Seeking Alpha
About this author:
Submit
an article to

In a recent post, “How is Citi going to deal with $38 billion in deferred tax assets?,” I pointed to a Reuters article which called into question Citigroup’s (C) ability to earn enough money to prevent its having to take a charge for an incredibly large deferred tax asset. That post generated a response from a Citi representative who emphatically defended Citi’s capital position with a chart comparing Citigroup to other large global financial institutions.

Below is that chart:

citigroup-capital

As you can see from the chart, based on Citi’s reported public accounts, the company is well-capitalized. Moreover, even hedge fund operators like John Paulson who maid a mint on shorting financials in 2007 and 2008 now think Citi is in much better condition. Paulson was known to be buying shares in August.

You could agree or disagree with Paulson about whether Citigroup is a buy at its present share price. And you could argue that Citi should be taking the charge that Willens suggests. But the fact is, Citi has been recapitalized – at taxpayer expense. And that’s more the point here.

Citigroup has received more money from the government ($45 billion) than any other bank in the U.S., none of which has been paid back. Moreover, the government was forced to not just forgo dividends on its preferreds but also convert these into common equity and provide debt guarantees for the company. Absent government money, Citigroup is the worst capitalized big bank. Absent government money, Citigroup would not exist.

Even still, Citigroup cannot be nearly as profitable as it once was because it has been forced to sell assets in order to achieve its ratios. Yet, it is an organization with almost $1.9 trillion in assets and is certainly still too big to fail.

I see Citigroup as emblematic of the problems we face in dealing with large systemically dangerous institutions. They insist that we return to some semblance of business as usual after they have received massive bailouts without any clear timeline when those monies will be repaid – if ever. Meanwhile, it is far from clear what these institutions would look like if the collateral they put up for loans received from the Federal Reserve and the rest of their assets were marked to market.

I, for one, think the big banks have made it. I said so as far back as April. I may not like the way they have been recapitalized, but I am in little doubt that they have been.

But Citigroup and Bank of America (BAC) in particular have gotten there with great help from taxpayers. All of the too-big-to-fail financial behemoths exist because of government largesse. That high-level executives of these organizations show little contrition or remorse for having cost our economy tremendously is the saddest part of this crisis.

Disclosure: I have no financial positions in Citigroup or any other financial services company.

Print this article with comments
Comments
6
Comments 1 - 6 out of 6
You are viewing the latest 20 comments
  •  
    1) I don't understand how the table defends the point that they may have to take huge losses writing off the tax deferment.

    2) I no longer understand the government's strategy going into Citigroup. It seems they are just holding onto the equity hoping that things will just magically get better.
    Nov 13 09:15 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Particularmen,
    Are you passing off your nonsense just to get some hits for your comical website? Makes me want to click it just to get a chuckle, but I wont support you.
    Nov 13 11:44 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Edward, move on. you have milked this one enough. you and mayo have nothing new to add. take a break. you have beaten this horse to death....a number of times.
    Nov 13 01:52 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Here we go again....you need to add annual preprovision earnings
    plus the Fair value of Financial Instruments found in the 10Q........
    you keep bringing up Bank of America the government money is
    all preferred stock so it has nothing do with the TCE or Tier 1 Common...How is Bank of America to blame fo the crisis??? It wasn'tLehman,Washington Mutual.Wachovia,AIG,Bear Stearns,Countrywide,Me... LynchINdyMac,Alan Greenspan,Fannie
    Mae,Freddie mac.....on and on and on....
    Nov 13 04:33 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Mr. Harrison: Thanks for keeping this issue up front. The Big Guys failed, and they were rewarded by the US taxpayer for their failure so that now they can continue to reward themselves for "doing God's work." Allah Akkba
    Nov 14 01:31 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    ok so you have a high capital position. Tier 1 capital rated by rating agencies obviously having a problem and you say business as usual.

    prove it by coming up with a concrete repayment schedule!!
    Nov 15 02:18 AM | Link | Reply
Viewing Comments 1-6 out of 6