Seeking Alpha
We cover over 5K calls/quarter
Profile| Send Message|
( followers)  

PRGX Global, Inc. (NASDAQ:PRGX)

Q1 2014 Earnings Conference Call

April 29, 2014 8:30 AM ET

Executives

Ronald Stewart – President and CEO

Bob Lee – CFO

Analysts

Matt Hill – William Blair

Kevin Liu – B. Riley & Company

Gregg Hillman – First Wilshire Securities

Geoff Miller – Baird

Operator

Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the PRGX Global Inc First Quarter 2014 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will follow at that time. (Operator instructions)

I will now turn the call over to your host, Ron Stewart, President and CEO. Please go ahead.

Ronald Stewart

Thank you, Stephanie [ph], and welcome to today’s earnings conference call. Before I get into my comments, however, I’d like to turn it over to Bob Lee, our Chief Financial Officer, who will cover our Safe Harbor Statement.

Bob Lee

Thank you, Ron, and good day to everyone. Let me note at the outset that certain statements in this conference call may be considered forward-looking statements under the Safe Harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. These statements include statements relating to management’s views with respect to future events and financial performance that are based on management’s current expectations and beliefs and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from historical experience or from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

For additional information on these factors, please refer to PRGX Global Inc’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including but not limited to, its reports on Forms 10K and 10-Q. PRGX undertakes no duty to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. This presentation also contains references to certain non-GAAP financial measures such as EBIT, EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA, metrics that we use internally to measure our operating performance. A reconciliation between these non-GAAP measures and net loss, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, is available under the Investor Relations portion of our website at prgx.com.

Ronald Stewart

Thanks, Bob. So this call follows quickly on the heels of our fourth quarter earnings call. I’m here to bring you up to speed on my first 135 days as CEO and update you on our business.

When looking at our most recent financial results, it is more obvious this quarter than the last why there is a need to make necessary adjustments to the company’s previous strategy, focusing on the areas of our business which offered the greatest long term opportunities and addressing the areas for improvement.

Looking at our core Recovery Audit business, the financials for the first quarter, as reported, don’t clearly reflect the strength of this business. There was a 7.4% year-over-year decline in Q1 RA revenue primarily attributable to the delay of several large claims and the delayed audit start in a large legacy client. This delayed revenue also directly impacted EBITDA as a large majority of direct cause are recognized in the current period. We expect to recognize the majority of this delayed revenue and associated EBITDA during Q2 and Q3.

As we’ve discussed before, the CMS scope changes made last year in Medicare RAC program have significantly reduced reveries for all RAC providers. Because of the large dependence on Medicare in our healthcare business, our Q1 results reflect this reduced scope as we work through our obligations under the current subcontracts. Although these results are clearly disappointing, they are not unexpected.

As I mentioned in our last earnings call, we are rationalizing all of the services that were formerly referred to as Profit Optimization. We have made a number of revisions in our scope of offerings and our staffing. We now refer to these service offerings as Adjacent Services to emphasize the logical connection and extensions to our core RA offerings. As expected, we experienced a year-over-year decline in Q1 Adjacent Services top line revenue and associated EBITDA as we began the year with a weak backlog of both business.

Now turning to our strategy, I have spent a majority of my time since becoming CEO immersing myself in our business. In addition to visiting our operations and key clients throughout the United States, I have also spent time in India and in Europe. At this point, I have met with most of our largest clients and a majority of our people around the world. These meetings have proved invaluable as we update our business strategy.

Coming through the past 135 days, I have a number of observations and conclusions regarding our business. First, we have an impressive set of long term clients that highly value our services. Second, we have a solid value proposition for our clients built around a true win-win revenue model delivered on a global scale. In addition, we have the most experienced and qualified professionals serving our clients each day and every day.

While we have a solid foundation to build on, we do have a number of key challenges that we are addressing to enable revenue and EBITDA growth going forward. First let’s examine our core business.

Our legacy operating model built from our history of acquiring successful but unique client-specific RA practices is overly complex and must be simplified. We are moving to a more standardized operating model with common processes, quality metrics and technology infrastructure. Our services will be delivered through an integrated network of professional teams to trying to deliver high-touch client service and efficient audit execution.

Several central elements of this strategy were initiated over the past few years. We are broadening the scope of these process changes and will accelerate the schedule and sharpen our focus to drive measurable benefits. We call this initiative Next Generation Recovery Audit and our ultimate objective is to provide core recovery audit services that are better, faster and more economically impactful than our competition.

