Seeking Alpha
We cover over 5K calls/quarter
Profile| Send Message| ()  

The Coca-Cola Company (KO)

Q3 2006 Earnings Call

October 19, 2006 8:00 am ET

Executives

Neville Isdell - Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Gary Fayard – CFO

Muhtar Kent - President of International Operations

Sandy Douglas - President of our North America Operating Group

Ann Taylor - IR

Analysts

Mark Swartzberg - Stifel Nicholas

Lauren Torres – HSBC

Brian Spillane - Banc of America

Marc Greenberg - Deutsche Bank

Christine Farkas - Merrill Lynch

Robert Van Brugge – Sanford Bernstein

Carlos Laboy - Bear Stearns

Will Pecoriello - Morgan Stanley

John Faucher - JP Morgan

Matthew Reilly – Morningstar

Presentation

Operator

At this time I would like to welcome everyone to the Coca-Cola Company third quarter 2006 earnings results conference call. (Operator Instructions) I would like to remind everyone that the purpose of this conference is to talk with investors and therefore questions from the media will not be addressed. Media participants should contact Coca-Cola's media relations department if they have questions. I would now like to introduce Ann Taylor, Vice President and Director of Investor Relations.

Ann Taylor

Good morning and thank you for being with us today. I am pleased to be joined by Neville Isdell, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Gary Fayard, our CFO; Muhtar Kent, President of our International Operations; and Sandy Douglas, President of our North America Operating Group. Following prepared remarks by Neville and Gary this morning, we will turn the call over for your questions.

Before we get started, I would like to remind you that this call may contain forward-looking statements including statements concerning long-term earning objectives and should be considered in conjunction with cautionary statements contained in our earnings release and in the company's most recent SEC report.

In addition, I would also like to call your attention to the fact that we have posted schedules on our company's website at www.thecocacolacompany.com in the investor section, which reconcile our results as reported under GAAP to certain non-GAAP measures, which may be referred to by senior executives in our discussion this morning, and from time to time in discussing our financial performance. Please look on our website for this information. Now let me turn the call over to Neville.

Neville Isdell

Thank you, Ann and good morning, everyone. As usual I'm just going to make a few observations about the quarterly results and then Gary's going to follow with his overview of financials and some additional perspective on 2006 which should, we believe, give you plenty of time for your questions.

I'm pleased to report that we delivered another solid quarter. In the quarter, top line volume growth of 5% resulted in ongoing operating income growth of 8%, including a slight currency benefit. Our performance was driven by balanced growth across our international geographies; a continued, system-wide focus on execution; and of course, on innovation and effective marketing programs that are increasingly connecting with our consumers.

On a year-to-date basis then, ongoing currency neutral; operating income increased 7% and ongoing EPS grew 8%; both within our long-term growth model. That was even as we continued to make solid investments in our marketing.

From a top line perspective, I'm particularly pleased with three important factors:

First we again demonstrated our ability to deliver consistent volume growth on a year-over-year basis. We cycled 5% growth in the prior year, something that I know you've all raised as an issue. Can we cycle the third quarter of last year? Our two-year run rate continues to be ahead of our long-term growth target.

Second, we achieved balanced growth across categories with 5% growth in carbonated beverages, our highest growth rate for carbonated beverages in more than five years; and 5% growth in noncarbonated beverages. Trademark Coca-Cola grew 3%, accelerating on the 2% growth in the prior year. Sprite delivered 11% international growth and 6% worldwide; and Fanta grew 7%. As a result, these core brands contributed more than half of the growth in the quarter. We gained share in carbonated soft drinks globally.

In noncarbonated beverages, we continue to expand our presence, cycling strong double-digit growth in the prior year with solid performance in water, ready-to-drink juice, and sports drinks. However, we are not satisfied with our share performance in noncarbs. Expanding our presence in ready-to-drink tea and coffee continue as a significant opportunity, and neither we nor Nestle are happy with the progress that we've made in this area. Now you're starting to see signs of progress, including the recent relaunch of Nestea in the U.S.; the introductions of Enviga and Gold Peak in North America, but there's clearly more that we can do.

Finally, our results continue to benefit from the geographic diversity of our business. Our international operations delivered 7% growth as four of our five international groups achieved mid single-digit or better volume growth. The quarter was led by strong volume growth in key emerging markets in Latin America, Central and Eastern Europe, and many parts of Asia and Africa even as they lapped solid results in the prior year.

Volume increased 11% in markets with per capita consumption less than 150. It's a statistic I love giving to you because this is where a great deal of our long-term growth comes from. Now these results more than offset the volume declines in the Philippines, in Japan, and North America.

In addition, and equally encouraging, is the strength of some of our more developed markets. I'd like to just take a moment now to highlight two groups that I'm particularly encouraged by. In Latin America, we delivered another outstanding quarter. Strong core brands, marketing programs, World Cup included. The focus on noncarb opportunities and world-class execution led to 7% volume growth, lapping a prior year growth rate of 5%. In Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina, trademarks Coke, Sprite, and Fanta grew 7%, 9% and 10% respectively as we gained carbonated soft drink share in Latin America.

