying with their own money tend to do more shopping, and are more prudent in deciding which procedures to use, which doctors and hospitals etc. Or so the theory goes...
On Nov <span title="Convert this amount" class="currency_conver... 02:39 PM goldbug101 wrote:
> "Hyper Inflation" is a term that should be followed by Zimbabwe or
> Weimer Republic.
>
> Prices doubling every few weeks and days, sometimes by the hours.
>
>
> No matter how much "money" the FED prints, true "hyperinflation"
> will not occur in the US unless the unemployment figures return to
> the 4-5% range.
>
> People who are not working and subsist only on the fixed income of
> unemployment or SS or pensions are the great weight holding down
> any "hyperinflation."
>
> The TBTF banks are hoarding this new "money" from the FED which leaves
> little velocity to ignite serious inflation, let alone hyperinflation.
>
>
> The TBTF banks, and many smaller community banks as well, have giant
> black holes on their balance sheets that must be filled with all
> this money being printed by the FED.
>
> Only if those balance sheet black holes are filled up would the velocity
> of money rise to maybe create hyperinflation.
>
> If real hyperinflation was to ever take hold, it would not last long
> in the US as society would collapse and there would be a rebirth
> of a new nation.
>
> Shakespeare predicted it would start by killing all the lawyers.
> If hyperinflation comes to pass, bankers and politicians will be
> the first to face the anger of the masses.