Your Portfolio Does Not Have To Be Perfect

by: Roger Nusbaum

Summary

He gets broad global equity exposure through minimum volatility funds, some REIT exposure, commodity exposure through a natural resources fund, three bond market segments and cash.

Brett’s portfolio is of course similar to any portfolios we’ve looked at over the years; not unreasonably complex, can be constructed with ETFs and is unlikely to be ruinous.

Whatever you end up with is obviously a combination of savings and growth of those savings from investing (the amount saved is far more within your control).

By Roger Nusbaum AdvisorShares ETF Strategist

Brett Arends had a fun post for MarketWatch titled, "Is this the perfect investment portfolio?" Arends works his way through some high level detail of his personal situation - from needing an investment portfolio just like anyone else, to his methodology, to the end product, and finally, to some expectations he has for the portfolio.

He articulates his objective succinctly:

I want a simple investment portfolio that I don't have to fool around with, and which I know maximizes my chances of earning a good long-term return, and minimizes my chance of ending up in the poor house.

I want an investment portfolio that is exposed to all likely environments, and committed to none. One based on intelligence and reasonable suppositions about the future, and not merely data mining from the past.

The result is 10% weightings to ten different "asset classes," although I would say there are maybe four asset classes, but ten market segments. He gets broad global equity exposure through minimum volatility funds, some REIT exposure, commodity exposure through a natural resources fund (he explains this preference in the article), three bond market segments, and cash.

The use of the word perfect in the title is probably tongue-in-cheek, but could turn out to be ideal for him and for some of his audience (not an endorsement of the portfolio on my part, merely allowing for the possibility). It is, after all, global diversification across many asset classes, so it certainly could be sufficient, even if not perfect, or even if it turns out to be far from the best over the next 20 years (or any other relevant time frame).

Brett's portfolio is, of course, similar to any number of portfolios we've looked at over the years: not unreasonably complex, can be constructed with ETFs, and is unlikely to be ruinous. Not being ruinous can be said of many portfolios, but not necessarily the people who own them. A portfolio concept cannot account for human factors like panicking at the wrong time or having some unforeseen and expensive life event happening at the worst possible time.

If you have a financial plan - these can range from something that looks like a phone book to a simple spreadsheet - then you might have different scenarios involving different accumulated dollar amounts; maybe $X at the low end to $3X at the high end for example. Whatever you end up with is obviously a combination of savings and growth of those savings from investing - the amount saved is far more within your control.

Human factors and savings rates, quite clearly, play huge roles in however your financial situation plays out. Thus, the perfect portfolio for you or for your clients will take these factors into consideration, and, of course, I am using the word "perfect" tongue-in-cheek.

While most people will not read about a portfolio and immediately adopt it as their own, there is utility in reading about someone else's process, and, perhaps, being influenced in your own process.

Disclosure: The author has no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. The author wrote this article themselves, and it expresses their own opinions. The author is not receiving compensation for it. The author has no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Additional disclosure: To the extent that this content includes references to securities, those references do not constitute an offer or solicitation to buy, sell or hold such security. AdvisorShares is a sponsor of actively managed exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and holds positions in all of its ETFs. This document should not be considered investment advice and the information contain within should not be relied upon in assessing whether or not to invest in any products mentioned. Investment in securities carries a high degree of risk which may result in investors losing all of their invested capital. Please keep in mind that a company’s past financial performance, including the performance of its share price, does not guarantee future results. To learn more about the risks with actively managed ETFs visit our website AdvisorShares.com.