We gained traction with noncarbonated beverages in many markets. Noncarbonated beverages in Latin America grew double digits and represented over 20% of the company's total noncarb growth for the quarter.

Secondly, I continue to be pleased with the progress we're making in Europe where volume grew 10% in the quarter. Now, we clearly did benefit from favorable weather for most of the quarter. We also are delivering on the strategies and the priorities outlined on our earnings call a year ago, and we are gaining momentum.

Spain and Central Europe continued their solid performance and our actions in Northwest Europe and Germany gained traction. The performance is a result of strong execution of our key marketing programs in alignment with our partners as we drove growth in CSDs and accelerated our position in noncarbs. Europe successfully activated our World Cup marketing program, as in fact did over 100 markets globally. As the World Cup closed, we started launching Coca-Cola Zero in Great Britain, Germany and Spain.

For Coke share in Britain, early results were really positive. Let me just give you some data. Growing household and impulse penetration in the 16 weeks since the launch has resulted in our share of colas increasing by over 3 percentage points versus the prior year, and our primary competitor’s share fell by almost 3 percentage points. In other words, a 6 percentage point swing. Strong repeat purchase and lower than expected cannibalization demonstrates to us that our innovative three cola strategy will be successful in these markets. Therefore, in addition, we're going to be launching Coca-Cola Zero in Belgium and Nordics during the fourth quarter, something that we had not originally budgeted.

Europe has also made good progress in expanding beyond carbonated soft drinks. While they only account for 13% of the growth volume, non-CSDs contributed 51% of total volume growth.

We completed two strategic acquisitions in the quarter. The Apollinaris source water brand in Germany, Queen of Table Waters, and the Traficante source waters in Italy. Now that combined added 3 points of growth to the quarter, so organically there was a 7% growth. Additionally, we continue to innovate and expand the presence of our Aquarius, POWERADE and Burn trademarks across the group. So you can see that we are continuing to turn the corner in Europe.

So now let me discuss what are probably going to be your two top questions: performance in Japan and North America. We've started the recovery process in Japan and we've delivered on our commitment of sequential volume growth improvement versus the second quarter. Weakness in core brands and softness in the overall soft drink category continued to impact our results. Now while our overall share continued to decline, we did gain share in carbonated soft drinks and importantly, in ready-to-drink coffee.

The Georgia Coffee re-launch continued to be on track resulting in a slight volume improvement versus the prior quarter and a gain in category share. The new marketing campaign has been well received as our consumer tracking shows improvements in brand awareness, ad awareness, and purchase intent. Additionally just one small proof point, but the TV spot supporting the campaign was recognized by independent consumer research as the top spot in Japan in August.

In the fourth quarter, we're going to have new flavor launches under Fanta and Georgia Coffee including a core promotional campaign. Under Trademark Coca-Cola, we're going to continue to focus on Diet Coke. We introduced Cherry Coke during the holiday season as well as Coca-Cola promotional efforts in focused key channels to maximize home consumption during the winter season.

The Japan team is aggressively addressing the issues and is focused on executing their strategies required to drive the long-term health of the business. I'd like to reiterate that we continue sequential improvement and we will see that in the fourth quarter, though the results will remain weak.

Let’s turn now to North America. While there was certainly positives in the quarter, overall, once again, I'm not satisfied with our performance. North American unit case volume was down 1% in the quarter, lapping a 3% growth in the prior year. Volume results were certainly impacted by a weakening of the CSD category in September and by several strategic choices that we made to improve long-term profitability.

Let me take the positive side first. We continue leadership in carbonated soft drinks and we actually gained share in what is, as you all know, a challenging environment. Of course, the near term cost environment is also likely to put pressure on category volumes as we go forward. However, being consistent on this, we continue to see significant opportunity in carbonated beverages, as broadly defined. This is going to require us to continually innovate and redefine carbonated beverages and deliver the right level of execution.

We also began to refocus our resources behind the more profitable Dasani business. So if you exclude the impact of warehoused water, North America unit case growth would have actually been flat with the prior quarter. Now, there was a volume impact of that on the water side, but actually there was a minimal profit impact as we moved to more profitable Dasani.

In juices, we also announced our third price increase in our premium chilled orange juice to offset what are significant cost increases in cost increases in orange juice solids. Volume was obviously negatively impacted. What we're doing here is continuing to take actions to enhance the value proposition of juices to our consumers. It's important to note, though, that we gained volume and value share in the quarter. That was driven by strong performance in the premium trademark, Simply, and the products under that trademark.

Therefore, we continue to focus on profitability, accelerating our presence in noncarbonated beverage categories with particular focus on the tea category at the moment, and you will see that again in the fourth quarter. As I mentioned earlier, that includes the relaunch and repackaging of Nestea and the introduction of Gold Peak, our premium brewed tea. Trademark POWERADE grew in mid single-digits and that was cycling over 30% growth in the prior year.

Now while I'm not satisfied with the quarter in North America, Sandy in his first 30 days on the job has been focused on assessing our brand, category, and customer marketing, plus working with our bottling partners to focus efforts on capturing the opportunities that we believe are there for long-term growth and profit for the system. Sandy's long experience and successful experience in North America and his leadership of our customer organization globally, in my view, make him uniquely qualified to drive our efforts forward and we have seen a seamless transition from Don to Sandy.