Today, we are executing a substantial portion of our business through our Next Generation Recovery Audit global delivery model. We have plans in place to accelerate the transition to this delivery model throughout 2014.

Next, our core business is built on processing huge amounts of client data to facilitate the execution of complex audit concepts to identify areas and discrepancies in our clients’ procure-to-pay processes. Our legacy technology infrastructure has served the company well. But like the core audit operating model, we have a variety of technology platforms which are expensive to support and limit our ability to scale innovation and in services.

PRGX is well along the way of implementing the advanced tools and a common technology infrastructure that will enable faster and more accurate client data processing and provide a scalable platform for Adjacent Services. We expect to have our top 10 customers migrated to our common technology infrastructure and processing tools by the end of 2014 with all of our clients migrated over the next three years.

Next, let’s look at our Adjacent Services. In addition to increasing processing speed and operating efficiencies in our core Recovery Audit business, we are defining and developing scalable new services to deliver additional value to our legacy clients. While this was the objective of profit optimization, we were unable to scale the PO offerings in a meaningful way. The idea of Adjacent Services is to provide services that are logical extensions of our core capabilities and domain expertise and to profitably deliver these services on a scalable platform. We’re seeing solid demand for our data enrichment services and our finance transformation support.

We are also revising our go-to-market approach to focus our organization around our core client relationships and to develop bundled service offerings around the unique needs of specific industry segments such as grocery, oil and gas, discrete manufacturing, general merchandise, et cetera. Simply put, the better job we do in understanding and partnering with our clients in their specific industry domains to drive incremental value, the more opportunities we’ll have to drive deeper and longer tenured relationships.

With regard to healthcare, our current strategy is to align our resource levels with the scope and volume of our existing Medicare contract applications as they wind down through 2014 and ‘15. We have Medicaid and private payer contracts as well and we’ll continue to support these contracts going forward. We continue to work through our strategy for healthcare and we will keep you updated as we define our strategy for this portion of our business.

We’ve established an aggressive and meaningful strategy for transformation around our core clients and services and we are well on our way with the execution. At the end of the day, our clients must see us as a trusted and value-creating partner far superior to our competition. That is our goal and I look forward to updating you on our transformation progress in future earnings calls.

Finally, let’s take a look at how we see 2014 unfolding given all the recent changes. For the year, we are expecting consolidated revenue to drop from $195 million in 2013 to a range of $165 million to $170 million in 2014. Approximately half of this drop is from healthcare.

Adjacent services is also expected to decline due to the weak backlog entering 2014 and the rationalization of our service offerings. The balance of the decline is due to the completion of one large RA project along with rate and scope changes at a few RA clients.

We continue to believe our healthcare segment will lose $3 million to $4 million of adjusted EBITDA in 2014 and that Adjacent Services will be profitable by the end of the year. We expect adjusted EBITDA for the remainder of the business to be comparable to 2014 despite the revenue declines primarily enabled through reductions in core business operating costs and corporate overhead.

With my strategy update and 2014 overview complete, I will now turn the call back over to Bob to provide the details around our first quarter performance.

Bob Lee

Thanks, Ron. Now to begin the review of our Financial Results for the three month ended March 31, 2014. Consolidated revenue was $37.9 million compared to the prior year’s first quarter revenue of $45.1 million, a decrease of 16%. On a constant dollar basis, adjusted for changes in foreign currency exchange rates, 2014 first quarter revenue decreased 15.3% compared to the same period in 2013.

Revenue from each of our reporting segments was as follows. Recovery Audit Services Americas revenue was $24.8 million compared to the prior year’s first quarter revenue of $26.2 million, a decrease of 5.5%. On a constant dollar basis, adjusted for changes in foreign exchange rates, Recovery Audit Services Americas’ first quarter revenue decreased by 3.3% compared to the same period in 2013.

This slight decline in this, our largest segment, was entirely attributable to delays we experienced in obtaining claim approvals at a couple of our larger clients as well as a delayed start date to begin auditing at another large legacy plan. We believe we will resolve the claim delays over the remainder of 2014 and already have begun auditing at the large legacy client.

