U.S. Treasuries in a Bubble, Not Commodities 13 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
US Treasuries are not behaving the way that they "normally" should.
We say this looking at strong equity, commodity, and precious metal prices. The price of US Treasuries should be falling, or at best not rising. Rising gold, silver, platinum, copper, equites, et al, seemingly are good for US Treasury prices.
Rising prices of precious metals should be seen as inflationary; so how US Treasury prices rise
Here is another thought; in six months from now, Gold could be trading at around $1300 and Silver at $25, if current trends continue. Where would US 10 & 30 year Treasuries be trading then?
Is the activity in the US Treasury market the real deal? Is it correctly anticipating a "deflationary" and/or low growth environment? Perhaps commodity prices are about to implode as last year. Or are precious metals and commodities suggesting something about US Treasury prices.
We think that the real deal lies with the behavior in commodities (precious metals in particular), equities, and the TIP:US 10yr spread - that is, US Treasury markets are on the verge of falling into the abyss rather than commodities.






A number of commentators have argued that "bubbles" exist in equity and commodity markets, well perhaps, but just maybe the real bubble is within the US Treasury market.
Disclosure: Long DBC, TBT, SLV and DIA
Related Articles
|





















1. Gold tops $1344; or
2. Oil reaches $100 again.
At that point the US$ will be carried off in a body bag and it'll be "Weimar, Part Deux" time.
I admit GLD is nice. As a hedge, but not as a primary investment strategy. I echo David Rosenberg's sentiment on this. He has been suggesting commodities and defensive income investments including bonds. As of late he has been specifically suggesting GLD. But to suggest a bond bubble is in the works is foolish. Wake me up when the US economy has wiped out between 30 to 40% more of its debt, until then inflation will remain a boogey man.
I agree there is a bond bubble. However, so long as the US is committed to artificially depressed interest rates I see no reason why bonds will collapse in nominal value.
The bond bubble will burst GRADUALLY, the mechanism being that an annual devaluation of the dollar of 10-15% over the next 4-5 years will cause the inflation-adjusted value of bonds to drop by about 70-80%.
With this in mind (and the fact that even the Fed & Congress can't go on forever pumping cash) it makes some sense that treasuries are being bid so high (and down to low yields)
It could well be the equity & commodity markets that "blink first"
And when that buuble does burst, look for the possible collapse of many major US financial institutions who have moved their assets from one bubble - mortgage securities to another bubble - Treasuries.
Problem - the premise is false. The Fed isn't pumping out money. The Fed's balance sheet is the same size as it was last October. All that happened in the meantime is the emergency short term loans to the banking system etc were repaid, and the Fed parked the proceeds in treasuries and agency mortgage backeds.
Everyone in the world is predicting the same US inflation and dollar collapse that was the bubble in the first place. It didn't happen 2005 to 2008 because the Fed held M1 completely constant over that span. It isn't going to happen this time either because the Fed hasn't moved its sheet size in a year.
The treasury auctions are 4 times oversubscribed in bills at zero and 2.5 times oversubscribed for the 10 years with actual yield.
Foreign investors did stop buying agencies over the last year but continue to buy treasuries hand over fist. China, Hong Kong, Japan, the UK, everybody else in smaller amounts. They may talk about the dollar being old hat but it continues to be the place they are parking their net new reserves. Foreign investors have also been buying the US stock market since April, at a $15 billion a month clip.
And the reason is clear - they are not willing to see their current account surpluses disappear, by actually pushing the US to trade balance. So the net capital inflow ot the US has slowed but it remains an inflow.
As for the much vaunted "carry trade", US investors owned less in foreign assets at the end of last year than nearly ever, really. Their foreign stocks got slammed; Americans don't buy foreign government bonds. Meanwhile the supposedly stupid US treasury positions all the foreigners have piled up earned plus 13% in that smash year. Foreign ownership of US assets went down because of the stock market decline, but only by $1 trillion, while US holdings abroad dropped $2.5 trillion - because we own their stock and they own our bonds.
As of the end of 2008, US investors had only a 5% position in foreign stocks and only 3% in foreign bond assets, and 80% of the latter are dollar denominated. The total US investor position in the BRICs is less than 0.5% of US household assets. Some carry trade. Nor can this change much net in the short run, because the net flow of capital remains inward at a $400 billion a year rate.
People talk their ideology but their actual trading positions are saying something quite different. Risk aversion is off the charts after last year's smash, and secular deleveraging continues.
"As for the much vaunted "carry trade", US investors owned less in foreign assets at the end of last year than nearly ever, really."
There is now no longer any real possibility that the US dollar could be salvaged. It's no longer possible for the astronomical amount of US debts to be paid. Raising interest rate is no longer meaningful, because the higher interest rates merely means more money will be printed out of thin air to pay the interest.
Read why a collapse of the US dollar is now not avoidable:
seekingalpha.com/autho...