In summary overall, I'm very pleased with our top and bottom line performance. We continue to effectively manage our portfolio of brands and our portfolio of countries to deliver results in line with our growth targets. I'm confident we're taking the necessary actions to create sustainable growth and value for the benefits of our shareholders and other stakeholders. Now let me just turn you over to Gary.

Gary Fayard

Thanks, Neville and good morning. As you saw on the release, we reported earnings per share of $0.62 in the quarter, an increase of 15% on a year-to-date basis; reported earnings per share of $1.87, which represents an increase of 12%. Our quarterly results included a couple of items that impacted comparability that essentially offset each other in the quarter. We had some charges related to asset impairment and restructuring which were primarily offset by the benefits that we had from a reversal of a tax valuation allowance. Therefore, there's no difference between reported and adjusted or comparable earnings per share for the quarter.

After considering items impacting comparability in both years, EPS increased 9% in the quarter and 8% year-to-date. In addition, we have lowered our expected underlying effective tax rate on operations for 2006 and for 2007 to 23.5% or 24%, which provided a $0.01 per share of benefit in the quarter, and I'll touch more on that in a minute.

At the net revenue line for the quarter, we reported revenues up 7% versus the prior year; there were a few items that specifically impacted that number. Structural change negatively impacted revenues by 2%, primarily due to the transfer in Spain of canning rights to the bottlers, and we've discussed that in the past. As a reminder, there's no profit impact from that change. So excluding structural changes, revenues in the quarter grew 9%.

Pricing and mix was 4%, driven by a solid pricing environment across many of our key environments, in particular Latin America; and improved performance in our bottling investment group.

We grew operating income by 11% on a reported basis for the third quarter. We also had some items impacting comparability in the current and prior-year quarter. So after considering these impacts, operating income increased 8%, which included a slight positive impact from currency.

SG&A increased 12% in the quarter, which is higher than our run rate in the first half of the year. So let me take a minute to walk you through what contributed to that increase. About half of the increase is due to structural change in acquisitions, the cycling of lower expenses in the prior year and currency, each of those contributing about two points to the growth.

First, as expected, we saw higher expenses in the bottling investments group, including the impact of acquisitions as we continue to invest behind sales and service. Second, we cycled lower stock option expense and some various small gains on sales of land in the prior year. Lastly, currency increased SG&A by 2%. Driving a significant portion of the remaining growth was continued solid investment behind our core operations, as marketing expenses grew at a rate similar to our top line.

Now with regard to cash flow in the quarter, you will see a decline in cash from operations driven by an increase in working capital on a year-over-year basis. This is caused by the same key items that we discussed in the first two quarters, which we relate to settlement of marketing accruals and timing of marketing payments and cash tax payments related to repatriation of foreign earnings from last year. As you'll see, these relate to timing of expenses rather than changes in the fundamental working capital structure of our operations.

Let me address a couple other factors that we see impacting our outlook for the remainder of this year. During the second quarter earnings call, we stated that there was a $0.02 per share of benefit from gallons timing that we received in the quarter and that benefit would reverse in the second half of 2006. We see $0.01 of that gallons timing reversing in the third quarter and expect the additional $0.01 to reverse in the fourth quarter.

On share repurchase, as a result of the number of recent and potential acquisition activities, we were conservative and refrained from actively repurchasing shares during the majority of the quarter. We currently intend that our range of share repurchase in 2006 will remain between $2 billion and $2.5 billion.

For input costs, we continue to see upward pressure, but we are actively managing those pressures.

Now on taxes, I mentioned earlier we anticipate that our underlying effective tax rate for the full year of 2006 and 2007 will be approximately 23.5%. The tax rate for the quarter was slightly lower than this revised underlying effective rate due to two reasons.

One, there's a catch up to bringing the effective tax rate for the first nine months in line with our new, lower, full-year estimate. Recall that we had previously anticipated and applied an underlying effective tax rate of 24% through the first half of 2006.

Secondly, we have a one-time net tax benefit of approximately $41 million, due primarily to a reduction of a valuation allowance on our U.S. capital loss carryforwards. This is associated with our fulfillment of a 2003 agreement with Femsa which allows them to regain a majority ownership in Coca-Cola Femsa as they were diluted to a minority stake as a result of the Pan Amco acquisition. The planned sale, which will impact the fourth quarter, will result in a gain and on that gain -- as opposed to what some other companies would want you to do -- I would suggest that you treat it as a nonrecurring item and exclude it from ongoing earnings.

Now let me move to currency. On a comparable basis, currency has had only a slight positive impact on our operating income for the quarter. Year-to-date has been a 1% drag. We have put coverage in place and are effectively covered through the fourth quarter of 2006 on most key currencies, but based on current spot rates and the expected impact of the coverage in place, we expect currencies to have a slight negative impact to operating income in the fourth quarter and a 1% negative impact for the full year of 2006, and that includes the impact of the first nine months. This is slightly more pessimistic on the impact in the fourth quarter than I gave you at the last earnings call, as the yen and the rand remain weak.

In closing, and as we outlined in the release, with the progress to-date and the pipeline we have in place, we believe that we are taking the necessary actions to create long-term sustainable growth and value for our shareholders.

