The following is an extract of an interview with Jim Rogers from our new publication, Asia's Money Masters. Rogers is now a private investor based in Singapore and most famous for having retired at age 37 after co-founding the Quantum Fund with George Soros.
Asia's Money Masters: You've been warning for some time that central bank actions since 2008 have created even deeper problems for the world and a more serious day of reckoning will come. Does that remain your base case?
Jim Rogers: Yes, absolutely. We have all of the major central banks printing staggering amounts of money. We've got this artificial ocean of liquidity out there and it has to end someday. When it does, it's going to be very difficult.
The US is cutting back stimulus while Japan and the EU may be providing additional QE at some point this year. How do you see that playing out? Are emerging markets where the main risks lay?
JR: The main risk lies with the US. The US market is near all-time highs. Emerging markets have gone down a lot already. The risk though is everywhere, including emerging markets.
What kind of triggers are you looking for to indicate that a deeper correction may be near?
JR: A deeper correction may have already begun for all I know, though I doubt it. Usually what happens when markets peak is that you have marginal players going down first.
We're already starting to see some marginal countries and marginal companies decline. If you look at the advance-decline statistics in the US stock market for instance - the indices are making highs but the number of stocks which are making new highs has collapsed.
When a more serious correction starts, what will probably happen is that the US will continue to cut back QE, but at some point it will cause enough pain that the politicians and bureaucrats will give in and stop any further tapering. At that point, markets will breathe a big sigh of relief, resume their climb and then it may even turn into a bubble. At that point, it'll be the last hurrah.
Let's move on briefly to one of the issues making headlines: Ukraine. Markets have largely shrugged off that issue. Is there a chance that they're wrong and this could turn into a deeper crisis?
JR: Well, of course. You go back and look at the history of war - people make mistakes. Country "A" makes a mistake and then country "B" makes a mistake, and all of a sudden, you have people at war. In 1914 for instance, within 6-8 months of the war beginning, people all over the world, including Europe, were saying: "How did we get into this?" That was because it was so absurd what was going on. And yet they didn't manage to end the war until four years later.
That's often how things start. It could happen in Ukraine, but I doubt it. The US and EU don't seem interested in engaging in a war over Ukraine. But you never know. Throughout history people have bungled themselves into wars even though nobody really wanted them.
Even under a worst-case scenario such as war, Russian equities look cheap at around five times earnings. Are you a buyer of Russian equities at these levels?
JR: Yes, I bought some in March. And I'll probably buy more before long.
Turning to Asia and the economy everyone's focused on: China. You're on record saying that the economic slowdown in China won't get too serious. Do you maintain that view?
JR: I'm not sure where I said that. Where did I say that?
You've said that there's unlikely to be an economic crash like famed short-seller, Jim Chanos, and others are forecasting.
JR: That's not right. What I've said is that China is the next great country in the world. There'll certainly be setbacks along the way.
In the 19th century as America was rising to power, it had 15 depressions, a horrible Civil War, massacres in the streets and little in the way of human rights. And yet, America turned out to be pretty successful.
China will have setbacks along the way. I have no idea what, when, why or how. But China is the largest creditor nation in the world and if and when they have setbacks, I would rather be investing money with creditor nations such as China than debtor nations.
I have frequently said that we'll have people in the real estate business going bankrupt in China because the government is trying to cool off that particular sector. But on the other hand, other parts of the Chinese economy will continue to do extremely well.
If you're in agriculture in China, you won't know whether real estate speculators in Shanghai are going broke because you'll be too busy making money yourself.
Would you suggest that property and local government are the areas which are most vulnerable in China right now?
JR: Well, Beijing has said they want property prices to come down.
They've been saying that for a long time without much long-lasting success…
JR: They've said it on several times and every time in the past when prices were softening, property executives went begging to Beijing and Beijing loosened policy again.
This time, as property prices weaken, the government is again loosening policy. But there will come a time where it doesn't matter how much authorities ease policy: if you have excess supply, you have excess supply. And you won't be able to do anything about it. We're certainly getting closer to that point now.
Conversely, the areas which should still thrive even in an economic downturn: your focus has been on agriculture, water and tourism - do they remain the best structural plays on Chinese growth?
JR: Those are some of them. Beijing has said that it will let market forces play a greater role in the future. That's fabulous as far as I'm concerned. It's ironic that in "Red" China, you'll have the market playing a larger role. On the other hand, in the West, people seem to be saying that the government is smarter than the market.
But in China, healthcare is going to get a gigantic push. Railroads, cleaning up pollution and farming too. The government has also said that it'll open up the financial sector. I think it's serious about this and I bought a few shares in a financial company recently as a consequence.
Let's turn from the world's second largest economy to the third: Japan. You've been a critic of Abenomics. Can you outline exactly why?
JR: Japan has decided that it's going to debase the currency and drive up inflation. That's never been a good solution to any problems throughout history. Politicians sometimes can go: "We can control inflation" or "we can control currencies". Sometimes that can work in the short run but it's never worked in the long run.
Shinzo Abe says he has three arrows to get the Japanese economy back on track. The third arrow is probably going end up in Japan's back.
I own Japanese shares because of Mr Abe's money printing policies. But I think everyone is going to look back at this period in 10-15 years and say: "that's what finally ruined Japan".
As you mention, Japan is trying to depreciate the yen. Do you see the yen heading a lot lower over the next 12 to 24 months?
JR: I'm long the yen at the moment mainly because there are such huge short positions in the currency- one of the highest short positions that I've ever seen. As I mentioned, I'm not particularly optimistic about Japan or the yen in the long term, but for the moment I remain long the yen. Eventually I'll sell my yen because the current easy money policies in Japan cannot continue indefinitely.
Note that I'm also long the US dollar even though I'm not particularly optimistic about the long-term picture there either. But I expect more turmoil - certainly currency turmoil. And in periods of currency turmoil throughout history, the US dollar and yen have been perceived as safe havens. They're not safe havens, but I suspect that they will again be among the currencies which people will go to for safety during the next serious downturn.
Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.