As part of our process, we perform a rigorous discounted cash-flow methodology that dives into the true intrinsic worth of companies. In LinkedIn's (NYSE:LNKD) case, we think the firm is overvalued. We think it is fairly valued at $133 per share.
At Valuentum, we think a comprehensive analysis of a firm's discounted cash-flow valuation and relative valuation versus industry peers is the best way to identify the most attractive stocks at the best time to buy. This process culminates in what we call our Valuentum Buying Index (click here for an in-depth presentation about our methodology), which ranks stocks on a scale from 1 to 10, with 10 being the best. Essentially, we're looking for firms that overlap investment methodologies, thereby revealing the greatest interest by investors (we like firms that fall in the center of the diagram below):
If a company is undervalued both on a DCF and on a relative valuation basis it scores high on our scale. LinkedIn posts a VBI score of 1 on our scale, reflecting our 'overvalued' DCF assessment of the firm, its unattractive relative valuation versus peers, and bearish technicals. We compare LinkedIn to peers Facebook (NASDAQ:FB), Google (NASDAQ:GOOG), and Yahoo (NASDAQ:YHOO).
• LinkedIn earns a ValueCreation™ rating of EXCELLENT, the highest possible mark on our scale. The firm has been generating economic value for shareholders for the past few years, a track record we view very positively. Return on invested capital (excluding goodwill) has averaged 72.5% during the past three years.
• LinkedIn operates the world's largest professional network on the Internet in over 200 countries and territories. On its website, members create, manage and share their professional identity and build out their professional networks in order to facilitate a more productive and successful career.
• LinkedIn has an excellent combination of strong free cash flow generation and low financial leverage. We expect the firm's free cash flow margin to average about 5.1% in coming years, and the firm had no debt as of last quarter.
• LinkedIn's business model is relatively unproven, and historical growth has masked all cyclicality, which may be severe. Competition from a variety of fronts could overwhelm the firm's network effect, inevitably disrupting its business model. The magnitude of future growth and profitability are other key uncertainties.
Economic Profit Analysis
The best measure of a firm's ability to create value for shareholders is expressed by comparing its return on invested capital - ROIC - with its weighted average cost of capital - WACC. The gap or difference between ROIC and WACC is called the firm's economic profit spread. LinkedIn's 3-year historical return on invested capital (without goodwill) is 72.5%, which is above the estimate of its cost of capital of 11.8%. As such, we assign the firm a ValueCreation™ rating of EXCELLENT. In the chart below, we show the probable path of ROIC in the years ahead based on the estimated volatility of key drivers behind the measure. The solid grey line reflects the most likely outcome, in our opinion, and represents the scenario that results in our fair value estimate.
Cash Flow Analysis
Firms that generate a free cash flow margin (free cash flow divided by total revenue) above 5% are usually considered cash cows. LinkedIn's free cash flow margin has averaged about 10.2% during the past 3 years. As such, we think the firm's cash flow generation is relatively STRONG. The free cash flow measure shown above is derived by taking cash flow from operations less capital expenditures and differs from enterprise free cash flow (FCFF), which we use in deriving our fair value estimate for the company. For more information on the differences between these two measures, please visit our website at Valuentum.com. At LinkedIn, cash flow from operations increased about 138% from levels registered two years ago, while capital expenditures expanded about 30% over the same time period.
The estimated fair value of $133 per share represents a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of about 325.5 times last year's earnings and an implied EV/EBITDA multiple of about 104 times last year's EBITDA -- both nosebleed levels. Our model reflects a compound annual revenue growth rate of 38.7% during the next five years, a pace that is higher than the firm's 3-year historical compound annual growth rate of 23%. Our model reflects a 5-year projected average operating margin of 19.7%, which is above LinkedIn's trailing 3-year average. Beyond year 5, we assume free cash flow will grow at an annual rate of 17.4% for the next 15 years and 3% in perpetuity. For LinkedIn, we use an 11.8% weighted average cost of capital to discount future free cash flows.
Margin of Safety Analysis
Our discounted cash flow process values each firm on the basis of the present value of all future free cash flows. Although we estimate the firm's fair value at about $133 per share, every company has a range of probable fair values that's created by the uncertainty of key valuation drivers (like future revenue or earnings, for example). After all, if the future was known with certainty, we wouldn't see much volatility in the markets as stocks would trade precisely at their known fair values. Our ValueRisk™ rating sets the margin of safety or the fair value range we assign to each stock. In the graph below, we show this probable range of fair values for LinkedIn. We think the firm is attractive below $86 per share (the green line), but quite expensive above $180 per share (the red line). The prices that fall along the yellow line, which includes our fair value estimate, represent a reasonable valuation for the firm, in our opinion.
Future Path of Fair Value
We estimate LinkedIn's fair value at this point in time to be about $133 per share. As time passes, however, companies generate cash flow and pay out cash to shareholders in the form of dividends. The chart below compares the firm's current share price with the path of LinkedIn's expected equity value per share over the next three years, assuming our long-term projections prove accurate. The range between the resulting downside fair value and upside fair value in Year 3 represents our best estimate of the value of the firm's shares three years hence. This range of potential outcomes is also subject to change over time, should our views on the firm's future cash flow potential change. The expected fair value of $186 per share in Year 3 represents our existing fair value per share of $133 increased at an annual rate of the firm's cost of equity less its dividend yield. The upside and downside ranges are derived in the same way, but from the upper and lower bounds of our fair value estimate range.
Pro Forma Financial Statements
Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Additional disclosure: FB and GOOG are included in the portfolio of our Best Ideas Newsletter.