That's it for the topics I wanted to cover this morning. Neville, Muhtar, Sandy, and I are now ready for your questions.

Question-and-Answer Session

Operator

Your first question comes from the line of Mark Swartzberg - Stifel Nicholas.

Mark Swartzberg - Stifel Nicholas

Good morning, everyone. Gary or Neville, simply a fact question for you: year-to-date marketing spend, if you look at that on a per case basis, can you give us the rate of growth there?

Gary Fayard

Yes, Mark, it is 10%.

Mark Swartzberg - Stifel Nicholas

10% on a per case?

Gary Fayard

I'm sorry, per case, no. Year-over-year, it is about 10%.

Mark Swartzberg - Stifel Nicholas

Okay and then we can adjust for the cases?

Gary Fayard

You can adjust it for the cases.

Neville Isdell

I think, as I said in my earlier remarks, Mark, we believe we are getting traction out of the spend. I think if you want to go back to really the question about the $400 million, I think you see it certainly in the international results, as to how that is now working for us. Again, you see that positively on the revenue line, so marketing is essentially up at the same level as revenue overall.

Mark Swartzberg - Stifel Nicholas

Yes. Thank you.

Operator

Your next question comes from Lauren Torres - HSBC.

Lauren Torres – HSBC

Good morning. Two markets that you really didn't touch upon were India and the Philippines. I was hoping you could just give us an update for what you are seeing there, if we see improvements, structurally any changes, anything you can add there would be great.

Neville Isdell

Muhtar do you want to have that?

Muhtar Kent

Good morning. On India, despite the issues around the Pepsi size issue, we grew our unit cases in India 4% in the quarter, and that was actually the first growth we have had in India for the last eight quarters consecutively, despite all the issues around that matter. I think we are still cautious about our results in India. But we are working our programs, imaging programs in India and marketing programs are really working. I think you can see that from the results.

As far as the Philippines is concerned, we are still in discussions with our partner and we basically see the business continue to be challenged at the moment. We are working very hard to try to resolve the issues with our partner.

Lauren Torres – HSBC

Do you have a timeline as far as discussions are concerned?

Muhtar Kent

As soon as feasible.

Lauren Torres – HSBC

Thank you.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Brian Spillane - Banc of America.

Brian Spillane - Banc of America

Good morning, just a question on new products. What contribution to your volume growth rate in the quarter came from new products introduced this year?

Neville Isdell

I actually don't have that one right off the top. We are going to have to come back to you. It varies obviously by geography where we have put those new products, in you would see all of the growth that's in Australia would have come out of new products. You would see a major amount of the turnaround in the U.K. out of new products.

We have also, of course, got acquisitions in there; that would be about seven-tenths of 1%. We actually don't break that out normally in terms of giving that breakout. Let me just go back. If you look at core brand Coca-Cola, if you look at what you call here Coca-Cola Classic, you are looking at a 3% growth off that base.

I've always said, job one is to regenerate growth with the brands that we have and that we would be able to do that. While that's not true across every geography, and I've referred to some of the geographic splits, we have proven to be able to do that. So that is against the marketing, that's against the new campaign. That's against bringing in the increased intellectual capital with better people, et cetera. You see it with Fanta and you see it with Sprite. Within that, of course there are some new flavors, et cetera.

But the innovation is not, at this point in time, the key driver. That is still down the line. I think that's 07/08 as you see that coming, you see the early pieces of that, as I mentioned with tea in North America as you look at Gold Peak, the relaunch of Nestea, you see the launch of Enviga. You know, it is the tip of the iceberg now coming through.

So we are maintaining our ongoing volume targets but I think the encouraging thing is that job one is working pretty well, which is the reinvestment behind the core and the growth of that. Now, does that not mean that there is not a pipeline of launches out there? No. I mean, you have seen the innovation around the Odwalla trademark, you have seem the extension of the Simply brand in juice; you have seen what we have done with Godiva and of course the other brands that I've mentioned. So there is a lot going out there. We are running out Aquarius across Europe after great success if in Spain. I mentioned Burn in my early remarks across Europe. That is not high volume metrically but it’s high from a profit standpoint. So that mix is taking place.

Again, when we talk about innovation, I want to look at it in two ways because some of the innovation is not going to show up on the volume charts. Burn would be a particular example, Full Throttle would be another example where you actually see it in terms of the overall margins and overall profitability. So some of these innovations are not a raw comparison of what's the percentage in volume terms, is probably not a good one and we certainly wouldn't want to give away the profit ones as well.

Sandy, I don't know if you want to say something about Vault and Energy in North America, but I think you are pretty encouraged with the early results on Vault.

Sandy Douglas

Yes, Neville, I think the results with Vault particularly in immediate consumption have been very strong and we continue to build momentum with that brand. Energy, year-to-date is growing share around Full Throttle, Tab Energy, and yet we have tremendous plans going forward for new products in the Energy area.

So you mentioned the momentum with Simply and Odwalla, and then of course the year-over-year momentum with Coke Zero where we still have a lot more to do in terms of marketing and executing Coke Zero, but as we lap the introduction we have good growth in the quarter of about 30%.

