Tractor Supply: One Of The Great Stocks Of The Decade

| About: Tractor Supply (TSCO)

Why are mediocre stocks so popular when there are so many great ones out there ready to be discovered?

That is the one question I keep posing to myself day after day after looking at so many portfolios full of stocks like Cisco, Johnson & Johnson, Lowe's, Intel, Microsoft, and on and on.

They might be good companies: I shop at Lowe's. But if you are looking for growth or income or even just staying even with the market, they just are not going to do it for you anymore.

But investors keep stuffing them into their portfolios, and this has to be at least one reason why: No investment advisor ever got fired for recommending GE or Wal-Mart.

So most investors really have to make two decisions: Which stock to buy, and which guru to follow.

There's no doubt lots of investors feel way more comfortable with those big, stodgy names. Ditto for the televised pundits.

But some of these companies are so big, they have long since run out of room to grow. Attention Wal-Mart investors: I'm talking about you.

What about Tractor Supply (NASDAQ:TSCO)? Tractor who?

Unless you are reading my newsletter, or listening to my radio show, you've probably never heard of it. The pundits are certainly not touting the fortunes of TSCO, a chain store whose major claim to fame is selling farm implements and goat food to yuppies.

If that is the case, you have missed out on one of the great stocks of the decade. A stock that continues to hit new all-time highs and blow away the performance of Lowe's and Home Depot.

And is still a stock to consider.


Over the last ten years, TSCO has delivered total returns of almost 24% per year to investors while the market has delivered 5.4%.

Over the last five years the company has delivered 46% per year while the market has delivered only 8% during the same time frame.

Over the last three years TSCO has delivered a whopping 51% per year to investors while the market has delivered 14%. And over the last 12 months, TSCO is up 37% while the market is only up 17%.

I've interviewed the CEO of TSCO on my radio show. He may not get the attention of his lesser-performing colleagues, but he sure impressed our listeners with what he was doing to grow his company - and their share prices.


But it doesn't all end with performance. Stocks also have to make sense from a valuation standpoint. Now that doesn't mean I'm going to go eliminating biotech stocks from my list of companies I'd consider buying, but I also own boring stocks like TSCO.

The consensus analyst's estimates for TSCO's earnings next year currently stand at $2.63 per share. The consensus average five-year earnings growth estimate for TSCO is 17% per year.

Given these expectations, the shares currently sport an OK PEG ratio of 1.50. PEG ratio is just one valuation measure, however.

When we take that estimate of $2.63 per share and extrapolate it out over the next five years, we come up with potential earnings per share of $4.94 five years from now.

When I apply a multiple that I think is appropriate for the shares, I come up with a five-year target price of $124 per share. With the stock currently trading at $68.27, I still see considerable upside potential.

Stock Chart

Lastly, TSCO has a very healthy one-year stock chart. See for yourself.

I may have never before seen a TSCO TV commercial, ad, or even a store, but TSCO's concept has obviously worked. Of the 3,567 stocks that I track, TSCO currently comes in at #8. It also earns a very hard-earned grade of A+. This represents the top 3% of the entire market. I only consider stocks that have a grade of A- or better. Tractor Supply easily makes the grade.

TSCO is for moderate risk investors. I always have a well-diversified portfolio of 25-30 stocks to mitigate my risk.

I'm also very vigilant on a daily basis on the stocks that I own. At the current time, clients are long the stock.

Disclosure: I am long TSCO. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.