Margin Of Safety In Financial Independence

Includes: DGRW
by: Dividend Growth Investor


In this article, I discuss strategies to create a bullet-proof dividend portfolio, which can withstand almost anything that the future throws at it.

I took the idea of redundancies from the concept of engineering, where bridges are constructed so that they can carry several times their projected peak load.

For my portfolio, I want to ensure it withstands as much pressure without breaking. Thus, I expect to have multiple layers of redundancies built into my portfolio.

Financial independence is the point at which your annual dividend income meets or exceeds your annual expenditures. At this point, the dividend investor does not need to have a job, although they could decide to keep doing their work if they enjoy it. The best part is that the investor does not need to work for money again in their life, and can choose to spend their time as they please. They could do volunteer work, take care of younger or elder family members, travel, read or write, or even watch soap operas all the time. If they enjoy their work, they could continue doing that, or they might decide to start their own independent business. The sky is the limit when you have taken care of the downside by having a dividend portfolio generate an ever rising amount of cash every year, which covers your expenses.

I believe that a dividend portfolio will generate rising income for decade, and solid capital gains in the process of 30 years or more. Even at a total return of 7%/year, $1 million today will grow to $8 million over that time period. That of course assumes that dividends are spent, and very little is reinvested back. Some companies will be sold, acquired, merged or fail, but in general this will be a very passive portfolio. I am pretty optimistic about my portfolio after I reach financial independence and believe I will ultimately end up earning much more in dividends than what I would ever earn from paid employment. Once I select a quality dividend paying company, my only downside is the price I paid for the stock. My upside is the sum of all future dividends I will receive until the end of time. The rest is unrealized capital gains, which would result in a step-up basis for whoever inherits the DGI nest egg. However, I am also operating under the belief that the upside will take care of itself. Therefore, I need to spend my time to protect my downside risks. As a result, I believe in generating redundancies in my portfolio in order to ensure that I stay financially independent. This is where the concept of margin of safety in Financial Independence comes from.

I took the idea of redundancies from the concept of engineering, where bridges are constructed so that they can carry several times their projected peak load. They have built-in overlaps and redundancies just in case peak loads increase over time, and also to withstand a long period of normal wear and tear.

For my portfolio, I want to ensure it withstands as much pressure without breaking. Thus, I expect to have multiple layers of redundancies built into my portfolio.

- I buy stocks that have many products/services with revenues derived from many continents/countries. This diversity in revenue streams ensures that the company is not overly reliant on a single product for which demand softens.

- I buy stocks from different industries, and I try to be diversified so that a total collapse of one of these companies doesn't derail my plans. I seek safety in numbers and believe that a portfolio should include at least 30-40 individual components for diversification purposes.

- I focus on companies that regularly hike dividends, and have an established track record of doing so. This provides an extra layer protection that my dividend income will keep up with inflation over time.

- I make sure dividend payments are adequately covered for any new companies I buy, so that short term fluctuations in earnings per share do not leave dividends in danger. In addition, I make sure that dividend growth is not largely achieved by the expansion in the payout ratio.

- I also plan to retire when dividend income covers expenses by a nice margin of up to 1.30-1.50 times expenses. I am placing the money that generates the excess dividends in tax-deferred accounts, so that they grow uninterrupted if I never use them. In addition, putting money in tax-deferred accounts further diversifies my asset base, and would shelter this portion of net worth from taxes for several decades from now.

- I hold my stocks through several brokerages in order to make sure I would always be under the SIPC covered amounts, and protect myself in case of broker failures

On a personal note, I also try to keep 3-6 months of expenses in my checking account. I do keep these funds just in case, even though I do not really need an emergency fund. I do not need an emergency fund because I am disciplined about my spending. In addition, my dividend portfolio is an emergency fund of itself since it would throw off enough cash to support me for 12 months. Currently, this figure is close to 7 months worth of expenses being covered by dividend income. Plus, I view my dividend portfolio as an emergency fund that has enough resources to pay for somewhere around 240 months' worth of expenses.

In addition to that, I also have a line of credit equivalent to 2 years expenses I can draw on, in case my cash reserves are depleted. I honestly doubt that I would ever use the cash or line of credit for emergency purposes, but then you never know what the future holds for.

Next, I also expect that I will be able to collect some Social Security benefits in the future, when I become eligible for them. I strongly doubt that Social Security will ever be destroyed, although I wouldn't be surprised if it gets modified in the future. I view Social Security income as similar to an investment in an inflation-protected annuity or inflation protected treasury bond.

The one weak spot in my retirement planning is the absolutely low amount of fixed income allocation I have. In order to withstand the next Great Depression or Japan of the past 20 years, I would need to have exposure to domestic government bonds. If we get deflation, this would jeopardize corporate profits and the ability to maintain dividend payments for a lot of companies. My allocation to fixed income is currently less than 1% today. I do not believe that the current environment offers good prospects for buyers of US Treasuries, which is why I have abstained from investing there. I simply do not want to invest my money in an asset whose principal and income are certain to lose purchasing power over time. However, I am monitoring the situation, and would gladly change my mind if attractive offers are present.

Disclosure: The author has no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. The author wrote this article themselves, and it expresses their own opinions. The author is not receiving compensation for it. The author has no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.