In this article, I will feature one industrial stock that has seen intensive insider selling during the last 30 days. Intensive insider selling can be defined by the following three criteria:
- The stock was sold by three or more insiders within one month.
- The stock was not purchased by any insiders in the month of intensive selling.
- At least two sellers decreased their holdings by more than 10%.
Hexcel Corporation (NYSE:HXL) engages in the development, manufacture, and marketing of lightweight and high-performance structural materials for use in commercial aerospace, space and defense, and industrial applications.
Insider selling during the last 30 days
Here is a table of Hexcel's insider-trading activity during the last 30 days by insider.
|Name||Title||Trade Date||Shares Sold||Rule 10b5-1||Current Ownership||Decrease In Ownership|
|Lynn Brubaker||Director||Jan 2-10||5,933||Yes||3,500 shares||62.9%|
|Ira Krakower||SVP||Dec 23-24||20,888||Yes||229,005 shares||8.4%|
|Michael Macintyre||Treasurer||Dec 19||1,000||Yes||732 shares + 6,507 options||12.1%|
There have been 27,821 shares sold by insiders during the last 30 days. All these shares were sold pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 plan.
SEC Rule 10b5-1 is a regulation enacted by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in 2000. The SEC states that Rule 10b5-1 was enacted in order to resolve an unsettled issue over the definition of insider trading, which is prohibited by SEC Rule 10b-5. After Rule 10b5-1 was enacted, the SEC staff publicly took the position that canceling a planned trade made under the safe harbor does not constitute insider trading, even if the person was aware of the inside information when canceling the trade. This staff interpretation raises the possibility that executives can exploit this safe harbor by entering into 10b5-1 trading plans before they have inside information while retaining the option to later cancel those plans based on inside information.
For example, a CEO of a company could call a broker on January 1 and enter into a plan to sell a particular quantity of shares of his company's stock on March 1, find out terrible news about his company on February 1 that will not become public until April 1, and then go forward with the March 1 sale anyway, saving himself from losing money when the bad news becomes public. Under the terms of Rule 10b5-1(b) this is insider trading because the CEO "was aware" of the inside information when he made the trade. But he can assert an affirmative defense under Rule 10b5-1(c), because he planned the trade before he learned the inside information.
In general, it is a safer way for an insider to sell shares pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan than without it.
Insider selling by calendar month
Here is a table of Hexcel's insider-trading activity by calendar month.
|Month||Insider selling / shares||Insider buying / shares|
There have been 235,976 shares sold, and there have been zero shares purchased by insiders since January 2013.
Hexcel reported the third-quarter financial results on October 21 with the following highlights:
|Net income||$48.7 million|
Hexcel's guidance is as follows:
|Revenue||$1.655-$1.685 billion||$1.80-$1.88 billion|
(Source: December presentation)
Hexcel has the second-highest P/S ratio among these three companies. In Cytec, there have been 150,569 shares sold, and there have been zero shares purchased by insiders since January 2013. Only Hexcel has seen intensive insider selling during the last 30 days.
There have been three different insiders selling Hexcel, and there have not been any insiders buying Hexcel during the last 30 days. Two of these three insiders decreased their holdings by more than 10%. Hexcel has an insider ownership of 0.40%.
Before entering short Hexcel, I would like to get a bearish confirmation from the Point and Figure chart. The main reason for the proposed short entry is the intensive insider-selling activity.
Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.