Seeking Alpha
Registered investment advisor, bonds, closed-end funds, ETF investing
Profile| Send Message|
( followers)

Today's zoological lesson concerns the large, often hidden and withdrawn creature that includes tapirus bairdii, tapirus terrestris, tapirus indicus and another half dozen species, one of which is of particular current interest.

Like its siblings, tapirus bernankis is large, mostly hidden and "withdrawn." And like some family members, it has recently appeared to be somewhat endangered.

(Tapirs also wallow in mud pits. I've done my part - make up your own joke.)

But tapirus bernankis isn't so endangered that it will never happen. Indeed, it has to happen sometime, or else all manner of bad things will follow, like excessive inflation and the Treasury owning nearly all of the bonds.

It didn't happen in September, because the Fed said conditions weren't yet right, which was a surprise and a disappointment to the Fed's Open Market Committee, especially Kansas City's hawkish Esther George. And so the investing world said, "Oh well," and settled back to continue trading on the comfortable premise that interest rates will remain low for a while longer.

That this condition will continue only until tapirus bernankis arrives, however, is being disputed by some bond market royals. Pimco founder Bill Gross contends that, regardless of when the taper commences, the Fed is now signaling that there will be no raise in its "policy rate" until 2016. That's contrary to the popular assumption that even a whiff of tapering will cause an inexorable climb in rates.

Mr. Gross's contrary assertion is emphatic:

"If you want to trust one thing and one thing only," he says, "trust that once QE (quantitative easing) is gone … Fed funds will then stay lower than expected for a long, long time. Right now the market expects (and the Fed forecasts) Fed funds to be 1% higher by late 2015 and 1% higher still by December 2016.

"Bet against that."

In fact, maybe you'll want to roll over the bet for a good long while. Mr. Gross contends that the U.S. economy is so highly levered that we may have to get used to low policy rates "for decades to come."

And comes much-regarded DoubleLine Funds chief Jeffrey Gundlach in a Sept. 26 webcast, ever so slightly cracking open the door to possibilities that: 1) the low point in interest rates may not have been seen yet, and 2) 10-year bond yields could suffer a bona fide meltdown.

All of this flies in the face of conventional wisdom, as recently enunciated by Forbes fixed-income columnist Richard Lehmann: "[Y]ou can be sure that long-term rates are going to rise over the next two years… ."

Well, given that the two reigning bond kings dissent from that view, forgive me for not being sure of it at all. I do believe that my current portfolio recommendation remains well suited for either case. And the short-term target-maturity ETF that it includes can alternatively be used in a creative laddering approach, as explained below:

If rates were to begin rising over the next couple of years, an investor would not want to get caught holding a high percentage of long-term bonds. They'd be the ones most likely to suffer the greatest devaluations. Therefore, keeping maturities short is advisable for a good chunk of your portfolio.

But that's no reason to put all of your potentially reinvestible cash in, well, cash, or tiny-yielding money-market funds, C.D.s or the like. An alternative is the Guggenheim BulletShares 2014 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJE), which yields 3.4%, based on recent monthly distributions and a price of $26.68. Its holdings mature by Dec. 31 of next year, which, like any short-term investment, limits both its interest rate and default risks.

That's the first rung on the ladder. But Guggenheim (and some other fund companies) offer similar ETFs that end in 2015, 2016 and beyond. And because each fund is a basket of bonds, you get substantially more diversification than you'd get with a ladder of single bonds.

This is a wise approach regardless of the interest-rate future. If rates rise, the shorter-term stuff can be reinvested at the long end to grab the presumably higher rates. And if Mr. Gross is right, and rates stay low for 10 or 20 years, you'll still have diversification as to the conventional risks attendant to bond investing.

Disclosure: I am long BSJE. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Additional disclosure: I also own several Pimco and DoubleLine funds.