Note that historically, the first quarter of the year tends to be our weakest quarter in this operating segment. Recovery Audit Services Europe, Asia Pacific Revenue was $9.7 million compared to the prior year’s first quarter revenue of $11 million, a decrease of 11.9%. On a constant dollar basis, adjusted for changes in foreign exchange rates, Recovery Audit Services Europe, Asia Pacific first quarter revenue decreased by 14.6% compared to the same period in 2013. Similar to the Americas, this decline is primarily due to claim delays at several large clients that we anticipate will be recovered in the remainder of 2014.

Beginning with the first quarter of 2014, we are separating our former New Services segment into its two components – Adjacent Services which we formally referred to as Profit Optimization Services and Healthcare Claims Recovery Audit Services or HCRA. Adjacent Services revenue was $2.3 million compared to the prior year’s first quarter revenue of $3.9 million, a decrease of 42.1%.

We had a weak backlog of projects coming in to 2014 with no individually significant projects whereas 2013 had several significant projects that it carried over from the prior year. As Ron just mentioned, we are rationalizing some of the offerings in this segment and expect 2014 revenue to decline as a result.

HCRA revenue was $1.1 million compared to the prior year’s first quarter revenue of $3.9 million. This decline is due to the significant and expected lower revenue from our Medicare RAC subcontracts caused by the continued restrictions of scope limitations imposed since the prior year.

We’ve previously announced that we’ve withdrawn from the Medicare RAC rebid process and we expect the related revenue to continue to decline through the remainder of 2014. Our adjusted EBITDA expectations regarding HCRA for 2014 continue to be a loss in the $3 million to $4 million range followed by a smaller loss in 2015.

Our cost of revenue or COR was $27.5 million in the first quarter of 2014 compared to $30.2 million in last year’s first quarter. The reduction in COR is due to the cost reductions, primarily compensation in our European operations as we continue to implement our service delivery model changes in that segment. We also reduced cost in HCRA and Adjacent Services in response to the expected revenue declines.

We did have an increase in our COR expenses in our Americas segment despite having a revenue decline which is due primarily to personnel we added to expand our service offerings into new industry segments. We believe our efforts in this area will prove beneficial in the remainder of 2014, but they had a negative impact on first quarter results.

Total SG&A in the 2014 first quarter was $11.3 million compared to $11.9 million in last year’s first quarter, a decrease of $0.6 million or 5%. The decline is primarily in corporate support where we have reduced headcount and lowered discretionary cost. Reported SG&A increased in our EAP segment due to the 2013 period containing benefits from the reversal of certain acquisition related liabilities and provision for bad debts with no similar benefits in the 2014 period.

Depreciation expense decreased $0.3 million and amortization expense decreased $0.4 million compared to the first quarter of 2013. We expect similar year-over-year decreases on quarterly basis through the remainder of 2014.

For the three months ended March 31, 2014, our net loss was $3.7 million or $0.12 per basic and diluted share compared to a net loss of $0.5 million or $0.02 per basic and diluted share for the same period in 2013. Although we reduced our cost by over $4 million, these reductions were not sufficient to offset the revenue declines we experienced.

Our adjusted EBITDA for the first quarter of 2014 was $0.5 million or 1.4% of revenue compared to $3.6 million or 8.1% for the same period in 2013. Adjustments to EBITDA were $1.4 million in the first quarter of 2014 compared to $1 million in the same period last year. With the increase primarily due to transformation severance charges in this year’s first quarter with no corresponding charges in the prior year period.

I will now highlight certain balance sheet and cash flow information. As of March 31, 2014, we had unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of $45.7 million and no borrowings against our revolving credit facility and no bank debt. In March 31, 2014, current assets exceeded current liabilities by $53.2 million. During the first quarter of 2014, we reduced accounts receivable balance of approximately $7.2 million, most of this being collections on Medicare RAC subcontract balances.

Net cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2014 amounted to $2.9 million compared to $0.8 million for the first quarter last year. Capital expenditures on property equipment for the three months ended March 31, 2014 were $0.8 million compared to $2.2 million for the same period last year.

In December 2013, we fully paid off the remaining balance of our term loan with SunTrust Bank. We currently have no debt outstanding. In January, we extended our credit facility and increased our borrowing capacity to $25 million. In March 2014, we announced a $10 million increase to our stock repurchase program, bringing the total amount of our common stock that we may repurchase under the program to $20 million.

Ronald Stewart

Thanks, Bob. Now let’s turn it back over to Stephanie to facilitate questions.

Question-and-Answer Session

Operator

Thank you. (Operator instructions) Our first question comes from Tim McHugh from William Blair. Your line is open.

