BGI spokeswoman Christine Hudacko said that as asset counts rose on the funds, Barclays was able to pass down economy-of-scale savings to shareholders. The truth is closer to “has to” – Barclays' management agreement for many of its funds calls for a direct relationship between fees and assets levels, with fees falling as different fund families reach new milestone asset counts. Still, a fee reduction is a fee reduction, and Barclays should be congratulated for doing the right thing for shareholders.
Curiously, the fee on the hugely popular iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Fund (EEM) remains stuck at 75 basis points. That fund is not bound by the asset-linked fee reductions that impacts the other products, so despite posting some of the highest asset growth of any fund on the market in 2006, the 75 basis point expense ratio [ER] is staying right where it is.
Many thought that BGI would reduce the fee on EEM after Vanguard altered its MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) to be essentially identical to the fast-growing BGI product. VWO charges just 30 basis points for the same exposure.
Outside of EEM and the even more popular iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA), most of the MSCI-linked funds are dropping their official fee by four basis points. Billions of dollars in assets time four basis points equals … a lot of money.
The new and old published fees are: