Growth Portfolio Super Bowl 2nd Round: General Motors Vs. Masco

Includes: GM, MAS
by: Abba's Aces

In the second round of the Growth Portfolio playoffs, we have #12 seeded Masco Corporation (NYSE:MAS) taking on #4 seeded General Motors Company (NYSE:GM). Masco manufactures, distributes and installs home improvement and building products. General Motors designs, builds and sells cars, trucks and automobile parts globally.

The following table depicts the recent earnings reports for each company:




Actual EPS


Estimated EPS


Actual Revenue

($ in billions)

Estimated Revenue

($ in billions)













GM is up 35.37% in the past year while Masco is up 31.83% excluding dividends (up 32.97% including dividends), and are beating the S&P 500, which has gained 25.3% in the same time frame. This matchup will be played out in a best of seven game series based on the metrics below. For a complete list of all the metrics utilized in the seven game series click here. Not all the metrics will be looked at if a team can win and win early. This matchup will determine the winner, which will go on to play in the next round of the playoffs for the Growth Portfolio Super Bowl.

Forward P/E

Forward P/E is the metric of how many times future earnings you are paying up for a particular stock. The earnings portion of the ratio I utilize is the earnings value for the next twelve months or for the next full fiscal year. I like utilizing the forward P/E ratio as opposed to the trailing twelve-month P/E ratio because it is an indication of where the stock is going to go in the future. I like to get a glimpse of the future, but will take note of where it was coming from in the past. GM carries a 1-year forward-looking P/E ratio of 8.69, which is inexpensively priced for the future right now while Masco's 1-year forward-looking P/E ratio of 20.4 is currently fairly priced. Game One goes to GM.

1-yr PEG

This metric is the trailing twelve-month P/E ratio divided by the anticipated growth rate for a specific amount of time. This ratio is used to determine how much an individual is paying with respect to the growth prospects of the company. Traditionally the PEG ratio used by analysts is the five-year estimated growth rate, however I like to use the one-year growth rate. This is because as a capital projects manager that performs strategy planning for the research and development division of a large-cap biotech company I noticed that 100% of people cannot forecast their needs beyond one year. Even within that one year things can change dramatically. I put much more faith in a one-year forecast as opposed to a five-year forecast. The PEG ratio some say provides a better picture of the value of a company when compared to the P/E ratio alone. The 1-year PEG ratio for GM is currently at 0.46 based on a 1-yr earnings growth of 37.01% while Masco's 1-yr PEG ratio stands at 1.2 with a 1-yr growth rate of 42.73%. GM beats Masco out in Game Two to take a two game lead.

EPS Growth Next Year

This metric is really simple, it is essentially taking the difference of next year's projected earnings and comparing it against the current year's earnings. The higher the value the better prospects the company has. I generally like to see earnings growth rates of greater than 11%. Again, in this situation I like to take a look at the one-year earnings growth projection opposed to the five-year projection based on what I discussed in the PEG section above. GM has a projected EPS growth rate of 37.01% while Masco sports a growth rate of 42.73%. Masco manages to wrestle Game Three away from GM to edge closer in the series.

Dividend Yield

Dividend yield is a no brainer; it must be had in a portfolio. The dividend yield is the amount of annual dividend paid out by a company in any given year divided by the current share price of the stock. In my portfolio I don't discriminate against low yielding stocks as long as they provide excellent fundamental metrics in the form of the forward P/E, the 1-yr PEG and the 1-yr EPS growth rate. Dividends are a way to measure how much cash flow you're getting for each dollar invested in the stock. Obviously, the higher the yield, the better, as long as it is covered by the trailing twelve-month earnings. Unfortunately, GM doesn't pay a dividend while Masco pays a yield of 1.3%. Masco is able to even the series at two games apiece.

Return on Assets

Return on assets is the metric, which shows how profitable a company is relative to its total assets, telling us how efficient a management team is at using its assets to generate earnings. It is best to compare ROA values of companies within the same industry as it is industry dependent, but for the purposes of this tournament I will not be utilizing that rule of thumb. The assets of a company are comprised of both debt and equity. The higher the ROA value, the better, because the company is earning more money on less investment. GM is showing a 3% efficiency rate on their assets while Masco is showing 2.6% efficiency. With this victory GM takes the lead in the series once again.

Return on Equity

Return on equity is an important financial metric for purposes of comparing the profitability, which is generated with the money shareholders have invested in the company to that of other companies in the same industry. It is best to compare ROE values of companies within the same industry as it is industry dependent, but for the purposes of this tournament I will not be utilizing that rule of thumb. Equity is determined as the net income for the full fiscal year before dividends paid to common stock holders but after dividends to preferred stock, but does not include preferred shares. The higher the ROE value, the better. GM proves their efficiency of managing their shareholders' equity to be 17.1% while Masco sports a massive value of 51%! By winning this game Masco forces the first Game Seven in the tournament.

Return on Investment

ROI is an important financial metric because it evaluates the efficiency of an investment that a company makes and if an investment doesn't have a positive ROI, then the investment should not be made. It is calculated by dividing the difference of cost of investment from gain from investment by cost of investment. It is best to compare ROI values of companies within the same industry as it is industry dependent, but for the purposes of this tournament, I will not be utilizing that rule of thumb. The higher the ROI value the better. GM came out slugging in the decisive game with an ROI of 10.1% while Masco was only able to muster a value of 4.7%. With this victory GM is able to advance into the next round of the playoffs in a hard fought seven game series against Masco.


Although Masco came up just a bit short against GM, Masco is still a great company with great long-term story. Both Masco and GM are in industries, which are white hot these days. Both companies have excellent short-term and long-term earnings growth potential, hence the reason why they are in my growth portfolio. After beating Masco, GM will advance to the next round of the playoffs and away the victor of Gilead (NASDAQ:GILD) and Wolverine World Wide (NYSE:WWW) matchup.

Disclaimer: This article is meant to serve as a journal for myself as to the rationale of why I bought/sold this stock when I look back on it in the future. These are only my personal opinions and you should do your own homework. Only you are responsible for what you trade and happy investing!

Disclosure: I am long GM, MAS, GILD, WWW. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.