Matt Hill – William Blair

Good morning. This is Matt Hill in for Tim McHugh. Just a question around the delay at the large legacy client in the Recovery Audit piece, is that just strictly timing related or is there any competitive issues going on there that might have caused that and how common could something like this come up in future course as we look forward?

Bob Lee

It comes up from time to time. I mean in this particular case, it was just a link and renewal process. It was a competitive situation and the rebid process did extend beyond what it had in the past but as I mentioned in my opening comment, we’ve already started auditing. We won and already started auditing.

Matt Hill – William Blair

Okay. And then also, you mentioned you expect – you still expect a positive EBITDA in the core Recovery Audit Business in 2014.

Ronald Stewart

Yes. We expect positive EBITDA and we expect it to be about where we in 2013 on an adjusted EBITDA level.

Matt Hill – William Blair

Okay, great. And then also in the Medicare RAC business, just trying to think going forward for the rest of the year, is there any help you can give us in this [ph] kind of model kind of in the step down as you wind down the work on the existing contract there?

Ronald Stewart

Well, we audit through June. That’s the – under the current contract, we audit through June. And then after that, it’s really supporting the appeals process and the administration of the subcontracts as we go through 2015. So it really becomes – from a new revenue standpoint and claims, think of it as winding down between now and June, then after that the revenues will decline and we will align our resources appropriately based on the level of activity required to support those contracts.

Matt Hill – William Blair

All right. And then just one last one, if I could. And the Adjacent Services, the weak backlog coming into the year sound like it was due to a couple – a few large projects. And then I want to [ph] get a little understanding around is was it kind of broad across the different services in that segment or was it just a few practices? I think you’d mentioned a couple that were – that you’re still seeing some strength in there.

Ronald Stewart

Well, first of all, in 2013, there was one engagement that was pretty strong coming into the year. So I think that was a lift in 2013 and we did not have a replacement engagement or engagements in 2014. I would say that the backlog was weak across all of the areas of PO for time, now Adjacent Services.

And, yes, we do see some – several promising engagements in our pipeline that – the one which we closed just recently and we’ve got a couple more that would be significant but they’ve been delayed in getting to contract and getting started, so those impacted our Q1 numbers. Again, we feel like we’ve got a good pipeline, we’ve got a good debt pipeline closed and the work started. And we’re going to adjust our staffing accordingly.

Matt Hill – William Blair

All right, thank you very much.

Ronald Stewart

Thank you, Matt.

Operator

Our next question comes from Kevin Liu with B. Riley & Company. Your line is open.

Kevin Liu – B. Riley & Company

Hi, good morning. I wanted to talk a little bit about Americas business on the Recovery Audit side [ph]. First off, if you had started this original client engagement at the time you expected and you didn’t have these delays on the claims processing side, I’m just curious as to whether you would have been able to grow that business year-over-year?

Bob Lee

It would have been pretty close, Kevin. I mean it would have been certainly comparable to last year’s number.

Kevin Liu – B. Riley & Company

Okay. And with respect to some of the competitive situations you had going on, maybe if you could talk about what sort of rate reductions might have been – you might have had to include within your vision in order to secure that work and what sort of impact you would think it have on the Americas gross margin this year?

Bob Lee

I’ll let Ron follow up after my comment. I don’t think we want to get that granular on late changes at specific clients. So I would then just say it’s a competitive business and we work very hard to retain our clients.

Ronald Stewart

Yes. And, Kevin, competitive pressures are part of this business, as you know. And what we’ve got to be able to do is to improve our performance and deliver higher value recoveries to our plans and drive our revenues through our performance. Competition is a reality and pressure on the rates has been a reality for years in this business.

Kevin Liu – B. Riley & Company

Understood. Maybe if I ask it a little bit differently, I mean you guys have certainly made a lot of strides in terms of getting the Americas gross margin up towards that 50% range over the past couple of years. I’m curious if you believe you can even the trend to those almost over the course of this year or whether some of these very pressures might cause a dip in the Americas gross margin this year?

Ronald Stewart

We are absolutely on track and on plan to drive higher gross margins in our business and that is ultimately what will sustain the level of adjusted EBIDA that we were projecting for this year. But we’ve got to take cost down and we’ve got to take cost down globally. And we’ve got a plan in place and we expect to do that.

Kevin Liu – B. Riley & Company

Great. And just one last one, given the new breakouts you’re providing for the former New Services segment, wondering if you guys could provide the historical numbers there, either here on this call or perhaps just posting to your website later today?

Bob Lee

It won’t be later today. It will probably be around the timing of when we file the Q [indiscernible], we’ll put an 8-K out with the prior quarters.

Kevin Liu – B. Riley & Company

Got it, thank you.

Ronald Stewart

Thanks, Kevin.

Operator

(Operator Instructions) Our next question comes from Gregg Hillman with First Wilshire Securities, your line is open.

Gregg Hillman – First Wilshire Securities

Yes, good morning. First of all, for – I guess the core business, I guess it’s Recovery Audit Americas commercial as a percentage of sales, what is it right now or what was it for the three months or what was in 2013 on retail business?

Bob Lee

I don’t know if we’re going to go that granular on the components but then within the business, I mean, it is a – it’s a significant portion of the Americas business, significant portion of the European businesses.

Well, it’s probably a scenario where we plan to grow, as far as, you know, given the specific components within the segment, I don’t know that we’re going to do that.

Gregg Hillman – First Wilshire Securities

Okay. Well, then maybe you could talk about how you’re going to grow commercial. I think in past calls, you talked about that you’re reengineering the company around your [indiscernible], compete and commercial and more effectively and I’m just wondering, number one, do you have some of the big – bigger players in commercial and compete with software tools only, are you going to move more in that direction in terms of your competitive offerings and also, you know, are you going to have similar margins in commercial that you would have in retail?

Ronald Stewart

The – so let me address those. First of all, commercial does present an excellent opportunity for growth and not only in the U.S. but globally. Many of these clients are global clients and they want to be served globally.

Secondly, so I think we’re uniquely positioned especially in the global arena. Secondly, in terms of how we bundle and then how we go to market, you know, we’re definitely looking at more of a – industry segment view so that we can, you know, bring together services that are you know, much more relevant to a segment by oil and gas or discreet manufacturing that – services that would be unique to their particular requirements and environment.

In terms of the degree of software, we do have a very solid foundation for how we execute our services and we have software elements to that that are vendor development and expansion, so I think we are moving more and more to strengthening our technology platforms and capabilities that we’re offering to our clients.

You know, that does not mean that we’re going to get into software business and start licensing technology to our clients. Again, we feel like that our core confidence is delivering core [ph] Recovery Audit and risk management services for these clients.

Gregg Hillman – First Wilshire Securities

Okay, and as the margin question, you know retail versus commercial, I mean, I take that your commercial margins are less than they are than retail, is that correct, right now?

Bob Lee

There’s a pretty – within – it’s client by client given in retail, there’s a fairly broad range of margins even within the retail space but if you’re just going to compare an average commercial client to an average retail client, they’re not going to be that different. What drives our overall margins is our larger clients, the margins in those clients will tend to be larger than the commercial margins.

But – I mean, overall, Gregg, yes, I mean, we expect the margins to be at least above 40% on average and maybe approaching some of the Americas margins but – you know, the answer to your question, there’ll be slightly on average, slightly less than the retail. But again the retail, even within the retail segment, there’s a pretty broad range or margins from client to client.

Gregg Hillman – First Wilshire Securities

And when you say above 40%, do you mean for across the board or is that for – that’s for retail and commercial?

Bob Lee

No, commercial on average.

Gregg Hillman – First Wilshire Securities

Okay. So it is a little less than –

Bob Lee

Yes, a little less.

Gregg Hillman – First Wilshire Securities

Than the retail margin – okay, thanks very much.

Ronald Stewart

Thanks Gregg.

Operator

Our next question comes from Geoff Miller with Baird, your line is open.

Geoff Miller – Baird

Yes, thanks [indiscernible] and I have a question. I was jumping between calls so I thought you guys have already said this but the Recovery Audit business in the Americas, I understand that there’s some natural variability from quarter to quarter in this business, but the year-over-year comp also should have been pretty easy this quarter and you – it seems like outhit by some of the negative variants in the year ago period as well. So if you could just talk about, you know, I guess what caused the weakness in that light?

Bob Lee

Well, as Ron mentioned and we’ve already mentioned in talking about, you know, comparing the whole year, you know the challenges within Recovery Audit segment, not just Americas but the segment as a whole, with rate pressures and some of the scope changes that we’ve talked about as a base, we’re probably looking at a decline in total for the year which we’ve just stayed in the helm, if you were on the call at the time.

So I think that’s it and then you couple it with, you know, the specific timing events of these clients, Europe and Americas, that’s what caused it.