Brian Spillane - Banc of America

So Neville, your progress on loading the new innovation pipeline, you feel like you are pretty much on track with what you laid out a year ago?

Neville Isdell

Yes, I am. The proof point that we have with regard to that is what's in the pipeline. We have an innovation lab here which we bring customers into so that they can see what we are doing and what we are working on. It is part of this collaborative customer model that Sandy actually put in place in his old job. Where we involve our customers at an earlier stage in terms of what we are bringing down the pipeline on a confidential basis. They will agree to come. They will say, “well, we can spend an hour-and-a-half” and they spend four hours. That's where we open up the window as to what's coming down the pipeline.

I would also refer to a day that we spent with our top to top bottlers about three weeks ago. Each of them as they went through the summaries said “This is the best medium that we have had. We are very encouraged with what you have coming down the pipeline.”

The issue, of course, is that some of these innovations are value-added. Some of them along the line are going to involve health claims; that's going to need FDA approval. I said I'm here for the long term. I'm managing for the long term. So some of these are out in '08 and '09. This is not something where we can get instant gratification, I'm afraid. But I'm confident that the pipeline is being built the way that I outlined it.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Marc Greenberg - Deutsche Bank.

Marc Greenberg - Deutsche Bank

Thanks, good morning. My question relates to Japan. I'm hoping you might be able to offer some insights with regards to the system and portfolio capabilities; ability to offset any risk that you see in change in consumer buying patterns? In other words, have you thought about whether or not the consumer has fundamentally shifted away from ready-to-drink coffee, given the ongoing category weakness? And what impact growth in Starbucks and the like are having on that important profit business for Coke?

Muhtar Kent

I'll just try to reflect on that. We think that there is a totally different consumer that is actually going after the Starbucks-type, the chilled cup coffee versus the canned coffee that is a very, very different business that is driven by vending and driven by a different kind of consumer. The profiles of the consumers are different. While that doesn't mean that there is not a going to be future success for that Starbucks-type chilled cup coffee, of which there are many other products out in the marketplace and is a growing segment. But we feel that there is certainly a very different consumer, and also as far as that segment, the canned coffee segment is concerned you are talking about roughly 8 million to 10 million transactions per day which currently is done through convenience stores, done through vending machines, primarily. So we don't see that that is something necessarily that we will take away but it will be complementary. That's how we see it.

That doesn't mean that there is no opportunities and we are certainly looking at that opportunity very, very seriously in terms of what that can give to our business also going into the future. But we don't see that as a threat to that very large canned coffee market in Japan.

Neville Isdell

I think the results that we outlined, just broadly, in terms of the growth that we are getting back into Georgia underpin that. Let me talk broadly about the coffee category. We think there are exciting margin opportunities there. That is obviously what's happening with regard to Starbucks. You see us with our tests with Far Coast in Canada, very early days. We are exploring; this is again not going to show up on the charts in a hurry.

That gives us new ways to test, new ways to test flavors in different markets, flavor combinations with coffee. You will see that rolling out now in Norway, Singapore, et cetera.

Again, if we go back to the earlier question about innovation that's an area where we are innovating and we think that chilled coffee in Japan, through the convenience channel, is going to be an additional opportunity for us, but without obsoleting the existing pack and the existing formulations that we have. Again, to be repetitive, but I think it is important to say this: that turnaround is very much on track.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Christine Farkas - Merrill Lynch.

Christine Farkas - Merrill Lynch

Thank you very much. Good morning A question for Neville or Sandy. Looking at North America, with revenues up 4% and profits down 7% and given your discussion about the focus on more profitable water, can you just talk through a little bit about how your mix was negative, if warehouse volumes water were down? Talk a little bit about the magnitude of the input costs in the quarter. In perspective, what drove the 4% favorable price mix on a global basis when country mix seems still a bit negative? Thank you.

Neville Isdell

I think there is a global question here. Gary, why don't you start with that?

Gary Fayard

Yes, there are a couple of things that I would say. Let me start with North America. If you look at year-to-date, North America has actually had a very good year-to-date. You see that gallons were actually ahead of cases in the first half of the year, which we highlighted in the second quarter call. That started reversing in the third quarter and that's what you are actually seeing a lot of what happened at a high level in North America. Where gallons were actually down two in the quarter.

We do have higher input costs. We are managing that. We are optimistic, particularly because where we have got the premium high end of the market, particularly in juice where there's been a lot of pressure on input costs; where we have got the Simply trademark and Odwalla, we have actually continued to see growth there and really, offsetting the input costs. So while there is pressure there, I think we are effectively managing that.

Lastly on North America, we purposely and have actually planned all along in this quarter to start changing out some of our water plants and switching those over to the Dasani brand, which drives higher profitability. It had an impact on volumes, but very little impact on profit for the quarter.

If I look then globally at what happened, price mix as I said, if you go to revenue, revenue was 9% comparable without structural change. Price mix up at 9% was actually 4 points. Of that bottling investments group, while their margin percentages are lower and it can have some impact on the margin, bottling investments actually contributed 2 points of that 4-point price mix growth. That's where we are seeing significant improvement from the bottlers, the CBOs that we own.

