Japan Parallels Are Too Close for Comfort 13 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
We here at TPC aren’t the only ones concerned about the parallels with Japan. There appears to be an increasingly loud drumbeat over the shocking similarities between Japan in the 90’s and the U.S. This morning, Hong Kong’s leader Donald Tsang had some rather alarming comments:
“I’m scared and leaders should look out. America is doing exactly what Japan did last time.”
As opposed to dealing with our issues here at home, Tsang believes the Fed has created a dollar carry trade that is simply reflating bubbles all over the world:
“We have a U.S. dollar carry trade at the moment. Where is the money going — it’s where the problem’s going to be: Asia. You can see asset prices going up, not only in Korea, in Taiwan, in Singapore and in Hong Kong, going up to levels that are incompatible or inconsistent with the economic fundamentals.”
As we’ve previously mentioned, the parallels between the current deleveraging cycle here in the U.S. and Japan’s deleveraging cycle of the 90’s, are numerous. Credit Writedowns recently posted this excellent video from Fox Business which succinctly touches on many of these similarities. I highly recommend readers take a look (attached below).
One of the most interesting takeaways from the video is the current tax situation in the U.S. In Japan, the credit crisis was prolonged mainly because Japan attempted to bail their way out of their sinking ship. Rather than deal with the problems directly (IT’S THE DEBT STUPID!) they attempted to circumvent the problem by creating an environment where the government spent hordes of money to prop up failing institutions. Here in the U.S., we have not only bailed out failing institutions to the tune of several trillion dollars, but we have also continued to promote fiscal irresponsibility via government programs such as cash for clunkers and the first time homebuyers tax credit. Making matters worse, we have a Federal Reserve and Treasury which have agreed to double team the ailing dollar as they print money to no end and effectively punish the prudent while rewarding the speculators (the same bastards that helped create this mess to begin with). Our tax issues have not yet reared their ugly head, but trust me, they are coming.
What we haven’t quite dealt with is how the government is going to overcome their massive revenue shortfalls and ever expanding debt. As Jim Jubak recently described, they are going to come back to the consumer for another blow to the knees. No, the bailouts weren’t enough. Destroying the dollars in your pockets isn’t enough. Because of their fiscal irresponsibility they are going to raise your taxes in 2010. And don’t be fooled. The income tax may not spike, but they will get you in every other way they can. Sales tax, real estate taxes, etc etc. You are paying for their mistakes. Whether you were prudent or not.
Richard Koo is convinced that we can spend our way out of this mess. I am not so sure. There’s only one way to deal with a debt problem. Attack it head on and force those that made bad decisions to restructure and get their house in order or pay down that debt. Injecting a bloated system with more debt does nothing but kick the can down the road (no matter what the stock market does in the near-term). The video is attached:
Related Articles
|
























This article has 13 comments:
On the other hand, to simply have half of financial America fail in one swoop would surely be disastrous, and would probably accompany regime change of some sort. Some people may want such drastic change, but when it happens, usually the result is something totally unpredictable, and not wholly desirable.
Entrepreneurs are needed to bring us out of our current economic malaise. And until there is a general understanding that the bearers of the status quo probably aren't the ones we should be looking to for guidance then we aren't going to see any real change or improvement. Alternative energy has the potential to bring us a good ways towards prosperity but until we start to see more (like myself) who are assembling business plans and working through those SBA tutorials and less of existing corporate entities whining to the government for corporate welfare subsidies we aren't likely to see any real or permanent improvement.
There is a significant debate underway currently in the US and it might be summarized in the following question: Can (or even should) governments and central banks intervene effectively in a modern mature economy to forestall a major recession/depression running its ‘natural’ course? Clearly the governments and central banks of all the significant mature economies (and of the most significant emerging economy, China) have lined up decisively on the side of intervention.
The experience of Japan over the past 20 years has become a metaphor in this debate. In the most primitive form of the debate, some oversimplified cartoon picture of Japan’s economic misadventures is set up as a straw man and it is asserted emphatically that the US (if it adopts or continues down a path equated with a Japanese mistake) is destined to suffer Japan’s fate (only more so). Happily the debate can take a more genuine form.
Japan’s experience is evoked by both sides in this genuine debate; the interventionists as evidence that stimulus must be provided at decisive levels and coupled with vigorous restructuring of inefficient and ineffective financial and industrial enterprises, on the one hand, and the anti-interventionists, on the other, as evidence that necessary economic reform (and therefore the real end of the recession) can only occur if the recession is allowed to do its work of constructive destruction (which artificial fiscal or monetary stimulus measures only delayed or impeded). In other words, both sides acknowledge that Japan’s economy stalled in near deflation for a protracted period and that the efforts of its government and central bank failed to end that state of affairs but the interventionists see the Japan’s error to have been for its fiscal and monetary authorities to have done too little while the anti-interventionists see the error to have been for these authorities to have intervened against market forces at all.
In reality the division as described above between interventionists and non-interventionists is somewhat artificial; particularly at this point in time. The current challenge is to devise and implement significant reforms to the international investment banking system, particularly as represented in the US and UK, and the international balance of trade without impeding the recovery that may now be under way. Clearly re-inflation alone would, at best, merely return the global and US economies to some echo of 2005 (but with massive national debts in most of the mature economies) which would only be the harbinger of a further October of 2008 style crisis soon thereafter, but worse.
On Nov 13 07:27 PM Graham and Dodd Investor wrote:
> U.S. has a version of the Japan disease. No kidding. Donald Tsang,
> in Hong Kong, is someone who would understand these things.
Usually those who make money in the market don't tell everyone. Those who try to bandwagon people into positions you already took are usually trying to unload. If you are unhappy with your short positions I certainly understand. Just don't try to sell me on them.
Those on SA want to have constructive fundamental discussions. If you want a bunch of people ranting and raving about buys and sells watch CNN or blog on Yahoo finance or the 100 other sites stock promoters have ruined.
But back to your point "Dodge the bullet" How? What is the opportunity?
On Nov 13 10:39 PM Mad Hedge Fund Trader wrote:
> Look at the world’s worst population pyramid, that for Japan. These
> graphs show that a nearly perfect pyramid drove a miracle stock market
> during the fifties and sixties which I remember well, when Japan
> had your model high growth emerging market economy. That changed
> dramatically when the population started to age rapidly during the
> nineties. The 2007 graph is shouting at you not to go near the Land
> of the Rising Sun, and the 2050 projection tells you why. By then,
> a small young population of consumers with a very low birth rate
> will be supporting the backbreaking burden of a huge population of
> old age pensioners. Every two wage earners will be supporting one
> retiree. Think low GDP growth, huge government borrowing, deflation,
> and a terrible stock and housing markets. Dodge the bullet.
On Nov 13 04:58 PM Ricard wrote:
> There is no silver bullet. Richard Koo advocated a system that didn't
> cause a shock to the system.
>
> On the other hand, to simply have half of financial America fail
> in one swoop would surely be disastrous, and would probably accompany
> regime change of some sort. Some people may want such drastic change,
> but when it happens, usually the result is something totally unpredictable,
> and not wholly desirable.