- Four compelling reasons to own Treasuries right now, including two of the biggest risks facing the financial markets.
- Stay away from Treasury ETFs and profit even if rates rise.
- Deleveraging is a slow process and rates can stay low for a very long time.
- China is on the brink of disaster, which has significant global implications.
- Widespread financial warfare is just beginning.
Last week, I began to list my top seven reasons why it's actually time to buy Treasuries, even though many investors continue to shun them.
We've already gone over the first three. But now it gets really interesting.
Reason #4: You Can Profit Even if Rates Rise
In many investors' minds, the popular Treasury exchange-traded funds (ETFs) - the iShares Barclays 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (NYSEARCA:TLT) and the iShares Barclays 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (NYSEARCA:IEF) - have become synonymous with Treasuries.
Don't fall into this trap.
These ETFs are a flawed way to invest in Treasuries because they neutralize one of the imbedded safety mechanisms of a bond - the maturity date.
The ETFs periodically roll their positions to maintain the same average maturity and duration, or interest rate risk. For this service, you pay the funds' annual expense ratios of 0.15%.
If we purchase a 10-year Treasury (T-Note), however, our risk actually decreases over time as the maturity date approaches.
In five years, we'll no longer own a 10-year bond, but a 5-year bond. Depending on what level 5-year Treasury rates are at that point in time, our bonds may have risen in value - even if 10-year rates are higher. Plus, we'll have collected semi-annual coupon payments along the way.
Purchasing a T-Note isn't all that different from buying a stock. We simply use a unique identifier called a CUSIP, rather than a stock ticker. The CUSIP for the current 10-year Treasury (known as on-the-run) is 912828B66.
Investors looking to diversify should stick with T-Notes, and stay away from Treasury ETFs.
Reason #5: Rates Can Stay Low for a Very Long Time
There's a popular belief that once the Federal Reserve ceases quantitative easing, rates will skyrocket.
History suggests otherwise.
On March 31, 2010, the Fed ended its first quantitative easing program (QE1). The U.S. 10-year Treasury rate proceeded to fall from 3.84% to around 2.5% - at which point QE2 was announced.
Interest rate cycles also tend to be very long. After the Great Depression, the yield on long-term U.S. government bonds stayed below 3% for the better part of 20 years.
Reason #6: China is on the Brink of Disaster
Treasury haters commonly bring up a scenario in which China - the largest foreign holder of Treasuries - dumps its bonds on the open market, crushing the Treasury market in the process.
On the contrary, the recent events in China are actually very bullish for Treasuries.
You see, there are reasons to believe that China is experiencing its own "Bear Stearns" moment.
China's commercial and residential real estate boom has been fueled by a massive credit expansion, which is reminiscent of the United States' credit growth during the late stages of the housing bubble.
And now, China is witnessing the first defaults associated with excessive debt burdens and speculation, sending a major warning signal.
This is huge, folks. The Chinese economy, the world's second largest, has been one of the key drivers of global growth the past few years.
If the situation in China deteriorates further, then there will be serious global implications. An economic "hard landing" or a banking crisis in China would cause another deflationary shock, not unlike that of the credit crisis.
And Treasuries are one of the few assets that benefit from fears of deflation.
Reason #7: War Approaches
Many countries around the world, including China, will continue to have a tough time dealing with hangovers from credit expansions.
If history is any guide, it won't be a peaceful process. Kyle Bass, founder of hedge fund Hayman Capital, says:
"We sit today at the largest peacetime accumulation of debt in world history. You know how this ends, right? This ends through war… I don't know who's going to fight who… but I'm fairly certain in the next few years that you will see wars erupt, and not just small ones.
Russia's incursion into Ukraine may immediately come to mind, but there are other conflicts that need to be watched closely, as well.
Japan and China have fought a number of wars against each other, and a territorial dispute over a group of islands has led to rising tensions between the two nations as of late.
Indeed, there are some very scary parallels between recent events and those that preceded World War II.
But the world has changed so much that modern wars between superpowers will be more financial based. They'll be fought increasingly in the bond, currency and natural resource markets - and less on the battlefield.
There's no doubt in my mind that the United States will prove victorious in an era of financial warfare - just as it did in the first two world wars. Setting aside the fact that the United States has the strongest military in the world, it's also rich in natural resources and home to the most innovative companies.
Bottom line: After reviewing these seven reasons, it's clear that Treasuries still deserve the "safe haven" moniker and should currently have a place in our diversified portfolios.
Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Additional disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Dividends & Income Daily is a team of financial researchers. This article was written by our Editor-in-Chief, Alan Gula, CFA. We did not receive compensation for this article, and we have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.