I'm happy that we also got 2 points of pricing in the core business as well which is in line with what we have said our long-term earnings model is. And we are getting that, if you look at the mix of our volume in the quarter, you had Latin America obviously doing very well, but you also had very good volume results and profit results coming from Europe, which is high profit market. Therefore, overall results were very good.

Christine Farkas - Merrill Lynch

That really makes sense globally. Just touching on North America, the negative product mix was driven by water, even though the wholesale volumes were down?

Gary Fayard

Yes.

Christine Farkas - Merrill Lynch

Thank you very much.

Operator

Your next question comes from Robert Van Brugge – Sanford Bernstein.

Robert Van Brugge – Sanford Bernstein

Yes, good morning. Question for Gary. It looks like you spent about $500 million on the acquisitions in the quarter. Did that have any impact on the operating profit growth numbers?

Gary Fayard

Robert, very little, a negligible impact. It obviously did on volumes, but in this quarter negligible impact on operating income.

Operator

Your next question comes from Carlos Laboy - Bear Stearns.

Carlos Laboy - Bear Stearns

Good morning. Can you speak to progress and challenges for reaching noncarb deals in Latin America? And specifically, do incidence rates work for noncarbs, and why or why not?

Muhtar Kent

Can you repeat the second part of your question?

Carlos Laboy - Bear Stearns

Can you speak to progress and challenges for reaching noncarb deals in Latin America, and do incidence rates work for noncarbs; why or why not?

Muhtar Kent

Yes. First let me say this. As far as noncarb deals in Latin America, it is clearly growing, having a balanced growth both driving our CSD portfolio as well as looking at every opportunity in the nonalcoholic beverage category in noncarbs is clearly our priority in Latin America.

So if we see opportunities in Latin America that work for us on a regional basis, on a country basis we will certainly go after them. Therefore we look upon the whole area of opportunities across Latin America in noncarbs in both driving them organically, but also any other acquisitions that could work for us on a country-by-country basis.

Now as far as the noncarb business model is concerned, we are in discussions with our bottling partners in Latin America to reach a mutual win/win model, a business model that works, that drives volume and sustains profitability across Latin America for noncarbs. I was just down there last week meeting with all our Latin American bottlers and I'm very excited with the opportunities in that area.

Carlos Laboy - Bear Stearns

But specifically with regard to incidence, Muhtar?

I believe that you need a more all encompassing business model around noncarbs that works, that drives a win-win model for both us and our bottling partners. I'm very excited by the prospects of that.

I want to add that we reached a forward-looking agreement that demonstrates our solid and constructive relationship with our bottling partner Femsa. This agreement underscores our mutual understanding for value creation alternatives from a potentially larger revenue pool. I'm very happy to note that both our companies are aware of the growth opportunities, agree on the growth opportunities that exist in the carbs as well as noncarbs business. We will pursue these opportunities to fulfill our growth objectives for both of our shareholders. So I'm excited by that prospect also. I just want to say this at this moment, Carlos.

Neville Isdell

Carlos, obviously we are somewhat inhibited in that FEMSA will have to make their results announcements, but I encourage you to follow up with FEMSA and I think you will get some more granularity. This is of course across Latin America, but I think you will get some more granularity with regard to the agreements we have and how we are going to move forward very effectively with them in the next couple of weeks.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Will Pecoriello - Morgan Stanley.

Will Pecoriello - Morgan Stanley

Good morning, everyone. Can you talk about the cash flow impact looking out toward '07 from some of the bottling businesses that you have already announced you will be acquiring or you are in the works of, in terms of the cash to acquire as well as the capital required to run the business -- say China, Philippines, Philadelphia. You also have the $1 billion payment to Germany early next year. What are the cash flow impacts, any impact you see on the repo program looking out to '07 as a result of any of that?

Gary Fayard

Relative to the acquisitions, let me categorize those as carry beverages in China, Philadelphia and Germany. While we and [Sam McGill] have made some references in the Philippines to having some discussions, there are no definitive agreements there so I really cannot comment on at that.

First on Philadelphia, we actually have entered into a put call arrangement which is two years out, so there will be no impact on cash flow or capital for 2007. If you look, though, at Apollinaris Germany, the acquisition of Apollinaris, the acquisition of Traficante in Italy, the German bottling system and the put call arrangement there, as well as the letter of intent with the other bottlers, as well as China; there will be some additional capital in 2007 from those. We do not see it as being significant. It will be maybe a few hundred million dollars. Let's call it $300 million or $400 million probably for those bottlers next year.

My expectation though is we had a significant ramp up in capital in North America for 2006. We see some of that declining and don't have to add as much capital to North America in 2007. So those will somewhat offset, so you will see some slight modest increase but I don't think it is going to be a material kind of increase.

Will Pecoriello - Morgan Stanley

Gary, the couple hundred million is the actual CapEx involved in those bottling operations, but then taking into account the $1 billion payment and some of the acquisition costs as well?

Gary Fayard

Right. Yes, we do have about $1 billion in Germany for the put call. In addition to that, while we have got a nonbinding letter agreement with the remaining independent bottlers in Germany, I think most of that will probably be on a merger versus a cash basis. So call it $1 billion plus a little, but not material. We factored that in, have significant cash flows, I think in line with what we have been seeing and there should not be any impact on our share repurchase program.