Geoff Miller – Baird

Okay, and then the adjacent services, I know that you cited the weak backlog, just – how much of this is due to right sizing the services that you’re offering, maybe discontinuing some things that you’re deeming less strategic and how much of it is a weaker backlog in what you view as the core portfolio offering that you’re going to have going forward?

Ronald Stewart

Well, it’s really – you know, I think the backlog coming through the year was across the board. We just did not have a strong close on 2013 in terms of closing business, there were a number of things on the pipeline but didn’t – they were not close for a number of reasons.

And so we started with weakness and we still have some of that while we’re trying to close some of these pieces of work. And we had quite a bit of – I call an underutilized staff coming in to 2013 that we had to look at and make some decisions around and that occurred largely during the first quarter.

And so we thought we’re in better position now going in to Q2 and the rest of the year, but we will respond to that reality of the book backlog and not the pipeline as we look at the quarters ahead.

Geoff Miller – Baird

Okay, and then Ron, with the rate pressures and scope changes, you know, then being offset by the various initiatives that you guys have in place, for the RA business as a whole, what’s your current outlook for the EBITDA growth potential over the next couple of years?

Ronald Stewart

Well, the –first of all, for this year our – as I mentioned earlier for the core Recovery Audit business, we expect to be flat to 2013 and again a lot of that will be driven by you know, cost reductions in the core business and operating cost .

Now looking ahead, you know, again, our strategy is building around this global delivery model and enabling the – in a way, better and faster and more economic impact in what we provide to clients and we feel like that’s going to give us a higher win rate as we go into competitive situations as well as higher value to clients and perhaps shifting more and more work towards us that maybe they do internally to some degree.

So we feel like that – we’ll be well positioned there and then you know, in terms of the core platform around Recovery Audit and the services that we provide, you know, trying to extend that platform to enable new services that are high value to the clients, that’s at the crux of what we’re looking at and again we have some great examples of that today and we’re going to continue to build that. (Audio Gap) initiatives we have underway.

Geoff Miller – Baird

But post-2014, are you still thinking about this as like a high single digit EBITDA growth business or now that you’ve been in the role for a bit more time, is there any change to your thinking?

Ronald Stewart

No, I don’t think there’s a significant change and again, we’ll update you as we go through it but there’s some definite opportunities for, you know, high single digit, even low double digit EBITDA growth and that’s surely where we have our sights on.

And getting our revenues to at least flat and moving ahead as we replace some of the inherent rate reductions and internalization of the core recovery business that in a way, a part of this business.

Geoff Miller – Baird

Okay, thank you.

Ronald Stewart

Okay, thank you.

Operator

And currently showing no further questions, I will now turn the call back over to Ron Stewart for closing remarks.

Ronald Stewart

Thank you, Stephanie [ph], and thanks to all of you in the call for your interest and your questions. We genuinely appreciate your attendance and look forward to speak with you on the next quarterly earnings call. Thanks a lot.

Operator

Thank you ladies and gentlemen, and that concludes today’s conference. You may all disconnect and everyone have a great day.

Copyright policy: All transcripts on this site are the copyright of Seeking Alpha. However, we view them as an important resource for bloggers and journalists, and are excited to contribute to the democratization of financial information on the Internet. (Until now investors have had to pay thousands of dollars in subscription fees for transcripts.) So our reproduction policy is as follows: You may quote up to 400 words of any transcript on the condition that you attribute the transcript to Seeking Alpha and either link to the original transcript or to www.SeekingAlpha.com. All other use is prohibited.

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE IS A TEXTUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S CONFERENCE CALL, CONFERENCE PRESENTATION OR OTHER AUDIO PRESENTATION, AND WHILE EFFORTS ARE MADE TO PROVIDE AN ACCURATE TRANSCRIPTION, THERE MAY BE MATERIAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURACIES IN THE REPORTING OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE AUDIO PRESENTATIONS. IN NO WAY DOES SEEKING ALPHA ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS MADE BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEB SITE OR IN ANY TRANSCRIPT. USERS ARE ADVISED TO REVIEW THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S AUDIO PRESENTATION ITSELF AND THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S SEC FILINGS BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS.

If you have any additional questions about our online transcripts, please contact us at: transcripts@seekingalpha.com. Thank you!

Source: PRGX Global's CEO Discusses Q1 2014 Results - Earnings Call Transcript
This Transcript
All Transcripts