Those who talk finance with me know that I have an abiding respect for investor Bill Ackman. It comes close to man-love, I must admit. Bill is eloquent, thoughtful, intelligent, well-informed and any other adjective that gives praise.
My first experience reading about and listening to Bill came about this time last year when I was struggling with whether to invest in General Growth Properties (GGP). At the time last April, GGP was entering bankruptcy. But the market and economy had just begun to turn and I had personal experience with GGP properties and management and thought the company had excellent mall properties and was well run. I wanted to invest in GGP, which was then selling for only $0.65 per share and had a total capitalization only around $200M on a business with properties once valued at $30B. If it were possible to solve the debt problem at GGP, then the company had an excellent chance of survival.
Enter Bill Ackman into my life. As I was researching GGP, I came across research that Bill had put together at his hedge fund, Pershing Square Capital Management. He had done a very thorough job researching GGP and was able to show that with even modest “cap rate” assumptions, GGP would do very well. All it needed was time to restructure its debt. Ackman proceeded to take an active role in buying time for GGP, first by offering to provide bridge (DIP) financing (later provided by another party), helping convince the court of the merits of GGPs survival and later by joining the GGP Board of Directors.
As the year 2009 progressed, Ackman’s activism and my confidence in his research proved very profitable for both of us. I have now exited my GGP investment (much too early) but Ackman, to my knowledge, remains on board and has seen his investment return over 20-fold. I admire this type of clear vision and the courage to act on it.
Ackman was a noted short trader earlier in his career. He gained notoriety for his big short position in credit card company MBIA in 2005, for which he was investigated by the now-notorious Elliot Spitzer, then New York State Attorney General. He was able to demonstrate to Mr. Spitzer his innocence and turned the table on MBIA by exposing to the Attorney General their fraudulent practices, which were the reason for his short positions (presaging the debt crisis to come). He took a “sow’s ear” and turned it into the proverbial “silk purse.” That taxes moxy. That takes class.
Given his career path and the level to which he has risen, Ackman is very intimate with the inner workings of Wall Street. He shows himself to be rational and level-headed and has a thorough, first-hand understanding of the arcane financial instruments that Wall Street has created. So, when he gives his opinion on the Goldman Sachs (GS) situation, I listen (much more so than to EF Hutton). Today, as guest host on CNBC's Squawk Box, Ackman shared with us his assessment. He comes down on the side of Goldman Sachs for all the reasons I have provided in the past two weeks, but with the conviction that can come from only an insider. Here is an excerpt from the show:
Goldman Sachs did not commit fraud and the insurance company that bought the product that is the subject of a government investigation should have known the risks, Bill Ackman, founder and CEO of hedge fund Pershing Square Capital Management, told CNBC Tuesday.
“I don’t believe that Goldman committed fraud,” Ackman told “Squawk Box Europe.” “(ACA, the counterparty to Goldman – Paulson Partners) took their own risks. “They’re sophisticated investors.” “I don’t think the (Securities and Exchange Commission) has a good case,” Ackman said.
“Having been the subject of investigation in the past (for the MBIA case referenced earlier)… I don’t feel sorry for Goldman Sachs, but they’re not being treated fairly (either).”
Not only does Ackman contend that Goldman is innocent of the charges of fraud, as I also maintain, in addition, it would even have been unethical if Goldman had disclosed that hedge fund manager John Paulson was shorting the housing trade to any investors taking long positions, Ackman said.
Ackman argued that sophisticated investors (the German and Dutch banks that bought the long positions from ACA) have the information at their disposal to make their own decisions, and are also responsible for their own mistakes.
“Imagine that Soros and Buffett were on the two sides of this transaction,” he said. “We wouldn’t even be talking about this now.”
But later in the interview, Ackman states that the true victims are the taxpayers as they do not know they are party to the trade via “too big to fail” and taxpayer rescues. This is true in Germany and the UK as well as in America. It is the taxpayer that has to cover the losses made by overly aggressive bank managers who are playing with OTM (other people’s money) in order to win large bonuses.
So, it is not Goldman Sachs that should be taking the fall for the financial crisis, but the bank managers that lost money and the regulators / government officials that are charged by the public with protecting the financial system. The “witch hunt” that is today’s Congressional hearing is completely misdirected and intended to make the Congressmen who failed in their sworn responsibilities, look better, much better, than they really are.
Watch Ackman defend the shorts here.
At the end of this segment, the former SEC general counsel, Simon Lorne, appeared with Bill Ackman. Mr. Lorne offered his highly informed opinion that the case by the SEC against Goldman Sachs is “weak.” This is the position I have maintained. The facts will show that there was no “fraud”. If anything, there may have been some technical error of omission where disclosure is involved. This might justify a fine of some sort, even a large fine given the stakes involved. But Mr. Lorne says it all much better than me:
Watch it here.