Neville Isdell

Bill, while we are talking about bottlers let me just fire off that because that's the capital going forward. I just want to go back, because I think within the broad strategic intent of what I laid out nearly two-and-a-half years ago about what we wanted to do, one of the issues that was out there was, can The Coca-Cola Company run bottlers and run them effectively?

I created what I call euphemistically the hospital ward, as it were, for bottlers where we need to turn them around and brought in the capability. It is not just Ariel; underneath him we have brought in half a dozen very high quality operators. It is doing the basics as you know, I spent a lot of time on the bottling side as well; but it is doing just the basics which allow us to enhance the margins. You will see that as we have gone through year-to-date, we are talking about up 3.

Therefore, whilst we are not going to retain them, I mean the whole idea of the hospital ward is we are going to fix them and move them out. You will see some of that happening as we go forward into '07. There is nothing that I can commit to at this stage but I think you will see some cash coming out of some disposals because we have got them fixed and more will come into that mix as we need to.

I think from a very broad strategic standpoint that's extremely important because now we have got the ability to turn around bottlers that are underperforming and do that successfully. That was something I know, and quite legitimately, I'm not pushing back hard on this, was a big, big question about, well historically you haven’t run bottlers very well. What are you able to do? I think the proof points are coming in there as you look at those bottling investment numbers and therefore it has a very strong impact on what we are also able to do with regard to our overall base business; our core business in terms of concentrate sales. Because as we turn those around, therefore we have got higher performing bottlers out there.

The reason I've expanded it, I know you need to look at what the capital is needed to do that. But I think the capability, which is just as important, is something we are beginning to demonstrate.

Will Pecoriello - Morgan Stanley

Neville, given you ever that increased confidence on the capability do you need to use anymore of the hospital ward that you refer to, say in North America where there are structural issues?

Neville Isdell

Bill I would never comment on any part of the world but where the hospital ward may be. That's unfair to do that to anyone. Very largely, it actually comes from the bottlers themselves where they are unable to grow the business they have decided that they want to move out. I mean, it is interesting how this always evolves. It tends to be a business that is underperforming and the owners, say they have lost confidence in the ability to get a return on their capital and they sell to us because they have lost faith in the business. We have not lost faith in the business. We take it and we turn it around. We show that this is still a good business with business growth. In some instances -- the restructuring of Germany would be one -- we would take maybe an aggressive stance and bring about change. I don't take that off the table for some future actions, but by and large, it tends to be people who come to us and want to exit. We take it over and turn it around.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of John Faucher - JP Morgan.

John Faucher - JP Morgan

Yes, good morning everyone. It looks like you guys are trying to pull back on some of this low/no/negative profit bottled water that got added let’s say probably four or five years ago. Can you walk us through some other regions where we might see a pull back on some of this low margin bottled water volume? Should this continue to be a little bit of a drag on at least volumes over the next couple of quarters if that is the case? Thanks.

Neville Isdell

Basically, we have done most of it. I have talked about that with regard to a number of countries where we have underperformed in terms of pulling back; Indonesia was one, for example, parts of Europe were the other. There is obviously still some in North America and you will see some modest impacts that you are going to see there. That's going to go through probably to Q2 '07, first half of '07.

In terms of the, of the overall company, I don't think it is going to be a major number. We will highlight it obviously as you break out North America. You will see it within that. But again, as Gary pointed out to you in terms of the actions taken in the third quarter, whilst it has a volume metric impact, its impact on profitability is very limited. So we don't see that the moves we make in that area will in any way undermine our ability to meet our long-term growth targets for volume growth.

Operator

Next question comes from the line of Matthew Reilly - Morningstar.

Matthew Reilly – Morningstar

Good morning I would like to return to India for a moment. I was wondering if you think that the long-term potential of the carbonated soft drink category has been limited by the latest round of pesticide allegations and product bans?

Muhtar Kent

I do not think so. I think that the per capita consumption of carbonated soft drinks in India is very, very low. I think that they have a great future in India. I think the issue we have dealt very effectively and continue to deal with effectively with the issue of pesticides and with allegations. We feel very confident about our programs in India around marketing, both on a local basis as well as across the whole country.

We see this only as a very short setback. We feel that our growth in the third quarter could have been higher than it actually was. But we feel that over the long term we see great, great potential for our total portfolio in India, both in the carbonated beverage space as well as in the non-carbs.

Neville Isdell

You know, Muhtar and his team have, I'm sure -- don't want to put themselves in the position of being in any way self-congratulatory but if you look at the 4% growth we had in the quarter and obviously immediately after the pesticide issue hit again, when the CSE decided to use it -- as she admits -- for a broader issue of pesticides in the food chain in India, admitting they picked on carbonated soft drinks because that would get them headlines. You know, we had a major downturn for a few weeks. I think if you look at the 4%, you can see that we were prepared to handle it, we were prepared to go out there very rapidly, work with the government. You see the government statements, you have seen the judicial system work for us. I think you will see the consumers starting to read it for what it is.

Operator

Your final question is a follow-up from the line of Marc Greenberg - Deutsche Bank.

Marc Greenberg - Deutsche Bank

Thanks, good morning. Question relates to anything that you can offer with regard to the Coca-Cola systemwide procurement efforts. Wondering if you might be able to provide an update on how Coke is working with its bottlers to offset what appear to be higher input costs for both aluminum and high fructose corn syrup; and if at all that factors into your thinking for concentrate price increases in '07?

Neville Isdell

Well, you are dealing with a complex mix. Let me just go to input costs overall and I think we have to include in that sugar. Sugar prices did move up to something in the order of a 15-year high. That is important with regard to most of the rest of the world, because we use sugar as opposed to high fructose, HFCS, high fructose corn syrup. You have seen those prices come down. Certainly in the markets where we import as a system, because you are talking about the systemic purchasing that we have, we have been able to take cover to be able to minimize those costs.

So it is a 25-year-high actually, in sugar prices but we have been through this one before. So that forward coverage which was taken out systemically for import markets, remember, because controlled price commodity is one piece. PT is another important piece, but we do not believe given the capacity -- although there is, there is some tightness in one of the input costs -- but with the capacity that won't have a major effect.

Aluminum, we have seen the price of alumina come down, the raw material. We have not seen the price of aluminum coming down. Part of that is actually, you know, the focus is on the trading of the London metal exchange. Trading and hedging has got a big effect on that.

So if you look at the raw material input we think sometime around the end of '06/beginning of '07 that the reality of the marketplace is going to come through and there will be some easing. It is a tough one to call.

So if you go back to the questions around what that is going to mean with pricing and overall pricing flexibility, that is a complex equation because to what degree are you able to get that price out of the marketplace? It is obviously something that we face on an equal basis with all of our competitors. Particularly with aluminum where most suppliers have declared force majeur and therefore that may well be reflected more in pricing with the consumer rather than affecting our ability to price concentrate.

We are going to take this on a quarter by quarter basis because we think, given the other dynamics within that, that's an important piece.

Gary Fayard

Just a couple of other thoughts on that. We do have global procurement council made up of ourselves and all of our major bottlers and the main ingredients, those ingredients are packaging, are included under that procurement group and we are procuring on a global basis, so most of the ingredients and packaging materials that we are talking about, we are one of or perhaps the largest purchaser in the world. Therefore, that gives us some advantages in that and we are definitely working together as a global system on procurement.

The second piece as well is that as you look at different areas of the world, some of these commodity costs are in fact dollar-based, and because of that, different currencies will give you different impacts and different views on commodity costs. The pressures are not as great in some of the international markets because of that, as they are like the U.S. So we are managing it actively, and we will continue to keep you updated as we go quarter by quarter.

Neville Isdell

I think before I just close just a broader comment. You know you are going to see more of this consolidation taking place in terms of managing input costs and using the strength of the system overall. I think I mentioned on the last call what we are working on with regard to IT, not just in terms of developing common platforms with our bottlers but being able, therefore, to cut costs in terms of overall IT development. That is just another initiative building off what Gary has said and that certainly is a major strategic thrust to enable us to actually capitalize on the size of the system something I think we have not done as well as we might.

Over time you will see that to see that mitigate the costs of our system overall because after all, we are the ones able to help our bottlers by leveraging the overall power of the system.

So I would like to thank each of you for joining us this morning. I would believe that with the results in this quarter and the plans that we have in place, that I am confident that the business is on a solid footing. I did not put in, but I really should have in my other comments that there will always be a bump in the road. Hopefully we never hit one, but on a quarterly by quarterly basis that's something that's always a reality, sometime down the road.

We continue to focus on execution. It is critical on our part going forward. But again, I think our results to date do underline the fact that our execution is improving. Of course, I look forward to speaking to you all again on the fourth quarter call early next year to share our progress. Thanks very much indeed.

Operator

Thank you for participating in today's Coca-Cola Company's third quarter 2006 earnings results conference call.

Copyright policy: All transcripts on this site are the copyright of Seeking Alpha. However, we view them as an important resource for bloggers and journalists, and are excited to contribute to the democratization of financial information on the Internet. (Until now investors have had to pay thousands of dollars in subscription fees for transcripts.) So our reproduction policy is as follows: You may quote up to 400 words of any transcript on the condition that you attribute the transcript to Seeking Alpha and either link to the original transcript or to www.SeekingAlpha.com. All other use is prohibited.

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE IS A TEXTUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S CONFERENCE CALL, CONFERENCE PRESENTATION OR OTHER AUDIO PRESENTATION, AND WHILE EFFORTS ARE MADE TO PROVIDE AN ACCURATE TRANSCRIPTION, THERE MAY BE MATERIAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURACIES IN THE REPORTING OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE AUDIO PRESENTATIONS. IN NO WAY DOES SEEKING ALPHA ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS MADE BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEB SITE OR IN ANY TRANSCRIPT. USERS ARE ADVISED TO REVIEW THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S AUDIO PRESENTATION ITSELF AND THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S SEC FILINGS BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS.

If you have any additional questions about our online transcripts, please contact us at: transcripts@seekingalpha.com. Thank you!

Source: Coca-Cola Q3 2006 Earnings Call Transcript
This Transcript
All Transcripts